Explaining “Carbon” in Community Sequestration Projects: a Key Element in the Creation of Local Carbon Knowledges

References

• AIPP & IWGIA. (2012). The forest is life: Knowledge for communities. Chiang Mai: Asia Indigenous Peoples Pact (AIPP) and International Working Group for Indigenous Affairs (IWGIA).
   Google Scholar
• Asiyanbi, A. P. (2015). Mind the gap: Global truths, local complexities in emergent green initiatives. In R. L. Bryant (Ed.), The international handbook of political ecology (pp. 274–287). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Atela, J. (2012). The politics of agricultural carbon finance: The case of the Kenya agricultural carbon project (working paper No. 49). Brighton: STEPS Centre, University of Sussex.
   Google Scholar
• Bayrak, M., & Marafa, L. (2016). Ten years of REDD+: A critical review of the impact of REDD+ on forest-dependent communities. Sustainability, 8(7), 620. doi: 10.3390/su8070620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohensky, E., & Maru, Y. (2011). Indigenous knowledge, science, and resilience: What have we learned from a decade of international literature on “integration”? Ecology and Society, 16, 4. doi: 10.5751/ES-04342-160406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blom, B., Sunderland, T., & Murdiyarso, D. (2010). Getting REDD to work locally: Lessons learned from integrated conservation and development projects. Environmental Science & Policy, 13(2), 164–172. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boer, H. (2019). Deliberative engagement and REDD+ in Indonesia. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 104, 170–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, J. (2005). The use of indigenous knowledge in development: Problems and challenges. Progress in Development Studies, 5(2), 99–114. doi: 10.1191/1464993405ps105oa
   Google Scholar
• Bumpus, A. G. (2011). The matter of carbon: Understanding the materiality of tCO2e in carbon offsets. Antipode, 43(3), 612–638. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00879.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chase, S. E. (2005). Narrative inquiry: Multiple lenses, approaches, voices. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 651–680). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cromberg, M., Duchelle, A., & Rocha, I. (2014). Local participation in REDD+: lessons from the Eastern Brazilian Amazon. Forests, 5(4), 579–598. doi: 10.3390/f5040579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer, J., Stringer, L. C., Dougill, A. J., Leventon, J., Nshimbi, M., Chama, F., … Syampungani, S. (2014). Assessing participatory practices in community-based natural resource management: Experiences in community engagement from Southern Africa. Journal of Environmental Management, 137, 137–145. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.11.057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, K., Triraganon, R., Silori, C., & Stephenson, J. (2012). Putting free, prior, and informed consent into practice in REDD+ initiatives. Bangkok: RECOFTC, IGES and Norad.
   Google Scholar
• Green, L. J. (2008). ‘Indigenous knowledge’ and ‘science’: Reframing the debate on knowledge diversity. Archaeologies, 4(1), 144–163. doi: 10.1007/s11759-008-9057-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, M. J., Turner, M. D., & Daly, M. (2018). A critical political ecology of human dimensions of climate change: Epistemology, ontology, and ethics. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 9(4), e526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., Lövbrand, E., Turnhout, E., & Vijge, M. J. (2012). In pursuit of carbon accountability: The politics of REDD+ measuring, reporting and verification systems. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4(6), 726–731. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, R., Nelson, A., & Kiessling, S. (2012). Climate change and community based REDD+ education manual. Suva, Fiji: Live and Learn Environmental Education.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, R. J., Tallontire, A., Stringer, L., & Marchant, R. (2015). Unraveling the Notion of “fair carbon”: Key challenges for standards development. World Development, 70, 343–356. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, T., Collen, W., & Nicholas, K. A. (2013). Evaluating safeguards in a conservation incentive program: Participation, consent, and benefit sharing in indigenous communities of the Ecuadorian Amazon. Ecology and Society, 18(4), 1. doi: 10.5751/ES-05733-180401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klenk, N., Fiume, A., Meehan, K., & Gibbes, C. (2017). Local knowledge in climate adaptation research: Moving knowledge frameworks from extraction to co-production. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 8(5), e475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrazábal, A., McCall, M. K., Mwampamba, T. H., & Skutsch, M. (2012). The role of community carbon monitoring for REDD+: A review of experiences. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4(6), 707–716. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawlor, K., & Huberman, D. (2009). Reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD) and human rights. In J. Campese, T. Sunderland, T. Greiber, & G. Oviedo (Eds.), Rights-based approaches: Exploring issues and opportunities for conservation (pp. 268–286). Bogor: IUCN and CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, M., & Mearns, R. (1996). The lie of the land: Challenging received wisdom on the African environment. London: James Currey/International African Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, M., & Scoones, I. (2015). Political ecologies of carbon in Africa. In M. Leach, & I. Scoones (Eds.), Carbon conflicts and forest landscapes in Africa (pp. 21–62). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leggett, M., & Lovell, H. (2012). Community perceptions of REDD+: A case study from Papua New Guinea. Climate Policy, 12(1), 115–134. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2011.579317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. (2017). Just conservation: Biodiversity, wellbeing and sustainability. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, A., Coolsaet, B., Corbera, E., Dawson, N. M., Fraser, J. A., Lehmann, I., & Rodriguez, I. (2016). Justice and conservation: The need to incorporate recognition. Biological Conservation, 197, 254–261. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.03.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A., McGuire, S., & Sullivan, S. (2013). Global environmental justice and biodiversity conservation. The Geographical Journal, 179(2), 122–131. doi: 10.1111/geoj.12018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathur, V. N., Afionis, S., Paavola, J., Dougill, A. J., & Stringer, L. C. (2014). Experiences of host communities with carbon market projects: Towards multi-level climate justice. Climate Policy, 14(1), 42–62. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2013.861728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mbeche, R. (2017). Climbing the ladder of participation: Symbolic or substantive representation in preparing Uganda for REDD+? Conservation and Society, 15(4), 426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, C. L., Coad, L., Helfgott, A., & Schroeder, H. (2012). Operationalizing social safeguards in REDD+: actors, interests and ideas. Environmental Science & Policy, 21, 63–72. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, M., Mahanty, S., & Schreckenberg, K. (2013). Examining equity: A multidimensional framework for assessing equity in payments for ecosystem services. Environmental Science and Policy, 33, 416–427. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElwee, P. (2017). Doing REDD+ work in Vietnam: Will the new carbon focus bring equity to forest management? In S. Paladino, & S. J. Fiske (Eds.), The carbon fix: Forest carbon, social justice, and environmental governance (pp. 184–200). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, A., Weaver, S., Challies, E., Howson, P., Astuti, R., & Haalboom, B. (2014). Practical critique: Bridging the gap between critical and practice-oriented REDD+ research communities. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 55(3), 277–291. doi: 10.1111/apv.12064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meiser, A. (2017). Alternative models of knowledge as a critique of epistemic power structures—introduction. Sociologus; Zeitschrift Fur Empirische Soziologie, Sozialpsychologische Und Ethnologische Forschung. A Journal for Empirical Sociology, Social Psychology, and Ethnic Research, 67(1), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nel, A. (2015). Assembling value in carbon forestry: Practices of assemblage, overflows and counter-performativities in Ugandan carbon forestry (working paper No. 10). Manchester: Leverhulme Centre for the Study of Value, The University of Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, Q. T., Luong, T. T., Nguyen, T. H. V., & K’Tip (2010). Evaluation and verification of the free, prior and informed consent process under the UN-REDD programme in Lam Dong Province, Vietnam. Bangkok: RECOFTC.
   Google Scholar
• Pasgaard, M., Sun, Z., Müller, D., & Mertz, O. (2016). Challenges and opportunities for REDD+: A reality check from perspectives of effectiveness, efficiency and equity. Environmental Science & Policy, 63, 161–169. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.05.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, M., & Panfil, S. N. (2010). Manual for social impact assessment of land-based carbon projects. Version 1. Washington, DC: Forest Trends, Climate, Community & Biodiversity Alliance, Rainforest Alliance and Fauna & Flora International.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, R., Silori, C. S., Poudyal, B. H., & Paudel, N. S. (2014). Grassroots capacity development for REDD+: Approaches and key lessons from Nepal (policy brief no. 31). Lalitpur: ForestAction Nepal.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro-Garza, E. (2013). Contesting the market-based nature of Mexico’s national payments for ecosystem services programs: Four sites of articulation and hybridization. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 46, 5–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samndong, R. A. (2018). The participation illusion: Questioning community participation in a REDD+ pilot project in the Democratic Republic of Congo. International Forestry Review, 20(3), 390–404. doi: 10.1505/146554818824063032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stringer, L. C., Dougill, A. J., Mkwambisi, D. D., Dyer, J. C., Kalaba, F. K., & Mngoli, M. (2012). Challenges and opportunities for carbon management in Malawi and Zambia. Carbon Management, 3(2), 159–173. doi: 10.4155/cmt.12.14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturgeon, J., Legrange, S., Leonard-Fabrice, O., & Crawhall, N. (2011). Gabon workshop report. In African indigenous peoples and REDD+ human rights, equity and forest carbon capture in climate mitigation (pp. 41–46). Cape Town: Indigenous Peoples of Africa Coordinating Committee (IPACC).
   Google Scholar
• Stephan, B. (2013). How to trade ‘not cutting down trees’. In C. Methmann, D. Rothe, & B. Stephan (Eds.), Interpretive approaches to global climate governance: (De)constructing the greenhouse (pp. 57–71). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, S., & León, M. C. (2010). Climate change & the role of forests—A community manual. Arlinton, VA: Conservation International.
   Google Scholar
• Suiseeya, K. R. M. (2017). Contesting justice in global forest governance: The promises and pitfalls of REDD + . Conservation and Society, 15(2), 189. doi: 10.4103/cs.cs_15_104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnhout, E., Gupta, A., Weatherley-Singh, J., Vijge, M. J., De Koning, J., Visseren-Hamakers, I. J., … Lederer, M. (2017). Envisioning REDD+ in a post-Paris era: Between evolving expectations and current practice. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 8(1), e425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twyman, C., Smith, T. A., & Arnall, A. (2015). What is carbon? Conceptualising carbon and capabilities in the context of community sequestration projects in the global south. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 6(6), 627–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNREDD. (2013). Guidelines on free, prior and informed consent. Geneva, Switzerland: UN-REDD Programme Secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• UN-REDD. (2017). REDD+ safeguards under the UFCCC, REDD+ Academy Learning Journal No. 8. Retrieved from https://unredd.net/documents/global-programme-191/redd-academy-3509/redd-academy-learning-journals/english/14977-redd-academy-learning-journal-module-8-redd-safeguards-under-the-unfccc.html
   Google Scholar
• Week, D., Diprose, R., & Jessup, T. (2014). From global policy to local practice: Lessons from using village agreements for a community-managed REDD+ pilot (working paper). Jakarta: Indonesia–Australia Forest Carbon Partnership.
   Google Scholar
• WWF. (2013). Capacity building materials on REDD+ for indigenous peoples and local communities. Washington, DC: People and Conservation Program, World Wide Fund for Nature.
   Google Scholar
• World Agroforestry Centre. (2011). Improving carbon initiatives aimed at smallholders: Addressing opportunities and challenges through better communication (Policy brief No. 11). Retrieved from http://www.worldagroforestry.org/downloads/Publications/PDFS/BR11228.pdf
   Google Scholar