Coaching: client factors & contextual dynamics in the change process

References

• *Alvey, S., & Barclay, K. (2007). The characteristics of dyadic trust in executive coaching. Journal of Leadership Studies, 1(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.20004
   Google Scholar
• Athanasopoulou, A., & Dopson, S. (2018). A systematic review of executive coaching outcomes: Is it the journey or the destination that matters the most? The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 70–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachkirova, T. (2017). Developing a knowledge base of coaching: Questions to explore. In T. Bachkirova, G. Spence, & D. Drake (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of coaching (pp. 23–41). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bachkirova, T., Arthur, L., & Reading, E. (2015). Evaluating a coaching and mentoring programme: Challenges and solutions. International Coaching Psychology Review, 10(2), 175–189.
   Google Scholar
• Bachkirova, T., & Lawton Smith, C. (2015). From competencies to capabilities in the assessment and accreditation of coaches. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 13(2), 123–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachkirova, T., Sibley, J., & Myers, A. C. (2015). Developing and applying a new instrument for microanalysis of the coaching process: The coaching process Q-set. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 26(4), 431–462. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, L. F. (2017). How emotions are made: The secret life the brain. New York, NY: Houghton-Mifflin-Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, C. A., Britten, N., Barber, N., Bradley, C., & Stevenson, F. (1999). Using reflexivity to optimize teamwork in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 9(1), 26–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973299129121677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ben-Hador, B. (2016). Coaching executives as tacit performance evaluation: A multiple case study. Journal of Management Development, 35(1), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-08-2014-0091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozer, G., & Jones, R. J. (2018). Understanding the factors that determine workplace coaching effectiveness: A systematic literature review. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27(3), 342–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1446946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Bush, M. W. (2005). Client perceptions of effectiveness in executive coaching. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 66(4-A), 1417.
   Google Scholar
• Cavanagh, M. J. (2013). The coaching engagement in the twenty-first century: New paradigms for complex times. In S. David, D. Clutterbuck, & D. Megginson (Eds.), Beyond goals: Effective strategies in coaching and mentoring (pp. 151–183). Gower.
   Google Scholar
• *Cavicchia, S. (2010). Shame in the coaching relationship: Reflections on organisational vulnerability. Journal of Management Development, 29(10), 877–890. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621711011084204
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, S. R., Rhodes, C., Kornberger, M., & Stilin, R. (2005). Business coaching: Challenges for an emerging industry. Industrial and Commercial Training, 37(5), 218–223. https://doi.org/10.1108/00197850510609630
   Google Scholar
• Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2004). Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 173–208. https://doi.org/10.2307%2F4131471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, E., Bachkirova, T., & Clutterbuck, D. (2014). Theoretical traditions and coaching genres: Mapping the territory. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 16(2), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422313520472
   Google Scholar
• *Day, A. (2010). Coaching at relational depth: A case study. Journal of Management Development, 29(10), 864–876.
   Google Scholar
• De Haan, E. (2008). Relational coaching: Journeys towards mastering one-to-one learning. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• de Haan, E. (2019). A systematic review of qualitative studies in workplace and executive coaching: The emergence of a body of research. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 71(4), 227–248. http://doi.org/10.1037/cpb0000144
   Google Scholar
• De Haan, E., & Duckworth, A. (2012). Signalling a new trend in executive coaching outcome research. International Coaching Psychology Review, 8(1), 6–19.
   Google Scholar
• *De Haan, E., & Nieß, C. (2015). Differences between critical moments for clients, coaches, and sponsors of coaching. International Coaching Psychology Review, 10(1), 56–61.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon-Woods, M., Booth, A., & Sutton, A. J. (2007). Synthesizing qualitative research: A review of published reports. Qualitative Research, 7, 375–422.
   Google Scholar
• Drake, D. B. (2015). Narrative coaching: Bringing our new stories to life. CNC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ely, K., Boyce, L. A., Nelson, J. K., Zaccaro, S. J., Hernez-Broome, G., & Whyman, W. (2010). Evaluating leadership coaching: A review and integrated framework. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(4), 585–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finfgeld, D. L. (2003). Metasynthesis: The state of the art—so far. Qualitative Health Research, 13(7), 893–904. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732303253462
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gephart, R. P. (2004). From the editors: Qualitative research and the Academy of Management Journal. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 454–462. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2004.14438580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M. (2011). Workplace, executive and life coaching: An annotated bibliography from the behavioural science and business literature. Coaching Psychology Unit, University of Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M. (2017). Coaching as evidence-based practice: The view through a multiple- perspective model of coaching research. In T. Bachkirova, G. Spence, & D. Drake (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of coaching (pp. 62–84). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, J. B., Levy, P. E., & Jeffers, M. (2008). Development of a model of the feedback process within executive coaching. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 60(1), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1037/1065-9293.60.1.42
   Google Scholar
• Greif, S. (2017). Researching outcomes of coaching. In T. Bachkirova, G. Spence, & D. Drake (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of coaching (pp. 569–588). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• *Gyllensten, K., & Palmer, S. (2007). The coaching relationship: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. International Coaching Psychology Review, 2(2), 168–177.
   Google Scholar
• Hampson, S. (2012). Personality processes: Mechanisms by which personality traits “get outside the skin”. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 315–339. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoon, C. (2013). Meta-synthesis of qualitative case studies: An approach of theory building. Organizational Research Methods, 16(4), 522–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428113484969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Huggler, L. A. A. (2007). CEOs on the couch: Building the therapeutic coaching alliance in psychoanalytically informed executive coaching. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 68(3B), 1971.
   Google Scholar
• *Hurd, J. J. (2009). Development coaching: Helping scientific and technical professionals make the leap into leadership. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 28(5), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.20277
   Google Scholar
• *Ianiro, P. M., & Kauffeld, S. (2014). Take care what you bring with you: How coaches mood and interpersonal behavior affect coaching success. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 66(3), 231–257. https://doi.org/10.1037/cpb0000012
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. J., Woods, S., & Guillaume, Y. R. F. (2016). The effectiveness of workplace coaching: A meta-analysis of learning and performance outcomes from coaching. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 89(2), 249–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kets de Vries, M. F. R. (2013). Coaching’s ‘good jour’: Creating tipping points. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 6(2), 152–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/17521882.2013.806944
   Google Scholar
• *Kiel, F., Rimmer, E., Wiliams, K., & Doyle, M. (1996). Coaching at the top. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 48(2), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/1061-4087.48.2.67
   Google Scholar
• Kinn, L. G., Holgersen, H., & Ekeland, T. (2013). Metasynthesis and bricolage: An artistic exercise of creating a collage of meaning. Qualitative Health Research, 23(9), 1285–1292. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732313502127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachal, J., Revah-Levy, A., Orri, M., & Moro, M. R. (2017). Methasynthesis: An original method to synthesize qualitative literature in psychiatry. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 8, 269. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, P. (2017). Managerial coaching – A literature review. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 15(2), 43–69. https://doi.org/10.24384/000250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackie, D. (2015). The effects of coachee readiness and core self-evaluations on leadership coaching outcomes: A controlled trial. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 8(2), 120–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/17521882.2015.1019532
   Google Scholar
• *Mansi, A. (2007). Executive coaching and psychometrics: A case study evaluating the use of the Hogan personality inventory (HPI) and the Hogan development survey (HDS) in senior management coaching. The Coaching Psychologist, 3(2), 53–58.
   Google Scholar
• McDowall, A. (2017). The use of psychological assessments in coaching and coaching research. In T. Bachkirova, G. Spence, & D. Drake (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of coaching (pp. 627–643). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McKenna, D. D., & Davis, S. L. (2009). Hidden in plain sight: The active ingredients of executive coaching. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2(3), 244–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2009.01143.x
   Google Scholar
• Myers, A. (2017). Researching the coaching process. In T. Bachkirova, G. Spence, & D. Drake (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of coaching (pp. 589–609). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• *Nanduri, V. (2018). How the participants experienced a coaching intervention conducted during company restructure and retrenchment: A qualitative research study using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 11(2), 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/17521882.2017.1351459
   Google Scholar
• National CASP Collaboration, Milton Keynes Primary Care Trust. (2006). 10 questions to help you make sense of qualitative research, critical appraisal skills program (CASP) (The Cochrane Collaboration). http://www.joannabriggs.eduau/cqrmg/role.html
   Google Scholar
• *Noon, R. (2018). Presence in executive coaching conversations – The C-2 model. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching & Mentoring. Special Issue, 12, 4–20. https://doi.org/10.24384/000533.
   Google Scholar
• Page, D. (2008). Systematic literature searching and the bibliographic database haystack. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(2), 171–180.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, S., & McDowall, A. (Eds.). (2010). The coaching relationship: Putting people first. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Passmore, J. (2007). An integrative model for executive coaching. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 59(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/1065-9293.59.1.68
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, B. L., Thorne, S. E., Canam, C., & Jillings, C. (2001). Meta-study of qualitative health research. A practical guide to meta-analysis and meta-synthesis (p. 111). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• *Peel, D. (2008). What factors affect coaching and mentoring in small and medium sized enterprises. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 6(2), 27–44.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, D. B., & Millier, J. (2005). The alchemy of coaching: “You’re good, Jennifer, but you could be really good.” Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 57(1), 14–40.
   Google Scholar
• Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the meta-synthesis.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sheldon, K. M., Jose, P. E., Kashdan, T. B., & Jarden, A. (2015). Personality, effective goal striving, and enhanced well-being: Comparing 10 candidate personality strengths. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(4), 575–585. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215573211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2018). How to do a systematic review: A best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sonesh, S. C., Coultas, C. W., Marlow, S. L., Lacerenza, C. N., Reyes, D., & Salas, E. (2015). Coaching in the wild: Identifying factors that lead to success. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 67(3), 189–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/cpb0000042
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, E. W. (1998). Transformative learning: A critical review (Information Series No. 374). ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education, The Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Terblanche, N. (2014). Knowledge sharing in the organizational context: Using social network analysis as a coaching tool. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 12(2), 146–167.
   Google Scholar
• Theeboom, T., Beersma, B., & Van Vianen, A. E. M. (2014). Does coaching work? A meta- analysis on the effects of coaching on individual level outcomes in an organizational context. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2013.837499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the systematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(45), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, A., Flemming, K., McInnes, E., Oliver, S., & Craig, J. (2012). Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12(181), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-181.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wales, S. (2003). Why coaching? Journal of Change Management, 3(3), 275–282.
   Google Scholar
• Western, S. (2012). Coaching and mentoring: A critical text. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.
   Google Scholar