1,024
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Portrayals of Endangered Species in Advertising: Exercising Intertextuality to Question the Anthropocentric Lens

Pages 118-134 | Received 29 Apr 2017, Accepted 08 Jan 2018, Published online: 05 Feb 2018

References

  • Aggarwal, P., & McGill, A. L. (2007). Is that car smiling at me? Schema congruity as a basis for evaluating anthropomorphized products. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(4), 468–479.
  • Bakhtin, M. (1935/1981). Discourse in the novel. In M. Holquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M.M. Bakhtin (pp. 259–422). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
  • Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
  • Baron-Cohen, S. (1992). The theory of mind hypothesis of autism: History and prospects of the idea. The Psychologist: Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 5, 9–12.
  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.
  • Beer, C. G. (1980). Perspectives on animal behavior comparisons. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Comparative methods in psychology (pp. 17–64). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Bekoff, M., & Bexell, S. (2010). Ignoring nature: Why we do it, the dire consequences, and the need for a paradigm shift to save animals, habitats, and ourselves. Human Ecology Form, 17(1), 70–74.
  • Belcher, J. R., & Deforge, B. R. (2012). Social stigma and homelessness: The limits of social change. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 22, 929–946.
  • Bookchin, M. (1982). The ecology of freedom: The emergence and dissolution of hierarchy. Palo Alto, CA: Cheshire Books.
  • Braunwart, N. D. (2015). Animals in advertising: Eliciting powerful consumer response, resulting in enhanced brand engagement (University Honors Theses). Paper 151.
  • Brey, P. (2000). Technology as extension of human faculties: Metaphysics, epistemology, and technology. Research in Philosophy and Technology, 19, 121–128.
  • Brown, S. (2010). Where the wild brands are: Some thoughts on anthropomorphic marketing. The Marketing Review, 10(3), 209–224.
  • Brulle, R. J. (2000). Agency, democracy, and nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Budinsky, J., & Bryan, S. (2013). “It’s not easy being green”: The greenwashing of environmental discourses in advertising. Canadian Journal of Communication, 38(2), 207–226.
  • Burke, K. (1969). A rhetoric of motives. Berkeley: The University of California.
  • Castillo, M. (2015, July 12). Americans will spend more than $60 billion on their pets this year. CNBC. NBC News. Retrieved from http://www.nbcnews.com/business/consumer/americans-will-spend-more-60-billion-their-pets-year-n390181
  • Catton, W., & Dunlap, R. (1980). A new ecological paradigm for post-exuberant sociology. American Behavioral Scientist, 24(1), 15–47.
  • Chilton, P, & Schäffner, C. (1997). Introduction: Themes and principles in the analysis of political discourse. In P. Chilton & C. Schäffner (Eds.), Politics as text and talk: Analytic approaches to political discourse (pp. 1–41). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
  • Corbett, J. B. (2002). A faint green sell: Advertising and the natural world. In M. Meister & P. M. Japp (Eds.), Enviropop: Studies in environmental rhetoric and popular culture (pp. 141–160). Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Corbett, J. B. (2006). Communicating nature: How we create and understand environmental messages. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Cronan, W. (1995). The trouble with wilderness; or, getting back to the wrong nature. In W. Cronen (Ed.), Uncommon ground: Toward reinventing nature (pp. 182–202). New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
  • Davission, A., & Booth, P. (2010). Intertextuality, parody, and polyphony in Pepsi’s 2009 presidential inauguration campaign. Journal of Visual Literacy, 29(1), 68–87.
  • Delbaere, M., McQuarrie, E. F., & Phillips, B. J. (2011). Personification in advertising: Using a visual metaphor to trigger anthropomorphism. Journal of Advertising, 40(1), 121–130.
  • Easterling, D., Kenworthy, A., & Nemzoff, R. (1996). The greening of advertising: A twenty-five year look at environmental advertising. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 4(1), 20–34.
  • Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864–886.
  • Fairclough, N. (1992). Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse and Society, 3(2), 193–217.
  • Fairclough, N. (2001). Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer. (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 121–138). London: Sage.
  • Fiske, J. (1987). Television culture. London: Routledge.
  • Folse, J. A. G., Netemeyer, R. G., & Burton, S. (2012). Spokescharacters: How the personality traits of sincerity, excitement, and competence help to build equity. Journal of Advertising, 41(1), 17–32.
  • Fowles, J. (1996). Advertising and popular culture. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Geeraerts, D., & Cuyckens, H. (2007). The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Gelbrich, K., Gäthke, D., & Westjohn, S. A. (2012). Anthropomorphism and allegory in advertising across cultures: Effects on memory and persuasion. Journal of Euromarketing, 21(4), 174–192.
  • Gladwin, T., Kennelly, J., & Krause, T. (1995). Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 874–907.
  • Gray, J. (2010). Show sold separately: Promos, spoilers, and other media paratexts. New York, NY: New York University Press.
  • Guthrie, S. E. (1995). Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion. New York,NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Guthrie, S. E. (1997). Anthropomorphism: A definition and theory. In R. W. Mitchell, N. S. Thompson, & H. L. Miles (Eds.), Anthropomorphism, anecdotes, and animals (pp. 50–58). Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/decoding. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe, & P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, media, language (pp. 129–138). Birmingham: Center for Contemporary Cultural Studies.
  • Haralambos, M., Herald, R. M., & Holborn, M. (2000). Sociology: Themes and perspectives (5th ed.). London: Collins Educational.
  • Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Hatim, B. (1997). Communication across culture: Translation theory and contrastive text linguistics. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.
  • Hendry, J. (2010). Communication and the natural world. State College, PA: Strata.
  • Hope, D. S. (2002). Environment as consumer icon in advertising fantasy. In M. Meister & P. M. Japp (Eds.), Enviropop: Studies in environmental rhetoric and popular culture (pp. 161–174). Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Horak, J. C. (2006). Wildlife documentaries: From classical forms to reality TV. Film History, 18, 459–475.
  • Huckin, T. N. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. Miller (Ed.), Functional approaches to written text (pp. 78–92). Washington, DC: United States Information Agency.
  • Hume, D. (1957). The natural history of religion. Stanford, CA: Stanford UP. 1957.
  • Jardine, A. (2016, November 18). A suburban family takes care of a 700lb tiger in this magical WWF spot. Creativity Online. Retrieved from http://creativity-online.com/work/wwf-a-tiger-in-suburbia/49995.
  • Kilbourne, W. E. (1995). Green advertising: Salvation or oxymoron? Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 7–20.
  • Kristeva, J. (1977/1980). Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Kuhn, S., Brick, T. R., Müller, B. C. N., & Gallinat, J. (2014). Is this car looking at you? How anthropomorphism predicts fusiform face area activation when seeing cars. PLoS ONE, 9(12): e113885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113885
  • Kuppens, A. H. (2009). English in advertising: Generic intertextuality in a globalizing media environment. Applied Linguistics, 31(1), 115–135.
  • Lesher, J. H. (1992). Xenophanes of Colophon: Fragments. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
  • Levy, S. J. (1985). Dreams, fairy tales, animals and cars. Psychology and Marketing, 2(2), 67–81.
  • Lin, W. K., & Wang, J. Y. (2012). The influence of animated spokescharacters in customer orientation. The International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 4(4), 142–154.
  • Lorimer, H. (2006). Herding memories of humans and animals. Environment & Planning: Society & Space, 24, 497–518.
  • Manson, N. A. (2000). Anthropocentrism and the design argument. Religious Studies, 36, 163–176.
  • Martín-Fores, I., Martín-Lopez, B., & Montes, C. (2013). Anthropomorphic factors influencing Spanish conservation policies of vertebrates. International Journal of Biodiversity, 2013, 1–9.
  • Meister, M. (1997). “Sustainable development” in visual imagery: Rhetorical function in the Jeep Cherokee. Communication Quarterly, 45, 223–234.
  • Meyers-Levy, J., & Peracchio, L. A. (1992). Getting an angle on advertising: The effect of camera angle on product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(4), 454–461.
  • Miesler, L., Landwehr, J. R., McGill, A. L., & Herrmann, A. (2011). Imitating human forms in product design: How does anthropomorphism work, when does it work, and what does it affect (PhD dissertation). University of St. Gallen, Switzerland.
  • Milton, K. (2005). Anthropomorphism or egomorphism? The perception of nonhuman persons by human ones. In J. Knight (Ed.), Animals in person: Cultural perspectives on human-animal intimacies (pp. 255–271). Oxford: BERG.
  • Nemčoková, K. (2014). Multigeneric intertextuality in advertising: Discourse strategy from a cognitive perspective. Topics in Linguistics, 13(1), 26–35.
  • O’Keefe, G. J., & Shepard, R. L. (2002). Overcoming the challenges of environmental public information and action programs. In J. P. Dillard & M. Pfau (Eds.), The Persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 661–687). Belmont, CA: Sage.
  • Olsen, R. K. (2002). Living above it all: The liminal fantasy of sport utility vehicle advertisements. In M. Meister & P. M. Japp (Eds.), Enviropop: Studies in environmental rhetoric and popular culture (pp. 161–174). Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Pappas, S. (2016, May 5). There might be 1 trillion species on earth. Live Science. Retrieved from http://www.livescience.com/54660-1-trillion-species-on-earth.html
  • Pateman, T. (1989). Pragmatics in semiotics: Bakhtin/Volosinov. Journal of Literary Semantics, 18(3), 206–216.
  • Pierce, K. (2002). What if the energizer bunny were female? Importance of gender in perceptions of advertising spokescharacter effectiveness. Sex Roles, 45(11–12), 845–858.
  • Pieters, R., Warlop, L., & Wedel, M. (2002). Breaking through the clutter: Benefits of advertisement originality and familiarity for brand attention and memory. Management Science, 48(2), 765–781.
  • Porter, P. (2006). Engaging the animal in the moving image. Society and Animals, 14(4), 399–416.
  • Root-Bernstein, M., Douglas, L., Smith, A., & Verrisimo, D. (2013). Anthropomorphized species as tools for conservation: Utility beyond prosocial, intelligent and suffering species. Biodiversity and Conservation, 22, 1577–1589.
  • Schmitt, C. R. (2013). If a text falls in the woods … : intertextuality, environmental perception, and the non-authored text. Cultural Analysis, 11, 17–35.
  • Soanes, C., & Stevenson, A. (Eds.). (2005). Oxford dictionary of English (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Spears, N. E., Mowen, J. C., & Chakraborty, G. (1996). Symbolic role of animals in print advertising: Content analysis and conceptual development. Journal of Business Research, 37(2), 87–95.
  • Stibbe, A. (2012). Animals erased: Discourse, ecology and reconnection with the natural world. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
  • Tannenbaum, M., & Goldstein, A. (2005). Multiliteracies as a bridge between the curriculum and the individual: On teaching art via the personal photo album. Journal of Visual Literacy, 25(2), 123–144.
  • Taylor, A. (2009). Animals & ethics: An overview of the philosophical debate. Peterborough: Broadview Press.
  • Taylor, S. (2011). Beasts of burden: Disability studies and Animal rights. Qui Parle, 19, 191–222.
  • Verdonk, P. (2002). Oxford introductions to language study: Stylistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J., & Epley, N. (2010). Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(3), 219–232.
  • Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • WWF. (2016, April 26). Your donation matters. WWF. Retrieved from http://wwf.panda.org/how_you_can_help/support_wwf/donate/
  • Zinkhan, G. M., & Carlson, L. (1995). Green advertising and the reluctant consumer. Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 1–6.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.