239
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Gold Mining in the Greek “Village of Gaul”: Newspaper Coverage of Conflict and Discursive Positioning of Opposing Coalitions

Pages 667-681 | Received 27 Jan 2016, Accepted 20 Nov 2016, Published online: 17 Mar 2017

References

  • Arce-Gomez, A., Donovan, J. D., & Bedggood, R. E. (2015). Social impact assessments: Developing a consolidated conceptual framework. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 50, 85–94. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2014.08.006
  • Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. ( V. McGee, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
  • Bebbington, A., Humphreys Bebbington, D., Bury, J., Lingan, J., Muñoz, J. P., & Scurrah, M. (2008). Mining and social movements: Struggles over livelihood and rural territorial development in the Andes. World Development, 36, 2888–2905. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.11.016
  • Buchanan, K. S. (2013). Contested discourses, knowledge, and socio-environmental conflict in Ecuador. Environmental Science and Policy, 30, 19–25. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.12.012
  • Çoban, A. (2004). Community-based ecological resistance: The Bergama Movement in Turkey. Environmental Politics, 13, 438–460. doi: 10.1080/0964401042000209658
  • Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20, 43–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x
  • Delicath, G. W., & DeLuca, K. M. (2003). Image events, the public sphere, and argumentative practice: The case of radical environmental groups. Argumentation, 17, 315–333. doi: 10.1023/A:1025179019397
  • DeLuca, K. M., & Peeples, J. (2002). From public sphere to public screen: Democracy, activism, and the “violence” of Seattle. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 19, 125–151. doi: 10.1080/07393180216559
  • Edley, N. (2001). Analyzing masculinity: Interpretative repertoires, ideological dilemmas and subject positions. In M. Wetherell & S. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide for analysis (pp. 189–228). London: Sage/Open University.
  • Eley, G. 1992. Nations, publics, and political cultures: Placing Habermas in the nineteenth century. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 289–339). Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Hajer, M. A. (1993). Discourse coalitions and the institutionalization of practice. In F. Fischer & J. Forester (Eds.), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning (pp. 43–76). Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Hajer, M. A. (2006). Doing discourse analysis: Coalitions, practices, meaning. In M. van den Brink & T. Metze (Eds.), Words matter in policy and planning—Discourse theory and method in the social sciences (pp. 65–74). Utrecht: Koninklijk Nederlands Aardrijkskundig Genootschap.
  • Harré, R., & van Langenhove, L. (1999). The dynamics of social episodes. In R. Harré & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action (pp. 1–14). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Harrè, R., & Slocum, N. (2003). Disputes as complex social events: On the uses of positioning theory. In R. Harrè & F. Moghaddam (Eds.), The self and others: Positioning individuals and groups in personal, political and cultural contexts (pp. 123–137). London: Praeger.
  • Hilson, G. (2002). An overview of land use conflicts in mining communities. Land Use Policy, 19, 65–73. doi: 10.1016/S0264-8377(01)00043-6
  • Horowitz, L. S. (2010). “Twenty years is yesterday”: Science, multinational mining, and the political ecology of trust in New Caledonia. Geofurum, 41, 617–626. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.02.003
  • Hovardas, T. (2010). The contribution of social science research to the management of the Dadia Forest Reserve: Nature’s face in society’s mirror. In C. Catsadorakis & H. Kälander (Eds.), Τhe Dadia-Lefkimi-Soufli Forest National Park, Greece: Biodiversity, management, and conservation (pp. 253–263). Athens: WWF-International.
  • Hovardas, T. (2012). Can forest management produce new risk situations? A mixed-motive perspective from the Dadia-Soufli-Lefkimi Forest National Park, Greece. In J. J. Diez (Ed.), Sustainable forest management: Case studies (pp. 239–258). Rijeka: INTECH.
  • Hovardas, T. (2014). “Playing with fire” in a pre-election period: Newspaper coverage of 2007 wildfires in Greece. Society and Natural Resources, 27, 689–705. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2014.901462
  • Hovardas, T. (2015). An “asymmetric threat” that should have been anticipated: Political discourse on 2007 wildfires in Greece. Environmental Communication, 9, 409–427. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2014.981282
  • Hovardas, T., Korfiatis, K. J., & Pantis, D. J. (2009). Environmental representations of local communities’ spokespersons in protected areas. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 19, 459–472. doi: 10.1002/casp.1008
  • Hovardas, T., & Stavrakakis, Y. (2014). Press analysis report. MEMOTRADE – Social memory of water-related trades and practices: Local knowledge and climate change adaptation. ERA-NET CIRCLE-2, CIRCLE-MED2-2013.
  • Howarth, D., & Stavrakakis, Y. (2000). Introducing discourse theory and political analysis. In D. Howarth, A. J. Norval, & Y. Stavrakakis (Eds.), Discourse theory and political analysis—identities, hegemonies and social change (pp. 1–23). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Hurley, P. T., & Ari, Y. (2011). Mining (dis)amenity: The political ecology of mining opposition in the Kaz (Ida) Mountain region of western Turkey. Development and Change, 42, 1393–1415. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01737.x
  • Kirsch, S. (2014). Mining capitalism: The relationship between corporations and their critics. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
  • Kousis, M. (2007). Local environmental protest in Greece, 1974–94: Exploring the political dimension. Environmental Politics, 16, 785–804. doi: 10.1080/09644010701634117
  • Lange, J. I. (1993). The logic of competing information campaigns: Conflict over old growth and the spotted owl. Communication Monographs, 60, 239–257. doi: 10.1080/03637759309376311
  • Metze, T., & Dodge, G. (2016). Dynamic discourse coalitions on hydro-fracking in Europe and the United States. Environmental Communication, 10, 365–379. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2015.1133437
  • Newenham-Kahindi, A. M. (2011). A global mining corporation and local communities in the Lake Victoria zone: The case of Barrick Gold Multinational in Tanzania. Journal of Business Ethics, 99, 253–282. doi: 10.1007/s10551-010-0653-4
  • Nzeadibe, T. C., Ajaero, C. K., Okonkwo, E. E., Okpoko, P. U., Akukwe, T. I., & Njoku-Tony, R. F. (2015). Integrating community perceptions and cultural diversity in social impact assessment in Nigeria. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 55, 74–83. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2015.07.005
  • Ottinger, G. (2015). Refining expertise – How responsible engineers subvert environmental justice challenges. New York, NY: New York University Press.
  • Özen, H. (2009). Located locally, disseminated nationally: The Bergama movement. Environmental Politics, 18, 408–423. doi: 10.1080/09644010902823766
  • Özen, H. (2014). Overcoming environmental challenges by antagonizing environmental protesters: The Turkish government discourse against anti-hydroelectric power plants movements. Environmental Communication, 8, 433–451. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2014.953967
  • Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric, and social construction. London: Sage.
  • Renzi, B. G., Cotton, M., Napolitano, G., & Barkemeyer, R. (2016). Rebirth, devastation and sickness: Analyzing the role of metaphor in media discourses of nuclear power. Environmental Communication. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2016.1157506
  • Sabatier, P., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1999). The advocacy coalition framework: An assessment. In P. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 117–166). Boulder, CO: Westview.
  • Stoffle, R., & Minnis, J. (2008). Resilience at risk: Epistemological and social construction barriers to risk communication. Journal of Risk Research, 11, 55–68. doi: 10.1080/13669870701521479
  • Stoltenborg, D., & Boelens, R. (2016). Ddisputes over land and water rights in gold mining: The case of Cerro de San Pedro, Mexico. Water International, 41, 447–467. doi: 10.1080/02508060.2016.1143202
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Urkidi, L. (2010). A glocal environmental movement against gold mining: Pascua-Lama in Chile. Ecological Economics, 70, 219–227. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.05.004
  • Usher, M. (2013). Defending and transcending local identity through environmental discourse. Environmental Politics, 22, 811–831. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2013.765685
  • Vanclay, F., & Prenzel, P. V. (2014). How social impact assessment can contribute to conflict management. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 45, 30–37. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2013.11.003
  • Van Kempen, H. (2007). Media-party parallelism and its effects: A cross-national comparative study. Political Communication, 24, 303–320. doi: 10.1080/10584600701471674
  • Van Zwanenberg, P., & Millstone, E. (2000). Beyond skeptical relativism: Evaluating the social constructions of expert risk assessments. Science, Technology and Human Values, 25, 259–282. doi: 10.1177/016224390002500301
  • Wetherell, M., & Potter, J. (1988). Discourse analysis and the identification of interpretative repertoires. In C. Antaki (Ed.), Analysing everyday explanations: A casebook of methods (pp. 168–183). London: Sage.
  • Wynne, B. (1992a). Uncertainty and environmental learning: Reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. Global Environmental Change, 2, 111–27. doi: 10.1016/0959-3780(92)90017-2
  • Wynne, B. (1992b). Misunderstood misunderstanding: Social identities and public uptake of science. Public Understanding of Science, 1, 281–304. doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/1/3/004

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.