Powered by Immersion? Examining Effects of 360-Degree Photography on Knowledge Acquisition and Perceived Message Credibility of Climate Change News

References

• Ahn, S. J., Bostick, J., Ogle, E., Nowak, K. L., McGillicuddy, K. T., & Bailenson, J. N. (2016). Experiencing nature: Embodying animals in immersive virtual environments increases inclusion of nature in self and involvement with nature. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(6), 399–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn, S. J. G., Bailenson, J. N., & Park, D. (2014). Short-and long-term effects of embodied experiences in immersive virtual environments on environmental locus of control and behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 235–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boksem, M. A., Meijman, T. F., & Lorist, M. M. (2005). Effects of mental fatigue on attention: An ERP study. Cognitive Brain Research, 25(1), 107–116.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bucy, E. P. (2004). The interactivity paradox: Closer to the news but confused. In E. P. Bucy & J. E. Newhagen (Eds.), Media access: Social and psychological dimensions of new technology use (pp. 47–72). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, D. A., Corner, A., Webster, R., & Markowitz, E. M. (2016). Climate visuals: A mixed methods investigation of public perceptions of climate images in three countries. Global Environmental Change, 41, 172–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, M. P. (2006). Visual representations in science education: The influence of prior knowledge and cognitive load theory on instructional design principles. Science Education, 90(6), 1073–1091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Haan, Y., Kruikemeier, S., Lecheler, S., Smit, G., & van der Nat, R. (2017). When does an infographic say more than a thousand words? Audience evaluations of news visualizations. Journalism Studies. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2016.1267592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine-Wright, P. (2013). Think global, act local? The relevance of place attachments and place identities in a climate changed world. Global Environmental Change, 23(1), 61–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiFrancesco, A. D., & Young, N. (2011). Seeing climate change: The visual construction of global warming in Canadian national print media. Cultural Geographies, 18(4), 517–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurobarometer, S. (2009). Europeans’ attitudes towards climate change. (Special Eurobarometer No. 313). Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., Storksdieck, M., & Dierking, L. D. (2007). Investigating public science interest and understanding: Evidence for the importance of free-choice learning. Public Understanding of Science, 16(4), 455–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, L., & Hart, P. S. (2018). Is there any hope? How climate change news imagery and text influence audience emotions and support for climate mitigation policies. Risk Analysis, 38(3), 585–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R. (2016). The public and news about the environment. In J. Painter (Ed.), Something old, something new: Digital media and the coverage of climate change (pp. 24–36). Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
   Google Scholar
• Geise, S., & Baden, C. (2014). Putting the image back into the frame: Modeling the linkage between visual communication and frame-processing theory. Communication Theory, 25(1), 46–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P. M. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greussing, E., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2018). Simply bells and whistles? Cognitive effects of visual aesthetics in digital longforms. Digital Journalism. doi: 10.1080/21670811.2018.1488598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, A., & Machin, D. (2013). Researching visual environmental communication. Environmental Communication, 7(2), 151–168.
   Google Scholar
• Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E. (1998). How seductive details do their damage: A theory of cognitive interest in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 414–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidig, S., Müller, J., & Reichelt, M. (2015). Emotional design in multimedia learning: Differentiation on relevant design features and their effects on emotions and learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 81–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herring, J., VanDyke, M. S., Cummins, R. G., & Melton, F. (2017). Communicating local climate risks online through an interactive data visualization. Environmental Communication, 11(1), 90–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horning, M. A. (2017). Interacting with news: Exploring the effects of modality and perceived responsiveness and control on news source credibility and enjoyment among second screen viewers. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 273–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutsteiner, R. (2018, April 11). Golfstrom wird schwächer. ORF Online. Retrieved from https://science.orf.at/stories/2906395/
   Google Scholar
• Kiousis, S. (2006). Exploring the impact of modality on perceptions of credibility for online news stories. Journalism Studies, 7(2), 348–359.
   Google Scholar
• Kozma, R. (2003). The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 205–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, A. (1995). Defining audio/video redundancy from a limited-capacity information processing perspective. Communication Research, 22(1), 86–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, A. (2000). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication, 50(1), 46–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, A., Bolls, P., Potter, R. F., & Kawahara, K. (1999). The effects of production pacing and arousing content on the information processing of television messages. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43(4), 451–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, A., Bradley, S. D., Park, B., Shin, M., & Chung, Y. (2006). Parsing the resource pie: Using STRTs to measure attention to mediated messages. Media Psychology, 8(4), 369–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavie, T., & Tractinsky, N. (2004). Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 60(3), 269–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E. J., & Kim, Y. W. (2016). Effects of infographics on news elaboration, acquisition, and evaluation: Prior knowledge and issue involvement as moderators. New Media & Society, 18(8), 1579–1598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-García, X., Silva-Rodríguez, A., & Negreira-Rey, M. C. (2019). Laboratory journalism. In M. Túñez-López, V.-A. Martínez-Fernández, X. López-García, X. Rúas-Araújo, & F. Campos-Freire (Eds.), Communication: Innovation & quality (pp. 147–162). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S., & Whitmarsh, L. (2007). Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change, 17(3-4), 445–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (1985). How to analyze science prose. In B. K. Britton, & J. B. Black (Eds.), Understanding expository text: A theoretical and practical handbook for analyzing explanatory text (pp. 305–313). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Metag, J., Schäfer, M. S., Füchslin, T., Barsuhn, T., & Kleinen-von Königslöw, K. (2016). Perceptions of climate change imagery: Evoked salience and self-efficacy in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria. Science Communication, 38(2), 197–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Medders, R. B. (2010). Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 413–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, H., & Cairns, P. (Eds.). (2016). Why engagement matters: Cross-disciplinary perspectives of user engagement in digital media. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Oh, J., Bellur, S., & Sundar, S. S. (2018). Clicking, assessing, immersing, and sharing: An empirical model of user engagement with interactive media. Communication Research, 45(5), 737–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, S. J. (2013). Image matters: Climate change imagery in US, UK and Australian newspapers. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 49, 10–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, S. J. (2017). Engaging with climate change imagery. In Oxford encyclopedia of climate change communication. Oxford, England: Oxford Research Encyclopedias. doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.371
   Google Scholar
• Oyibo, K., Adaji, I., Orji, R., & Vassileva, J. (2018, July). What drives the perceived credibility of mobile websites: Classical or expressive aesthetics? In International conference on human-computer interaction (pp. 576–594). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Painter, J. (2016). New players and the search to be different. In J. Painter (Ed.), Something old, something new: Digital media and the coverage of climate change (pp. 8–23). Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Communication and persuasion (pp. 1–24). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, T. E., Boomgaarden, H. G., De Swert, K., & de Vreese, C. H. (2018). Framing fast and slow: A dual processing account of multimodal framing effects. Media Psychology. doi: 10.1080/15213269.2018.1476891
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preisendörfer, P. (1999). Konzeptualisierung und Messung des Umweltbewußtseins. In Umwelteinstellungen und Umweltverhalten in Deutschland (pp. 42–55). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Rebich-Hespanha, S., Rice, R. E., Montello, D. R., Retzloff, S., Tien, S., & Hespanha, J. P. (2015). Image themes and frames in US print news stories about climate change. Environmental Communication, 9(4), 491–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, C. A., & Wiley, J. (2006). An examination of the seductive details effect in terms of working memory capacity. Memory & Cognition, 34(2), 344–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweiger, W. (1999). Medienglaubwürdigkeit – Nutzungserfahrung oder Medienimage? Eine Befragung zur Glaubwürdigkeit des World Wide Web im Vergleich mit anderen Medien. In P. Rössler, & W. Wirth (Eds.), Glaubwürdigkeit im Internet: Fragestellungen, Modelle, empirische Befunde (pp. 89–110). München: Reinhard Fischer.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D. (2003). A note on presence terminology. Presence Connect, 3(3), 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D. (2002). Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory, 12(2), 173–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sojka, J. Z., & Giese, J. L. (2006). Communicating through pictures and words: Understanding the role of affect and cognition in processing visual and verbal information. Psychology and Marketing, 23(12), 995–1014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 73–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S. (2008). The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In M. Metzger & A. Flanagin (Eds.), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 73–100). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., Bellur, S., Oh, J., Xu, Q., & Jia, H. (2014). User experience of on-screen interaction techniques: An experimental investigation of clicking, sliding, zooming, hovering, dragging, and flipping. Human–Computer Interaction, 29(2), 109–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., Jia, H., Waddell, T. F., & Huang, Y. (2015). Toward a theory of interactive media effects (TIME). In S. S. Sundar (Ed.), The handbook of the psychology of communication technology (pp. 47–86). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., Kang, J., & Oprean, D. (2017). Being there in the midst of the story: How immersive journalism affects our perceptions and cognitions. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(11), 672–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taddicken, M. (2013). Climate change from the user’s perspective. Journal of Media Psychology, 25, 39–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran, H. L. (2015). More or less? Multimedia effects on perceptions of news websites. Electronic News, 9(1), 51–67.
   Google Scholar
• Van Damme, K., All, A., De Marez, L., & Van Leuven, S. (2018). 360° video journalism: Experimental study on the effect of immersion on news experience and distant suffering. Journalism Studies. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2018.1561208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S., Corner, A., Chapman, D., & Markowitz, E. (2018). Public engagement with climate imagery in a changing digital landscape. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 9(2), e509–e527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wathen, C. N., & Burkell, J. (2002). Believe it or not: Factors influencing credibility on the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(2), 134–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Q., & Sundar, S. S. (2016). Interactivity and memory: Information processing of interactive versus non-interactive content. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 620–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar