Perceived Collective Efficacy and Trust in Government Influence Public Engagement with Climate Change-Related Water Conservation Policies

References

• Adger, W. N. (2003). Social capital, collective action, and adaptation to climate change. Economic Geography, 79(4), 387–404. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2003.tb00220.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahluwalia, M., Gupta, H., & Stern, N. (2016). A more sustainable energy strategy for India. Retrieved from http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Ahluwalia-Gupta-and-Stern-policy-paper-3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., Joyce, N., Sheikh, S., & Cote, N. G. (2011). Knowledge and the prediction of behavior: The role of information accuracy in the theory of planned behavior. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 33(2), 101–117. doi: 10.1080/01973533.2011.568834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antilla, L. (2010). Self-censorship and science: A geographical review of media coverage of climate tipping points. Public Understanding of Science, 19(2), 240–256. doi: 10.1177/0963662508094099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (Ed.). (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1998). Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Psychology and Health, 13(4), 623–649. doi: 10.1080/08870449808407422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 75–78. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, A., Gurin, G., & Miller, W. E. (1954). The voter decides. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
   Google Scholar
• Capstick, S., Whitmarsh, L., Poortinga, W., Pidgeon, N., & Upham, P. (2015). International trends in public perceptions of climate change over the past quarter century. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 6(1), 35–61. doi: 10.1002/wcc.321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Census. (2011). Census 2011. New Delhi: Government of India. Retrieved from http://censusindia.gov.in/
   Google Scholar
• Central Water Resources (CWC). (2011). India: Country paper on water security. Retrieved from http://www.indiaenvironmentportal. org.in/files/file/Water%20Report%20-INDIA.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, T., Dan, A., & Shwom, R. (2007). Support for climate change policy: Social psychological and social structural influences. Rural Sociology, 72(2), 185–214. doi: 10.1526/003601107781170026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, D., Maibach, E. W., Zhao, X., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2011). Support for climate policy and societal action are linked to perceptions about scientific agreement. Nature Climate Change, 1(9), 462–466. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drews, S., & Bergh, J. C. J. M. v. d. (2016). What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies. Climate Policy, 16(7), 855–876. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2015.1058240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durham, C. C., Knight, D., & Locke, E. A. (1997). Effects of leader role, team-set goal difficulty, efficacy, and tactics on team effectiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72(2), 203–231. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1997.2739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earley, P. C. (1994). Self or group? Cultural effects of training on self-efficacy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(1), 89–117. doi: 10.2307/2393495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, L., & Hart, P. S. (2016). Using political efficacy messages to increase climate activism: The mediating role of emotions. Science Communication, 38(1), 99–127. doi: 10.1177/1075547015617941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feltz, D. L., & Lirgg, C. D. (1998). Perceived team and player efficacy in hockey. Journal of Applied Psychology;Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(4), 557–564. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.83.4.557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gameel, B., Lu, S., Jung, H., & Johnson, T. J. (2017). Putting out fire with gasoline in Tahrir Square: Revisiting the Gamson hypothesis. International Journal of Communication, 11, 1816–1838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A. (1968). Power and discontent. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
   Google Scholar
• Gavin, N. T., & Marshall, T. (2011). Mediated climate change in Britain: Scepticism on the web and on television around Copenhagen. Global Environmental Change, 21(3), 1035–1044. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goddard, R. D. (2001). Collective efficacy: A neglected construct in the study of schools and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 467–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Hoy, A. W. (2004). Collective efficacy beliefs: Theoretical developments, empirical evidence, and future directions. Educational Researcher, 33(3), 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Grothmann, T., & Patt, A. (2005). Adaptive capacity and human cognition: The process of individual adaptation to climate change. Global Environmental Change Part A, 15(3), 199–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, P. S., & Feldman, L. (2014). Threat without efficacy? Climate change on US network news. Science Communication, 36(3), 325–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, P. S., & Feldman, L. (2016). The influence of climate change efficacy messages and efficacy beliefs on intended political participation. PloS One, 11(8), e0157658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmielowski, J. D., Feldman, L., Myers, T. A., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E. (2013). An attack on science? Media use, trust in scientists, and perceptions of global warming. Public Understanding of Science, 23, 866–883. doi: 10.1177/0963662513480091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmielowski, J. D., & Nisbet, E. C. (2016). “Maybe yes, maybe no?”: Testing the indirect relationship of news use through ambivalence and strength of policy position on public engagement with climate change. Mass Communication and Society, 19(5), 650–670. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2016.1183029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, M., & Marien, S. (2013). A comparative analysis of the relationship between political trust and forms of political participation in Europe. European Societies, 15(1), 131–152. doi: 10.1080/14616696.2012.692807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imada, Y., Shiogama, H., Takahashi, C., Watanbe, M., Mori, M., Kamae, Y., & Maeda, S. (2017). Climate change increased the likelihood of the 2016 heat extremes in Asia. Retrieved from http://www.ametsoc.net/eee/2016/ch19.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jex, S. M., & Bliese, P. D. (1999). Efficacy beliefs as a moderator of the impact of work-related stressors: A multilevel study. Journal of Applied Psychology;Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), 349–361. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koletsou, A., & Mancy, R. (2011). Which efficacy constructs for large-scale social dilemma problems? Individual and collective forms of efficacy and outcome expectancies in the context of climate change mitigation. Risk Management, 13(4), 184–208. doi: 10.1057/rm.2011.12
   Google Scholar
• Krosnick, J. A. (1988). The role of attitude importance in social evaluation: A study of policy preferences, presidential candidate evaluations, and voting behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(2), 196–210. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.55.2.196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krosnick, J. A., Holbrook, A. L., Lowe, L., & Visser, P. S. (2006). The origins and consequences of democratic citizens’ policy agendas: A study of popular concern about global warming. Climatic Change, 77(1), 7–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, F. L. F. (2006). Collective efficacy, support for democratization, and political participation in Hong Kong. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(3), 297–317. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edh105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, F. L. F. (2010). The perceptual bases of collective efficacy and protest participation: The case of pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22(3), 392–411. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edq023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, T. M., Markowitz, E. M., Howe, P. D., Ko, C.-Y., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2015). Predictors of public climate change awareness and risk perception around the world. Nature Climate Change, 5(11), 1014–1020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiserowitz, A. (2006). Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change, 77(1), 45–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S., & Whitmarsh, L. (2007). Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change, 17(3–4), 445–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubell, M., & Vedlitz, A. (2006). Collective action, environmental activism, and air quality policy. Political Research Quarterly, 59(1), 149–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubell, M., Zahran, S., & Vedlitz, A. (2007). Collective action and citizen responses to global warming. Political Behavior, 29, 391–413. doi: 10.1007/s11109-006-9025-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malka, A., Krosnick, J. A., & Langer, G. (2009). The association of knowledge with concern about global warming: Trusted information sources shape public thinking. Risk Analysis, 29(5), 633–647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrell, M. E. (2003). Survey and experimental evidence for a reliable and valid measure of internal political efficacy. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 67(4), 589–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, S. C. (2016). Reflections on climate change communication research and practice in the second decade of the 21st century: What more is there to say? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 7(3), 345–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mummendey, A., Kessler, T., Klink, A., & Mielke, R. (1999). Strategies to cope with negative social identity: Predictions by social identity theory and relative deprivation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(2), 229–245. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.76.2.229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, T. A. (2011). Goodbye, listwise deletion: Presenting hot deck imputation as an easy and effective tool for handling missing data. Communication Methods and Measures, 5(4), 297–310. doi: 10.1080/19312458.2011.624490
   Google Scholar
• NAPCC. (2008). National Action Plan on Climate Change, Prime Minister’s Council on Climate Change. New Delhi: Government of India. Retrieved from http://pmindia.nic.in/clima te_change.htm
   Google Scholar
• Nisbet, M. C. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51(2), 12–23. doi: 10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12-23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ockwell, D., Whitmarsh, L., & O’Neill, S. (2009). Reorienting climate change communication for effective mitigation: Forcing people to be green or fostering grass-roots engagement? Science Communication, 30(3), 305–327. doi: 10.1177/1075547008328969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, R. E., Bard, R. J., & Fisher, A. (1999). Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change. Risk Analysis, 19(3), 461–471. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00421.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, S., & Nicholson-Cole, S. (2009). “Fear won’t do it” promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Science Communication, 30(3), 355–379. doi: 10.1177/1075547008329201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2010). A multi-scale approach to coping with climate change and other collective action problems. Solutions, 1(2), 27–36.
   Google Scholar
• Painter, J. (2013). Climate change in the media: Reporting risk and uncertainty. London: I.B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Papa, M. J., Singhal, A., Law, S., Pant, S., Sood, S., Rogers, E. M., & Shefner-Rogers, C. L. (2000). Entertainment-education and social change: An analysis of parasocial interaction, social learning, collective efficacy, and paradoxical communication. Journal of Communication, 50(4), 31–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, P. H. (1983). The participatory consequences of internal and external political efficacy: A research note. The Western Political Quarterly, 36(3), 400–409. doi: 10.1177/106591298303600306
   Google Scholar
• Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2003). Exploring the dimensionality of trust in risk regulation. Risk Analysis, 23(5), 961–972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priest, S. H. (2001). A grain of truth: The media, the public, and biotechnology. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Rural women go the extra mile in walk for water. (2014, August 24). Hindustan Times. Retrieved from http://www.hindustantimes.com/india/rural-women-go-the-extra-mile-in-walk-for-water/story-KGcr9rkU62Qiw66cSifnVN.html
   Google Scholar
• Schewe, J., Heinke, J., Gerten, D., Haddeland, I., Arnell, N. W., Clark, D. B., … Kabat, P. (2014). Multimodel assessment of water scarcity under climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(9), 3245–3250. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1222460110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seligson, M. A. (1980). Trust, efficacy and modes of political participation: A study of Costa Rican peasants. British Journal of Political Science, 10(01), 75–98. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400002015
   Google Scholar
• Semenza, J. C., Hall, D. E., Wilson, D. J., Bontempo, B. D., Sailor, D. J., & George, L. A. (2008). Public perception of climate change: Voluntary mitigation and barriers to behavior change. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(5), 479–487. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.08.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singhal, A., & Rogers, E. M. (1999). Entertainment-education: A communication strategy for social change. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. (1993). Perceived risk, trust, and democracy. Risk Analysis, 13(6), 675–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, S. N., & Wlezien, C. (2010). Degrees of democracy: Politics, public opinion, and policy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thaker, J., Maibach, E., Leiserowitz, A., Zhao, X., & Howe, P. (2015). The role of collective efficacy in climate change adaptation in India. Weather, Climate, and Society, 8(1), 21–34. doi: 10.1175/WCAS-D-14-00037.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Linden, S. L., Leiserowitz, A. A., Feinberg, G. D., & Maibach, E. W. (2015). The scientific consensus on climate change as a gateway belief: Experimental evidence. PloS One, 10(2), e0118489. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118489
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Linden, S., Maibach, E., & Leiserowitz, A. (2015). Improving public engagement with climate change: Five “best practice” insights from psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(6), 758–763. doi: 10.1177/1745691615598516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504–535. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velasquez, A., & LaRose, R. (2015). Youth collective activism through social media: The role of collective efficacy. New Media & Society, 17(6), 899–918. doi: 10.1177/1461444813518391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vraga, E. (2017). Political participation and voting relevant to climate change. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science. Retrieved from http://climatescience.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228620-e-339
   Google Scholar
• Watts, M. W. (1973). Efficacy, trust, and commitment to the political process. Social Science Quarterly, 54(3), 623–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte, K., & Allen, M. (2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education & Behavior: The Official Publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 27(5), 591–615. doi: 10.1177/109019810002700506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeich, S., & Levine, R. (1994). Political efficacy: Enhancing the construct and its relationship to mobilization of people. Journal of Community Psychology, 22(3), 259–271. doi: 10.1002/1520-6629(199407)22:3<259::AID-JCOP2290220306>3.0.CO;2-H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahran, S., Brody, S. D., Grover, H., & Vedlitz, A. (2006). Climate change vulnerability and policy support. Society and Natural Resources, 19(9), 771–789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar