1,466
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Interpreting Images of Fracking: How Visual Frames and Standing Attitudes Shape Perceptions of Environmental Risk and Economic Benefit

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 322-343 | Received 27 Jan 2017, Accepted 20 Sep 2017, Published online: 04 Jan 2018

References

  • Arpan, L. M., Baker, K., Lee, Y., Jung, T., Lorusso, L., & Smith, J. (2006). News coverage of social protests and the effects of photographs and prior attitudes. Mass Communication and Society, 9(1), 1–20. doi: 10.1207/s15327825mcs0901_1
  • Bas, O., & Grabe, M. E. (2016). Personalized news and participatory intent. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(14), 1719–1736. doi: 10.1177/0002764216676247
  • Blair, B. D., Weible, C. M., Heikkila, T., & McCormack, L. (2015). Certainty and uncertainty in framing the risks and benefits of hydraulic fracturing in the Colorado news media. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 6(3), 290–307. doi: 10.1002/rhc3.12086
  • Boudet, H., Clarke, C., Bugden, D., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2014). “Fracking” controversy and communication: Using national survey data to understand public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing. Energy Policy, 65, 57–67. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.017
  • Brantner, C., Lobinger, K., & Wetzstein, I. (2011). Effects of visual framing on emotional responses and evaluations of news stories about the Gaza conflict 2009. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88(3), 523–540. doi: 10.1177/107769901108800304
  • Brunsting, S., de Best-Waldhober, M., Brouwer, A. S., Riesch, H., & Reiner, D. (2013). Communicating CCS: Effects of text-only and text-and-visual depictions of CO2 storage on risk perceptions and attitudes. Energy Procedia, 37, 7318–7326. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.670
  • Bucy, E. P., & Newhagen, J. E. (1999). The emotional appropriateness heuristic: Processing televised presidential reactions to the news. Journal of Communication, 49(4), 59–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02817.x
  • Buttny, R., & Feldpausch-Parker, A. M. (2016). Communicating hydrofracking. Environmental Communication, 10(3), 289–291. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2016.1159278
  • Cama, T. (2015, June 1). Maryland bans fracking. The Hill. Retrieved from http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/243625-maryland-bans-fracking
  • Carvalho, A. (2007). Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: Re-reading news on climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 16(2), 223–243. doi: 10.1177/0963662506066775
  • Corbett, J. B., & Durfee, J. L. (2004). Testing public (un)certainty of science. Science Communication, 26(2), 129–151. doi: 10.1177/1075547004270234
  • Corr, P. J. (2013). Approach and avoidance behaviour: Multiple systems and their interactions. Emotion Review, 5(3), 285–290. doi: 10.1177/1754073913477507
  • Domke, D., Perlmutter, D., & Spratt, M. (2002). The primes of our times? Journalism, 3(2), 131–159. doi: 10.1177/146488490200300211
  • Ellsworth, P. C. (1994). Some reasons to expect universal antecedents of emotion. In P. Ekman & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 150–154). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
  • EPA. (2015). EPA’s study of hydraulic fracturing for oil and gas and its potential impact on drinking water resources. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/hfstudy
  • Frankowski, E. (2014, March). Update: Fracking still impacting property values, property rights across America. Resource Media. Retrieved from http://www.resource-media.org/update-fracking-impacting-property-values-rights-quality-life-america/
  • Geise, S., & Baden, C. (2015). Putting the image back into the frame: Modeling the linkage between visual communication and frame-processing theory. Communication Theory, 25(1), 46–69. doi: 10.1111/comt.12048
  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2009). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
  • Graber, D. A. (1996). Say it with pictures. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546(1), 85–96. doi: 10.1177/0002716296546001008
  • Gross, S. R., Holtz, R., & Miller, N. (1995). Attitude certainty. In R. E. Petty, & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 215–245). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/decoding. In Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies (Ed.), Culture, media, language. Working papers in cultural studies, 1972–1979 (pp. 128–138). London: Routledge.
  • Hansen, A., & Machin, D. (2013). Researching visual environmental communication. Environmental Communication, 7(2), 151–168. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2013.785441
  • Hassett, K. A., & Mathur, A. (2013, April). Benefits of hydraulic fracking. Oxford Energy Forum, 91. Retrieved from https://www.aei.org/publication/benefits-of-hydraulic-fracking/
  • Hausman, C., & Kellogg, R. (2015, April). Welfare and distributional implications of shale gas. National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/HausmanText.pdf
  • Hilson, C. (2015). Framing fracking: Which frames are heard in English planning and environmental policy and practice? Journal of Environmental Law, 27(2), 177–202. doi: 10.1093/jel/equ036
  • Ho, S. S., Brossard, D., & Scheufele, D. A. (2008). Effects of value predispositions, mass media use, and knowledge on public attitudes toward embryonic stem cell research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20(2), 171–192. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edn017
  • Hopke, J. E. (2016). Translocal anti-fracking activism: An exploration of network structure and tie content. Environmental Communication, 10(3), 380–394. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2016.1147474
  • Joffe, H. (2008). The power of visual material: Persuasion, emotion and identification. Diogenes, 55(1), 84–93. doi: 10.1177/0392192107087919
  • Kaplan, T. (2014, December 18). Citing health risks, Cuomo bans fracking in New York state. New York Times, p. A1. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/18/nyregion/cuomo-to-ban-fracking-in-new-york-state-citing-health-risks.html
  • Kharroub, T., & Bas, O. (2015). Social media and protests: An examination of Twitter images of the 2011 Egyptian revolution. New Media & Society, 18(9), 1973–1992. doi: 10.1177/1461444815571914
  • Kühne, R., & Schemer, C. (2015). The emotional effects of news frames on information processing and opinion formation. Communication Research, 42(3), 387–407. doi: 10.1177/0093650213514599
  • Lakoff, G. (2010). Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 70–81. doi: 10.1080/17524030903529749
  • Lazard, A., & Atkinson, L. (2014). Putting environmental infographics center stage. Science Communication, 37(1), 6–33. doi:1075547014555997 doi: 10.1177/1075547014555997
  • Lipshitz, R., & Strauss, O. (1997). Coping with uncertainty: A naturalistic decision-making analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(2), 149–163. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1997.2679
  • Maehr, A. M., Watts, G. R., Hanratty, J., & Talmi, D. (2015). Emotional response to images of wind turbines: A psychophysiological study of their visual impact on the landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 142, 71–79. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.05.011
  • Mazur, A. (1981). Media coverage and public opinion on scientific controversies. Journal of Communication, 31(2), 106–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1981.tb01234.x
  • McBride, J., & Sergie, M. A. (2015, June). Hydraulic fracturing (fracking). Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved from http://www.cfr.org/energy-and-environment/hydraulic-fracturing-fracking/p31559
  • Messaris, P., & Abraham, L. (2001). The role of images in framing news stories. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, Jr., & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 215–226). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Nelson, A. (2016, September 29). The rise and fall of fracking in Europe, The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2016/sep/29/fracking-shale-gas-europe-opposition-ban
  • Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Neuman, W. R. (2016). The digital difference: Media technology and the theory of communication effects. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Newhagen, J. E. (1998). TV news images that induce anger, fear, and disgust: Effects on approach-avoidance and memory. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42(2), 265–276. doi: 10.1080/08838159809364448
  • Nisbet, M. C. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51(2), 12–23.
  • Powell, T. E., Boomgaarden, H. G., De Swert, K., & de Vreese, C. H. (2015). A clearer picture: The contribution of visuals and text to framing effects. Journal of Communication, 65(6), 997–1017. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12184
  • Rebich-Hespanha, S., Rice, R. E., Montello, D. R., Retzloff, S., Tien, S., & Hespanha, J. P. (2015). Image themes and frames in U.S. print news stories about climate change. Environmental Communication, 9(4), 491–519. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2014.983534
  • Rodriguez, L., & Dimitrova, D. V. (2011). The levels of visual framing. Journal of Visual Literacy, 30(1), 48–65. doi: 10.1080/23796529.2011.11674684
  • Sarge, M. A., VanDyke, M. S., King, A. J., & White, S. R. (2015). Selective perceptions of hydraulic fracturing. Politics and the Life Sciences, 34(1), 57–72. doi: 10.1017/pls.2015.6
  • Taber, C. S., Cann, D., & Kucsova, S. (2009). The motivated processing of political arguments. Political Behavior, 31(2), 137–155. doi: 10.1007/s11109-008-9075-8
  • Tormala, Z. L. (2016). The role of certainty (and uncertainty) in attitudes and persuasion. Current Opinion in Psychology, 10, 6–11. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.10.017
  • Trumbo, J. (1999). Visual literacy and science communication. Science Communication, 20(4), 409–425. doi: 10.1177/1075547099020004004
  • US Energy Information Administration. (2016). Shale in the United States. Retrieved from http://www.eia.gov/energy_in_brief/article/shale_in_the_united_states.cfm
  • US Energy Information Administration. (2017). EIA – Independent statistics and analysis. Retrieved from http://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/0383(2017).pdf
  • Vaismoradi, M., Jones, J., Turunen, H., & Snelgrove, S. (2016). Theme development in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 6(5), 100–110. doi: 10.5430/jnep.v6n5p100
  • Williams, L., Macnaghten, P., Davies, R., & Curtis, S. (2017). Framing “fracking”: Exploring public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing in the United Kingdom. Public Understanding of Science, 26(1), 89–104. doi: 10.1177/0963662515595159
  • Wines, M. (2016, May 2). Colorado court strikes down local bans on fracking. New York Times, p. A10. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/03/us/colorado-court-strikes-down-local-bans-on-fracking.html
  • Wood, J. (2012). The global anti-fracking movement: What it wants, how it operates and what’s next. White paper. MarcellusProtest.org. Retrieved from http://www.marcellusprotest.org/sites/marcellusprotest.org/files/shale_gas_whitepaper.pdf

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.