Identifying Suitable Cognitive Assessments for Children and Adolescents with Acquired Brain Injury for use by Occupational Therapists in Acute and Subacute Hospital Contexts: A Scoping Review

References

• Boyd RN, Baque E, Piovesana A, Ross S, Ziviani J, Sakzewski L, Barber L, Lloyd O, McKinlay L, Whittingham K, et al. Mitii™ ABI: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial of a web-based multi-modal training program for children and adolescents with an acquired brain injury (ABI). BMC Neurol. 2015;15(140):1–29. DOI::10.1186/s12883-015-0381-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. Disability, ageing and carers, Australia: disability and long term health conditions. Report No: 4433.0. Canberra (ACT): Australian Bureau of Statistics; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Finnanger TG, Olsen A, Skandsen T, Lydersen S, Vik A, Evensen KAI, Catroppa C, Håberg AK, Andersson S, Indredavik MS. Life after adolescent and adult moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: self-reported executive, emotional, and behavioural function 2–5 years after injury. Behav Neurol. 2015;2015:1–19. DOI:10.1155/2015/329241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanberg VL, MacKenzie DE, Merritt BK. Scoping review of the multiple errands test: is it relevant to youths with acquired brain injury? Br J Occup Ther. 2018;81(12):673–86. doi:10.1177/0308022618791714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin J, Froude EH, McAleer J. Children’s participation in home, school and community life after acquired brain injury. Aust Occup Ther J. 2010;57(2):118–26. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1630.2009.00822.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crist P. Framing ecological validity in occupational therapy practice. Open J Occup Ther. 2015;3(3):1–8. doi:10.15453/2168-6408.1181.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. International classification of functioning, disability and health: children & youth version: ICF-CY. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organisation; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Radomski MV, Morrison MT. Assessing abilities and capacities: cognition. In: Radomski MV, Trombly Latham CA editors. Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction. 7th. Baltimore (MD): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014. p. 121–43.
   Google Scholar
• Maas AIR, Menon DK, Adelson PD, Andelic N, Bell MJ, Belli A, Bragge P, Brazinova A, Büki A, Chesnut RM, et al. Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research. Lancet Neurol. 2017 Dec;16(12):987–1048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilboa Y, Jansari A, Kerrouche B, Uçak E, Tiberghien A, Benkhaled O, Aligon D, Mariller A, Verdier V, Mintegui A, et al. Assessment of executive functions in children and adolescents with acquired brain injury (ABI) using a novel complex multi-tasking computerised task: the Jansari assessment of executive functions for children (JEF-C©). Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2019;29(9):1359–82. DOI::10.1080/09602011.2017.1411819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chevignard MP, Soo C, Galvin J, Catroppa C, Eren S. Ecological assessment of cognitive functions in children with acquired brain injury: a systematic review. Brain Inj. 2012;26(9):1033–57. doi:10.3109/02699052.2012.666366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz N, Golstand S, Bar-Ilan RT, Parush S. The dynamic occupational therapy cognitive assessment for children (DOTCA-Ch): a new instrument for assessing learning potential. Am J Occup Ther. 2007;61(1):41–52. doi:10.5014/ajot.61.1.41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesson SA, Nogajski RR, Macey J-A, Paget SP. Reliability of the abbreviated westmead post-traumatic amnesia scale in children: impact of age on test results. Emerg Med Australas. 2016;28(1):73–77. doi:10.1111/1742-6723.12502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krasny-Pacini A, Servant V, Alzieu C, Chevignard M. Ecological prospective memory assessment in children with acquired brain injury using the children’s cooking task. Dev Neurorehabil. 2017;20(1):53–58. doi:10.3109/17518423.2015.1058298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britton L, Rosenwax L, McNamara B. Occupational therapy practice in acute physical hospital settings: evidence from a scoping review. Aust Occup Ther J. 2015;62(6):370–77. doi:10.1111/1440-1630.12227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams KS, Young DK, Amos Burke GA, Fountain DM. Comparing the weefim and pedi in neurorehabilitation for children with acquired brain injury: a systematic review. Dev Neurorehabil. 2017;20(7):443–51. DOI:10.1080/17518423.2017.1289419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam-Webster. Tertiary care. Springfield (MA): Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary; n.d. [accessed 2021 Dec 1]. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tertiary%20care
   Google Scholar
• CanChild Centre for Disability Research. Outcome measures rating form. Ontario (Canada): McMaster University; 2004 Aug 01 [accessed 2021 Dec 03]. https://www.canchild.ca/system/tenon/assets/attachments/000/000/372/original/measrate.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lesko LJ, Zineh I, Huang S-M. What is clinical utility and why should we care? Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010;88(6):729–33. doi:10.1038/clpt.2010.229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heale R, Twycross A. Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evid Based Nurs. 2015;18(3):66–67. doi:10.1136/eb-2015-102129.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilczynski N, McKibbon A. Finding the evidence. In: Hoffman T, Bennett S, Del Mar C editors. Evidence-based practice across the health professions. 2nd. Chatswood (NSW): Elsevier; 2013. p. 38–60.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes E. Rehabilitation outcome measures. London (UK): Churchill Livingstone; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Daudt HML, Van Mossel C, Scott SJ. Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13(48):1–9. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616.
   Google Scholar
• Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5(69):1–9. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink L, Terwee C, Patrick D, Alonso J, Stratford P, Knol D, Bouter L, de Vet H. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of heath status measurement instruments: an international delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(4):539–49. doi:10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kmet LM, Lee RC, Cook LS. Standard quality assessment criteria for evaluating primary research papers from a variety of fields. Edmonton (Canada): Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Chevignard MP, Catroppa C, Galvin J, Anderson V. Development and evaluation of an ecological task to assess executive functioning post childhood TBI: the children’s cooking task. Brain Impair. 2010;11(2):125–43. doi:10.1375/brim.11.2.125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chevignard MP, Servant V, Mariller A, Abada G, Pradat-Diehl P, Laurent-Vannier A. Assessment of executive functioning in children after TBI with a naturalistic open-ended task: a pilot study. Dev Neurorehabil. 2009;12(2):76–91. doi:10.1080/17518420902777019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seel RT, Wright G, Wallace T, Newman S, Dennis L. The utility of the fim+fam for assessing traumatic brain injury day program outcomes. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2007;22(5):267–77. DOI:10.1097/01.HTR.0000290971.56130.c8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beers SR, Garcia-Filion P, Wisniewski SR, Tian Y, Berger RP, Bell MJ, Adelson PD. The pediatric version of the GOS-E: validity and sensitivity for use in TBI clinical trials. Brain Inj. 2012;26(4–5):326. doi:10.3109/02699052.2012.660091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottari CL, Dassa C, Rainville CM, É D. The IADL profile: development, content validity, intra- and interrater agreement. Can J Occup Ther. 2010;77(2):90–100. doi:10.2182/cjot.2010.77.2.5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart T, Whyte J, Ellis C, Chervoneva I. Construct validity of an attention rating scale for traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology. 2009;23(6):729–35. doi:10.1037/a0016153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte J, Hart T, Ellis CA, Chervoneva I. The moss attention rating scale for traumatic brain injury: further explorations of reliability and sensitivity to change. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(5):966–73. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.12.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oddson B, Rumney P, Johnson P, Thomas-Stonell N. Clinical use of the Mayo-Portland adaptability inventory in rehabilitation after paediatric acquired brain injury. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;48(11):918–22. doi:10.1017/s0012162206002003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas-Stonell N, Johnson P, Rumney P, Wright V, Oddson B. An evaluation of the responsiveness of a comprehensive set of outcome measures for children and adolescents with traumatic brain injuries. Pediatr Rehabil. 2006;9(1):14–23. doi:10.1080/13638490500050097.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shanahan L, McAllister L, Curtin M. The Party Planning Task: a useful tool in the functional assessment of planning skills in adolescents with TBI. Brain Inj. 2011;25(11):1080–90. doi:10.3109/02699052.2011.607781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nott MT, Chapparo C. Exploring the validity of the perceive, recall, plan and perform system of task analysis: cognitive strategy use in adults with brain injury. Br J Occup Ther. 2012;75(6):256–63. doi:10.4276/030802212X13383757345067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook LG, Chapman SB, Levin HS, Kennedy MRT. Self-regulation abilities in children with severe traumatic brain injury: a preliminary investigation of naturalistic action. NeuroRehabilitation. 2008;23(6):467–75. doi:10.3233/nre-2008-23603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erez N, Weiss PL, Kizony R, Rand D. Comparing performance within a virtual supermarket of children with traumatic brain injury to typically developing children: a pilot study. Otjr. 2013;33(4):218–27. doi:10.3928/15394492-20130912-04.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen J, Koterba C, Samora J, Leonard J, Lever K, Grayson D, Ramsden M, Shi J, Yeates K, Taylor H, et al. Virtual reality-based cognitive assessment tool (VR-CAT) for pediatric traumatic brain injury: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;100(12):210–11. DOI::10.1016/j.apmr.2019.10.154.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett PC, Ong B, Ponsford J. Assessment of executive dysfunction following traumatic brain injury: comparison of the BADS with other clinical neuropsychological measures. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2005;11(5):606–13. doi:10.1017/S1355617705050721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longaud-Valès A, Chevignard M, Dufour C, Grill J, Puget S, Sainte-Rose C, Valteau-Couanet D, Dellatolas G. Assessment of executive functioning in children and young adults treated for frontal lobe tumours using ecologically valid tests. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2016;26(4):558–83. doi:10.1080/09602011.2015.1048253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akhand O, Galetta MS, Cobbs L, Hasanaj L, Webb N, Drattell J, Amorapanth P, Rizzo J-R, Nolan R, Serrano L, et al. The new Mobile universal lexicon evaluation system (MULES): a test of rapid picture naming for concussion sized for the sidelines. J Neurol Sci. 2018;387(1):199–204. DOI::10.1016/j.jns.2018.02.031.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blackwell LS, Shishido Y, and Howarth R. Cognitive recovery of children and adolescents with moderate to severe TBI during inpatient rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil . 2020;44(7):1–7 doi:10.1080/09638288.2020.1788176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slomine B, Eikenberg J, Salorio C, Suskauer S, Trovato M, Christensen J. Preliminary evaluation of the Cognitive and Linguistic Scale: a measure to assess recovery in inpatient rehabilitation following pediatric brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2008;23(5):286–93. doi:10.1097/01.HTR.0000336841.53338.2f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slomine B, Grasmick P, Suskauer S, Salorio C. Psychometric properties of the cognitive and linguistic scale: a follow-up study. Rehabil Psychol. 2016;61(3):328–35. doi:10.1037/rep0000096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazan E, Zhang J, Brenkel M, Shulman K, Feinstein A. Getting clocked: screening for TBI-related cognitive impairment with the clock drawing test. Brain Inj. 2017;31(11):1501–06. doi:10.1080/02699052.2017.1376763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kizony R, Tau S, Bar O, Engel Yeger B. Comparing memory and meta-memory abilities between children with acquired brain injury and healthy peers. Res Dev Disabil. 2014;35(7):1666–73. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.03.041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow M, Schlabach D, Peiffer J, Cook C. Differences in change scores and the predictive validity of three commonly used measures following concussion in the middle school and high school aged population. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2011;6(3):150–57. PMID: 21904694
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lau BC, Collins MW, Lovell MR. Sensitivity and specificity of subacute computerized neurocognitive testing and symptom evaluation in predicting outcomes after sports-related concussion. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(6):1209–16. doi:10.1177/0363546510392016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjarks BJ, Dorman JC, Valentine VD, Munce TA, Thompson PA, Kindt SL, Bergeron MF. Comparison and utility of King-Devick and ImPACT composite scores in adolescent concussion patients. J Neurol Sci. 2013;334(1–2):148–53. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2013.08.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn DA, Asbell SJ, Donders J. Clinical utility of the LANSE-A in adolescents with traumatic brain injury. Rehabil Psychol. 2015;60(2):187–92. doi:10.1037/rep0000034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebby PC, Pollock M, Mouanoutoua A, Lewey JH. Performance of children and adolescents with brain injury on the Lebby-Asbell neurocognitive screening examination for children and adolescents. J Child Neurol. 2015;30(10):1255–62. doi:10.1177/0883073814556886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preiss JA. Predicting traumatic brain injury: examining executive function, memory, judgment, and other factors on the Lebby-Asbell Neurocognitive Screening Examination. [ dissertation]. San Diego (CA): Alliant International University, Fresno Campus; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Panwar N, Purohit D, Deo Sinha V, Joshi M. Evaluation of extent and pattern of neurocognitive functions in mild and moderate traumatic brain injury patients by using Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) score as a screening tool: an observational study from India. Asian J Psychiatr. 2019;41(1):60–65. doi:10.1016/j.ajp.2018.08.007.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang JY, Feinstein A. Screening for cognitive impairments after traumatic brain injury: a comparison of a brief computerized battery with the Montreal cognitive assessment. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2016;28(4):328–31. doi:10.1176/appi.neuropsych.16010005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladenheim B, Zemon V, Sinclair C, Mast J. The quick measure of cognitive status: a tool to monitor pediatric neurocognitive recovery. Poster presented at: 136th Annual Meeting of the American Neurological Association; 2011 Oct 27; San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair C. The Quick Measure of Cognitive Status: assessment of children with post-traumatic brain injury. [ dissertation]. Ann Arbor (MI): Yeshiva University; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Bart O, Sarah A, Tzafrir D. Validation of the Israeli version of the rivermead behavioral memory test for children following acquired brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2013;28(6):419–25. doi:10.1097/htr.0b013e3182585d22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubenhoff JA, Kirkwood M, Gao D, Deakyne S, Wathen J. Evaluation of the standardized assessment of concussion in a pediatric emergency department. Pediatrics. 2010;126(4):688–95. doi:10.1542/peds.2009-2804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lah S, David P, Epps A, Tate R, Brookes N. Preliminary validation study of the Sydney post-traumatic amnesia scale (SYPTAS) in children with traumatic brain injury aged 4 to 7 years. Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2019;8(1):61–69. doi:10.1080/21622965.2017.1381100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isquith PK, Roth RM, Gioia GA. Assessment of executive functioning using tasks of executive control. In: Goldstein S, Naglieri JA, editors. Handbook of executive functioning. New York City (NY): Springer Science & Business Media; 2014. p. 333–57.
   Google Scholar
• Allen DN, Leany BD, Thaler NS, Cross C, Sutton GP, Mayfield J. Memory and attention profiles in pediatric traumatic brain injury. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2010;25(7):618–33. doi:10.1093/arclin/acq051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrank FA. Woodcock-Johnson III tests of cognitive abilities. In: Davis AS, editor. The handbook of pediatric neuropsychology. New York City (NY): Springer Publishing Company; 2011. p. 415–34.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson K, Donders J, Nguyen L. Self and parent ratings of executive functioning after adolescent traumatic brain injury. Rehabil Psychol. 2011;56(2):100–06. doi:10.1037/a0023446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Adolescents: health risks and solutions. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2018 Dec 13 [accessed 2020 Sep 15]. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/adolescents-health-risks-and-solutions
   Google Scholar
• The Joanna Briggs Institute Levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendation Working Party. JBI levels of evidence. Adelaide (SA): Joanna Briggs Institute; 2013 Oct 01 [accessed 2020 Jul 10]. https://joannabriggs.org/sites/default/files/2019-05/JBI-Levels-of-evidence_2014_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• The Joanna Briggs Institute Levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendation Working Party. Supporting document for the Joanna Briggs institute levels of evidence and grades of recommendation. Adelaide (SA): Joanna Briggs Institute; 2014 Jan 15 [accessed 2020 Jul 10]. https://joannabriggs.org/sites/default/files/2019-05/JBI%20Levels%20of%20Evidence%20Supporting%20Documents-v2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Watson W, Pedowitz A, Nowak S, Neumayer C, Kaplan E, Shah S. Feasibility of National institutes of health toolbox cognition battery in pediatric brain injury rehabilitation settings. Rehabil Psychol. 2020;65(1):22–30. doi:10.1037/rep0000309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castellanos I, Kronenberger WG, Pisoni DB. Questionnaire-based assessment of executive functioning: psychometrics. Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2018;7(2):93–109. doi:10.1080/21622965.2016.1248557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plourde V, Brooks BL. Is computerized cognitive testing useful in children and adolescents with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury? J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2017;23(4):304–13. doi:10.1017/S1355617717000066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike NA, Poulsen MK, Woo MA. Validity of the Montreal cognitive assessment screener in adolescents and young adults with and without congenital heart disease. Nurs Res. 2017;66(3):222–30. doi:10.1097/nnr.0000000000000192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson LD, Furger RE, Gikas P, Lerner EB, Barr WB, Hammeke TA, Randolph C, Guskiewicz K, McCrea MA. Prospective, head-to-head study of three computerized neurocognitive assessment tools part 2: utility for assessment of mild traumatic brain injury in emergency department patients. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2017;23(4):293–303. doi:10.1017/S1355617717000157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray A, Di Tommaso A, Molineux M, Young A, Power P. Contemporary occupational therapy philosophy and practice in hospital settings. Scand J Occup Ther. 2020;1(1):1–12. doi:10.1080/11038128.2020.1750691.
   Google Scholar
• Britton L, Rosenwax L, McNamara B. Occupational therapy in Australian acute hospitals: a modified practice. Aust Occup Ther J. 2016;63(4):257–65. doi:10.1111/1440-1630.12298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polatajko HJ, Davis J, Stewart D, Cantin N, Amoroso B, Purdie L, Zimmerman D. Specifying the domain of concern: occupation as a core. In: Townsend EA, Polatajko HJ editors. Enabling occupation II: advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being, and justice through occupation. 2nd. Ottawa (Canada): Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists; 2013. p. 13–36.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend EA, Beagan B, Kumas-Tan Z, Versnel J, Iwama M, Landry J, Stewart D, Brown J. Enabling: occupational therapy’s core competency. In: Townsend EA, Polatajko HJ editors. Enabling occupation II: advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being and justice through occupation. 2nd. Ottawa (Canada): Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists; 2013. p. 87–134.
   Google Scholar
• Dunst CJ, Trivette CM. Capacity-building family-systems intervention practices. J Fam Soc Work. 2009;12(2):119–43. doi:10.1080/10522150802713322.
   Google Scholar
• Sandhaug M, Andelic N, Vatne A, Seiler S, Mygland A. Functional level during sub-acute rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury: course and predictors of outcome. Brain Inj. 2010;24(5):740–47. doi:10.3109/02699051003652849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu M, Baxter J. Australian children’s screen time and participation in extracurricular activities. Report No: 1839-5767. Melbourne (VIC): Australian Institute of Family Studies; 2016. [accessed 2020 Sep 05]. https://growingupinaustralia.gov.au/sites/default/files/publication-documents/asr2015e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Csapó B, Molnár G, Nagy J. Computer-based assessment of school readiness and early reasoning. J Educ Psychol. 2014;106(3):639–50. doi:10.1037/a0035756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurdi S, Montaner J, Garcia-Sanjuan F, Jaen J, Nacher V. A systematic review of game technologies for pediatric patients. Comput Biol Med. 2018;97(1):89–112. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.04.019.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pauly MV, Burns LR. Price transparency for medical devices. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008;27(6):1544–53. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.27.6.1544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Commonwealth of Australia. Budget 2020-21: economic recovery plan for Australia. Report No: 9781925832150. Canberra (ACT): The Commonwealth of Australia; 2020. [accessed 2020 Oct 09]. https://budget.gov.au/2020-21/content/download/glossy_overview.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gottschalk F. Impacts of technology use on children: exploring literature on the brain, cognition and well-being. Oecd. 2019;3(1):6–32. doi:10.1787/8296464e-en.
   Google Scholar
• Simblett SK, Ring H, Bateman A. The Dysexecutive questionnaire revised (DEX-R): an extended measure of everyday dysexecutive problems after acquired brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2017;27(8):1124–41. doi:10.1080/09602011.2015.1121880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth RM, Isquith PK, Gioia GA. Assessment of executive functioning using the Behavior rating inventory of executive function (BRIEF). In: Goldstein S, Naglieri JA, editors. Handbook of executive functioning. New York City (NY): Springer Science & Business Media; 2014. p. 301–31.
   Google Scholar
• Morsbach SK, Prinz RJ. Understanding and improving the validity of self-report of parenting. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2006;9(1):1–21. doi:10.1007/s10567-006-0001-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokorelias KM, Gignac MAM, Naglie G, Cameron JI. Towards a universal model of family centered care: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(564):1–11. doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4394-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruiz-Casares M, Nazif-Muñoz JI, Iwo R, Oulhote Y. Nonadult supervision of children in low- and middle-income countries: results from 61 national population-based surveys. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(8):1564–91. doi:10.3390/ijerph15081564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend EA, Polatajko HJ. Enabling occupation II: advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being, and justice through occupation. 2nd. Ottawa (Canada): Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Romli MH, Wan Yunus F, Mackenzie L. Overview of reviews of standardised occupation-based instruments for use in occupational therapy practice. Aust Occup Ther J. 2019;66(4):428–45. doi:10.1111/1440-1630.12572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapleau AM. Exploring the role and scope of clinical assessment in occupational therapy. Open J Occup Ther. 2015;3(3):1–5. doi:10.15453/2168-6408.1200.
   Google Scholar
• Gillen A, Greber C. Occupation-focused practice: challenges and choices. Br J Occup Ther. 2014;77(1):39–41. doi:10.4276/030802214x13887685335580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilding C, Whiteford G. Language, identity and representation: occupation and occupational therapy in acute settings. Aust Occup Ther J. 2008;55(3):180–87. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1630.2007.00678.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turpin M, Iwama M. Using occupational therapy models in practice: a field guide. London (UK): Elsevier Health Sciences; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• DiCenso A, Guyatt G, Ciliska D. Evidence-based nursing: a guide to clinical practice. London (UK): Mosby Inc; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Poulos CJ, Magee C, Bashford G, Eagar K. Determining level of care appropriateness in the patient journey from acute care to rehabilitation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11(291):2–9. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-11-291.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones P, Drummond A. Occupational therapy for children with acquired brain injury: a review of the literature. Br J Occup Ther. 2005;68(7):324–30. doi:10.1177/030802260506800707.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor S, McLean B, Falkmer T, Carey LM, Girdler S, Elliott C, Blair E. Assessing body sensations in children: intra-rater reliability of assessment and effects of age. Br J Occup Ther. 2019;82(3):179–85. doi:10.1177/0308022618786933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. Census reveals a fast changing, culturally diverse nation. Canberra (ACT): Australian Bureau of Statistics; 2017 Jun 27 [accessed 2020 Sep 18]. https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/lookup/media%20release3
   Google Scholar
• Fries JF, Lingala B, Siemons L, Glas CAW, Cella D, Hussain YN, Bruce B, Krishnan E. Extending the floor and the ceiling for assessment of physical function. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66(5):1378–87. doi:10.1002/art.38342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernabeu M, Laxe S, Lopez R, Stucki G, Ward A, Barnes M, Kostanjsek N, Reed G, Tate R, Whyte J, et al. Developing core sets for persons with traumatic brain injury based on the international classification of functioning, disability, and health. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23(5):464–67. DOI::10.1177/1545968308328725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruff RM, Iverson GL, Barth JT, Bush SS, Broshek DK. Recommendations for diagnosing a mild traumatic brain injury: a national academy of neuropsychology education paper. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2009;24(1):3–10. doi:10.1093/arclin/acp006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, Rwjg O, Bouter LM, de Vet Hcw, de Vet HCW. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(4):651–57. doi:10.1007/s11136-011-9960-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber KS. The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Res Sci Educ. 2018;48(1):1273–96. doi:10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2.
   Google Scholar
• Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–63. doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276–82. doi:10.11613/BM.2012.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dancey C, Reidy J. Statistics without maths for psychology. Harlow (England): Prentice Hall; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Liang MH, Fossel AH, Larson MG. Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Med Care. 1990;28(7):632–42. doi:10.1097/00005650-199007000-00008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar