383
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Examining the Structure of a New Pediatric Measure of Functional Independence Using the interRAI Child and Youth Mental Health Assessment System

, ORCID Icon, &
Pages 526-533 | Received 06 May 2019, Accepted 24 Nov 2019, Published online: 03 Dec 2019

References

  • Liu M, Toikawa H, Seki M, Domen K, Chino N. Functional independence measure for children (WeeFIM): a preliminary study in nondisabled Japanese children. Am J Physl Med Rehabil. 1998;77(1):36–44. doi:10.1097/00002060-199801000-00006.
  • Msall ME. Measuring functional skills in preschool children at risk for neurodevelopmental disabilities. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2005;11(3):263–73. doi:10.1002/mrdd.20073.
  • Smits D, Gorter JW, Ketelaar M, Van Schie PE, Dallmeijer AJ, Lindeman E, Jongmans MJ. Relationship between gross motor capacity and daily-life mobility in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52(3):e60–e66. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03525.x.
  • Kerr C, McDowell BC, Parkes J, Stevenson M, Cosgrave AP. Age-related changes in energy efficiency of gait, activity, and participation in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53(1):61–67. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2010.03795.x.
  • Meester-Delver A, Beelen A, Ketelaar M, Hadders-Algra M, Nollet F, Gorter JW. Construct validity of the capacity profile in preschool children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009;51(6):446–53. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03151.x.
  • Gunel MK, Mutlu A, Tarsulu T, Livanelioglu A. Relationship among the Manual Ability Classification System (MACS), the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), and the functional status (WeeFIM) in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Eur J Pediatr. 2009;168:477–85. doi:10.1007/s00431-008-0775-1.
  • Haley SM, Pengsheng N, Dumas HM, Fragala-Pinkham MA, Hambleton RK, Montpetit K, Tucker CA, Gorton GE, Watson K, Tucker CA. Measuring global physical health in children with cerebral palsy: illustration of a multidimensional bi-factor model and computerized adaptive testing. Qual Life Res. 2009;18(3):359–70. doi:10.1007/s11136-009-9447-5.
  • Holsbeeke L, Ketelaar M, Schoemaker MM, Gorter JW. Capacity, capability, and performance: different constructs or three of a kind? Arch Med Rehabil. 2009;90(5):849–55. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2008.11.015.
  • Peny-Dahlstrand M, Gosman-Hedstrom G, Krumlinde-Sundholm L. Are there cross-cultural differences of ADL ability in children measured with the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS)? Scand J Occup Ther. 2012;19(1):26–32. doi:10.3109/11038128.2011.552632.
  • Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. The index of ADL: A standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. Stud Illness Aged. 1963;185(12):914–19. doi:10.1001/jama.1963.03060120024016.
  • Morris JN, Berg K, Fries BE, Steel K, Howard EP. Scaling functional status within the interRAI suite of assessment instruments. BMC Geriatr. 2013;13:128–39. doi:10.1186/1471-2318-13-128.
  • Morris JN, Fries BE, Morris SA. Scaling ADLs within the MDS. J Gerontology. 1999;54(11):M546–M553. doi:10.1093/gerona/54.11.M546.
  • Katz S, Apbom CA. A measure of primary sociobiological functions. Int J Health Ser. 1976;6(3):493–508. doi:10.2190/UURL-2RYU-WRYD-EY3K.
  • Tsuji T, Liu M, Toikawa H, Hanayama K, Sonoda S, Chino N. ADL structure for nondisabled Japanese children based on the functional independence measure for children (WeeFIM). Am J Physl Med Rehabil. 1999;78(3):208–12. doi:10.1097/00002060-199905000-00003.
  • Chen CC, Bode RK, Granger CV, Heinemann AW. Psychometric properties and developmental differences in children’s ADL item hierarchy: a study of the WeeFIM instrument. Am J Physl Med Rehabil. 2005;84(9):671–79. doi:10.1097/01.phm.0000176439.32318.36.
  • Maenner MJ, Smith LE, Hong J, Makuch R, Greenberg JS, Mailick MR. Evaluation of activities of daily living scale for adolescents and adults with developmental disabilities. Disabilities Health J. 2013;6(1):8–17. doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2012.08.005.
  • Serghiou MH, Rose HW, Pidcock FS, Esselman PC, Engrav LH, Kowalske KJ, Lezotte DC. The WeeFIM [R] instrument–A paediatric measure of functional independence to predict longitudinal recovery of paediatric burn patients. Dev Neurorehabil. 2008;11:39–50. doi:10.1080/17518420701520644.
  • WeeFIM System clinical guide: version 5.01. (2000). Buffalo, United States: University of Buffalo.
  • Stewart SL, Theall LA, Morris JN, Berg K, Björkgren M, Declercq A, … Topinková E. interRAI Child and Youth Mental Health Collaborative Action Plans (CAPs) for use with the interRAI Child and youth mental health developmental disability (ChYMH-DD) assessment instrument. Version 1, standard edition. Washington (DC): interRAI; 2016.
  • Stewart SL, LaRose L, Gleason K, Nicolson R, McKnight M, Knott W, … Topinková E. interRAI Child and Youth Mental Health — developmental disabilities (ChYMH-DD) assessment form and user’s manual. Version 1. Washington (DC): interRAI; 2015.
  • Stewart SL, Hirdes JP, Curtin-Telegdi N, Perlman CM, McKnight M, MacLeod K, … Topinková E. Santé mentale des enfants et des adolescents (SMEA) interRAI manuel de l’utilisateur et formulaire d’évaluation: pour utilisation avec les évaluations en milieu hospitalier et en milieu communau-taire. Version 9.3, Édition canadienne-française. Washington (DC): interRAI; 2018a.
  • Stewart SL, Theall LA, Morris JN, Berg K, Björkgren M, Declercq A, … Topinková E. Guides d’analyse par domaine d’intervention (GAD) pour la santé mentale des enfants et des adolescents interRAI: pour utilisation avec l’instrument d’évaluation de la santé mentale des enfants et des adolescents. Version 9.3, Édition canadienne-française. Washington (DC): interRAI; 2018b.
  • Stewart SL, Currie M, Arbeau K, Leschied A, Kerry A. Assessment and planning for community and custodial services: the application of interRAI assessment in the youth justice system. In: Corrado R, Leschied A, editors. Serious and violent young offenders and youth criminal justice: a Canadian perspective. Vancouver, Canada: Simon Fraser University Press; 2015. p. 355–97.
  • Stewart SL, Hirdes JP. Identifying mental health symptoms in children and youth in residential and inpatient care settings. Healthcare Manage Forum. 2015;28(4):150–56. doi:10.1177/0840470415581240.
  • Stewart SL, Thornley E, Poss J, Hirdes J. Resource intensity for children and youth (RIChY): the development of an algorithm to identify high service users in children’s mental health. Health Serv Insights. 2019;12:1–10. doi:10.1177/1178632919827930.
  • Kottorp A, Bernspång B, Fisher AG. Activities of daily living in persons with intellectual disability: strengths and limitations in specific motor and process skills. Aust Occup Ther J. 2003;50(4):195–204. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1630.2003.00401.x.
  • Parsons S (2017). Splithalf; calculate task split half reliability estimates. doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.5559175.v2
  • Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297–334. doi:10.1007/BF02310555.
  • Van Schuur W. Mokken scale analysis: between the Guttman scale and parametric item response theory. Political Anal. 2003;11(2):139–63. doi:10.1093/pan/mpg002.
  • Spector WD, Fleishman JA. Instrumental activities of daily living to measure functional disability. J Gerontology. 1998;53B(1):S46–S57. doi:10.1093/geronb/53B.1.S46.
  • Fitzgerald JF, Smith DM, Martin DK, Freedman JA, Wolinsky FD. Replication of the multidimensionality of activities of daily living. J Gerontology. 1993;48:S28–S31. doi:10.1093/geronj/48.1.S28.
  • Phillips CD, Patnaik A, Dyer JA, Naiser E, Hawes C, Fournier CJ, Elliott TR. Reliability and measurement of activity limitations (ADLs) for children with special health care needs (CSHCN) living in the community. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(21–22):2013–22. doi:10.3109/09638288.2011555596.
  • Stewart SL, Hamza CA. The Child and Youth Mental Health Assessment (ChYMH): an examination of the psychometric properties of an integrated assessment developed for clinically referred children and youth. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):82, 1–10. doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1970-9.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.