Revisiting purchasing power parity in major oil-exporting countries

References

• Apergis, N. 1998. Budget deficits and exchange rates: further evidence from cointegration and causality tests. Journal of Economic Studies 25: 161–78. doi:10.1108/01443589810215324.
   Google Scholar
• Arize, A.C., J. Malindretos, and S. Christoffersen. 2003. Monetary dynamics, exchange rates and parameter instability: an empirical investigation. Journal of Economic Studies 30: 493–513. doi:10.1108/01443580310492808.
   Google Scholar
• Baffoe-Bonnie, J. 2004. Dynamic modelling of fiscal and exchange rates policy effects in a developing country: A non-structural approach. Journal of Economic Studies 31: 57–75. doi:10.1108/01443580410516260.
   Google Scholar
• Bahmani-Oskooee, M., T. Chang, and K. Hung. 2013. Revisiting purchasing power parity in Latin America: Sequential panel selection method. Applied Economics 45: 4584–90. doi:10.1080/00036846.2013.795279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahmani-Oskooee, M., and S. Hegerty. 2009. Purchasing power parity in less-developed and transition economies: A review paper. Journal of Economic Surveys 23: 617–58. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6419.2009.00574.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahmani-Oskooee, M., A.M. Kutan, and Z. Zhou. 2008. Do real exchange rates follow a nonlinear mean reverting process in developing countries. Southern Economic Journal 74: 1049–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, J., and S. Ng. 2004. A PANIC attack on unit roots and cointegration. Econometrica 72: 1127–1177. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00528.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beach, E.D., N.C. Kruse, and N.D. Uri. 1993. The doctrine of relative purchasing power parity re-examined. Journal of Economic Studies 20: 3–23. doi:10.1108/01443589310040369.
   Google Scholar
• Bleaney, M. 1992. Does long-run purchasing-power parity hold within the European monetary system? Journal of Economic Studies 19: 66–72. doi:10.1108/01443589210027293.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, I. 2002. Combination unit root tests for cross-sectionally correlated panels. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Chortareas, G., and G. Kapetanios. 2009. Getting PPP right: Identifying mean-reverting real exchange rates in panels. Journal of Banking and Finance 33: 390–404. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2008.08.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, W., and J. Lee. 2012. A unit root test using a Fourier series to approximate smooth breaks. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 74: 574–99. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0084.2011.00662.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hojman, D.E. 1989. Fundamental equilibrium exchange rates under contractionary devaluation: A Peruvian model. Journal of Economic Studies 16: 5–26. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000000130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, M.J. 2002. Exchange rate regimes and economic convergence in the European Union. Journal of Economic Studies 29: 6–20. doi:10.1108/01443580210414085.
   Google Scholar
• Horne, J. 2004. Eight conjectures about exchange rates. Journal of Economic Studies 31: 524–548. doi:10.1108/01443580410569262.
   Google Scholar
• Im, K.S., M.H. Pesaran, and Y. Shin. 2003. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics 115: 53–74. doi:10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, C. 1995. Forecasting of foreign exchange rate by normal mixture models. Journal of Economic Studies 22: 45–57. doi:10.1108/01443589510076089.
   Google Scholar
• Kapetanios, G., Y. Shin, and A. Snell. 2003. Testing for a unit root in the nonlinear STAR framework. Journal of Econometrics 112: 359–379. doi:10.1016/S0304-4076(02)00202-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilian, L., and M.P. Taylor. 2003. Why is it so difficult to beat the random walk forecast of exchange rates? Journal of International Economics 60: 85–107. doi:10.1016/S0022-1996(02)00060-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwiatkowski, D., P. Phillips, P. Schmidt, and Y. Shin. 1992. Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? Journal of Econometrics 54: 159–78. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-Y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, A., C.F. Lin, and C.-S. Chu. 2002. Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics 108: 1–24. doi:10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, S.-Y., H.-J. Chang, and T.Y. Chang. 2011. Revisiting purchasing power parity for nine transition countries: A Fourier stationary test. Post-Communist Economies 23: 191–201. doi:10.1080/14631377.2011.570049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lothian, J.R., and M.P. Taylor. 2008. Real exchange rates over the past two centuries: How important is the Harrod-Balassa-Samuelson effect? The Economic Journal 118: 1742–1763. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02188.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddala, G.S., and S. Wu. 1999. A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 61: 631–52. doi:10.1111/1468-0084.61.s1.13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menkhoff, L., and M.P. Taylor. 2007. The obstinate passion of foreign exchange professionals: Technical analysis. Journal of Economic Literature 45: 936–972. doi:10.1257/jel.45.4.936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, R., and B. Perron. 2004. Testing for a unit root in panels with dynamic factors. Journal of Econometrics 122: 81–126. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2003.10.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moosa, I.A. 1994. Testing proportionality, symmetry and exclusiveness in long-run PPP. Journal of Economic Studies 21: 3–21. doi:10.1108/01443589410065631.
   Google Scholar
• Narayan, P.K. 2005. New evidence on purchasing power parity from 17 OECD countries. Applied Economics 37: 1063–71. doi:10.1080/00036840500081713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’connell, P.G.J. 1998. The overvaluation of purchasing power parity. Journal of International Economics 44: 1–19. doi:10.1016/S0022-1996(97)00017-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peel, D.A., and I.A. Venetis. 2003. Purchasing power parity over two centuries: Trends and nonlinearity. Applied Economics 35: 609–17. doi:10.1080/0003684022000035773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perron, P. 1989. The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica 57: 1361–401. doi:10.2307/1913712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesaran, M.H. 2007. A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics 22: 265–312. doi:10.1002/jae.951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogoff, K. 1996. The purchasing power parity puzzle. Journal of Economic Literature 34: 647–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarno, L., and M.P. Taylor. 2002. Purchasing power parity and the real exchange rate. IMF Staff Papers 49: 65–105.
   Google Scholar
• Sjölander, P. 2007. Unreal exchange rates: A simulation based approach to adjust misleading PPP estimates. Journal of Economic Studies 34: 256–88. doi:10.1108/01443580710772786.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, A.M., and M.P. Taylor. 2004. The purchasing power parity debate. Journal of Economic Perspectives 18: 135–58. doi:10.1257/0895330042632744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, M.P., and D.A. Peel. 2000. Nonlinear adjustment, long-run equilibrium and exchange rate fundamentals. Journal of International Money and Finance 19: 33–53. doi:10.1016/S0261-5606(99)00044-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, M.P., D.A. Peel, and L. Sarno. 2001. Nonlinear mean-reversion in real exchange rates: Toward a solution to the purchasing power parity puzzles. International Economic Review 42: 1015–42. doi:10.1111/1468-2354.00144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, M.P., and L. Sarno. 1998. The behavior of real exchange rates during the post-Bretton Woods period. Journal of International Economics 46: 281–312. doi:10.1016/S0022-1996(97)00054-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ucar, N., and T. Omay. 2009. Testing for unit root in nonlinear heterogeneous panels. Economics Letters 104: 5–8. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2009.03.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar