Committed Participation or Flashes of Action? Mobilizing Public Attention to Climate on Twitter, 2011–2015

References

• Andrews, K. T., & Caren, N. (2010). Making the news: Movement organizations, media attention, and the public agenda. American Ociological Review, 75(6), 841–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastos, M. T., & Mercea, D. (2016). Serial activists: Political Twitter beyond influentials and the twittertariat. New Media & Society, 18(10), 2359–2378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information. Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., Segerberg, A., & Walker, S. (2014). Organization in the crowd: Peer production in large-scale networked protests. Information, Communication & Society, 17(2), 232–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brulle, R. J., Carmichael, J., & Jenkins, J. C. (2012). Shifting public opinion on climate change: An empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the US, 2002–2010. Climatic Change, 114(2), 169–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. E. (2011). The use of Twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics. In Proceedings of the 6th European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) General Conference 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. (2011). The political information cycle in a hybrid news system: The British prime minister and the “Bullygate” affair. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16(1), 3–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, J. R. (2010). Beyond frames: Recovering the strategic in climate communication. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 122–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crimson Hexagon: Partner with us. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.crimsonhexagon.com/partnerships /.
   Google Scholar
• Egan, P. J., & Mullin, M. (2017). Climate change: US public opinion. Annual Review of Political Science, 20, 209–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freelon, D., & Karpf, D. (2015). Of big birds and bayonets: Hybrid Twitter interactivity in the 2012 presidential debates. Information, Communication & Society, 18(4), 390–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freelon, D., McIlwain, C., & Clark, M. (2018). Quantifying the power and consequences of social media protest. New Media & Society, 20(3), 990–1011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A., & Wolfsfeld, G. (1993). Movements and media as interacting systems. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 528(1), 114–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1978). Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 83(6), 1420–1443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladwell, M. (2010, October 4). Small change: Why the revolution will not be tweeted, New Yorker. Retrieved from http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/10/04/101004fa_fact_gladwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hemsley, J., & Mason, R. M. (2013). Knowledge and knowledge management in the social media age. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 23(1-2), 138–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hestres, L. E. (2014). Preaching to the choir: Internet-mediated advocacy, issue public mobilization, and climate change. New Media & Society, 16(2), 323–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hestres, L. E. (2015). Climate change advocacy online: Theories of change, target audiences, and online strategy. Environmental Politics, 24(2), 193–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmberg, K., & Hellsten, I. (2016). Twitter campaigns around the fifth IPCC report: Campaign spreading, shared hashtags, and separate communities. SAGE Open, 6(3), 1–7. doi: 10.1177/2158244016659117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, S. M., & Hart, P. S. (2015). Polarized frames on “climate change” and “global warming” across countries and states: Evidence from Twitter big data. Global Environmental Change, 32, 11–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpf, D. (2012). The MoveOn effect: The unexpected transformation of American political advocacy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. M. (2009). Issue publics in the new information environment: Selectivity, domain specificity, and extremity. Communication Research, 36(2), 254–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirilenko, A. P., & Stepchenkova, S. O. (2014). Public microblogging on climate change: One year of Twitter worldwide. Global Environmental Change, 26, 171–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopmans, R., & Olzak, S. (2004). Discursive opportunities and the Evolution of Right-wing Violence in Germany 1. American Journal of Sociology, 110(1), 198–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leas, E. C., Althouse, B. M., Dredze, M., Obradovich, N., Fowler, J. H., Noar, S. M., … Ayers, J. W. (2016). Big data sensors of organic advocacy: The case of Leonardo DiCaprio and climate change. PloS one, 11(8), e0159885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Feinberg, G., & Howe, P. (2013). Global warming’s Six Americas, September 2012. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication.
   Google Scholar
• Lotan, G., Graeff, E., Ananny, M., Gaffney, D., & Pearce, I. (2011). The Arab Spring the revolutions were tweeted: Information flows during the 2011 Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions. International Journal of Communication, 5, 31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovejoy, K., & Saxton, G. D. (2012). Information, community, and action: How nonprofit organizations use social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 337–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, P. (2015). Why are people skeptical about climate change? Some insights from blog comments. Environmental Communication, 9(2), 153–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercea, D., & Bastos, M. T. (2016). Being a serial transnational activist. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(2), 140–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morozov, E. (2009, May 19). The brave new world of slacktivism. Foreign Policy. Retrieved from http://foreignpolicy.com/2009/05/19/the-brave-new-world-of-slacktivism/.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, T. P. (2017). Tracking the release of IPCC AR5 on Twitter: Users, comments, and sources following the release of the working group I summary for policymakers. Public Understanding of Science, 26(7), 815–825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Number of monthly active Twitter users worldwide from 1st quarter 2010 to 4th quarter 2017 (in millions). (2018, April 2). Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/282087/number-of-monthly-active-twitter-users/.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, S., Williams, H. T., Kurz, T., Wiersma, B., & Boykoff, M. (2015). Dominant frames in legacy and social media coverage of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report. Nature Climate Change, 5(4), 380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, W., Holmberg, K., Hellsten, I., & Nerlich, B. (2014). Climate change on Twitter: Topics, communities and conversations about the 2013 IPCC working group 1 report. PloS ONE, 9(4), e94785. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, M. A., & Park, H. W. (2018). Climate change and youtube: deliberation potential in post-video discussions. Environmental Communication, 12(1), 115–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stier, S., Schünemann, W. J., & Steiger, S. (2018). Of activists and gatekeepers: Temporal and structural properties of policy networks on Twitter. New Media & Society, 20(5), 1910–1930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorson, K., Edgerly, S., Kligler-Vilenchik, N., Xu, Y., & Wang, L. (2016). Seeking visibility in a big tent: digital communication and the People’s climate March. International Journal of Communication, 10, 4784–4806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrall, A. T., Stecula, D., & Sweet, D. (2014). May we have your attention please? Human-rights NGOs and the problem of global communication. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 19(2), 135–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (1999). From interactions to outcomes in social movements. In M. Giugni, D. McAdam, & C. Tilly (Eds.), How social movements matter (pp. 253–270). Minneapolis, MN: U of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Z. (2013). “Not this one” social movements, the attention economy, and microcelebrity networked activism. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7), 848–870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wouters, R., & Walgrave, S. (2017). What makes protest powerful? Reintroducing and elaborating Charles Tilly’s WUNC concept. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2909740 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2909740.
   Google Scholar