Optimizing Messaging to Reduce Red Meat Consumption

References

• Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. (2013). Red meat and livestock slaughter reports. Retrieved from http://www.agr.gc.ca/eng/industry-markets-and-trade/market-information-by-sector/red-meat-and-livestock/?id=1361290681874
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (2002). Constructing a TpB questionnaire: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Retrieved from http://www.people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (2011). The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections. Psychology and Health, 26 (9), 1113–1127. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2011.613995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardevol-Abreu, A. (2015). Framing theory in communication research in Spain. Origins, development and current situation. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 70, 423–450. doi: 10.4185/RLCS-2015-1053en
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, R., Froggatt, A., & Wellesley, L. (2014). Livestock—climate change’s forgotten sector. Global public opinion on meat and dairy consumption. London: Chatham House.
   Google Scholar
• Beardsworth, A. D., & Keil, E. T. (1991). Health-related beliefs and dietary practices among vegetarians and vegans: A qualitative study. Health Education Journal, 50, 38–42. doi: 10.1177/001789699105000111
   Google Scholar
• Berndsen, M., & van der Pligt, J. (2004). Ambivalence towards meat. Appetite, 42, 71–78. doi:10.1016/S01956663(03)00119-3 doi: 10.1016/S0195-6663(03)00119-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canuel, M., Abdous, B., Bélanger, D., Gosselin, P. & Hewitt J. (2014). Development of composite indices to measure the adoption of pro-environmental behaviours across Canadian provinces. Plos ONE, 9, 1–14. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darley, J. M., & Latane, B. (1968). Bystander intervention on emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 377–383. doi: 10.1037/h0025589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boer, J., & Aiking, H. (2017). Pursuing a low meat diet to improve both health and sustainability: How can we use the frames that shape our meals? Ecological Economics, 142, 238–248. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boer, J., Schosler, H., & Boersema, J. J. (2013). Climate change and meat eating: An inconvenient couple? Journal Of Environmental Psychology, 33, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N. (2001). The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Political Behavior, 23(3), 225–256. doi: 10.1023/A:1015006907312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elections Canada. (2015). October 19, 2015 Election Results. Retrieved from http://enr.elections.ca/National.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eshel, G., Shepon, A., Makov, T., & Milo, R. (2014). Land, irrigation water, greenhouse gas, and reactive nitrogen burdens of meat, eggs, and dairy production in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(33), 11996–12001. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1402183111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2006). Food and agricultural organization of the united nations statistical databases. Rome. Retrieved from http://faostat.fao.org/default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Gifford, R. (2011). The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. American Psychologist, 66(4), 290–302. doi: 10.1037/a0023566
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford, R., & Comeau, L. A. (2011). Message framing influences perceived climate change competence, engagement, and behavioral intentions. Global Environmental Change, 21(4), 1301–1307. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 472–482. doi: 10.1086/586910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health Canada. (2007). What is a food guide serving? Retrieved from http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/food-guide aliment/basics-base/serving-portion-eng.php
   Google Scholar
• Huenemann, R. L., & Turner, D. (1942). Methods of dietary investigation. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 18, 562–568.
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2014). Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change, contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. E., & Ward, G. M. (1996). Estimates of animal methane emissions. Environmental Monitoring And Assessment, 42(1–2), 133–141. doi: 10.1007/BF00394046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joy, M. (2010). Why we love dogs, eat pigs, and wear cows. An introduction to carnism. San Francisco, CA: Red Wheel/Weiser.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, B. A., Reed, D. D., & McKerchar, T. L. (2014). Using a visual analogue scale to assess delay, social, and probability discounting of an environmental loss. The Psychological Record, 64(2), 261–269. doi: 10.1007/s40732-014-0041-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenyon, P. M., & Barker, M. E. (1998). Attitudes towards meat-eating in vegetarian and Non-vegetarian teenage girls in England—an ethnographic approach. Appetite, 30, 185–198. doi: 10.1006/appe.1997.0129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laestadius, L. I., Neff, R. A., Barry, C. L., & Frattaroli, S. (2013). Meat consumption and climate change: The role of non-governmental organizations. Climatic Change, 120, 25–38. doi: 10.1007/s10584-013-0807-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lea, E., & Worsley, A. (2001). Influences on meat consumption in Australia. Appetite, 36, 127–136. doi: 10.1006/appe.2000.0386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, S., & Pickering, G. J. (2017). Visual representations of climate change in Canada. Manuscript in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, B. R., McDonald, R. I., Brewer, M., & Hayes, B. K. (2014). The psychology of environmental decisions. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 39, 443–467. doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-010713-094623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolan, J. M., Schultz, P. W., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). Normative social influence is underdetected. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 913–923. doi: 10.1177/0146167208316691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordgren, A. (2012). Ethical issues in mitigation of climate change: The option of reduced meat production and consumption. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 25, 563–584. doi: 10.1007/s10806-011-9335-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development/Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. (2015). OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2015. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/agr_outlook-2015-en
   Google Scholar
• Piazza, J., Ruby, M. B., Loughnan, S., Luong, M., Kulik, J., Watkins, H. M., & Seigerman, M. (2015). Rationalizing meat consumption. The 4Ns. Appetite, 91, 114–128. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.04.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, G. J. (2015). Head in the (Oil) sand? Climate change scepticism in Canada. Journal of Environmental and Social Sciences, 2(2), 117–127.
   Google Scholar
• Povey, R., Wellens, B., & Conner, M. (2001). Attitudes towards following meat, vegetarian and vegan diets: An examination of the role of ambivalence. Appetite, 37(1), 15–26. doi: 10.1006/appe.2001.0406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roos, E., Sundberg, C., Tidaker, P., Strid, I., & Hansson, P. (2013). Can carbon footprint serve as an indicator of the environmental impact of meat production? Ecological Indicators, 24, 573–581. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, S., & Lee, H. L. (2009). Non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions data for climate change economic analysis. In T. W. Hertel, S. K. Rose, S. Richard, & J. Tol (Eds.), Economic analysis of land use in global climate change policy (pp. 89–120). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rothgerber, H. (2013). Real men don’t eat (vegetable) quiche: Masculinity and the justification of meat consumption. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 14(4), 363–375. doi: 10.1037/a0030379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, M. L. S., & Booth, D. A. (1996). Influences on meat avoidance among British students. Appetite, 27(3), 197–205. doi: 10.1006/appe.1996.0046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sax, M. (2006). Skipping a step: The environmental case for passing the meat: Instead of eating the animals that eat the plants, why not just eat the plants? Briarpatch Magazine, 4, 24–27.
   Google Scholar
• Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2013). Personally relevant climate change. Environment and Behavior, 45, 60–85. doi: 10.1177/0013916511421196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serecon Management Consulting Inc. (2005). Canadian food trends to 2020—A long range consumer outlook. Retrieved from http://stayactiveeathealthy.ca/sites/default/files/resources/Canadian_Food_Trends_2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sheeran, P. (2002). Intention–behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. European Review of Social Psychology, 12, 1–36. doi: 10.1080/14792772143000003
   Google Scholar
• Smtih, S. M., & Petty, R. E. (1996). Message framing and persuasion: A message processing analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(3), 257–268. doi: 10.1177/0146167296223004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, A., & Pidgeon, N. (2010). Framing and communicating climate change: The effects of distance and outcome frame manipulations. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 656–667. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada. (2013). Canada (Code 01) (table). National Household Survey (NHS) Profile. 2011 National Household Survey. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 99-004-XWE. Ottawa. Released September 11, 2013. Retrieved from http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/nhs-enm/2011/dp-pd/prof/index.cfm?Lang=E
   Google Scholar
• Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T., Castel, V., Rosales, M., & de Haan, C. (2006). Livestock’s long shadow: Environmental issues and options. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Guagnano, G. A. (1995). The New ecological paradigm in social-psychological context. Environment and Behavior, 27(6), 723–743. doi: 10.1177/0013916595276001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, B., & Gilg, A. W. (2007). A conceptual framework for understanding and analyzing attitudes towards environmental behaviour. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 89(4), 361–379. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0467.2007.00266.x
   Google Scholar
• Vasseur, L., & Pickering, G. (2015). Feeding the social animal: How to engage Canadians in climate change mitigation. In C. Potvin, S. Aitken, F. Berkes, L. Margolis, & M. Stoddart (Eds.), Acting on climate change: Extending the dialogue among Canadians (pp. 166–171). Montreal: Sustainable Canada Dialogues.
   Google Scholar
• Verplanken, B., & Aarts, H. (1999). Habit, attitude, and planned behaviour: Is habit an empty construct or an interesting case of goal-directed automaticity? European Review of Social Psychology, 10, 1–34. doi: 10.1080/14792779943000035
   Google Scholar
• Westhoek, H., Lesschen, J. P., Rood, T., Wagner, S., De Marco, A., Murphy-Bokern, D., … Oenema, O. (2014). Food choices, health and environment: Effects of cutting Europe’s meat and dairy intake. Global Environmental Change, 26, 196–205. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitmarsh, L. (2011). Scepticism and uncertainty about climate change: Dimensions, determinants and change over time. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 690–700. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiest, S. L., Raymond, L., & Clawson, R. A. (2015). Framing, partisan predispositions, and public opinion on climate change. Global Environmental Change, 31, 187–198. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, D. R., & Roggenbuck, J. W. (1989). Measuring place attachment: Some preliminary results. In Abstracts: 1989 leisure research symposium (pp. 32). Arlington, VA: National Recreation and Park Association.
   Google Scholar
• Yeomans, M., & Herberich, D. (2014). An experimental test of the effect of negative social norms on energy-efficient investments. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 108, 187–197. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2014.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, L. R., & Nestle, M. (1995). Portion sizes in dietary assessment: Issues and policy implications. Nutrition Reviews, 53(6), 149–158. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.1995.tb01542.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, M. (2016). Environmental skepticism and its impact on environmental behaviour in Canada. International Journal of Canadian Studies, 53(53), 61–84. doi: 10.3138/ijcs.53.61
   Google Scholar