“Stop Blaming the Cows!”: How Livestock Production is Legitimized in Everyday Discourse on Facebook

References

• Almiron, N., & Zoppeddu, M. (2015). Eating meat and climate change: The media blind spot – a study of Spanish and Italian press coverage. Environmental Communication, 9(3), 307–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auer, M. R., Zhang, Y., & Lee, P. (2014). The potential of microblogs for the study of public perceptions of climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5(3), 291–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benulic, K.-S. (2016) A beef with meat – media and audience framings of environmentally unsustainable production and consumption (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Södertörn University, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Berglez, P., & Olausson, U. (2014). The post-political condition of climate change: An ideology approach. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 25(1), 54–71.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, A. (2005). Representing the politics of the greenhouse effect: Discursive strategies in the British media. Critical Discourse Studies, 2(1), 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2005). The rise of the network society: The information age: Economy, society and culture. London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, J. R., & McCoskey, S. (2013). Does global meat consumption follow an environmental Kuznets curve? Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 9(2), 26–36.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, G., Green, N., Burningham, K., Evans, D., & Jackson, T. (2012). Unravelling the threads: Discourses of sustainability and consumption in an online forum. Environmental Communication, 6(1), 101–118.
   Google Scholar
• Danermark, B., Ekström, M., Jakobsen, L., & Karlsson, J. C. (2002). Explaining society: Critical realism in the social sciences. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ekström, M., & Larsson, L. (2010). Inledning (Introduction). In M. Ekström & L. Larsson (Eds.), Metoder i kommunikationsvetenskap [Methods in communication studies] (pp. 13–25). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Elgesem, D., Steskal, L., & Diakopoulos, N. (2015). Structure and content of the discourse on climate change in the blogosphere: The big picture. Environmental Communication, 9(2), 169–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. P. (2010). Meat’s place on the campaign menu: How US environmental discourse negotiates vegetarianism. Environmental Communication, 4(3), 255–276.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, P. J., Steinfeld, H., Henderson, B., Mottet, A., Opio, C., Dijkman, J., … Tempio, G. (2013). Tackling climate change through livestock – a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Hestres, L. E. (2014). Preaching to the choir: Internet-mediated advocacy, issue public mobilization, and climate change. New Media & Society, 16, 323–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höijer, B. (2008). Ontological assumptions and generalizations in qualitative (audience) research. European Journal of Communication, 23(3), 275–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höijer, B. (2011). Social representation theory: A new theory for media research. Nordicom Review, 32(2), 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, A., et al. (2016). 2016 Environmental performance index. New Haven, CT: Yale University. Retrieved from http://epi.yale.edu
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, B. (2016). The many modalities of social networking: The role of Twitter in greens politics. Environmental Communication, 10(1), 25–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joy, M. (2010). Why we love dogs, eat pigs, and wear cows: An introduction to carnism. San Francisco, CA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M. (2006). Cultural cognition and public policy. Faculty Scholarship Series (Paper 103). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/103
   Google Scholar
• Katz-Kimchi, M., & Manosevitch, I. (2015). Mobilizing Facebook users against Facebook’s energy policy: The case of greenpeace unfriend coal campaign. Environmental Communication, 9(2), 248–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirilenko, A. P., & Stepchenkova, S. O. (2014). Public microblogging on climate change: One year of Twitter worldwide. Global Environmental Change, 26, 171–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koteyko, N., Jaspal, R., & Nerlich, B. (2012). Climate change and “climategate” in online reader comments: A mixed methods study. The Geographical Journal, 179(1), 74–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koteyko, N., Nerlich, B., & Hellsten, I. (2015). Climate change communication and the Internet: Challenges and opportunities for research. Environmental Communication, 9(2), 149–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laestadius, L. I., Neff, R. A., Barry, C. L., & Frattaroli, S. (2016). No meat, less meat, or better meat: Understanding NGO messaging choices intended to alter meat consumption in light of climate change. Environmental Communication, 10(1), 84–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughnan, S., Haslam, N., & Bastian, B. (2010). The role of meat consumption in the denial of moral status and mind to meat animals. Appetite, 55, 156–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeseele, P., & Raeijmaekers, D. (2017). Journalism and democracy: Towards a sustainable future. In P. Berglez, U. Olausson, & M. Ots (Eds.), What is sustainable journalism? Integrating the environmental, social, and economic challenges of journalism (pp. 116–134). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Marcu, A., Gaspar, R., Rutsaert, P., Seibt, B., Fletcher, D., Verbeke, W., & Barnett, J. (2015). Analogies, metaphors, and wondering about the future: Lay sense-making around synthetic meat. Public Understanding of Science, 24(5), 547–562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marková, I. (2003). Dialogicality and social representations: The dynamics of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, P. (2015). Why are people skeptical about climate change? Some insights from blog comments. Environmental Communication, 9(2), 153–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscovici, S. (1988). Notes towards a description of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 211–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscovici, S. (2000). Social representations: Explorations in social psychology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Neff, R. A., Chan, I. L., & Smith, K. S. (2008). Yesterday’s dinner, tomorrow’s weather, today’s news? US newspaper coverage of food system contributions to climate change. Public Health Nutrition, 12, 1006–1014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olausson, U. (2007). The ideological horizons of citizenship: National media as discursive bridge. In B. Höijer (Ed.), Ideological horizons in media and citizens discourses: Theoretical and methodological approaches (pp. 51–73). Gothenburg: Nordicom.
   Google Scholar
• Olausson, U. (2009). Global warming – global responsibility? Media frames of collective action and scientific certainty. Public Understanding of Science, 18(4), 421–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olausson, U. (2010). Towards a European identity? The news media and the case of climate change. European Journal of Communication, 25(2), 138–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olausson, U. (2011). “We’re the ones to blame”: Citizens’ representations of climate change and the role of the media. Environmental Communication, 5(3), 281–299.
   Google Scholar
• Olausson, U. (2017a). The reinvented journalist: The discursive construction of journalistic identity on Twitter. Digital Journalism, 5(1), 61–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olausson, U. (2017b). The celebrified journalist: Journalistic self-promotion and branding in celebrity constructions on Twitter. Journalism Studies. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2017.1349548
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, S., Williams, H. T. P., Kurz, T., & Wiersma, B. (2015). Dominant frames in legacy and social media coverage of the IPCC fifth assessment report. Nature Climate Change, 5, 380–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, W., Holmberg, K., Hellsten, I., & Nerlich, B. (2014). Climate change on Twitter: Topics, communities and conversations about the 2013 IPCC working group 1 report. PLOS ONE, 9(4), e94785. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2016). Spring 2016 global attitudes survey. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/04/20/not-everyone-in-advanced-economies-is-using-social-media/
   Google Scholar
• Piazza, J., Ruby, R. B., Loughnan, S., Luong, M., Kulik, J., Watkins, H. M., & Seigerman, M. (2015). Rationalizing meat consumption. The 4Ns. Appetite, 91, 114–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poortinga, W., Spence, A., Whitmarsh, L., Capstick, S., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2011). Uncertain climate: An investigation into public scepticism about anthropogenic climate change. Global Environmental Change, 21(3), 1015–1024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan, Á, Shan, L., McConnon, Á, Marcu, A., Raats, M., Wall, P., & Barnett, J. (2014). Strategies for dismissing dietary risks: Insights from user-generated comments online. Health, Risk & Society, 16(4), 308–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. A. (2008). Beasts, burgers, and hummers: Meat and the crisis of masculinity in contemporary television advertisements. Environmental Communication, 2(3), 281–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, A., & Schäfer, M. S. (2015). Constructions of climate justice in German, Indian and US media. Climatic Change, 133(3), 535–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharman, A. (2014). Mapping the climate sceptical blogosphere. Global Environmental Change, 26, 159–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, N., & Joffe, H. (2013). How the public engages with global warming: A social representations approach. Public Understanding of Science, 22(1), 16–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T., Castel, V., Rosales, M., & de Haan, C. (2006). Livestock’s long shadow: Environmental issues and options. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Board of Agriculture. (2013). Hållbar köttkonsumtion: Vad är det? Hur når vi dit? [Sustainable meat consumption: What is it? How do we get there?] (Report no. 2013:1). Jordbruksverket.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Board of Agriculture. (2015). Food consumption and nutritive values, data up to 2015 (Report no. JO 44 SM 1501). Jordbruksverket.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2010). Apocalypse forever? Post-political populism and the spectre of climate change. Theory, Culture & Society, 28(2–3), 214–232.
   Google Scholar
• Tobler, C., Visschers, V. H. M., & Siegrist, M. (2011). Eating green: Consumers’ willingness to adopt ecological food consumption behaviors. Appetite, 57, 674–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vi-Skogen. (2017). Varmare klimat – iskall nyhet [Warmer climate – ice cold news]. Retrieved from https://viskogen.se/nyhet/ny-rapport-klimatskeptikerna-gor-comeback/
   Google Scholar
• Whitmarsh, L. (2009). What's in a name? Commonalities and differences in public understanding of “climate change” and “global warming”. Public Understanding of Science, 18(4), 401–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wibeck, V. (2014). Social representations of climate change in Swedish lay focus groups: Local or distant, gradual or catastrophic?. Public Understanding of Science, 23(2), 204–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, H. T. P., McMurray, J. R., Kurz, T., & Lambert, F. H. (2015). Network analysis reveals open forums and echo chambers in social media discussions of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 32, 126–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar