Popular Philanthrocapitalism? The Potential and Pitfalls of Online Empowerment in “Free” Nature 2.0 Initiatives

References

• Aarseth, E. (2012). Playing research: Methodological approaches to game analysis. In B. Herzogenrath (Ed.), Travels in intermedia[lity]: ReBlurring the boundaries (pp. 175–191). Dartmouth: Dartmouth College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Angulo, N. (2013). Facebook game ‘Safari challenge’ combines gameplay with giving. FoxNews.Com.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, J. (2018, March 23). The Facebook scandal isn’t just about privacy. Your economic future is on the line. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/mar/23/facebook-scandal-privacy-data-equality-wealth
   Google Scholar
• Barkemeyer, R., Comyns, B., Figge, F., & Napolitano, G. (2014). CEO statements in sustainability reports: Substantive information or background noise? Accounting Forum, 38, 241–257. doi: 10.1016/j.accfor.2014.07.002
   Google Scholar
• Barkemeyer, R., Preuss, L., & Lee, L. (2015). On the effectiveness of private transnational governance regimes—evaluating corporate sustainability reporting according to the global reporting initiative. Journal of World Business, 50, 312–325. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2014.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. Newhaven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Binyamin, T. (2015). New platform Greenvolved aims to involve customers with CSR activities but will business bite? Retrieved from http://www.csrwire.com/blog/posts/1196-new-platform-greenvolved-aims-to-involve-customers-with-csr-activities-but-will-business-bite
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, M., & Green, M. (2008). Philanthrocapitalism: How giving can save the world. London: A & C Black.
   Google Scholar
• Boellstorff, T., Nardi, B., Pearce, C., & Taylor, T. (2012). Ethnography and virtual worlds: A handbook of method. Oxford: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bosworth, D. (2011). The cultural contradictions of philanthrocapitalism. Society, 48, 382–388. doi: 10.1007/s12115-011-9466-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budabin, A., & Pruce, J. (2018). The elite politics of media advocacy in human rights. New Political Science, 40(4), 744–762. doi: 10.1080/07393148.2018.1528062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büscher, B. (2013). Nature 2.0. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 44, 1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büscher, B. (2016). Nature 2.0: Exploring and theorizing the links between new media and nature conservation. New Media & Society, 18(5), 726–743. doi: 10.1177/1461444814545841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büscher, B. (2017). Conservation and development 2.0: Intensifications and disjunctures in the politics of online ‘do-good’ platforms. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 79, 163–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büscher, B., & Igoe, J. (2013). ‘Prosuming’conservation? Web 2.0, nature and the intensification of value-producing labour in late capitalism. Journal of Consumer Culture, 13(3), 283–305. doi: 10.1177/1469540513482691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büscher, B., Koot, S., & Nelson, I. (2017). Introduction. Nature 2.0: New media, online activism and the cyberpolitics of environmental conservation. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 79, 111–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the internet age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, E. G. (2010). Ethnographic approaches to digital media. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39, 487–505. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, M., & Bellamy Foster, J. (1998). Virtual capitalism: Monopoly capital, marketing and the information highway. In R. W. McChesney, E. M. Wood, & J. Bellamy Foster (Eds.), Capitalism and the information age: The political economy of the global communication revolution (pp. 51–67). New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, J. (2005). Communicative capitalism: Circulation and the foreclosure of politics. Cultural Politics: an International Journal, 1(1), 51–74. doi: 10.2752/174321905778054845
   Google Scholar
• Dempsey, J. (2016). Enterprising nature: Economics, markets, and finance in global biodiversity politics. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Desert River Games. (2015). About. Retrieved from http://desertrivergames.com/about-drg.html
   Google Scholar
• Di Mento, M., & Lindsay, D. (2018, February 6). America’s superrich made near-record contributions to charity in 2017. The Chronicles of Philanthropy. Retrieved from https://www.philanthropy.com/article/America-s-Superrich-Made/242446
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, M. (2008). Just another emperor? The myths and realities of philanthrocapitalism. Dēmos: A Network for Ideas & Action and The Young Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, C. S., & Bochner, A. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 733–768). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, N. (2015). ‘Conscience capitalism’ and the neoliberalisation of the non-profit sector. New Political Economy, 20(2), 254–272. doi: 10.1080/13563467.2014.923823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R. (2017). Gaming conservation: Nature 2.0 confronts nature-deficit disorder. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 79, 153–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. (2008). Internet and society: Social theory in the information age. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. (2009). Information and communication technologies and society: A contribution to the critique of the political economy of the internet. European Journal of Communication, 24(1), 69–87. doi: 10.1177/0267323108098947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. (2013). Digital prosumption labour on social media in the context of the capitalist regime of time. Time & Society, 23(1), 97–123. doi: 10.1177/0961463X13502117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. (2014). Social media and the public sphere. TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 12(1), 57–101. doi: 10.31269/triplec.v12i1.552
   Google Scholar
• Gerlitz, C., & Helmond, A. (2013). The like economy: Social buttons and the data-intensive web. New Media & Society, 15(8), 1348–1365. doi: 10.1177/1461444812472322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, M., Litter, J., Brockington, D., & Boykoff, M. (2016). Spectacular environmentalism: Media, knowledge and the framing of ecological politics. Environmental Communication, 10(6), 677–688. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2016.1219489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenvolved. (2013). Greenvolved. Retrieved from www.greenvolved.com
   Google Scholar
• Greenvolved. (2019a). A change of mindset. Retrieved from http://greenvolved.tumblr.com/post/51542699440/a-change-of-mindset
   Google Scholar
• Greenvolved. (2019b). Our world has a serious problem. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmqaU2xMVAs
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R. (2018). Breaking down barriers of culture and geography? Caring-at-a-distance through web 2.0. New Political Science, 40(4), 727–743. doi: 10.1080/07393148.2018.1528534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R., & Silver, J. (2017). From selfie to #sealfie: Nature 2.0 and the digital cultural politics of an internationally contested resource. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 79, 114–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hine, C. (2008). Virtual ethnography: Modes, varieties, affordances. In N. Fielding, R. M. Lee, & G. Blank (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of online research methods (pp. 257–270). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, G. (2012). Biodiversity for billionaires: Capitalism, conservation and the role of philanthropy in saving/selling nature. Development and Change, 43(1), 185–203. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01749.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapoor, I. (2012). Celebrity humanitarianism: The ideology of global charity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Koot, S. (2016). Perpetuating power through autoethnography: My unawareness of research and memories of paternalism among the indigenous Hai//om in Namibia. Critical Arts, 30(6), 840–854. doi: 10.1080/02560046.2016.1263217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, P., & Leyshon, A. (2016). Platform capitalism: The intermediation and capitalisation of digital economic circulation. Finance and Society, 3(1), 11–31. doi: 10.2218/finsoc.v3i1.1936
   Google Scholar
• Leadbeater, C. (2008). We-think: Mass innovation, not mass production. London: Profile books.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, A. (2002). Convergence or convenience? International conservation NGOs and development assistance in Tanzania. World Development, 30(6), 1043–1055. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00022-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohr, S. (2015). IBM and Facebook in marketing partnership. New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• Lovink, G., & Rossiter, N. (2009). The digital given: 10 web 2.0 theses. The Fibreculture Journal, 14. Retrieved from http://journal.fibreculture.org/issue14/issue14_ippolita_et_al_print.html
   Google Scholar
• McChesney, R. W. (1998). The political economy of global communication. In R. W. McChesney, J. Bellamy Foster, & E. M. Wood (Eds.), Capitalism and the information age: The political economy of the global communication revolution (pp. 1–26). New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGonigal, J. (2012). Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. London: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Mendoza, M., Fletcher, R., Holmes, G., & Ogden, L. (2017). The Patagonian imaginary: Natural resources and global capitalism at the far end of the world. Journal of Latin American Geography, 16(2), 93–116. doi: 10.1353/lag.2017.0023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morozov, E. (2011). The net delusion: How not to liberate the world. New York, NY: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Morozov, E. (2013). To save everything click here. New York, NY: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raddon, M.-B. (2008). Neoliberal legacies: Planned giving and the new philanthropy. Studies in Political Economy, 81, 27–48. doi: 10.1080/19187033.2008.11675072
   Google Scholar
• Ramutsindela, M., Spierenburg, M., & Wels, H. (2011). Sponsoring nature: Environmental philanthropy for conservation. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Richey, L. A. (2018). Conceptualizing “everyday humanitarianism”: Ethics, affects, and practices of contemporary global helping. New Political Science, 40(4), 625–639. doi: 10.1080/07393148.2018.1528538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritzer, G., & Jurgenson, N. (2010). Production, consumption, prosumption: The nature of capitalism in the age of the digital ‘prosumer’. Journal of Consumer Culture, 10(1), 13–36. doi: 10.1177/1469540509354673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, B. (2009). Beyond the ‘networked public sphere’: Politics, participation and technics in web 2.0. The Fibreculture Journal, 14. Retrieved from http://www.journal.fibreculture.org/issue14/issue14_roberts_print.html
   Google Scholar
• Sandbrook, C., Adams, W., & Monteferri, B. (2014). Digital games and biodiversity conservation. Conservation Letters, 8(2), 118–124. doi: 10.1111/conl.12113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. D. (2008). Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijck, J., & Nieborg, D. (2009). Wikinomics and its discontents: A critical analysis of web 2.0 business manifestos. New Media & Society, 11(5), 855–874. doi: 10.1177/1461444809105356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for the future at the new frontier of power. New York, NY: Profile Books.
   Google Scholar
• Zwick, D., Bonsu, S. K., & Darmody, A. (2008). Putting consumers to work: ‘Co-creation’ and new marketing govern-mentality. Journal of Consumer Culture, 8(2), 163–196. doi: 10.1177/1469540508090089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar