Internet Memes, Media Frames, and the Conflicting Logics of Climate Change Discourse

References

• Adger, W. N., Dessai, S., Goulden, M., Hulme, M., Lorenzoni, I., Nelson, D. R., … Wreford, A. (2009). Are there social limits to adaptation on climate change? Climatic Change, 93, 335–354. doi: 10.1007/s10584-008-9520-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, A. (2009). Media, politics and climate change: Towards a new research agenda. Sociology Compass, 3(2), 166–182. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00188.x
   Google Scholar
• Androutsopoulos, J. (2009). Language and the three spheres of hip hop. In H. S. Alim, A. Ibrahim, & A. Pennycook (Eds.), Global linguistic flows: Hip hop cultures, youth identities, and the politics of language (pp. 43–62). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Born, D. (2018). Bearing witness? Polar bears as icons for climate change communication in National Geographic. Environmental Communication, 1–15. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2018.1435557
   Google Scholar
• Boykoff, M. T., & Goodman, M. K. (2009). Conspicuous redemption? Reflections on the promises and perils of the ‘Celebritization’ of climate change. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 40, 395–406. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carragee, K. M., & Roefs, W. (2004). The neglect of power in recent framing research. Journal of Communication, 54(2), 214–233. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02625.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, 57, 99–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00331.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, J., Nuccitelli, D., Green, S. A., Richardson, M., Winkler, B., Painting, R., … Skuce, A. (2013). Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environmental Research Letters, 8, 1–7. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dancygier, B., & Vandelanotte, L. (2017). Internet memes as multimodal constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 28(3), 565–598. doi: 10.1515/cog-2017-0074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C. B., Glantz, M., & Novak, D. R. (2016). “You can’t run your SUV on cute: Let’s Go!”: Internet memes as delegitimizing discourse. Environmental Communication, 10(1), 62–83. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2014.991411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison, P. (2012). The language of internet memes. In M. Mandiberg (Ed.), The social media reader (pp. 120–136). New York, NY: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Vreese, C. H. (2005). News framing: Theory and typology. Information Design Journal+Document Design, 13(1), 51–62. doi: 10.1075/idjdd.13.1.06vre
   Google Scholar
• Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1–37. doi: 10.1086/229213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, A. J. (2011). Talking past each other? Cultural framing of skeptical and convinced logics in the climate change debate. Organization & Environment, 24(1), 3–33. doi: 10.1177/1086026611404336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntington, H. (2016). Pepper spray cop and the American dream: Using synecdoche and metaphor to unlock internet memes’ visual political rhetoric. Communication Studies, 67(1), 77–93. doi: 10.1080/10510974.2015.1087414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacques, P. J., Dunlap, R. E., & Freeman, M. (2008). The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism. Environmental Politics, 17(3), 349–385. doi: 10.1080/09644010802055576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, S. M., & Hart, P. S. (2015). Polarized frames on “climate change” and “global warming” across countries and states: Evidence from Twitter big data. Global Environmental Change, 32, 11–17. doi:10.106/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.010. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kligler-Vilenchik, N., & Thorson, K. (2016). Good citizenship as a frame contest: Kony2012, memes, and critiques of the networked citizen. New Media & Society, 18(9), 1993–2011. doi: 10.1177/1461444815575311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, L. C.-S. (2016). Convergence in election campaigns: The frame contest between Facebook and mass media. Convergence: The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies, 22(2), 199–214. doi: 10.1177/1354856514545706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luther, C. A., & Xiang, Z. (2005). Within the boundaries of politics: News framing of SARS in China and the United States. Journal of Mass Communication Quarterly, 82, 857–872. doi: 10.1177/107769900508200407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner, R. M. (2013). Pop polyvocality: Internet memes, public participation, and the Occupy Wall Street movement. International Journal of Communication, 7, 2357–2390. Retrieved from http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1949/1015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montieri, V. (forthcoming). Nike Y U no do it yourself: Decrowning brands by means of memes. In A. S. Ross, & D. J. Rivers (Eds.), Discourses of (de)legitimization: Participatory culture in digital contexts. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, T. A., Rabinovich, A., Marshall, D., & Bretschneider, P. (2011). The future that may (or may not) come: How framing changes responses to uncertainty in climate change communications. Global Environmental Change, 21, 103–109. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, M. C. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51(2), 12–23. doi: 10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12-23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissenbaum, A., & Shifman, L. (2017). Internet memes as contested capital: The case of 4chan’s /b/ board. New Media & Society, 19(4), 483–501. doi: 10.1177/1461444815609313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poortinga, W., Spence, A., Whitmarsh, L., Capstick, S., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2011). Uncertain climate: An investigation into public scepticism about anthropogenic climate change. Global Environmental Change, 21(3), 1015–1024. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, V., Nir, L., & Cappella, J. N. (2005). Framing public discussion of gay civil unions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69(2), 179–212. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfi014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, J. (2015). Hero on Twitter, traitor on news: How social media and legacy news frame Snowden. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 20(2), 166–184. doi: 10.1177/1940161214566709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, A. S., & Rivers, D. J. (2017a). Digital cultures of political participation: Internet memes and the discursive delegitimization of the 2016 U.S. Presidential candidates. Discourse, Context and Media, 16, 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.dcm.2017.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, A. S., & Rivers, D. J. (2017b). Internet memes as polyvocal political participation. In D. Schill, & J. A. Hendricks (Eds.), The Presidency and social media: Discourse, disruption and digital democracy in the 2016 Presidential election (pp. 285–308). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schäfer, M. S., & Schlichting, I. (2014). Media representations of climate change: A meta-analysis of the research field. Environmental Communication, 8(2), 142–160. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2014.914050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103–122. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shifman, L. (2013). Memes in a digital world: Reconciling with a conceptual troublemaker. Journal of Computer-Mediated Behavior, 18, 362–377. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, C. (2016, November 16). This analysis shows how viral fake election news stories outperformed real news on Facebook. Buzzfeed. Retrieved from https://www.buzzfeed.com/craigsilverman/viral-fake-election-news-outperformed-real-news-on-facebook?utm_term=.xbOQ8Nqb2#.vcMEjRoZO
   Google Scholar
• Trenberth, K. E. (2012). Framing the way to relate climate extremes to climate change. Climatic Change, 115(2), 283–290. doi: 10.1007/s10584-012-0441-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, T. (2004). Ten reasons why linguists should pay attention to visual communication. In P. LeVine & R. Scollon (Eds.), Discourse and technology: Multimodal discourse analysis (pp. 7–19). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vliegenthart, R., & van Zoonen, L. (2011). Power to the frame: Bringing sociology back to frame analysis. European Journal of Communication, 26(2), 101–115. doi: 10.1177/0267323111404838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2009). Methods of critical discourse analysis. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, J. C. (2017, February 2). UC Berkeley cancels ‘alt-right’ speaker Milo Yiannopoulos as thousands protest. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/feb/01/milo-yiannopoulos-uc-berkeley-event-cancelled
   Google Scholar
• Wu, S., Hofman, J. M., Mason, W. A., & Watts, D. J. (2011). Who says what to whom on twitter. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web (pp. 705–714). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar