Managing technology licensing for stochastic R&D: from the perspective of an enterprise information system

References

• Aoki, R., and Y. Tauman. 2001. “Patent Licensing with Spillovers.” Economics Letters 73 (1): 125–130. doi:10.1016/S0165-1765(01)00471-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora, A., A. Fosfuri, and T. Rønde. 2013. “Managing Licensing in a Market for Technology.” Management Science 59 (5): 1092–1106. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1120.1628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arya, A., B. Mittendorf, and D. E. M. Sappington. 2008. “Outsourcing, Vertical Integration, and Price vs. Quantity Competition.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 26 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2006.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beggs, A. W. 1992. “The Licensing of Patents under Asymmetric Information.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 10 (2): 171–191. doi:10.1016/0167-7187(92)90014-P.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, M.-C., J.-L. Hu, and C.-H. Lin. 2013. “The Optimal Licensing Strategy of an outside Patentee in Vertically-Related Markets.” International Journal of Economics and Finance 5 (3): 102–112. doi:10.5539/ijef.v5n3p102.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, J. P. 2001. “Technology Transfer with Moral Hazard.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 19 (1–2): 249–266. doi:10.1016/S0167-7187(99)00020-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crama, P., B. D. Reyck, and Z. Degraeve. 2008. “Milestone Payments or Royalties? Contract Design for R&D Licensing.” Operations Research 56 (6): 1539–1552. doi:10.1287/opre.1080.0589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erkal, N. 2005. “Optimal Licensing Policy in Differentiated Industries.” The Economic Record 81 (252): 51–60. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4932.2005.00216.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., and O. R. Bode. 2013. “Licensing Endogenous Cost-Reduction in a Differentiated Stackelberg Model.” Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 18 (2): 308–315. doi:10.1016/j.cnsns.2012.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filippini, L. 2005. “Licensing Contract in a Stackelberg Model.” The Manchester School 73 (5): 582–598. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9957.2005.00465.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallini, N. T., and B. D. Wright. 1990. “Technology Transfer under Asymmetric Information.” The RAND Journal of Economics 21 (1): 147–160. doi:10.2307/2555500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germerad, P. 2001. “The Changing Role of R&D.” Reach-Technology Management 44: 15–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griliches, Z. 1992. “The Search for R&D Spillovers.” The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 94 (supplement): S29–S47. doi:10.2307/3440244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grindley, P. C., and D. J. Teece. 1997. “Managing Intellectual Capital: Licensing and Cross-Licensing in Semiconductors and Electronics.” California Management Review 39: 8–41. doi:10.2307/41165885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry Wang, X. H., and B. Z. Yang. 2004. “On Technology Licensing in a Stackelberg Duopoly.” Australian Economic Papers 43 (4): 448–458. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8454.2004.00241.x.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, X. P., L. J. Yang, H. G. Zhang, and D. Zhao. 2014. “The Optimal Licensing Contract in a Differentiated Stackelberg Model.” The Scientific World Journal 2014: 1–12. http:/dx.doi.org/10.1155/ 2014/437919.
   Google Scholar
• Kabiraj, T. 2004. “Patent Licensing in a Leadership Structure.” The Manchester School 72 (2): 188–205. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9957.2004.00388.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabiraj, T. 2005. “Technology Transfer in a Stackelberg Structure: Licensing Contracts and Welfare.” The Manchester School 73 (1): 1–28. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9957.2005.00421.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabiraj, T., and C. C. Lee. 2011. “Technology Transfer in a Duopoly with Horizontal and Vertical Product Differentiation.” Trade and Development Review 4 (1): 19–40.
   Google Scholar
• Li, C. Y., and J. Song. 2009. “Technology Licensing in a Vertically Differentiated Duopoly.” Japan and the World Economy 21 (2): 183–190. doi:10.1016/j.japwor.2008.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C. Y., and J. M. Wang. 2010. “Licensing a Vertical Product Innovation.” The Economic Record 86 (275): 517–527. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4932.2010.00630.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L. 2012. “Effects of Enterprise Technology on Supply Chain Collaboration: Analysis of China-Linked Supply Chain.” Enterprise Information Systems 6 (1): 55–77. doi:10.1080/17517575.2011.639904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, L. H., and N. Kulatilaka. 2006. “Network Effects and Technology Licensing with Fixed Fee, Royalty, and Hybrid Contracts.” Journal of Management Information Systems 23 (2): 91–118. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222230205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macho-Stadler, I., X. Martinez-Giralt, and J. D. Pérez-Castrillo. 1996. “The Role of Information in Licensing Contract Design.” Research Policy 25 (1): 43–57. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(94)00815-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield, E. 1985. “How Rapidly Does New Industrial Technology Leak Out?” The Journal of Industrial Economics 34 (2): 217–223. doi:10.2307/2098683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, A. 2010. “Licensing a New Product: Fee vs. Royalty Licensing with Unionized Labor Market.” Labour Economics 17 (4): 735–742. doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2009.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, A., and E. Pennings. 2006. “Tariffs, Licensing and Market Structure.” European Economic Review 50 (7): 1699–1707. doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2005.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, X., P. Sgro, and M. Nabin. 2014. “Licensing under Vertical Product Differentiation: Price vs. Quantity Competition.” Economic Modelling 36: 600–606. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2013.10.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panetto, H., and J. Ceci. 2013. “Information Systems for Enterprise Integration, Interoperability and Networking: Theory and Applications.” Enterprise Information Systems 7 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1080/17517575.2012.684802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poddar, S., and U. B. Sinha. 2004. “On Patent Licensing in Spatial Competition.” The Economic Record 80 (249): 208–218. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4932.2004.00173.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poddar, S., and U. B. Sinha. 2010. “Patent Licensing from a High-Cost Firm to a Low-Cost Firm.” The Economic Record 86 (274): 384–395. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4932.2010.00633.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockett, K. E. 1990. “Choosing the Competition and Patent Licensing.” The RAND Journal of Economics 21 (1): 161–172. doi:10.2307/2555501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, D. 2005. “Fee versus Royalty Reconsidered.” Games and Economic Behavior 53 (1): 141–147. doi:10.1016/j.geb.2004.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, D., and G. Stamatopoulos. 2009. “Drastic Innovations and Multiplicity of Optimal Licensing Policies.” Economics Letters 105 (1): 7–10. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2009.04.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamatopoulos, G., and Y. Tauman. 2008. “Licensing of a Quality-Improving Innovation.” Mathematical Social Sciences 56 (3): 410–438. doi:10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2008.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, K.-C. A., W.-J. Liang, and P.-S. Chou. 2013. “Patent Licensing under Cost Asymmetry among Firms.” Economic Modelling 31: 297–307. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2012.11.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, K-C. A, W.-J. Liang, and C-H. A Lin. 2012. “Licensing Under Network Externalities.” Economic Record 88 (283): 585–593. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4932.2012.00832.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X. H. 1998. “Fee versus Royalty Licensing in a Cournot Duopoly Model.” Economics Letters 60 (1): 55–62. doi:10.1016/S0165-1765(98)00092-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X. H. 2002. “Fee versus Royalty Licensing in a Differentiated Cournot Duopoly.” Journal of Economics & Business 54 (2): 253–266. doi:10.1016/S0148-6195(01)00065-0.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, D., H. M. Chen, X. P. Hong, and J. F. Liu. 2014. “Technology Licensing Contracts with Network Effects.” International Journal of Production Economics 158: 136–144. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.07.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar