Exploring the role of citizen participation in the policy acceptance process: the case of Korean nuclear facilities

References

• Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., Reckhow, S., & Kelly, A. (2009). How to reform a reform coalition: Outreach, agenda expansion, and brokerage in urban school reform. Policy Studies Journal, 37(4), 717–743. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00332.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. (1967). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
   Google Scholar
• Ayres, I., & Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive regulation. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, J., Morzaria, R., & Hirsch, R. (2013). A case-control study of support/opposition to wind turbines: Perceptions of health risk, economic benefits, and community conflict. Energy Policy, 61(Suppl.C), 931–943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.050
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M. (2000). Rights, wrongs, and gold in model testing. Structural Equation Modeling, 7(1), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem0701_04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, R., & Higgs, G. (2012). Gauging levels of public acceptance of the use of visualisation tools in promoting public participation. A case study of wind farm planning in South Wales, UK. Journal of Environmental Planning & Management, 55(2), 229–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2011.591925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, I. D., & Miller, D. R. (2007). Visual assessment of off-shore wind turbines: The influence of distance, contrast, movement and social variables. Renewable Energy, 32(5), 814–831. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2006.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. K. (1999). Trust expectations, information sharing, climate of trust, and negotiation effectiveness and efficiency. Group & Organization Management, 24(2), 217–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601199242005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrell, J. J. (1969). Citizen participation and decentralization. The American Review of Public Administration, 3(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/027507406900300102
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, N.-Y. I., & So, W.-M. W. (2015). Environmental governance in Hong Kong – Moving towards multi-level participation. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 8(3), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2015.1010471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, J. B., & Kim, H.-K. (2009). Competition, economic benefits, trust, and risk perception in siting a potentially hazardous facility. Landscape and Urban Planning, 91(1), 8–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, J. B., Kim, H.-K., & Rho, S. K. (2008). Analysis of local acceptance of a radioactive waste disposal facility. Risk Analysis, 28(4), 1021–1032. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01074.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalehite, E. G. (2008). Determinants of performance measurement: An investigation into the decision to conduct citizen surveys. Public Administration Review, 68(5), 891–907. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00930.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalland, Ø. (1983). The Alta case: Learning from the errors made in a human ecological conflict in Norway. Geoforum, 14(2), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7185(83)90017-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doney, P. M., Cannon, J. P., & Mullen, M. R. (1998). Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust. The Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 601–620. https://doi.org/10.2307/259297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragojlovic, N., & Einsiedel, E. (2015). What drives public acceptance of second-generation biofuels? Evidence from Canada. Biomass & Bioenergy, 75, 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.02.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyer, S., & Walker, I. (2013). Acceptance and support of the Australian carbon policy. Social Justice Research, 26(3), 343–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-013-0191-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. (1964). The division of labor in society. Free Press of Glencoe. (Original work published 1893).
   Google Scholar
• Ebdon, C., & Franklin, A. L. (2006). Citizen participation in budgeting theory. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 437–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00600.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ethridge, M. E. (1980). Agency responses to citizen participation requirements: An analysis of the Tennessee experience. The American Review of Public Administration, 14(2), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/027507408001400202
   Google Scholar
• Evans, A. M., & Campos, A. (2013). Open Government Initiatives: Challenges of Citizen Participation. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,32(1), 172–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21651
   Google Scholar
• Evans, B., Parks, J., & Theobald, K. (2011). Urban wind power and the private sector: Community benefits, social acceptance and public engagement. Journal of Environmental Planning & Management, 54(2), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2010.505829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, R. M., Williams, K. J. H., Smith, E. L., & Bishop, I. D. (2014). Beauty, belief, and trust: Toward a model of psychological processes in public acceptance of forest management. Environment and Behavior, 46(4), 476–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916512456023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(Feb.), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
   Google Scholar
• Frederickson, H. G., & Smith, K. B. (2003). The public administration theory primer. Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00667.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A. (2015). Putting the public back into governance: The challenges of citizen participation and its future. Public Administration Review, 75(4), 513–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Givel, M. (2010). The evolution of the theoretical foundations of punctuated equilibrium theory in public policy. Review of Policy Research, 27(2), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2009.00437.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glynn, T. J. (1981). Psychological Sense of Community: Measurement and Application. Human Relations,34(9), 789–818. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678103400904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Porumbescu, G., Hong, B., & Im, T. (2013). The effect of transparency on trust in government: A cross-national comparative experiment. Public Administration Review, 73(4), 575–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G., & Meijer, A. J. (2014). Effects of transparency on the perceived trustworthiness of a government organization: Evidence from an online experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(1), 137–157. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha, H., Jung, H., & Shim, J. (2014). Conflict assessment and development of conflict management mannual. Korea Radioactive Waste Agency (KORAD).
   Google Scholar
• Hammar, H., & Jagers, S. C. (2006). Can trust in politicians explain individuals’ support for climate policy? The case of CO2 tax. Climate Policy, 5(6), 613–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2006.9685582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handley, D. M., & Howell-Moroney, M. (2010). Ordering stakeholder relationships and citizen participation: Evidence from the community development block grant program. Public Administration Review, 70(4), 601–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02181.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, A. J., & Ma, L. (2021). Citizen Participation, Perceived Public Service Performance, And Trust In Government: Evidence from health policy reforms in Hong Kong. Public Performance & Management Review, 44(3), 471–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1780138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, A. D., Lubell, M., & McCoy, M. (2011). Belief systems and social capital as drivers of policy network structure: The case of California regional planning. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(3), 419–444. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiroshi, N., Yukio, H., Susumu, O., Cees, M., & Shoji, O. (2015). Effects of voice and similarity on procedural fairness and trust: A dual process model of public acceptance based on representatives’ participation. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 18(3), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschi, C., Schenkel, W., & Widmer, T. (2002). Designing sustainable transportation policy for acceptance: A comparison of Germany, the Netherlands and Switzerland. German Policy Studies/Politikfeldanalyse, 2(4), 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, D. J., & Harding, L. H. (2013). Public trust in government administrators. Public Integrity, 16(1), 53–76. https://doi.org/10.2753/PIN1099-9922160103
   Google Scholar
• Hwangbo, M., & Yun, S. (2014). Social conflicts and community changes caused by the location of nuclear power plants and termal effluents: Focusing on the case of the Hanvit nuclear power plant. Space and Society, 26(2), 46–83.
   Google Scholar
• Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort?. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, M., & Jensen, R. (2015). Common method bias in public management studies. International Public Management Journal, 18(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2014.997906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, M., Rana, N. P., Slade, E. L., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2018). Trustworthiness of digital government services: Deriving a comprehensive theory through interpretive structural modelling. Public Management Review, 20(5), 647–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1305689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. The Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 531–546. https://doi.org/10.2307/259293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julnes, P. D. (2001). Does participation increase perceptions of usefulness?. Public Performance & Management Review, 24(4), 403–418. https://doi.org/10.2307/3381227
   Google Scholar
• Kasperson, R. E., Golding, D., & Tuler, S. (1992). Social distrust as a factor in siting hazardous facilities and communicating risks. Journal of Social Issues, 48(4), 161–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01950.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasperson, R. E., & Ram, B. J. (2013). The public acceptance of new energy technologies. Daedalus, 142(1), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_00187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., & Lee, J. (2012). E‐participation, transparency, and trust in local government. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 819–828. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02593.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopits, G., & Craig, J. D. (1998). Transparency in government operations. International Monetary Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Kraft, M. E., & Clary, B. B. (1993). Citizen participation and the NIMBY syndrome: Public responses to radioactive waste disposal. Western Political Quarterly, 44(2), 299–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299104400204
   Google Scholar
• Laird, F. N. (1993). Participatory analysis, democracy, and technological decision-making. Science, Technology & Human Values, 18(3), 341–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399301800305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewicki, R. J., McAllister, D. J., & Bies, R. J. (1998). Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. The Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 438–458. https://doi.org/10.2307/259288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longstaff, H., Secko, D. M., Capurro, G., Hanney, P., & McIntyre, T. (2015). Fostering citizen deliberations on the social acceptability of renewable fuels policy: The case of advanced lignocellulosic biofuels in Canada. Biomass & Bioenergy, 74, 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.2307/258792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6629(198601)14:1<6::AID-JCOP2290140103>3.0.CO;2-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellinger, G. D. (1956). Interpersonal trust as a factor in communication. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52(3), 304–309. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, S. M. (2013). Administering representation: The role of elected administrators in translating citizens’ preferences into public policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(4), 865–897. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizrahi, S., Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Cohen, N. (2009). Trust, participation, and performance in public administration: An empirical examination of health services in Israel. Public Performance & Management Review, 33(1), 7–33. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-95763301017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D., Herd, P., & Harvey, H. (2015). Administrative burden: Learning, psychological, and compliance costs in citizen-state interactions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 43–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2003). Normative and instrumental perspectives on public participation: Citizen summits in Washington, D.C. The American Review of Public Administration, 33(2), 164–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074003251379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neshkova, M. I. (2014). Does agency autonomy foster public participation?. Public Administration Review, 74(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J. H. (2019). Does citizen participation matter to performance-based budgeting?. Public Performance & Management Review, 42(2), 280–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2018.1437050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petts, J. (2008). Public engagement to build trust: False hopes?. Journal of Risk Research, 11(6), 821–835. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870701715592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piotrowski, S. J., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2007). Citizen attitudes toward transparency in local government. The American Review of Public Administration, 37(3), 306–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074006296777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(2), 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porumbescu, G. (2015). Linking transparency to trust in government and voice. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(5), 520–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074015607301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porumbescu, G. A., Neshkova, M. I., & Huntoon, M. (2019). The effects of police performance on agency trustworthiness and citizen participation. Public Management Review, 21(2), 212–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1473473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2000). Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science, Technology & Human Values, 25(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390002500101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21(2–3), 129–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136406
   Google Scholar
• Serra, G. (1995). Citizen-initiated contact and satisfaction with bureaucracy: A multivariate analysis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5(2), 175–188. http://jpart.oxfordjournals.org/content/5/2/175.abstract
   Google Scholar
• Shim, J. (2009). Trust, perceived risk, perceived benefits, acceptance, nuclear power, structural equation model, SEM. Korea Policy Studies Review, 18(4), 93–123.
   Google Scholar
• Shim, J., & Kim, J. (2011). Understanding conflict frames about a nuclear power plant: Focusing on the effect of the Fukushima nuclear accident. Korean Public Administration Review, 45(3), 173–202.
   Google Scholar
• Shim, J., & Park, J.-H. (2016). Public participation and trust in government: The case of the Korean financial regulatory agency. Public Performance & Management Review, 40(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2016.1177554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M. (2000). The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology. Risk Analysis, 20(2), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.202020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, L. (2001). Political decisions and public risk perception. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 72(2), 115–123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00012-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, L., & Drottz-Sjöberg, B.-M. (2001). Fairness, risk and risk tolerance in the siting of a nuclear waste repository. Journal of Risk Research, 4(1), 75–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/136698701456040
   Google Scholar
• Skelcher, C. (2007). Does democracy matter? A transatlantic research design on democratic performance and special purpose governments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muj014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. (1993). Perceived risk, trust, and democracy. Risk Analysis, 13(6), 675–682. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb01329.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., Flynn, J., Mertz, C. K., Poumadère, M., & Mays, C. (2000). Nuclear power and the public. In O. Renn & B. Rohrmann (Eds.), Cross-cultural risk perception: A survey of empirical studies (pp. 55–102). Springer US.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, H. (2010). Involving the Finnish public in nuclear facility licensing: Participatory democracy and industrial bias. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 7(3), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2010.506486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka, Y. (2004). Major psychological factors determining public acceptance of the siting of nuclear facilities. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(6), 1147–1165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02000.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibaut, J. W., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. R., Elmendorf, W. F., McDonough, M. H., & Burban, L. L. (2005). Participation and conflict: Lessons learned from community forestry. Journal of Forestry, 103(4), 174. https://doi.org/10.1093/jof/103.4.174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (1998). Trust and democratic government. In V. Braithwaite & M. Levi (Eds.), Trust and governance (pp. 269–294). Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Van Ryzin, G. G. (2008). Validity of an on-line panel approach to citizen surveys. Public Performance & Management Review, 32(2), 236–261. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576320203
   Google Scholar
• Walton, A., & Gardner, J. (2015). Community acceptance of policy options for managing the maintenance of rainwater tanks. Local Environment, 20(5), 565–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2014.884554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., & Berman, E. (2001). Hypotheses about performance measurement in counties: Findings from a survey. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(3), 403–428. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., & Wan Wart, M. (2007). When public participation in administration leads to trust: An empirical assessment of managers’ perceptions. Public Administration Review, 67(2), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00712.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, B. L., Brown, S., & Greenberg, M. (1999). Determinants of trust perceptions among residents surrounding the Savannah River nuclear weapons site. Environment and Behavior, 31(3), 354–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139169921972146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M., & Bürer, M. J. (2007). Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept. Energy Policy, 35(5), 2683–2691. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xuan-Na, W. U., & Xue, W. U. (2015). Do the compensatory effects of outcome and procedure on policy acceptance depend on trust in authority?. Social Behavior and Personality, 43(9), 1429–1440. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2015.43.9.1429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, K., & Callahan, K. (2007). Citizen involvement efforts and bureaucratic responsiveness: Participatory values, stakeholder pressures, and administrative practicality. Public Administration Review, 67(2), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00711.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar