Assessing the impact of corporate governance on financial performance of listed companies in Vietnam

References

• Adhikary, B., L. Huynh, and G. Hoang. 2014. Board structure and firm performance in emerging economies: Evidence from Vietnam. Ruhuna Journal of Management and Finance 1, no. 1: 53–72.
   Google Scholar
• Agrawal, A., and C. Knoeber. 1996. Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 31, no. 3: 377–97. 10.2307/2331397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akerlof, G. 1970. The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 84, no. 3: 488–500. 10.2307/1879431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, F., E. Carletti, and R. Marquez 2007. Stakeholder capitalism, corporate governance and firm value. Corporate Governance and Firm Value (September 16, 2009). EFA.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Matari, E., A. Al-Swidi, and F. Fadzil. 2014. The measurements of firm performance’s dimensions. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting 6, no. 1: 24. doi:10.5296/ajfa.v6i1.4761.
   Google Scholar
• Bamber, L., and Y. Cheon. 1998. Discretionary management earnings forecast disclosures: Antecedents and outcomes associated with forecast venue and forecast specificity choices. Journal of Accounting Research 36, no. 2: 167–90. doi:10.2307/2491473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bebchuk, L., and A. Cohen. 2005. The costs of entrenched boards. Journal of Financial Economics 78, no. 2: 409–33. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bebchuk, L., A. Cohen, and A. Ferrell. 2009. What matters in corporate governance? The Review of Financial Studies 22, no. 2: 783–827. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhn099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berle, A., and G. Means. 1932. The modern corporation and private property. California Law Review 21, no. 1: 78. doi:10.2307/3475545.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, S., A. Wicks, S. Kotha, and T. Jones. 1999. Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal 42, no. 5: 488–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhagat, S., and B. Black. 1999. The uncertain relationship between board composition and firm performance. The Business Lawyer 54, no. 3: 921–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhagat, S., and B. Bolton 2008. Corporate governance and firm performance: Recent evidence. Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Black, B. 2001. The corporate governance behavior and market value of Russian firms. Emerging Markets Review 2, no. 2: 89–108. doi:10.1016/S1566-0141(01)00012-7.
   Google Scholar
• Black, B., H. Jang, and W. Kim. 2006. Does corporate governance predict firms’ market values? Evidence from Korea. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 22, no. 2: 366–413. doi:10.1093/jleo/ewj018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brickley, J., J. Coles, and G. Jarrell. 1997. Leadership structure: Separating the CEO and Chairman of the Board. Journal of Corporate Finance 3, no. 3: 189–220. doi:10.1016/S0929-1199(96)00013-2.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, L., and M. Caylor. 2006. Corporate governance and firm valuation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 25, no. 4: 409–34. doi:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2006.05.005.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, L. D., and M. L. Caylor. 2004. Corporate governance study: the correlation between corporate governance and company performance. Corporate Governance Study, Institutional Shareholder Services. https://stybelpeabody.com/pdf/issscoresandshareholdervalue.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, Y., P. Jiang, P. Limpaphayom, and L. Tong. 2007. Does corporate governance matter in China? China Economic Review 19, no. 3: 460–79. doi:10.1016/j.chieco.2008.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, Y., P. Jiang, and W. Tan. 2010. A transparency disclosure index measuring disclosures: Chinese listed companies. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 29, no. 3: 259–80. doi:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2010.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, K., and S. Pruitt. 1994. A simple approximation of Tobin’s q. Financial Management 70–74. doi:10.2307/3665623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claessens, S., and B. Yurtoglu. 2013. Corporate governance in emerging markets: A survey. Emerging Markets Review 15, no. C: 1–33. doi:10.1016/j.ememar.2012.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clatworthy, M., and M. Jones. 2006. Differential patterns of textual characteristics and company performance in the chairman’s statement. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 19, no. 4: 493–511. doi:10.1108/09513570610679100.
   Google Scholar
• Dao, B., and G. Hoang 2014. VN30 Index: Corporate governance and performance analysis. Available at SSRN 2543097.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J., D. Schoorman, and L. Donaldson. 1997. The distinctiveness of agency theory and stewardship theory. Academy of Management Review 22: 611–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Andres, P., V. Azofra, and F. Lopez. 2005. Corporate boards in OECD countries: Size, composition, functioning and effectiveness. Corporate Governance: An International Review 13, no. 2: 197–210. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00418.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demsetz, H., and B. Villalonga. 2001. Ownership structure and corporate performance. Journal of Corporate Finance 7, no. 3: 209–33. doi:10.1016/S0929-1199(01)00020-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, L., and J. Davis. 1991. Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management 16, no. 1: 49–64. doi:10.1177/031289629101600103.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, T., S. Sundgren, and M. Wells. 1998. Larger board size and decreasing firm value in small firms. Journal of Financial Economics 48, no. 1: 35–54. doi:10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00003-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epps, R., and S. Cereola. 2008. Do institutional shareholder services (ISS) corporate governance ratings reflect a company’s operating performance? Critical Perspectives on Accounting 19, no. 8: 1135–48. doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2007.06.007.
   Google Scholar
• Euromoney Institutional Investor Plc. 2001. Standard & Poor’s weighs up global corporate reports. Euromoney, October.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J., R. Evans, and S. Loh. 2002. Corporate governance and declining firm performance. International Journal of Business Studies 10, no. 1: 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Faleye, O., R. Hoitash, and U. Hoitash. 2011. The costs of intense board monitoring. Journal of Financial Economics 101, no. 1: 160–81. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.02.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E., and M. Jensen. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics 26, no. 2: 301–25. doi:10.1086/467037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finch, E., and A. Shivdasani. 2006. Are busy boards effective monitors. Journal of Finance 51, no. 2: 689–724.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Ballinger.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R., and D. Reed. 1983. Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review 25, no. 3: 88–106. doi:10.2307/41165018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, A., and S. Miles. 2006. Stakeholders: Theory and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, A., and N. Mathur. 2011. Factors that influence financial leverage of Canadian firms. Journal of Applied Finance and Banking 1, no. 2: 19–37.
   Google Scholar
• Gillan, S., and L. Starks. 2000. Corporate governance proposals and shareholder activism: The role of institutional investors. Journal of Financial Economics 57, no. 2: 275–305. doi:10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00058-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gompers, P., J. Ishii, and A. Metrick. 2003. Corporate governance and equity prices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 118, no. 1: 107–56. doi:10.1162/00335530360535162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, S. 1976. On the efficiency of competitive stock markets where trades have diverse information. The Journal of Finance 31, no. 2: 573–85. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1976.tb01907.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, S., and J. Stiglitz. 1980. On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets. The American Economic Review 70, no. 3: 393–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermalin, B., and M. S. Weisbach. 2001. Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature. doi:10.3386/w8161
   Google Scholar
• Hilman, A., and T. Dalziel. 2003. Board of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review 28, no. 3: 383‐396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IFC. 2015. Corporate governance in Vietnam: Success stories. Centre for Asia Private Equity Research. https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/topics_ext_content/ifc_external_corporate_site/ifc+cg/resources/lessons+learned/cg_in_vietnam_success_stories
   Google Scholar
• IFC. 2020. Báo cáo quản trị công ty Việt Nam. [Corporate Governance Report from Vietnam]. https://viod.vn/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2017-ACGS-Vietnam-Country-Report-VIE-Jan-20-2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jebran, K., and S. Chen. 2021. Can we learn lessons from the past? COVID‐19 crisis and corporate governance responses. International Journal of Finance & Economics. doi:10.1002/ijfe.2428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. 1993. The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance 48, no. 3: 831–80. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04022.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. 2010. Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 22, no. 1: 32–42. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6622.2010.00259.x.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M., and W. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3, no. 4: 305–60. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, H., M. Cheng, and S. Gray. 2007. Corporate governance and board composition: Diversity and independence of Australian boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review 15, no. 2: 194–207. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00554.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao, M.-F., L. Hodgkinson, and A. Jaafar. 2019. Ownership structure, board of directors and firm performance: Evidence from Taiwan. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society 19, no. 1: 189–216. doi:10.1108/CG-04-2018-0144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpoff, J., P. Malatesta, and R. Walkling. 1996. Corporate governance and shareholder initiatives: Empirical evidence. Journal of Financial Economics 42, no. 3: 365–95. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(96)00883-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiel, G., and G. Nicholson. 2003. Board composition and corporate governance: How the Australian experience informs contrasting theories of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Journal 11, no. 3: 189–205. doi:10.1111/1467-8683.00318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, T., and M. Wen. 2011. Shareholder governance, bondholder governance, and managerial risk-taking. Journal of Banking & Finance 35, no. 3: 512–31. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Porta, R., J. Lakonishok, A. Schleifer, and R. Vishny. 1997. Good news for value stocks: Further evidence on market efficiency. The Journal of Finance 52, no. 2: 859–74. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04825.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, T., and S. Lee. 2008. CEO duality and firm performance: Evidence from Hong Kong. Corporate Governance 8, no. 3: 299–316. doi:10.1108/14720700810879187.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, M., and R. Lundholm. 2000. Voluntary disclosure and equity offerings: Reducing information asymmetry or hyping the stock? Contemporary Accounting Research 17, no. 4: 623–62. doi:10.1506/9N45-F0JX-AXVW-LBWJ.
   Google Scholar
• Le, T., and G. Walker. 2008. Corporate governance of listed companies in Vietnam. Bond Law Review 20, no. 2: 1–80.
   Google Scholar
• Lewellen, W. G., and S. G. Badrinath. 1997. On the measurement of Tobin's q. Journal of financial economics 44, no. 1: 77–122. doi:10.1016/s0304-405x(96)00013-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X. 2010. The impacts of product market competition on the quantity and quality of voluntary disclosures. Review of Accounting Studies 15, no. 3: 663–711. doi:10.1007/s11142-010-9129-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallin, C. 2004. Corporate Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mallin, C., and A. Melis. 2012. Shareholder rights, shareholder voting, and corporate performance. Journal of Management & Governance 16, no. 2: 171–76. doi:10.1007/s10997-010-9138-1.
   Google Scholar
• Mashayekhi, B., and M. Bazaz. 2008. Corporate Governance and Firm Performance in Iran. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics 4, no. 2: 156–72. doi:10.1016/S1815-5669(10)70033-3.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, C., and J. Simmons. 2014. Embedding corporate social responsibility in corporate governance: A stakeholder systems approach. Journal of Business Ethics 119, no. 1: 77–86. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1615-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monks, R., and N. Minow. 1995. Corporate governance on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics 20, no. 3: 293–315.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, A., and K. Topyan. 2005. Corporate governance: A critical survey of key concepts, issues, and recent reforms in the US. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 17, no. 2: 75–89. doi:10.1007/s10672-005-3879-z.
   Google Scholar
• Nagar, V., D. Nanda, and P. Wysocki. 2003. Discretionary disclosure and stock-based incentives. Journal of Accounting and Economics 34, no. 1–3: 283–309. doi:10.1016/S0165-4101(02)00075-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2004. Principles of Corporate Governance. Paris: OECD Publication Service.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2015. G20/OECD principles of corporate governance. OECD Publishing. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/g20-oecd-principles-of-corporate-governance2015_9789264236882-en.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., and G. Salancik. 1978. The external control of organization: A resource depedence perspective. California: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pham, N., K. Oh, and R. Pech. 2015. Mergers and acquisitions: CEO duality, operating performance and stock returns in Vietnam. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 35, no. A: 298–316. doi:10.1016/j.pacfin.2015.01.007.
   Google Scholar
• Pham, Q., T. Ho, D. Pham, and H. Nguyen. 2020. Effects of corporate governance on high growth rate: Evidence from Vietnamese listed companies. Management Science Letters 10, no. 7: 1553–66. doi:10.5267/j.msl.2019.12.011.
   Google Scholar
• Prugsamatz, R. 2010. Factors that influence organization learning sustainability in non‐profit organizations. The Learning Organization 17, no. 3: 243–67. doi:10.1108/09696471011034937.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, K., S. Locke, F. Scrimgeour, and A. Gunasekarage. 2008. Corporate governance practices of small cap companies and their financial performance: An empirical study in New Zealand. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 4, no. 1: 51–78. doi:10.1504/IJBGE.2008.017891.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenstein, S., and J. Wyatt. 1990. Outside directors, board independence, and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics 26, no. 2: 175–91. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(90)90002-H.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schepker, D., and W.-Y. Oh. 2013. Complementary or substitutive effects? Corporate governance mechanisms and poison pill repeal. Journal of Management 39, no. 7: 1729–59. doi:10.1177/0149206312441209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharpe, W. 1964. Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. Journal of Finance 19, no. 3: 425–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shleifer, A., and R. Vishney. 1997. A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance 52, no. 2: 737–83. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, H. 2014. Risk management provider now ranks organizations against each other. IT World Canada. http://www.itworldcanada.com/article/risk-management-provider-now-ranks-organizations-against-each-other/94859
   Google Scholar
• Standard & Poor. 2002. Sustainability: The business perspective. https://rdmc.nottingham.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/internal/86/Business_edit/33_rating_agencies_corporate_governance_indices.html
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. 1998. A balance theory of wisdom. Review of General Psychology 2, no. 4: 347–65. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.4.347.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J., and W. McEwen. 1958. Organizational goals and environment: Goal-setting as an interaction process. American Sociological Review 23, no. 1: 23–31. doi:10.2307/2088620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomsen, S., T. Pedersen, and H. Kvist. 2006. Blockholder ownership: Effects on firm value in market and control-based governance systems. Journal of Corporate Finance 12, no. 2: 246–69. doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2005.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viet, P. 2013. Board structure and corporate financial performance: Empirical evidence from Vietnam’s listed firms. The Bullentin of the Graduate School of Commerce, Waseda University 78: 205–31.
   Google Scholar
• Vo, D., and T. Phan. 2013. Corporate governance and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Economic Development 7, no. 1: 62–78.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, T., S. Osborne‐Brown, and M. Longhurst. 2002. Issues Negotiation™ – Investing in stakeholders. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 7, no. 1: 54–61. doi:10.1108/13563280210416044.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, D., and M. Sillanpa. 1998. Including the stakeholders: The business case. Long Range Planning 31, no. 2: 201–10. doi:10.1016/S0024-6301(98)00004-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2013b. Report on observance of standards and codes (ROSC)-corporate governance country assessment. Vietnam.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2021. Doing Business Project. http://www.doingbusiness.org/ExploreTopics/ProtectingInvestors/
   Google Scholar
• Yoshikawa, T., H. Zhu, and P. Wang. 2014. National governance system, corporate ownership, and roles of outside directors: A corporate governance bundle perspective. Corporate Governance: An International Review 22, no. 3: 252–65. doi:10.1111/corg.12050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra, S., and J. Pearce II. 1989. Boards of directors and corporate governance: A review and integrative model. Journal of Management 15, no. 2: 291–334. doi:10.1177/014920638901500208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajac, E., and J. Westphal. 1994. The costs and benefits of managerial incentives and monitoring in large US corporations: When is more not better? Strategic Management Journal 15, no. S1: 121–42. doi:10.1002/smj.4250150909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zingales, L. 1998. Corporate governance. London: The New Palgrave Dictionary Economics and the Law, Macmillan.
   Google Scholar