Perceived Influence of Proenvironmental Testimonials

References

• Amburgey, J. W., & Thoman, D. B. (2012). Dimensionality of the new ecological paradigm: Issues of factor structure and measurement. Environment and Behavior, 44, 235–256. doi:10.1177/0013916511402064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentley, R. A., Garnett, P., O'Brien, M. J., Brock, W. A., & Lehmann, S. (2012). Word diffusion and climate science. PLoS One, 7, e47966. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047966
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostrom, A., Bohm, G., & O'Connor, R. E. (2013). Targeting and tailoring climate change communications. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 4, 447–455. doi:10.1002/wcc.234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, M. P., McLeod, D. M., & Rojas, H. (2008). The role of ego enhancement and perceived message exposure in third-person judgments concerning violent video games. American Behavioral Scientist, 52, 165–185. doi:10.1177/0002764208321349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. (1999). The social capital of opinion leaders. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 566, 37–54. doi:10.1177/0002716299566001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Research on Environmental Decisions. (2009). The psychology of climate change communication: A guide for scientists, journalists, educators, political aides, and the interested public. New York, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Coeckelbergh, M. (2015). Environmental skill: Motivation, knowledge, and the possibility of a non-romantic environmental ethics. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davison, W. P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 1–15. doi:10.1086/268763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detenber, B. H., Rosenthal, S., Liao, Y., & Ho, S. S. (2016). Climate and sustainability| audience segmentation in preparation for campaign design: Addressing climate change in Singapore. International Journal of Communication, 10(2016), 4736–4758.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, G. N., McKeever, B. W., Holton, A. E., Clarke, C., & Eosco, G. (2015). The power of a picture: Overcoming scientific misinformation by communicating weight-of-evidence information with visual exemplars. Journal of Communication, 65, 639–659. doi:10.1111/jcom.12159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978). The “new environmental paradigm”. The Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 10–19. doi: 10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425–442. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ecoAmerica. (2013). Communicating on climate: 13 Steps and guiding principles. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P., Nathanson, A. I., Detenber, B. H., & McLeod, D. M. (1999). Rethinking the social distance corollary: Perceived likelihood of exposure and the third-person perception. Communication Research, 26, 275–302. doi: 10.1177/009365099026003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, R., & Zillmann, D. (1994). Exaggerated versus representative exemplification in news reports – perceptions of issues and personal consequences. Communication Research, 21, 603–624. doi:10.1177/009365094021005003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golan, G. J., & Day, A. G. (2008). The first-person effect and its behavioral consequences: A new trend in the twenty-five year history of third-person effect research. Mass Communication and Society, 11, 539–556. doi:10.1080/15205430802368621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, R. J., Dunwoody, S., & Neuwirth, K. (1999). Proposed model of the relationship of risk information seeking and processing to the development of preventive behaviors. Environmental Research, 80, S230–S245. doi:10.1006/enrs.1998.3940
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., & Thorson, E. (1992). Perceived persuasive effects of product commercials and public-service announcements: Third-person effects in new domains. Communication Research, 19, 574–596. doi:10.1177/009365092019005002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, P. S., Nisbet, E. C., & Shanahan, J. E. (2011). Environmental values and the social amplification of risk: An examination of how environmental values and media use influence predispositions for public engagement in wildlife management decision making. Society & Natural Resources, 24, 276–291. doi:10.1080/08941920802676464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoorens, V., & Ruiter, S. (1996). The optimal impact phenomenon: Beyond the third person effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 599–610. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199607)26:4<599::AID-EJSP773>3.0.CO;2-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, P. D., Mildenberger, M., Marlon, J. R., & Leiserowitz, A. (2015). Geographic variation in opinions on climate change at state and local scales in the USA. Nature Climate Change, 5, 596–603. doi:10.1038/nclimate2583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. M., & Zeitz, H. (1988). The public’s view of the impact of the mass media: A test of the ‘third person’ effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 457–463. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420180507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahlor, L., Dunwoody, S., Griffin, R. J., Neuwirth, K., & Giese, J. (2003). Studying heuristic-systematic processing of risk communication. Risk Analysis, 23, 355–368. doi:10.1111/1539-6924.00314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H. S., Bigman, C. A., Leader, A. E., Lerman, C., & Cappella, J. N. (2012). Narrative health communication and behavior change: The influence of exemplars in the news on intention to quit smoking. Journal of Communication, 62, 473–492. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01644.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, K. M. (2000). Message format and audience values: Interactive effects of uncertainty information and environmental attitudes on perceived risk. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 41–51. doi:10.1006/jevp.1999.0145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, S. J. (2013). Perceived impact of a documentary film: An investigation of the first-person effect and its implications for environmental issues. Science Communication, 35, 708–733. doi:10.1177/1075547013478204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maibach, E. W., Leiserowitz, A., Roser-Renouf, C., Merz, C. K., & Akerlof, K. (2011). Global warming’s six Americas screening tools; instructions for coding and data treatment; and statistical program scripts. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication.
   Google Scholar
• Maibach, E. W., Nisbet, M. C., & Weathers, M. R. (2011). Conveying the human implications of climate change: A climate change communication primer for public health professionals. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Center for Climate Change Communication.
   Google Scholar
• Meirick, P. C. (2006). Media schemas, perceived effects, and person perceptions. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83, 632–649. doi: 10.1177/107769900608300310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, M. C., & Kotcher, J. E. (2009). A two-step flow of influence?: Opinion-leader campaigns on climate change. Science Communication, 30, 328–354. doi:10.1177/1075547008328797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perloff, R. M. (1993). Third-person effect research 1983–1992: A review and synthesis. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 5, 167–184. doi:10.1093/ijpor/5.2.167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perloff, R. M. (1999). The third person effect: A critical review and synthesis. Media Psychology, 1, 353–378. doi:10.1207/s1532785xmep0104_4
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R., & Cacioppo, J. (1984). Source factors and the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 668–672. doi:10.1080/03637758709390229
   Google Scholar
• Rokeach, M. (1968). A theory of organization and change within value-attitude systems. Journal of Social Issues, 24, 13–33. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1968.tb01466.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, S., Detenber, B. H., & Rojas, H. (2015). Efficacy beliefs in third-person effects. Communication Research, doi:10.1177/0093650215570657
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, S., Ho, S. S., Detenber, B. H., & Lee, E. (2013). National idiosyncrasy and public understanding of climate change: A comparison of Singapore and the United States. Paper presented at the conference on communication and environment, Uppsala, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Sarge, M. A., & Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2013). Impacts of efficacy and exemplification in an online message about weight loss on weight management self-efficacy, satisfaction, and personal importance. Journal of Health Communication, 18, 827–844. doi:10.1080/10810730.2012.757392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherr, S., Muller, P., & Fast, V. (2013). Do third-person perceptions amplify exemplification effects? International Journal of Communication, 7, 1603–1621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmierbach, M., Boyle, M. P., & McLeod, D. M. (2008). Understanding person perceptions: Comparing four common statistical approaches to third-person research. Mass Communication and Society, 11, 492–513. doi:10.1080/15205430802375311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmierbach, M., Xu, Q., & Boyle, M. P. (2012). The role of exemplification in shaping third-person perceptions and support for restrictions on video games. Mass Communication and Society, 15, 672–694. doi:10.1080/15205436.2011.616278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweisberger, V., Billinson, J., & Chock, T. M. (2014). Facebook, the third-person effect, and the differential impact hypothesis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 403–413. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, D. H., & Kim, J. K. (2011). Alcohol product placements and the third-person effect. Television & New Media, 12(5), 412–440. doi:10.1177/1527476410385477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 25, 322–348. doi:10.1177/0013916593255002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., Pan, Z. D., & Shen, L. J. (2008). Understanding the third-person perception: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 58, 280–300. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00385.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., Shen, L. J., & Pan, Z. D. (2008). On the behavioral component of the third-person effect. Communication Research, 35, 257–278. doi:10.1177/0093650207313167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trumbo, C. W., & O'Keefe, G. J. (2005). Intention to conserve water: Environmental values, reasoned action, and information effects across time. Society & Natural Resources, 18(6), 573–585. doi:10.1080/08941920590948002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente, T. W., & Davis, R. L. (1999). Accelerating the diffusion of innovations using opinion leaders. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 566, 55–67. doi:10.1177/0002716299566001005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, R., Lo, V. H., Lu, H. Y., & Hou, H. Y. (2015). Examining multiple behavioral effects of third-person perception: Evidence from the news about Fukushima nuclear crisis in Taiwan. Chinese Journal of Communication, 8, 95–111. doi:10.1080/17544750.2014.972422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, H. A., & Dillon, J. F. (2000). Knowledge about others’ reaction to a public service announcement: The impact on self-persuasion and third-person perception. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 788–803. doi: 10.1177/107769900007700405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J., & Gonzenbach, W. J. (2008). Does a perceptual discrepancy lead to action? A meta-analysis of the behavioral component of the third-person effect. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20, 375–385. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edn031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zillmann, D. (1999). Exemplification theory: Judging the whole by some of its parts. Media Psychology, 1, 69–94. doi:10.1207/s1532785xmep0101_5
   Google Scholar
• Zillmann, D. (2002). Exemplification theory of media influence. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 19–41). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Zillmann, D. (2006). Exemplification effects in the promotion of safety and health. Journal of Communication, 56, S221–S237. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00291.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar