A Dynamic Perspective on Publics and Counterpublics: The Role of the Blogosphere in Pushing the Issue of Climate Change During the 2016 US Presidential Campaign

References

• Adam, S., Antl-Wittenberg, E.-M., Eugster, B., Leidecker-Sandmann, M., Maier, M., & Schmidt, F. (2017). Strategies of pro-European parties in the face of a Eurosceptic challenge. European Union Politics, 18(2), 260–282. doi: 10.1177/1465116516661248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderegg, W. R. L., Prall, J. W., Harold, J., & Schneider, S. H. (2010). Expert credibility in climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(27), 12107–12109. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1003187107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar-Ilan, J. (2005). Information hub blogs. Journal of Information Science, 31(4), 297–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blei, D. M. (2012). Probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM, 55(4), 77–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent dirichlet allocation. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993–1022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borenstein, S. (2016, August 29). Why it matters: Climate change. Retrieved from https://apnews.com/4bc63552952c450eb13454f29663c674/why-it-matters-climate-change
   Google Scholar
• Boussalis, C., & Coan, T. G. (2016). Text-mining the signals of climate change doubt. Global Environmental Change, 36, 89–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boykoff, M., Daly, M., McAllister, L., McNatt, M., Nacu-Schmidt, A., Oonk, D., & Pearman, O. (2019). United States newspaper coverage of climate change or global warming, 2000–2019. Media and Climate Change Observatory Data Sets. Retrieved from https://scholar.colorado.edu/mecco_data/122/
   Google Scholar
• Boykoff, M. T. (2007). Flogging a dead norm? Newspaper coverage of anthropogenic climate change in the United States and United Kingdom from 2003 to 2006. Area, 39(4), 470–481. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2007.00769.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brüggemann, M., & Engesser, S. (2017). Beyond false balance: How interpretive journalism shapes media coverage of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 42, 58–67. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brulle, R. J. (2014). Institutionalizing delay: Foundation funding and the creation of U.S. climate change counter-movement organizations. Climatic Change, 122(4), 681–694. doi: 10.1007/s10584-013-1018-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruns, A. (2007). Methodologies for mapping the political blogosphere: An exploration using the issue crawler research tool. First Monday, 12(5). Retrieved from https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1834/1718
   Google Scholar
• Cammaerts, B. (2009). Radical pluralism and free speech in online public spaces. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 12(6), 555–575. doi: 10.1177/1367877909342479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cammaerts, B. (2012). Protest logics and the mediation opportunity structure. European Journal of Communication, 27(2), 117–134. doi: 10.1177/0267323112441007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cann, H. W., & Raymond, L. (2018). Does climate denialism still matter? The prevalence of alternative frames in opposition to climate policy. Environmental Politics. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2018.1439353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, L. (2011). Re-constructing digital democracy: An outline of four ‘positions’. New Media & Society, 13(6), 855–872. doi: 10.1177/1461444810389569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlgren, P. (2005). The internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication, 22(2), 147–162. doi: 10.1080/10584600590933160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downey, J., & Fenton, N. (2003). New media, counter publicity and the public sphere. New Media & Society, 5(2), 185–202. doi: 10.1177/1461444803005002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., McCright, A. M., & Yarosh, J. H. (2016). The political divide on climate change: Partisan polarization widens in the U.S. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 58(5), 4–23. doi: 10.1080/00139157.2016.1208995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckert, S., & Chadha, K. (2013). Muslim bloggers in Germany: An emerging counterpublic. Media, Culture & Society, 35(8), 926–942. doi: 10.1177/0163443713501930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elgesem, D. (2017). Polarization in blogging about the Paris meeting on climate change. In G. L. Ciampaglia, A. Mashhadi, & T. Yasseri (Eds.), Social informatics: 9th International Conference, SocInfo 2017, Oxford, UK, September 13–15, 2017, Proceedings, Part I (pp. 178–200). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Elgesem, D., Steskal, L., & Diakopoulos, N. (2015). Structure and content of the discourse on climate change in the blogosphere: The big picture. Environmental Communication, 9(2), 169–188. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2014.983536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsasser, S. W., & Dunlap, R. E. (2013). Leading voices in the denier choir: Conservative columnists’ dismissal of global warming and denigration of climate science. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(6), 754–776. doi: 10.1177/0002764212469800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, R., Chang, K., Hsieh, C., Wang, X., & Li, C. (2008). LIBLINEAR: A library for large linear classification. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9, 1871–1874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faris, R. M., Roberts, H., Etling, B., Bourassa, N., Zuckerman, E., & Benkler, Y. (2017). Partisanship, propaganda, and disinformation: Online media and the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Retrieved from http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33759251
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, H., & Drezner, D. W. (2008). The power and politics of blogs. Public Choice, 134, 15–30. doi: 10.1007/s11127-007-9198-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, (25/26), 56–80. doi: 10.2307/466240
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A. (1988). Political discourse and collective action. International Social Movement Research, 1, 219–244.
   Google Scholar
• Häussler, T., Adam, S., Schmid-Petri, H., & Reber, U. (2017). How political conflict shapes online spaces: A comparison of climate change hyperlink networks in the United States and Germany. International Journal of Communication, 11, 3096–3117. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/5644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helleputte, T. (2017). LiblineaR: Predictive models based on the LIBLINEAR C/C++ library. R package version 2.10-8. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/LiblineaR/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Joachims, T. (1998). Text categorization with support vector machines: Learning with many relevant features. Retrieved from http://www.cs.cornell.edu/people/tj/publications/joachims_98a.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, J. (2017). Public spheres of skepticism: Climate skeptics’ online comments in the German networked public sphere. International Journal of Communication, 11, 1661–1682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, D., Waldherr, A., Miltner, P., Wiedemann, G., Niekler, A., Keinert, A., … Adam, S. (2018). Applying LDA topic modeling in communication research: Toward a valid and reliable methodology. Communication Methods and Measures, 12(2-3), 93–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. S. (1993). Protest cycles and political process: American peace movements in the nuclear age. Political Research Quarterly, 46(3), 451–479. doi: 10.1177/106591299304600302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. S., & Minkoff, D. C. (2004). Conceptualizing political opportunity. Social Forces, 82(4), 1457–1492. doi: 10.1353/sof.2004.0082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. S., & Staggenborg, S. (1996). Movements, countermovements, and the structure of political opportunity. American Journal of Sociology, 101(6), 1628–1660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mimno, D. (2013). A wrapper around the Java machine learning tool MALLET. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/mallet/mallet.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nuernbergk, C. (2013). Anschlusskommunikation in der Netzwerköffentlichkeit. Ein inhalts- und netzwerkanalytischer Vergleich der Kommunikation im „Social Web“ zum G8-Gipfel von Heiligendamm. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Oreskes, N. (2004). The scientific consensus on climate change. Science, 306(5702), 1686–1686. doi: 10.1126/science.1103618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Painter, J., & Ashe, T. (2012). Cross-national comparison of the presence of climate scepticism in the print media in six countries, 2007–10. Environmental Research Letters, 7(4), 044005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. (2002). The virtual sphere. New Media & Society, 4(1), 9–27. doi: 10.1177/14614440222226244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, D. W. (2009). Blogging with authority: Strategic positioning in political blogs. International Journal of Communication, 3, 250–273. Retrieved from http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/355/308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2016, July 7). 2016 campaign: Strong Interest, widespread dissatisfaction. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/2016/07/07/2016-campaign-strong-interest-widespread-dissatisfaction/
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, T. (2014). Internet and the political public sphere. Sociology Compass, 8(12), 1315–1329. doi: 10.1111/soc4.12228
   Google Scholar
• Riegert, K., & Ramsay, G. (2013). Activists, individualists, and comics. Television & New Media, 14(4), 286–303. doi: 10.1177/1527476412463447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schäfer, M. S. (2012). Online communication on climate change and climate politics: A literature review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 3(6), 527–543. doi: 10.1002/wcc.191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid-Petri, H., Adam, S., Schmucki, I., & Häussler, T. (2017). A changing climate of skepticism: The factors shaping climate change coverage in the US press. Public Understanding of Science, 26(4), 498–513. doi: 10.1177/0963662515612276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Settles, B. (2010). Active learning literature survey. Retrieved from http://burrsettles.com/pub/settles.activelearning.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sevin, E., & Uzunoğlu, S. (2017). Do foreigners count? Internationalization of presidential campaigns. American Behavioral Scientist, 61(3), 315–333. doi: 10.1177/0002764217701215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharman, A. (2014). Mapping the climate sceptical blogosphere. Global Environmental Change, 26, 159–170. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidahmed, M., Puglise, N., & Diehm, J. (2016). What did Clinton and Trump talk about in the debates – And for how long? The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/22/clinton-trump-debate-analysis-foreign-policy-economy-scandals
   Google Scholar
• Toepfl, F., & Piwoni, E. (2015). Public spheres in interaction: Comment sections of news websites as counterpublic spaces. Journal of Communication, 65(3), 465–488. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toepfl, F., & Piwoni, E. (2017). Targeting dominant publics: How counterpublic commenters align their efforts with mainstream news. New Media & Society, 1461444817712085. doi: 10.1177/1461444817712085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallsten, K. (2007). Agenda setting and the blogosphere: An analysis of the relationship between mainstream media and political blogs. Review of Policy Research, 24(6), 567–587.
   Google Scholar