Media Frames and Cognitive Accessibility: What Do “Global Warming” and “Climate Change” Evoke in Partisan Minds?

References

• Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Akerlof, K., & Maibach, E. W. (2011). A rose by any other name…?: What members of the general public prefer to call “climate change”. Climatic Change, 106, 699–710. doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0070-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammon, U. (2001). The dominance of English in the internal scientific periodical literature and the future of language use in science. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Asplund, T., Hjerpe, M., & Wibeck, V. (2013). Framings and coverage of climate change in Swedish specialized farming magazines. Climatic Change, 117, 197–209. doi:10.1007/s10584-012-0535-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype-activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230–244. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, G. (2011). The Glenn Beck Program. Philadelphia, PA: Premiere Radio Networks.
   Google Scholar
• Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20, 351–368. doi:10.1093/pan/mpr057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billett, S. (2010). Dividing climate change: Global warming in the Indian mass media. Climatic Change, 99, 1–16. doi:10.1007/s10584-009-9605-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostrom, A., Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B., & Read, D. (1994). What do people know about global climate change? Part 1: Mental models. Risk Analysis, 14, 959–970. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00065.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 88–118. doi:10.1111/J.1460-2466.2006.00331.X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407–428. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N. (2001a). On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame? Journal of Politics, 63, 1041–1066. doi:10.1111/0022-3816.00100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N. (2001b). The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Political Behavior, 23, 225–256. doi:10.1023/A:1015006907312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N. (2010). What's it all about? Framing in political science. In G. Keren (Ed.), Perspectives on framing (pp. 279–302). New York: Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Drudge, M. (2004). Gore to warn of ‘global warming’ on New York City's coldest day in decades! Retrieved from http://www.drudgereportarchives.com/data/2004/01/15/20040115_193004_agwarm.htm
   Google Scholar
• Elsasser, S. W., & Dunlap, R. E. (2012). Leading voices in the Denier Choir: Conservative columnists' dismissal of global warming and denigration of climate science. American Behavioral Scientist, 57, 754–776. doi:10.1177/0002764212469800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. doi:10.1111/J.1460-2466.1993.Tb01304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2012). Climate change: Basic information. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/basicinfo.html
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Geer, J. G. (1991). Do open-ended questions measure “salient” issues? Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 360–370. doi:10.1086/269268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, D. (2006, July 2). If only gay sex caused global warming. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from http://articles.latimes.com/2006/jul/02/opinion/op-gilbert2
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gunderman, R. B. (2009). Biases in radiologic reasoning. American Journal of Roentgenology, Radium Therapy, and Nuclear Medicine, 192, 561–564. doi:10.2214/AJR.08.1220
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133–168). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T., Rholes, W. S., & Jones, C. R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141–154. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(77)80007-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S. (1990). Framing responsibility for political issues: The case of poverty. Political Behavior, 12(1), 19–40. doi:10.1007/BF00992330
   Google Scholar
• Jaskulskya, L., & Besela, R. (2013). Words that (don't) matter: An exploratory study of four climate change names in environmental discourse. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 12(1), 38–45. doi:10.1080/1533015X.2013.795836
   Google Scholar
• Joireman, J., Truelove, H. B., & Duell, B. (2010). Effect of outdoor temperature, heat primes and anchoring on belief in global warming. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 358–367. doi:10.1016/J.Jenvp.2010.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krosnick, J. A., Holbrook, A. L., & Visser, P. S. (2000). The impact of the fall 1997 debate about global warming on American public opinion. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 239–260. doi:10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (2010). Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 70–81. doi:10.1080/17524030903529749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiserowitz, A. (2006). Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change, 77(1–2), 45–72. doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9059-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E. W., Roser-Renouf, C., Smith, N., & Dawson, E. (2012). Climategate, public opinion, and the loss of trust. American Behavioral Scientist, 57, 818–837. doi:10.1177/0002764212458272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luntz, F. I. (2003). The environment: A cleaner, safer, healthier America. Technical Report. In Straight talk (pp. 131–146). Washington, DC: The Luntz Research Companies.
   Google Scholar
• Maibach, E. W., Nisbet, M. C., Baldwin, P. K., Akerlof, K., & Diao, G. (2010). Reframing climate change as a public health issue: An exploratory study of public reactions. BMC Public Health, 10, 299. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, C. (2010, October 29). Big partisan gap on climate change is widened by Tea Partiers. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/cwire/2010/10/29/29climatewire-big-partisan-gap-on-climate-change-is-widene-54943.html
   Google Scholar
• McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176. doi:10.1086/267990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2000). Challenging global warming as a social problem: An analysis of the conservative movement's counter-claims. Social Problems, 47, 499–522. doi:10.2307/3097132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011). The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public's views of global warming, 2001–2010. The Sociological Quarterly, 52, 155–194. doi:10.1111/J.1533-8525.2011.01198.X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. E., Oxley, Z. M., & Clawson, R. A. (1997). Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behavior, 19, 221–246. doi:10.1023/A:1024834831093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nerlich, B., & Jaspal, R. (2012). Metaphors we die by? Geoengineering, metaphors, and the argument from catastrophe. Metaphor and Symbol, 27(2), 131–147. doi:10.1080/10926488.2012.665795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, M. C. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51(2), 12–23. doi:10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12-23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, M. C. (2010). Knowledge into action: Framing the debates over climate change and poverty. In P. D'Angelo & J. A. Kuypers (Eds.), Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 43–83). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nolan, J. M. (2010). “An Inconvenient Truth” increases knowledge, concern, and willingness to reduce greenhouse gases. Environment and Behavior, 42, 643–658. doi:10.1177/0013916509357696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oreskes, N. (2004). The scientific consensus on climate change. Science, 306, 1686. doi:10.1126/science.1103618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2010). The merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. New York: Bloomsbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, B. (2012, January 23). Global warming could harm the Earth, but some areas might find it beneficial. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/global-warming-would-harm-the-earth-but-some-areas-might-find-it-beneficial/2012/01/17/gIQAbXwhLQ_story.html
   Google Scholar
• Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Running experiments using Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 411–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center for the People and the Press (Pew). (2010). Wide partisan divide over global warming: Few Tea Party Republicans see evidence. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/2010/10/27/wide-partisan-divide-over-global-warming/
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center for the People and the Press (Pew). (2012). More say there is solid evidence of global warming. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/2012/10/15/more-say-there-is-solid-evidence-of-global-warming/
   Google Scholar
• Price, V., Tewksbury, D., & Powers, E. (1997). Switching trains of thought: The impact of news frames on readers' cognitive responses. Communication Research, 24, 481–506. doi:10.1177/009365097024005002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read, D., Bostrom, A., Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B., & Smuts, T. (1994). What do people know about climate change? Part 2. Survey studies of educated lay people. Risk Analysis, 14, 971–982. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00066.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103–122. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuldt, J. P., Konrath, S. H., & Schwarz, N. (2011). “Global warming” or “climate change”?: Whether the planet is warming depends on question wording. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(1), 115–124. doi:10.1093/Poq/Nfq073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N. (1999). Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist, 54(2), 93–105. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.2.93
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, M. A. (1994). Think-aloud and thought listing procedures in investigating mental processes. In A. Lang (Ed.), Measuring psychological responses to media messages (pp. 1–14). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N., & Leiserowitz, A. (2012). The rise of global warming skepticism: Exploring affective image associations in the United States over time. Risk Analysis, 32, 1021–1032. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01801.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sniderman, P. M., & Theriault, S. M. (2004). The structure of political argument and the logic of issue framing. In W. E. Saris & P. M. Sniderman (Eds.), Studies in public opinion: Attitudes, non-attitudes and measurement error (pp. 133–165). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teigen, K. H., & Karevold, K. I. (2005). Looking back versus looking ahead: Framing of time and work at different stages of a project. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18, 229–246. doi:10.1002/bdm.502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440–463. doi:10.1037/a0018963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458. doi:10.1126/science.7455683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valkenburg, P. M., Semetko, H. A., & De Vreese, C. H. (1999). The effects of news frames on readers' thoughts and recall. Communication Research, 26, 550–569. doi:10.1177/009365099026005002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, E. U. (2006). Experience-based and description-based perceptions of long-term risk: Why global warming does not scare us (yet). Climatic Change, 77(1–2), 103–120. doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9060-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, E. U., & Stern, P. (2011). Public understanding of climate change in the United States. American Psychologist, 66, 315–328. doi:10.1037/a0023253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitmarsh, L. (2009). What's in a name? Commonalities and differences in public understanding of “global warming” and “climate change”. Public Understanding of Science, 18, 401–420. doi:10.1177/0963662506073088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, T. D., & Brekke, N. (1994). Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 116(1), 117–142. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar