Affective Encounters with Tidal Livelihoods: Digital Field Rhetorics for Justice and Care

References

• Ackerman, J. M. (2018). Walking in the city: The arrival of the rhetorical subject. In B. McGreavy, J. Wells, G. F. McHendry, & S. Senda-Cook (Eds.), Tracing rhetoric and material life: Ecological approaches (pp. 117–140). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, C. (2015). Low fidelity in high definition: Speculations of rhetorical editions. In J. Ridolfo, & W. Hart-Davidson (Eds.), Rhetoric and the digital humanities (pp. 127–139). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, C. (2016a). Pervasive citizenship through #SenseCommons. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 46(3), 269–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, C. (2016b). Writing and rhetoric and/as posthuman practice. College English, 78(6), 532–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brathwaite, E. K., & Mackey, N. (1991). An interview with Edward Kamau Brathwaite. Hambone, 9, 42–59.
   Google Scholar
• Burford, C., & Schutten, J. M. K. (2017). Internatural activists and the “Blackfish effect”: Contemplating captive orcas’ protest rhetoric through a coherence frame. Frontiers in Communication, 1(16), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Carbaugh, D., & Cerulli, T. (2013). Cultural discourses of dwelling: Investigating environmental communication as a place-based practice. Environmental Communication, 7(1), 4–23.
   Google Scholar
• Chrysanthi, A., Berggren, A., Davies, R., Earl, G. P., & Knibbe, J. (2016). The camera “at the trowel’s edge”: Personal video recording in archaeological research. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 23, 238–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly, W. E. (2013). The fragility of things: Self-organizing processes, neoliberal fantasies, and democratic activism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conquergood, D. (1991). Rethinking ethnography: Towards a critical cultural politics. Communication Monographs, 58, 179–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edbauer, J. (2005). Unframing models of public distribution: From rhetorical situation to rhetorical ecologies. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 35(4), 5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, K. S., Athearn, K., Chen, X., Bell, K. P., & Johnson, T. (2016). Measuring the impact of pollution closures on commercial shellfish harvest: The case of soft-shell clams in Machias Bay, Maine. Ocean and Coastal Management, 130, 196–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyman, D. (2015). Digital rhetoric: Theory, method, practice. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, B. L. (2010). Videographic geographies: Using digital video for geographic research. Progress in Human Geography, 35(4), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, J. G., Lind, K. D., & Kutnicki, S. (2017). A rhetorical bestiary. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 47(3), 222–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gries, L. E. (2015). Still life with rhetoric: A new materialist approach for visual rhetorics. Louisville, CO: University Press of Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and intervening: Introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hau‘ofa, E. (2018). Our sea of islands. In S. Hessler (Ed.), Tidalectics: Imagining an oceanic worldview through art and science (pp. 103–114). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hawhee, D. (2017). Rhetoric in tooth and claw: Animals, language, sensation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herbig, A., & Hess, A. (2012). Convergent critical rhetoric at the “Rally to Restore Sanity”: Exploring the intersection of rhetoric, ethnography, and documentary production. Communication Studies, 63(3), 269–289.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, A. (2011). Critical-rhetorical ethnography: Rethinking the place and process of rhetoric. Communication Studies, 62(2), 127–152.
   Google Scholar
• Hessler, S. (Ed.). (2018). Tidalectics: Imagining an oceanic worldview through art and science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, G. A. (1992). A hoot in the dark: The evolution of general rhetoric. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 25(1), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malin, S. A., & Ryder, S. S. (2018). Developing deeply intersectional environmental justice scholarship. Environmental Sociology, 4(1), 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGreavy, B. (2018). Intertidal poetry: Making our way through change. In B. McGreavy, J. Wells, G. F. McHendry, & S. Senda-Cook (Eds.), Tracing rhetoric and material life: Ecological approaches (pp. 87–115). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McGreavy, B., Randall, S., Quiring, T., Hathaway, C., & Hillyer, G. (2018). Enhancing adaptive capacities in coastal communities through engaged communication research: Insights from a statewide study of shellfish co-management. Ocean and Coastal Management, 163, 240–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGreavy, B., Wells, J., McHendry, G. F., & Senda-Cook, S. (Eds.). (2018). Tracing rhetoric and material life: Ecological approaches. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Middleton, M. K., Hess, A. A., Endres, D., & Senda-Cook, S. (Eds.). (2015). Participatory critical rhetoric: Theoretical and methodological foundations for studying rhetoric in situ. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Middleton, M. K., Senda-Cook, S., & Endres, D. (2011). Articulating rhetorical field methods: Challenges and tensions. Western Journal of Communication, 75(4), 386–406.
   Google Scholar
• Milstein, T. (2008). When whales “speak for themselves”: communication as a mediating force in wildlife tourism. Environmental Communication, 2(2), 173–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milstein, T. (2009). “Somethin’ tells me it’s all happening at the zoo”: Discourse, power, and conservationism. Environmental Communication, 3(1), 25–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey, S. (2016). Rhetorical delivery and digital technologies: Networks, affect, electracy. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pezzullo, P. C. (2009). Toxic tourism: Rhetorics of pollution, travel, and environmental justice. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pezzullo, P. C., & de Onís, C. M. (2017). Rethinking rhetorical field methods on a precarious planet. Communication Monographs, 85(1), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, S. (2007). Walking with video. Visual Studies, 22(3), 240–252.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. (2008). Doing sensory ethnography. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Plec, E. (Ed.). (2013). Perspectives on human-animal communication: Internatural communication. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Povinelli, E. A. (2016). Geontologies: A requiem to late liberalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Povinelli, E. A. (2018). The kinship of tides. In S. Hessler (Ed.), Tidalectics: Imagining an oceanic worldview through art and science (pp. 165–176). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rai, C. (2016). Democracy’s lot: Rhetoric, publics, and the places of invention. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rai, C., & Druschke, C. G. (Eds.). (2018). Field rhetoric: Ethnography, ecology, and engagement in the places of persuasion. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rivers, N. (2015). Deep ambivalence and wild objects: Toward a strange environmental rhetoric. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 98(2), 129–152.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. A. (1998). Overcoming the objectification of nature in constitutive theories: Toward a transhuman, materialist theory of communication. Western Journal of Communication, 62(3), 244–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seegert, N. (2014). Queer beasts: Ursine punctures in domesticity. Environmental Communication, 8(1), 75–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, K. (2007). Ordinary affects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, K. (2015). New England red. In P. Vannini (Ed.), Non-representational methodologies: Re-envisioning research (pp. 19–33). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stormer, N., & McGreavy, B. (2017). Thinking ecologically about rhetoric’s ontology: Capacity, vulnerability, and resilience. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 50(1), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, A. W. (2018, February). Articulating environmental justice: Approaching mindfulness through the lived experience. Presented at Western States Communication Association, Santa Clara, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Tsing, A. L. (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar