Green supplier selection: a new genetic/immune strategy with industrial application

References

• Allen, R., A. Athanassopoulos, R. G. Dyson, and E. Thanassoulis. 1997. “Weights Restrictions and Value Judgments in Data Envelopment Analysis: Evolution, Development and Future Directions.” Annals of Operations Research 73: 13–34. doi:10.1023/A:1018968909638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angulo-Meza, L., and M. P. E. Lins. 2002. “Review of Methods for Increasing Discrimination in Data Envelopment Analysis.” Annals of Operations Research 116: 225–242. doi:10.1023/A:1021340616758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arakawa, M., H. Nakayama, I. Hagiwara, and H. Yamakawa. 1998. “Multi-objective Optimization Using Adaptive Range Genetic Algorithms with Data Envelopment Analysis.” In A Collection of Technical Papers on 7th Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization (TP98-4970), 3 vols, St. Louis, MO, September 2–4, 2074–2082.
   Google Scholar
• Athan, T. W., and P. Y. Papalambros. 1996. “A Note on Weighted Criteria Methods for Compromise Solutions in Multi-Objective Optimization.” Journal of Engineering Optimization 27: 155–176. doi:10.1080/03052159608941404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, F. E., P. D. Cousins, R. C. Lamming, and A. C. Farukt. 2001. “The Role of Supply Management Capabilities in Green Supply.” Production and Operations Management 10 (2): 174–189. doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2001.tb00077.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, X., and F. Yang. 2011. “Measuring the Performance of Internet Companies Using a Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis Model.” Enterprise Information Systems 5 (2): 207–217. doi:10.1080/17517575.2010.528039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborti, N. 2004. Differential Evolution: The Real-Parameter Genetic Algorithm Applied to Materials and Metallurgy. Kanpur: Kanpur Genetic Algorithms Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Chankong, V., and Y. Y. Haimes. 1983. Multiobjective Decision Making Theory and Methodology. New York: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., and W. W. Cooper. 1977. “Goal Programming and Multiple Objective Optimizations.” European Journal of Operational Research 1 (1): 39–54. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(77)81007-2.
   Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, Z. M. Huang, and D. B. Sun. 1990. “Polyhedral Cone-Ratio DEA Models with an Illustrative Application to Large Commercial Banks.” Journal of Econometrics 46 (1–2): 73–91. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(90)90048-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes. 1978. “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units.” European Journal of Operational Research 2: 429–444. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes. 1981. “Evaluating Program and Managerial Efficiency: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Program Follow Through.” Management Science 27: 668–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatzoglou, P. D., and A. C. Soteriou. 1999. “A DEA Framework to Assess the Efficiency of the Software Requirements Capture and Analysis Process.” Journal of Decision Sciences 30 (2): 503–531. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb01620.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W.-C. 2014. “Revisiting Dual-Role Factors in Data Envelopment Analysis: Derivation and Implications.” IIE Transactions 46 (7): 653–663. doi:10.1080/0740817X.2012.721943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbett, C. J., and R. D. Klassen. 2006. “Extending the Horizons: Environmental Excellence as Key to Improving Operations.” Manufacturing and Service Operations Management 8: 5–22. doi:10.1287/msom.1060.0095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, I. 1999. “An Improved Technique for Choosing Parameters for Pareto Surface Generation Using Normal-Boundary Intersection.” Third World Congress of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Buffalo, NY, May 17–21.
   Google Scholar
• Das, I., and J. E. Dennis. 1997. “A Closer Look at Drawbacks of Minimizing Weighted Sums of Objectives for Pareto Set Generation in Multicriteria Optimization Problems.” Structural Optimization 14 (1): 63–69. doi:10.1007/BF01197559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Castro, L. N., and J. Timmis. 2002. Artificial Immune Systems: A New Computational Intelligence Approach. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Deb, K., A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan. 2000. “A Fast Elitist Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm for Multiobjective Optimization: NSGA II.” In Parallel Problem Solving from Nature – PPSN VI, edited by M. Schoenauer, 849–858. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dias, A. H. F., and J. A. Vasconcelos. 2002. “Multiobjective Genetic Algorithms Applied to Solve Optimization Problems.” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 38 (2): 1133–1136. doi:10.1109/20.996290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer, J. S., and R. K. Sarin. 1979. “Measurable Multiattribute Value Functions.” Operations Research 27 (4): 810–822. doi:10.1287/opre.27.4.810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer, J. S., and R. K. Sarin. 1982. “Relative Risk Aversion.” Management Science 28 (8): 875–886. doi:10.1287/mnsc.28.8.875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyson, R. G., and E. Thanassoulis. 1988. “Reducing Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 39 (6): 563–576. doi:10.1057/jors.1988.96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, M. K., and J. C. Henderson. 1989. “Data Envelopment Analysis for Managerial Control and Diagnosis.” Journal of Decision Sciences 20 (1): 90–119. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1989.tb01399.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eschenauer, H., J. Koski, and A. Osyczka. 1990. Multicriteria Design Optimization Procedures and Applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, J. C., C. M. Fonseca, and A. Gaspar-Cunha. 2007. “Methodology to Select Solutions from the Pareto-Optimal Set: A Comparative Study.” Proceedings of the 9th annual conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, New York, July 7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Gerasimov, E. N., and V. N. Repko. 1978. “Multicriterial Optimization.” Soviet Applied Mechanics 14 (11): 1179–1184. doi:10.1007/BF00883255.
   Google Scholar
• Ghodsypour, S. H., and C. O’Brien. 1998. “A Decision Support System for Supplier Selection Using an Integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process and Linear Programming.” International Journal of Production Economics 56–57 (2): 199–212. doi:10.1016/S0925-5273(97)00009-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghodsypour, S. H., and C. O’Brien. 2001. “The Total Cost of Logistics in Supplier Selection, under Conditions of Multiple Sourcing, Multiple Criteria and Capacity Constraint.” International Journal of Production Economics 73 (1): 15–27. doi:10.1016/S0925-5273(01)00093-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, D. E. 1989. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. MAssachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Goncalves, D. A., J. C. C. B. Mello, L. A. Meza, and M. P. E. Lins. 2004. “When a Value Judgment Using the Technique of Unobserved Dmus Can Be Changed by Weight Restrictions.” Research Reports in Production Engineering, Fluminense Federal University, Brazil, 4 (19): 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Guerra, M. A. P. 2006. “Analysis and Design of Virtual Enterprises.” PhD Thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon.
   Google Scholar
• Guide Jr., V. D. R., and L. N. V. Wassenhove. 2006a. “Closed-Loop Supply Chains: An Introduction to the Feature Issue (Part 1).” Production and Operations Management 15 (3): 345–350. doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2006.tb00249.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guide Jr., V. D. R., and L. N. V. Wassenhove. 2006b. “Closed-Loop Supply Chains: An Introduction to the Feature Issue (Part 2).” Production and Operations Management 15 (4): 471–472. doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2006.tb00156.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer, C., D. E. Cantor, and J. Dai. 2012. “The Competitive Determinants of a Firm’s Environmental Management Activities: Evidence from US Manufacturing Industries.” Journal of Operations Management 30 (1–2): 69–84. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2011.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, A. H., C. W. Hsu, and S. H. Chen. 2010. “Incorporating Carbon Management into Supplier Selection in the Green Supply Chain: Evidence from an Electronics Manufacturer in Taiwan.” Proceedings of 16th Annual International Sustainable Development Research Conference, Hong Kong, May 30–June 1.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, C.-L., Y.-J. Lai, and T.-Y. Liu. 1993. “A New Approach for Multiple Objective Decision Making.” Computers & Operations Research 20 (8): 889–899. doi:10.1016/0305-0548(93)90109-V.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahraman, C., U. Cebeci, and Z. Ulukan. 2003. “Multi-Criteria Supplier Selection Using Fuzzy AHP.” Logistics Information Management 16 (6): 382–394. doi:10.1108/09576050310503367.
   Google Scholar
• Kassinis, G. I., and A. C. Soteriou. 2003. “Greening the Service Profit Chain: The impact of Environmental Management Practices.” Production and Operations Management 12 (3): 386–403. doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2003.tb00210.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornbluth, J. 1991. “Analysing Policy Effectiveness Using Cone Restricted Data Envelopment Analysis.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 42: 1097–1104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koski, J., and R. Silvennoinen. 1987. “Norm Methods and Partial Weighting in Multicriterion Optimization of Structures.” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 24 (6): 1101–1121. doi:10.1002/nme.1620240606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, A., and V. Jain. 2010a. “Supplier Selection: A Green Approach with Carbon Footprint Monitoring.” Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Supply Chain Management and Information Systems, Hong Kong, October 6–8.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, A., and V. Jain. 2010b. “A Green Approach to Supplier Selection.” 2010 Annual INFORMS Meeting, Austin, TX, November 7–10.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, A., V. Jain, and S. Kumar. 2014. “A Comprehensive Environment Friendly Approach for Supplier Selection.” Omega 42: 109–123. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2013.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, R. J., Y. C. Wang, and F. C. Tien. 2010. “Integration of Artificial Neural Network and MADA Methods for Green Supplier Selection.” International Journal of Cleaner Production 18: 1161–1170. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.03.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H. I., H. Kang, C. Hsu, and H. Hung. 2009. “A Green Supplier Selection Model for High-Tech Industry.” International Journal of Expert Systems with Applications 36 (4): 7917–7927. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2008.11.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., and R. D. Klassen. 2008. “Drivers and Enablers That Foster Environmental Management Capabilities in Small- and Medium-Sized Suppliers in Supply Chains.” Production and Operations Management 17 (6): 573–586. doi:10.3401/poms.1080.0063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenzen, M. 2000. “Errors in Conventional and Input-Output-Based Life-Cycle Inventories.” Journal of Industrial Ecology 4 (4): 127–148. doi:10.1162/10881980052541981.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J., F.-Y. Ding, and V. Lall. 2000. “Using Data Envelopment Analysis to Compare Suppliers for Supplier Selection and Performance Improvement.” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 5 (3): 143–150. doi:10.1108/13598540010338893.
   Google Scholar
• Lozano, S., and G. Villa. 2009. “Multiobjective Target Setting in Data Envelopment Analysis Using AHP.” Computers and Operations Research 36 (2): 549–564. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2007.10.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmood, M. A., K. J. Pettingell, and A. I. Shaskevich. 1996. “Measuring Productivity of Software Projects: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach.” Journal of Decision Sciences 27 (1): 57–80. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb00843.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makui, A., A. Alinezhad, R. K. Mavi, and M. Zohrebandian. 2008. “A Goal Programming Method for Finding Common Weights in DEA with an Improved Discriminating Power for Efficiency.” Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering 1 (4): 293–303.
   Google Scholar
• Marler, R. T., and J. S. Arora. 2004. “Survey of Multi-Objective Optimization Methods for Engineering.” Journal of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 26 (6): 369–395. doi:10.1007/s00158-003-0368-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messac, A., A. Ismail-Yahaya, and C. A. Mattson. 2003. “The Normalized Normal Constraint Method for Generating the Pareto Frontier.” Journal of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 25 (2): 86–98. doi:10.1007/s00158-002-0276-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messac, A., and C. A. Mattson. 2002. “Generating Well-Distributed Sets of Pareto Points for Engineering Design Using Physical Programming.” Optimization and Engineering 3 (4): 431–450. doi:10.1023/A:1021179727569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalewicz, Z. 1994. Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs. 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Michalewicz, Z., and N. Attia. 1994. “Evolutionary Optimization of Constrained Problems.” In Proceedings of 3rd Annual Conference on EP, 98–108. Charlotte, NC: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Michalewicz, Z., and C. Z. Janikow. 1991. “GENOCOP: A Genetic Algorithm for Numerical Optimization Problems with Linear Constraints.” Communications of ACM 39 (12): (electronic supplement).
   Google Scholar
• Michalewicz, Z., and G. Nazhiyath. 1995. “GENOCOP III: A Co-Evolutionary Algorithm for Numerical Optimization Problems with Nonlinear Constraints.” In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, 1995, 2 vols, Perth, November 29–December 1, 647–651.
   Google Scholar
• Miettinen, K. 1999. Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Murata, T., and H. Ishibuchi. 1995. “MOGA: Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithms.” Proceedings of 1995 IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation, Perth, November 29–December 1.
   Google Scholar
• Noci, G. 1997. “Designing ‘Green’ Vendor Rating Systems for the Assessment of a Supplier’s Environmental Performance.” European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 3 (2): 103–114. doi:10.1016/S0969-7012(96)00021-4.
   Google Scholar
• Pil, F. K., and S. Rothenberg. 2003. “Environmental Performance as a Driver of Superior Quality.” Production and Operations Management 12 (3): 404–415. doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2003.tb00211.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Premachandra, I. M. 2001. “Controlling Factor Weights in Data Envelopment Analysis by Incorporating Decision Maker’s Value Judgment: An Approach Based on AHP.” Information and Management Sciences 12 (2): 67–82.
   Google Scholar
• Ramudhin, A., A. Chaabane, M. Kharoune, and M. Paquet. 2008. “Carbon Market Sensitive Green Supply Chain Network Design.” In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE IEEM, Singapore, December 8–11, 1093–1097.
   Google Scholar
• Ramudhin, A., A. Chaabane, and M. Paquet. 2009. “Carbon Market Sensitive Sustainable Supply Chain Network Design.” International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management 5 (1): 30–38.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, S. S., and T. I. Freiheit. 1991. “A Modified Game Theory Approach to Multiobjective Optimization.” Journal of Mechanical Design 113 (3): 286–291. doi:10.1115/1.2912781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robic, T., and T. Filipic. 2005. “DEMO: Differential Evolution for Multi-objective Optimization.” In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization - EMO, Guanajuato. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Roll, Y., W. D. Cook, and B. Golany. 1991. “Controlling Factor Weights in Data Envelopment Analysis.” IIE Transactions 23 (1): 2–9. doi:10.1080/07408179108963835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saen, R. F. 2007a. “A New Mathematical Approach for Suppliers Selection: Accounting for Non-Homogeneity Is Important.” Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computation 185 (1): 84–95. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2006.07.071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saen, R. F. 2007b. “Suppliers Selection in the Presence of Both Cardinal and Ordinal Data.” European Journal of Operational Research 183 (2): 741–747. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.10.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saen, R. F. 2009. “A New Approach for Selecting Slightly Non-Homogeneous Vendors.” Journal of Advances in Management Research 6 (2): 144–153. doi:10.1108/09727980911007172.
   Google Scholar
• Saen, R. F. 2010. “Restricting Weights in Supplier Selection Decisions in the Presence of Dual Role Factors.” Journal of Applied Mathematical Modelling 34 (10): 2820–2830. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2009.12.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanayei, A., S. F. Mousavi, M. R. Abdi, and A. Mohaghar. 2008. “An Integrated Group Decision-Making Process for Supplier Selection and Order Allocation Using Multi-Attribute Utility Theory and Linear Programming.” Journal of the Franklin Institute 345 (7): 731–747. doi:10.1016/j.jfranklin.2008.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffer, J. D. 1985. “Multiple Objective Optimization with Vector Evaluated Genetic Algorithms.” In Proceedings of The First International Conference on Genetic Algorithms and their Applications, Pittsburgh, PA, July 24–26, 93–100.
   Google Scholar
• Stadler, W. 1988. Fundamentals of Multicriteria Optimization, Multicriteria Optimization in Engineering and in the Sciences, 1–25. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suh, S., and G. Huppes. 2005. “Methods for Life Cycle Inventory of a product.” Journal of Cleaner Production 13: 687–697. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2003.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh, S., M. Lenzen, G. J. Treloar, H. Hondo, A. Horvath, G. Huppes, O. Jolliet, et al. 2004. “System Boundary Selection in Life-Cycle Inventories Using Hybrid Approaches.” Environmental Science & Technology 38 (3): 657–664. doi:10.1021/es0263745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syarif, A., Y. Yun, and M. Gen. 2002. “Study on Multi-Stage Logistic Chain Network: A Spanning Tree-based Genetic Algorithm Approach.” Journal of Computers and Industrial Engineering 43: 299–314. doi:10.1016/S0360-8352(02)00076-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talaue, C. O., N. A. N. Diesta, and C. G. Tapia. 2011. “Weights Restriction by Multiple Decision Makers in Data Envelopment Analysis using Fuzzy Programming.” Proceedings of the 11th Philippine Computing Science Congress, Philippines, March 4–5.
   Google Scholar
• Talluri, S., R. Narasimhan, and A. Nair. 2006. “Vendor Performance with Supply Risk: A Chance Constrained DEA Approach.” International Journal of Production Economics 100 (2): 212–222. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.11.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thanassoulis, E., and R. Allen. 1998. “Simulating Weights Restrictions in Data Envelopment Analysis by Means of Unobserved DMUs.” Management Science 44 (4): 586–594. doi:10.1287/mnsc.44.4.586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thanassoulis, E., R. G. Dyson, and M. Foster. 1987. “Relative Efficiency Assessments Using Data Envelopment Analysis: An Application to Data on Rates Departments.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 38: 397–411. doi:10.1057/jors.1987.68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, R. G., L. N. Langemeier, C.-T. Lee, E. Lee, and R. M. Thrall. 1990. “The Role of Multiplier Bounds in Efficiency Analysis with Application to Kansas Farming.” Journal of Econometrics 46: 93–108. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(90)90049-Y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, R. G., F. D. Singleton Jr., R. M. Thrall, and B. A. Smith. 1986. “Comparative Site Evaluations for Locating a High-Energy Physics Lab in Texas.” Interfaces 16: 35–49. doi:10.1287/inte.16.6.35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, A. 1996. “A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach to Measuring Vendor Performance.” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 1 (1): 28–39. doi:10.1108/13598549610155242.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, B. Y. H., M. Luque, and J. Yang. 2009. “Using Interactive Multiobjective Methods to Solve DEA Problems with Value Judgements.” Computers and Operations Research 36 (2): 623–636. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2007.10.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, G. E. 2009. “Research on Green Suppliers’ Evaluation based on AHP and Genetic Algorithm.” In Proceedings of International Conference on Signal Processing Systems, Singapore, May 15–17, 615–619.
   Google Scholar
• Yun, Y. B., H. Nakayama, T. Tanimo, and M. Arakawa. 1999. “A Multi-Objective Optimization Method Combining Generalized Data Envelopment Analysis and Genetic Algorithms.” 1999 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Tokyo, October 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, W. J., X. Liu, and C. A. Van Luttervelt. 1997. “On the Proposal of a New Theory, Methodology and Computer Aid for Virtual Enterprises Manufacturing Systems Design - in Relation to Partner Factories Selection.” Proceedings of International Conference of World Manufacturing Congress’ 97, Auckland, November 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, W. J., P. R. Ouyang, and Z. H. Sun. 2010. “A Novel Hybridization Design Principle for Intelligent Mechatronics Systems.” International Conference on Advanced Mechatronics (ICAM 2010), Osaka, October 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, Q., and J. Sarkis. 2004. “Relationships between Operational Practices and Performance among Early Adopters of Green Supply Chain Management Practices in Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises.” Journal of Operations Management 22 (3): 265–289. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2004.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinflou, A., C. Gagné, and M. Gravel. 2012. “GISMOO: A New Hybrid Genetic/Immune Strategy for Multiple- Objective Optimization.” Computers and Operations Research 39 (9): 1951–1968. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2011.08.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinflou, A., C. Gagné, M. Gravel, and W. L. Price. 2008. “Pareto Memetic Algorithm for Multiple Objective Optimization with an Industrial Application.” Journal of Heuristics 14: 313–333. doi:10.1007/s10732-007-9042-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zitzler, E., M. Laumanns, and L. Thiele. 2001. SPEA2: Improving the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm, Technical Report 103. Zurich: Computer Engineering and Communication Networks Laboratory (TIK), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich.
   Google Scholar