Energy Communication: Theory and Praxis Towards a Sustainable Energy Future

References

• Associated Press. (2016, December 5). Winter menaces N. Dakota camp as pipeline protestors dig in. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2016/12/05/us/ap-us-oil-pipeline-protest-digging-in.html
   Google Scholar
• Bigl, B. (2017). Fracking in the German press: Securing energy supply on the eve of the “Energiewende” – a quantitative framing-based analysis. Environmental Communication, 11(2), 231–247. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2016.1245207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, A. D. (2017). Examining community perceptions of energy systems development: The role of communication and sense of place. Environmental Communication, 11(2), 184–204. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2015.1047886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buttny, R., & Feldpausch-Parker, A. M. (Eds.). (2016). Communicating hydrofracking [Special issue]. Environmental Communication, 10(3), 289–291. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2016.1159278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Check, T. (2016). Mortification and moral equivalents: Jimmy Carter’s energy jeremiad and the limits of civic sacrifice. In R. D. Besel, & B. K. Duffy (Eds.), Green voices: Defending nature and the environment in American civic discourse (pp. 175–198). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, J. R. (2010). Beyond frames: Recovering the strategic in climate communication. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 122–133. doi: 10.1080/17524030903516555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C. B., Glantz, M., & Novak, D. R. (2016). “You can’t run your SUV on cute. Let’s go!”: Internet memes as delegitimizing discourse. Environmental Communication, 10(1), 62–83. doi:10.1080/17524032.2014.991411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Gandio, J. (2012). From affectivity to bodily emanation: An introduction to the human vibe. PhaenEx, 7(2), 28–58. Retrieved from http://www.phaenex.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/phaenex doi: 10.22329/p.v7i2.3554
   Google Scholar
• de Onís, K. M. (2016). “Pa’ que tú lo sepas”: Experiences with co-presence in Puerto Rico. In S. L. McKinnon, R. Asen, K. R. Chávez, & R. G. Howard (Eds.), Text+field: Innovations in rhetorical method (pp. 101–116). University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries, G., Terwel, B. W., & Ellemers, N. (2016). Perceptions of manipulation and judgments of illegitimacy: Pitfalls in the use of emphasis framing when communicating about CO2 capture and storage. Environmental Communication, 10(2), 206–226. doi:10.1080/17524032.2015.1047884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djerf-Pierre, M., Cokley, J., & Kuchel, L. J. (2016). Framing renewable energy: A comparative study of newspapers in Australia and Sweden. Environmental Communication, 10(5), 634–655. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2015.1056542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, J. (2007). Picturing the clima(c)tic: Greenpeace and the representational politics of climate change communication. Science as Culture, 16(2), 129–150. doi: 10.1080/09505430701368938
   Google Scholar
• Einsiedel, E. F., Remillard, C., Gomaa, M., & Zeaiter, E. (2017). The representation of biofuels in political cartoons: Ironies, contradictions and moral dilemmas. Environmental Communication, 11(1), 41–62. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2015.1076017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endres, D. (2009). From wasteland to waste site: The role of discourse in nuclear power’s environmental injustices. Local Environment, 14(10), 917–937. doi: 10.1080/13549830903244409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endres, D. E., Cozen, B., Barnett, J. T., O’Byrne, M., & Peterson, T. R. (2016). Communicating energy in a climate (of) crisis. In E. L. Cohen (Ed.), Communication yearbook (pp. 419–448). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fischhendler, I., Boymel, D., & Boykoff, M. T. (2016). How competing securitized discourses over land appropriation are constructed: The promotion of solar energy in the Israeli desert. Environmental Communication, 10(2), 147–168. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2014.979214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giancatarino, A. (2012). Energy democracy: Supporting community innovation. New York, NY: Center for Social Inclusion. Retrieved from http://www.centerforsocialinclusion.org/ideas/energy-democracy/
   Google Scholar
• Gunster, S. (2017). This changes everything: Capitalism vs. the climate. Environmental Communication, 11(1), 136–138. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2016.1196534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopke, J. E. (2016). Translocal anti-fracking activism: An exploration of network structure and tie content. Environmental Communication, 10(3), 380–394. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2016.1147474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornmoen, H. (2016). “Environmentally friendly oil and gas production”: Analyzing governmental argumentation and press deliberation on oil policy. Environmental Communication. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2016.1149086
   Google Scholar
• Katz-Kimchi, M., & Manosevitch, I. (2015). Mobilizing Facebook users against Facebook’s energy policy: The case of Greenpeace unfriend coal campaign. Environmental Communication, 9(2), 248–267. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2014.993413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsella, W. J. (2015). Rearticulating nuclear power: Energy activism and contested common sense. Environmental Communication, 9(3), 346–366. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2014.978348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, N. (2014). This changes everything: Capitalism vs. the climate. Toronto: Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. (2012). “Everybody, let’s tighten the anus”: Exploring the social and cultural meaning of a Korean folksong. Journal of Media and Religion, 11(4), 216–230. doi: 10.1080/15348423.2012.730342
   Google Scholar
• Lester, L. (2015). Three challenges for environmental communication research. Environmental Communication, 9(3), 392–397. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2015.1044065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matz, J., & Renfrew, D. (2015). Selling “fracking”: energy in depth and the Marcellus shale. Environmental Communication, 9(3), 288–306. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2014.929157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, B. M., & Lellis, J. (2016). Audience response to values-based marketplace advocacy by the fossil fuel industries. Environmental Communication, 10(2), 249–268. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2014.993414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra, R. (2016). Reconstituting “America”: The clean energy economy ventriloquized. Environmental Communication, 10(2), 269–288. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2015.1047885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monani, S. (2008). Energizing environmental activism? Environmental justice in extreme oil: The wilderness and oil on ice. Environmental Communication, 2(1), 119–127. doi: 10.1080/17524030801936772
   Google Scholar
• Nixon, R. (2011). Slow violence and the environmentalism of the poor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pezzullo, P. C. (2007). Toxic tourism: Rhetorics of pollution, travel, and environmental justice. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, L., & Delshad, A. (2016). Normative framing and public attitudes toward biofuels policies. Environmental Communication, 10(4), 508–524. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2015.1094104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinig, L., & Sprain, L. (2016). Cultural discourses of public engagement: Insights for energy system transformation. In J. Goodwin (Ed.), Confronting the challenges of public participation: Issues in environmental, planning, and health decision-making. Proceedings of a symposium at Iowa State University, (pp. 167–188). Ames, IA: Science Communication Project.
   Google Scholar
• Renzi, B. G., Cotton, M., Napolitano, G., & Barkemeyer, R. (2017). Rebirth, devastation and sickness: Analyzing the role of metaphor in media discourses of nuclear power. Environmental Communication, 11(5), 624–640. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2016.1157506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, J., Schwarze, S., Bsumek, P. K., & Peeples, J. (2016). Under pressure: Coal industry rhetoric and neoliberalism. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sprain, L. (2016, September). Democratic dilemmas of energy system transition. Paper presented at the Global Change and Sustainability Center Seminar Series, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, J., Wilson, E. J., & Peterson, T. R. (2015). Smart grid (r)evolution: Electric power struggles. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waggenspack, B. M., & Vandyke, M. (2016). Ashley Judd’s indictment of mountaintop removal coal mining: A stain on the conscience of America. In R. D. Besel, & B. K. Duffy (Eds.), Green voices: Defending nature and the environment in American civic discourse (pp. 301–323). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar