457
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Ecological Restoration or Healing?: Conflicting Ontologies and Missed Opportunities in Public Debates Surrounding Mississippi River Gorge Restoration

Pages 582-596 | Received 20 Jun 2019, Accepted 14 Nov 2019, Published online: 18 Dec 2019

References

  • Blackstock, M. (2001). Water: A first nations’ spiritual and ecological perspective. B.C. Journal of Ecosystems and Management, 1(1), 1–14.
  • Blaikie, P. (1985). The political economy of soil erosion in developing countries. London: Longman.
  • Blaser, M. (2009). Political ontology: Cultural studies without ‘cultures’? Cultural Studies, 23(5–6), 873–896.
  • Blaser, M. (2013a). Notes towards a political ontology of ‘environmental conflicts’. In L. Green (Ed.), Contested ecologies: Dialogues in the south on nature and knowledge (pp. 13–27). Cape Town: HSRC Press.
  • Blaser, M. (2013b). Ontological conflicts and the stories of peoples in spite of Europe: Toward a conversation on political ontology. Current Anthropology, 54(5), 547–568.
  • Blaser, M. (2014). Ontology and indigeneity: On the political ontology of heterogeneous assemblages. Cultural Geographies, 21(1), 49–58.
  • Brulle, R. J. (2010). From environmental campaigns to advancing the public dialog: Environmental communication for civic engagement. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 82–98.
  • Campbell, A. F. (2016, October 12). How America’s past shapes native Americans’ present. The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/10/native-americans-minneapolis/503441/
  • Carlson, A. (2018). On the uncompromising hand: Remembering Spirit Island. Open Rivers, 9, 63–74.
  • Carroll, C. (2014). Native enclosures: Tribal national parks and the progressive politics of environmental stewardship in Indian country. Geoforum, 53, 31–40.
  • Corntassel, J. (2018). Re-envisioning resurgence: Indigenous pathways to decolonization and sustainable self-determination. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education, & Society, 7(1), 86–101.
  • Corntassel, J., & Bryce, C. (2012). Practicing sustainable self-determination: Indigenous approaches to cultural restoration and revitalization. Brown Journal of World Affairs, 18(2), 151–162.
  • Davies, S. R. (2008). Constructing communication: Talking to scientists about talking to the public. Science Communication, 29(4), 413–434.
  • Depoe, S. P., Delicath, J. W., & Elsenbeer, M.-F. A. (Eds.). (2004). Communication and public participation in environmental decision making. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Dorothy, O. (2018). An endangered river: The Mississippi River Gorge. Open Rivers Summer, 11, 119–125.
  • Endres, D. (2009). The rhetoric of nuclear colonialism: Rhetorical exclusion of American Indian arguments in the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste siting decision. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 6(1), 39–60.
  • Endres, D. (2018). The most nuclear-bombed place: Ecological implications of the US nuclear testing program. In B. McGreavy, J. Wells, G. F. McHendry, & S. Senda-Cook (Eds.), Tracing rhetoric and material life: Ecological approaches (pp. 253–287). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Griffith, J. (2018). Do some work for me: Settler colonialism, professional communication, and representations of indigenous water. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education, & Society, 7(1), 132–157.
  • Healing Place Collaborative. (2018). “About.” Healing Place [blog]. Retrieved from healingplacemn.org.
  • A history of Owamni Yomni: Lock closures signal healing for Mississippi River. (2015, July 19). The Circle News. Retrieved from http://thecirclenews.org/cover-story/a-history-of-owamni-yomni-lock-closures-signal-healing-for-mississippi-river/
  • Hoover, E. (2013). Cultural and health implications of fish advisories in a native American community. Ecological Processes, 2(1), 4.
  • Hunt, S. (2014). Ontologies of indigeneity: The politics of embodying a concept. Cultural Geographies, 21(1), 27–32.
  • Johnson. (2018, April 13). “Resolution No. 2018R-098.” City of Minneapolis. Retrieved from https://lims.minneapolismn.gov/Download/MetaData/6913/2018-00319%20Res%20098_Id_6913.pdf.
  • Johnson, T. N. (2019). The Dakota access pipeline and the breakdown of participatory processes in environmental decision-making. Environmental Communication, 13(3), 335–352.
  • Lenhart, C. (2012). Restoration of the Mississippi River Gorge: Issues and research needs. Ecological Restoration, 30(3), 218–227.
  • Mackey, E. (2016). Unsettled expectations: Uncertainty, land, and settler decolonization. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.
  • McGreavy, B., Silka, L., & Lindenfeld, L. (2014). Interdisciplinary and actionable science: Exploring the generative potential in difference. Journal of Community Practice, 22(1–2), 189–209.
  • Middleton, E. (2010). A political ecology of healing. Journal of Political Ecology, 17, 1–28.
  • Mol, A. (1999). Ontological politics. A word and some questions. The Sociological Review, 47(S1), 74–89.
  • Mosedale, M. (2018, November 27). Rethinking the future of the Mississippi River. Mpls-St Paul Magazine. Retrieved from http://mspmag.com/arts-and-culture/general-interest/mississippi-river-future/
  • Nadasdy, P. (1999). The politics of TEK: Power and the ‘integration’ of knowledge. Arctic Anthropology, 36(1–2), 1–18.
  • Nadasdy, P. (2005a). The anti-politics of TEK: The institutionalization of co-management discourse and practice. Anthropologica, 47(2), 215–232.
  • Nadasdy, P. (2005b). Hunters and bureaucrats: Power, knowledge, and aboriginal-state relations in the Southwest Yukon. Vancouver: UBC Press.
  • Nadasdy, P. (2007). The gift in the animal: The ontology of hunting and human-animal sociality. American Ethnologist, 34(1), 25–43.
  • Nadasdy, P. (2011). ‘We don’t harvest animals; we kill them’ agricultural metaphors and the politics of wildlife management in the Yukon. In M. J. Goldman, P. Nadasdy, & M. D. Turner (Eds.), Knowing nature: Conversations at the Intersection of political ecology and science studies (pp. 135–151). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Peterson, T. R., & Horton, C. C. (1995). Rooted in the soil: How understanding the perspectives of landowners can enhance the management of environmental disputes. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 81(2), 139–166.
  • Povinelli, E. (1995). Do rocks listen? The cultural politics of apprehending Australian aboriginal labor. American Anthropologist, 97(3), 505–518.
  • Ranciere, J. (1992). Politics, identification, and subjectivization. October, 61, 58–64.
  • Ratliff, J. N. (1997). The politics of nuclear waste: An analysis of a public hearing on the proposed Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository. Communication Studies, 48(4), 359–380.
  • Restore the Gorge. (2017a, July). July 2017 survey responses complete. American Rivers, 1–11.
  • Restore the Gorge. (2017b, July). Restore the gorge: July 13, 2017 open house findings. Minneapolis, MN: American Rivers.
  • Robbins, P. (2012). Political ecology: A critical introduction. Hoboken, Nj: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Roper, E. (2019, August 9). Study could expand public access to roaring Minneapolis riverfront. Minneapolis Star Tribune. Retrieved from http://www.startribune.com/study-could-expand-public-access-to-roaring-minneapolis-riverfront/530861392/
  • Rose, D. B. (2008). On history, trees, and ethical proximity. Postcolonial Studies, 11(2), 157–167.
  • Schultz, K. A. (2017). Decolonizing political ecology: Ontology, technology, and ‘Critical’ enchantment. Journal of Political Ecology, 24, 125–143.
  • Sepulveda, C. (2018). “Our sacred waters: Theorizing kuuyam as a decolonial possibility.” Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education, & Society, 7(1), 40–58.
  • Shaw, B. (2018, August 27). University of Minnesota, Rowing clubs worried about proposal to remove Dams from Mississippi River. St. Paul, MN: St. Paul Pioneer Press.
  • Simpson, M., & Bagelman, J. (2018). Decolonizing urban political ecology: The production of nature in settler colonial cities. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 108(2), 558–568.
  • Smith, M. M. (2016). Owamniyomni, a Dakota name for ‘St. Anthony Falls’. Open Rivers Fall, 4, 48–49.
  • Svirsky, M. (2017). Resistance is a structure not an event. Settler Colonial Studies, 7(1), 19–39.
  • Thomas, D. (2017). “Imagining Spirit Island.” Southwest Journal. September 22, 2017.
  • Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education, & Society, 1(1), 1–40.
  • Turnhout, E., Van Bommel, S., & Aarts, N. (2010). How participation creates citizens: Participatory governance as performative practice. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 26–41.
  • Veracini, L. (2011). Telling the end of the Settler Colonial Story. In F. Bateman & L. Pilkington (Eds.), Studies in settler colonialism: Politics, identity and culture (pp. 204–218). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Wainwright, J., & Robertson, M. (2003). Territorialization, science and the colonial state: The case of Highway 55 in Minnesota. Cultural Geographies, 10, 196–217.
  • Walker, G. B., Senecah, S. L., & Daniels, S. E. (2006). From the forest to the river: Citizens’ views of stakeholder engagement. Human Ecology Review, 13(2), 193–202.
  • Whyte, K. P. (2013). On the role of traditional ecological knowledge as a collaborative concept: A philosophical study. Ecological Processes, 2(1), 7.
  • Wolfe, P. (2006). Settler colonialism and the elimination of the native. Journal of Genocide Research, 8(4), 387–409.
  • Yates, J. S., Harris, L. M., & Wilson, N. J. (2017). Multiple ontologies of water: Politics, conflict and implications for governance. Society and Space, 35(5), 797–815.
  • Yazzie, M. K., & Baldy, C. R. (2018). “Introduction: Indigenous peoples and the politics of water.” Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education, & Society, 7(1), 1–18.
  • Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.