Concurrent validity of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale to detect delayed gross motor development in preterm infants: A comparative study with the Bayley III

References

• Spittle AJ, Doyle LW, Boyd RN. A systematic review of the clinimetric properties of neuromotor assessments for preterm infants during the first year of life. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 2008;50(4):254–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subedi D, DeBoer MD, Scharf RJ. Developmental trajectories in children with prolonged NICU stays. Archives of Disease in Childhood 2016: archdischild-2016-310777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council on Children With Disabilities, Section on Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics, Bright Futures Steering Committee, Medical Home Initiatives for Children With Special Needs Project Advisory Committee. Identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders in the medical home: an algorithm for developmental surveillance and screening. Pediatrics 2006;118(1):405–420.
   Google Scholar
• Blank R, Smits-Engelsman B, Polatajko H, Wilson P. European academy for childhood disability (EACD): recommendations on the definition, diagnosis and intervention of developmental coordination disorder (long version). Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 2012;54(1):54–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vericat A, Orden AB. Herramientas de screening del desarrollo psicomotor en Latinoamérica. Revista Chilena de Pediatría 2010;81(5):391–401.
   Google Scholar
• dos Santos ESL, de Kieviet JF, Königs M, van Elburg RM, Oosterlaan J. Predictive value of the Bayley scales of infant development on development of very preterm/very low birth weight children: a meta-analysis. Early Human Development 2013;89(7):487–496.
   Google Scholar
• Bayley N. Bayley Scale of Infant and Toddler Development. 3, editor. San Antonio: The Psychological Corp; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Almeida KM, Dutra MVP, Mello RRd, Reis ABR, Martins PS. Concurrent validity and reliability of the Alberta infant motor scale in premature infants. Jornal de Pediatria (Rio J) 2008;84(5):442–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeng S-F, Yau K-IT, Chen L-C, Hsiao S-F. Alberta infant motor scale: reliability and validity when used on preterm infants in Taiwan. Physical Therapy 2000;80(2):168–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris SR, Backman CL, Mayson TA. Comparative predictive validity of the Harris infant neuromotor test and the Alberta infant motor scale. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 2010;52(5):462–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yıldırım ZH, Aydınlı N, Ekici B, Tatlı B, Çalişkan M. Can Alberta infant motor scale and milani comparetti motor development screening test be rapid alternatives to Bayley scales of infant development-II at high-risk infants. Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology 2012;15(3):196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pin TW, de Valle K, Eldridge B, Galea MP. Clinimetric properties of the Alberta infant motor scale in infants born preterm. Pediatric Physical Therapy 2010;22(3):278–286.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Darrah J, Piper M, Watt MJ. Assessment of gross motor skills of at risk infants: predictive validity of the Alberta infant motor scale. developmental medicine & child neurology 1998;40(7):485–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albuquerque PL, Lemos A, Guerra MQF, Eickmann SH. Accuracy of the Alberta infant motor scale (AIMS) to detect developmental delay of gross motor skills in preterm infants: a systematic review. Developmental Neurorehabilitation 2015;18(1):15–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flahault A, Cadilhac M, Thomas G. Sample size calculation should be performed for design accuracy in diagnostic test studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2005;58(8):859–862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prins S, Von Lindern J, Van Dijk S, Versteegh F. Motor development of premature infants born between 32 and 34 weeks. International Journal of Pediatrics 2010;2010:1–4. doi:10.1155/2010/462048.
   Google Scholar
• Stoelhorst GM, Rijken M, Martens SE, van Zwieten PH, Feenstra J, Zwinderman AH, Wit J-M, Veen S. Developmental outcome at 18 and 24 months of age in very preterm children: a cohort study from 1996 to 1997. Early Human Development 2003;72(2):83–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piper MC, Darrah J. Motor assessment of the developing infant. Philadelphia: W. B Saunders Company; 1994. 210 p.
   Google Scholar
• Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research: applications to practice. 3, editor. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2010;47(8):931–936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiechl-Kohlendorfer U, Ralser E, Peglow UP, Reiter G, Trawöger R. Adverse neurodevelopmental outcome in preterm infants: risk factor profiles for different gestational ages. Acta Paediatrica 2009;98(5):792–796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goyen T-A, Lui K. Longitudinal motor development of “apparently normal” high-risk infants at 18 months, 3 and 5 years. Early Human Development 2002;70(1):103–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder P, Eason JM, Philibert D, Ridgway A, McCaughey T. Concurrent validity and reliability of the Alberta infant motor scale in infants at dual risk for motor delays. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics 2008;28(3):267–282.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology 2003; 22(1):85–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar