The North–South Divide on Public Perceptions of Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering?: A Survey in Six Asia-Pacific Countries

References

• Asayama, S., & Hulme, M. (2019). Engineering climate debt: Temperature overshoot and peak-shaving as risky subprime mortgage lending. Climate Policy, 19(8), 937–946. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2019.1623165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asayama, S., Sugiyama, M., & Ishii, A. (2017). Ambivalent climate of opinions: Tensions and dilemmas in understanding geoengineering experimentation. Geoforum, 80, 82–92. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bala, G., & Gupta, A. (2018). India forges ahead with solar-geoengineering studies. Nature, 557, 637. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-05288-6
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy, R., Chilvers, J., & Vaughan, N. E. (2016). Deliberative Mapping of options for tackling climate change: Citizens and specialists “open up” appraisal of geoengineering. Public Understanding of Science, 25, 269–286. doi: 10.1177/0963662514548628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy, R., Chilvers, J., Vaughan, N. E., & Lenton, T. M. (2012). A review of climate geoengineering appraisals. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 3, 597–615. doi: 10.1002/wcc.197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy, R., Lezaun, J., & Palmer, J. (2017). Public perceptions of geoengineering research governance: An experimental deliberative approach. Global Environmental Change, 45, 194–202. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, G. F., Oldendick, R. W., Tuchfarber, A. J., & Bennett, S. E. (1980). Pseudo-opinions on public affairs. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44, 198. doi: 10.1086/268584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostrom, A., O’Connor, R. E., Böhm, G., Hanss, D., Bodi, O., Ekström, F., … Sælensminde, I. (2012). Causal thinking and support for climate change policies: International survey findings. Global Environmental Change, 22, 210–222. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, C., Merk, C., Pönitzsch, G., Rehdanz, K., & Schmidt, U. (2018). Public perception of climate engineering and carbon capture and storage in Germany: Survey evidence. Climate Policy, 18, 471–484. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2017.1304888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck, H. J. (2018). Perspectives on solar geoengineering from Finnish Lapland: Local insights on the global imaginary of Arctic geoengineering. Geoforum, 91, 78–86. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.02.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, E. T., Flegal, J. A., Keith, D. W., Mahajan, A., Tingley, D., & Wagner, G. (2016). What do people think when they think about solar geoengineering? A review of empirical social science literature, and prospects for future research. Earth’s Future, 4, 536–542. doi: 10.1002/2016EF000461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairns, R. (2015). Public perceptions of geoengineering. Geoengineering Our Climate? Working paper series. Retrieved from https://geoengineeringourclimate.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/cairns-2015-public-perceptions-of-geoengineering-click-for-download.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Capstick, S., Whitmarsh, L., Poortinga, W., Pidgeon, N., & Upham, P. (2015). International trends in public perceptions of climate change over the past quarter century. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 6, 35–61. doi: 10.1002/wcc.321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, W., Preston, C. J., Yung, L., Szerszynski, B., Keith, D. W., & Mercer, A. M. (2013). Public engagement on solar radiation management and why it needs to happen now. Climatic Change, 121, 567–577. doi: 10.1007/s10584-013-0763-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, W. A., & Yung, L. (2018). Perceptions of climate engineering in the South Pacific, Sub-Saharan Africa, and North American Arctic. Climatic Change, 147, 119–132. doi: 10.1007/s10584-018-2138-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corner, A., Parkhill, K., Pidgeon, N., & Vaughan, N. E. (2013). Messing with nature? Exploring public perceptions of geoengineering in the UK. Global Environmental Change, 23, 938–947. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corner, A., & Pidgeon, N. (2015). Like artificial trees? The effect of framing by natural analogy on public perceptions of geoengineering. Climatic Change, 130, 425–438. doi: 10.1007/s10584-014-1148-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, C. L., Lin, S. H., & Trump, B. D. (2017). Public perceptions of climate geoengineering: A systematic review of the literature. Climate Research, 73(3), 247–264. doi: 10.3354/cr01475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, C. L., & Rosenthal, S. (2018). Climate change and technology: Examining opinion formation of geoengineering. Environment Systems and Decisions, 38(2), 208–215. doi: 10.1007/s10669-018-9683-8
   Google Scholar
• Fairbrother, M. (2016). Geoengineering, moral hazard, and trust in climate science: Evidence from a survey experiment in Britain. Climatic Change, 139, 477–489. doi: 10.1007/s10584-016-1818-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466, 29. doi: 10.1038/466029a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irvine, P., Emanuel, K., He, J., Horowitz, L. W., Vecchi, G., & Keith, D. (2019). Halving warming with idealized solar geoengineering moderates key climate hazards. Nature Climate Change, 9(4), 295–299. doi: 10.1038/s41558-019-0398-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISSP Research Group. (2019). International social survey programme: Environment III - ISSP 2010. GESIS Data Archive. Cologne. ZA, 5500, Data file Version 3.0.0. doi:10.4232/1.13271
   Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M., Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Tarantola, T., Silva, C. L., & Braman, D. (2015). Geoengineering and climate change Polarization: Testing a two-channel model of science communication. ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 658, 192–222. doi: 10.1177/0002716214559002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kravitz, B., Caldeira, K., Boucher, O., Robock, A., Rasch, P. J., Alterskjaer, K., … Yoon, J.-H. (2013). Climate model response from the geoengineering model intercomparison project (GeoMIP). Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 118, 8320–8332. doi: 10.1002/jgrd.50646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, T. M., Markowitz, E. M., Howe, P. D., Ko, C.-Y., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2015). Predictors of public climate change awareness and risk perception around the world. Nature Climate Change, 5, 1014–1020. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, A. (2013). Does geoengineering present a moral hazard? Ecology Law Quarterly, 40, 673–712. doi: 10.15779/Z38JP1J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacMartin, D. G., Ricke, K. L., & Keith, D. W. (2018). Solar geoengineering as part of an overall strategy for meeting the 1.5°C Paris target. Philosophical Transactions Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 376, 20160454. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macnaghten, P., & Szerszynski, B. (2013). Living the global social experiment: An analysis of public discourse on solar radiation management and its implications for governance. Global Environmental Change, 23, 465–474. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahajan, A., Tingley, D., & Wagner, G. (2018). Fact, cheap, and imperfect? U.S. public opinion about solar geoengineering. Environmental Politics, 1–21. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2018.1479101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maibach, E. W., Leiserowitz, A., Roser-Renouf, C., Mertz, C. K., & Akerlof, K. (2011). Global warming’s six Americas screening tools: Survey instruments; instructions for coding and data treatment; and statistical program scripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University and George Mason University. Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. Retrieved from http://climatecommunication.yale.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/2012_03_Global-Warming%E2%80%99s-Six-Americas-Screener-Manual.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McLaren, D., Parkhill, K. A., Corner, A., Vaughan, N. E., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2016). Public conceptions of justice in climate engineering: Evidence from secondary analysis of public deliberation. Global Environmental Change, 41, 64–73. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, A. M., Keith, D. W., & Sharp, J. D. (2011). Public understanding of solar radiation management. Environmental Research Letters, 6, 044006. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/6/4/044006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merk, C., & Pönitzsch, G. (2017). The role of affect in attitude formation toward new technologies: The case of stratospheric aerosol injection. Risk Analysis, 37, 2289–2304. doi: 10.1111/risa.12780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merk, C., Pönitzsch, G., Kniebes, C., Rehdanz, K., & Schmidt, U. (2015). Exploring public perceptions of stratospheric sulfate injection. Climatic Change, 130, 299–312. doi: 10.1007/s10584-014-1317-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merk, C., Pönitzsch, G., & Rehdanz, K. (2016). Knowledge about aerosol injection does not reduce individual mitigation efforts. Environmental Research Letters, 11, 054009. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/5/054009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NRC (National Research Council). (2015a). Climate intervention: Carbon dioxide removal and reliable sequestration. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• NRC (National Research Council). (2015b). Climate intervention: Reflecting sunlight to cool Earth. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olivier, J. G. J., Schure, K. M., & Peters, J. A. H. W. (2017). Trends in global CO₂ and total greenhouse gas emissions. The Hague: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. Retrieved from http://www.pbl.nl/sites/default/files/cms/publicaties/pbl-2017-trends-in-global-co2-and-total-greenhouse-gas-emissons-2017-report_2674.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pasztor, J., Scharf, C., & Schmidt, K.-U. (2017). How to govern geoengineering? Science, 357(6348), 231. doi: 10.1126/science.aan6794
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2015). Global concern about climate change, broad support for limiting emissions. Retrieved from http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2015/11/Pew-Research-Center-Climate-Change-Report-FINAL-November-5-2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pidgeon, N., Corner, A., Parkhill, K., Spence, A., Butler, C., & Poortinga, W. (2012). Exploring early public responses to geoengineering. Philosophical Transactions Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 370, 4176–4196. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2012.0099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pidgeon, N., Parkhill, K., Corner, A., & Vaughan, N. (2013). Deliberating stratospheric aerosols for climate geoengineering and the SPICE project. Nature Climate Change, 3, 451–457. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poortinga, W., Pidgeon, N. F., Capstick, S., & Aoyagi, M. (2014). Public attitudes to nuclear power and climate change in Britain Two Years after the Fukushima Accident - Synthesis Report. London: UKERC. Retrieved from http://www.ukerc.ac.uk/asset/65EE60EE-C581-48D7-8ADC6D3D1BA5CED5/
   Google Scholar
• Preston, C., & Carr, W. (2019). Recognitional justice, climate engineering, and the care approach. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 1–16. doi: 10.1080/21550085.2018.1562527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, C. J. (2013). Ethics and geoengineering: Reviewing the moral issues raised by solar radiation management and carbon dioxide removal. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 4, 23–37. doi: 10.1002/wcc.198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rad, M. S., Martingano, A. J., & Ginges, J. (2018). Toward a psychology of Homo sapiens: Making psychological science more representative of the human population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(45), 11401–11405. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1721165115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, A. A., Artaxo, P., Asrat, A., & Parker, A. (2018). Developing countries must lead on solar geoengineering research. Nature, 556, 22–24. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-03917-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raimi, K. T., Maki, A., Dana, D., & Vandenbergh, M. P. (2019). Framing of geoengineering affects support for climate change mitigation. Environmental Communication, 13(3), 300–319. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2019.1575258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, S., Heyward, C., Kruger, T., Pidgeon, N., Redgwell, C., & Savulescu, J. (2013). The Oxford principles. Climatic Change, 121, 499–512. doi: 10.1007/s10584-012-0675-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheer, D., & Renn, O. (2014). Public perception of geoengineering and its consequences for public debate. Climatic Change, 125, 305–318. doi: 10.1007/s10584-014-1177-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, J., Cox, P., Haigh, J., Keith, D., Launder, B., Mace, G., … Watson, A. (2009). Geoengineering the climate: Science, governance and uncertainty. London: The Royal Society.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. (1995). The construction of preference. American Psychologist, 50, 364–371. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.50.5.364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E. M., & MacGregor, D. G. (2007). The affect heuristic. European Journal of Operational Research, 177, 1333–1352. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, A., Venables, D., Pidgeon, N., Poortinga, W., & Demsk, C. (2010). Public Perceptions of Climate Change and Energy Futures in Britain: Summary Findings of a Survey Conducted from January to March 2010. Understanding Risk Working Paper 10-01. Retrieved from http://psych.cf.ac.uk/understandingrisk/docs/final_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Suarez, P., Banerjee, B., & de Suarez, J. M. (2013). Geoengineering and the humanitarian challenge: What role for the most vulnerable? Geoengineering Our Climate Working Paper and Opinion Article Series. Retrieved from https://geoengineeringourclimate.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/suarez-et-al-2013-ge-and-the-humanitarian-challenge-click-for-download.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sugiyama, M., Arino, Y., Kosugi, T., Kurosawa, A., & Watanabe, S. (2018). Next steps in geoengineering scenario research: Limited deployment scenarios and beyond. Climate Policy, 18, 681–689. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2017.1323721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugiyama, M., Asayama, S., Ishii, A., Kosugi, T., Moore, J. C., Lin, J., … Xia, L. (2017a). The Asia-Pacific’s role in the emerging solar geoengineering debate. Climatic Change, 143, 1–12. doi: 10.1007/s10584-017-1994-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugiyama, M., Asayama, S., Kosugi, T., Ishii, A., Emori, S., Adachi, J., … Yoshizawa, G. (2017b). Transdisciplinary co-design of scientific research agendas: 40 research questions for socially relevant climate engineering research. Sustainability Science, 12, 31–44. doi: 10.1007/s11625-016-0376-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugiyama, M., & Fujiwara, M. (2016). Public perception of climate engineering in Japan: Results from online and classroom surveys. The University of Tokyo PARI Working Paper No. 23. Retrieved from https://pari.ifi.u-tokyo.ac.jp/publications/WP16_23.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sugiyama, M., Kosugi, T., Ishii, A., & Asayama, S. (2016). Public attitudes to climate engineering research and field experiments: Preliminary results of a web survey on students’ perception in six Asia-Pacific countries. The University of Tokyo PARI Working Paper No. 24. Retrieved from https://pari.ifi.u-tokyo.ac.jp/publications/WP16_24.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Temple, J. (2017). China Builds One of the World’s Largest Geoengineering Research Programs. Technology Review. Retrieved from https://www.technologyreview.com/s/608401/china-builds-one-of-the-worlds-largest-geoengineering-research-programs/
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2018). The emissions gap report 2018. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Retrieved from http://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/26895/EGR2018_FullReport_EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Visschers, V. H. M., Shi, J., Siegrist, M., & Arvai, J. (2017). Beliefs and values explain international differences in perception of solar radiation management: Insights from a cross-country survey. Climatic Change, 142, 531–544. doi: 10.1007/s10584-017-1970-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte, K. P. (2012). Now this! Indigenous sovereignty, political obliviousness and governance models for SRM research. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 15, 172–187. doi: 10.1080/21550085.2012.685570
   Google Scholar
• Wibeck, V., Hansson, A., & Anshelm, J. (2015). Questioning the technological fix to climate change – Lay sense-making of geoengineering in Sweden. Energy Research & Social Science, 7, 23–30. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2015.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wibeck, V., Hansson, A., Anshelm, J., Asayama, S., Dilling, L., Feetham, P. M., … Sugiyama, M. (2017). Making sense of climate engineering: A focus group study of lay publics in four countries. Climatic Change, 145, 1–14. doi: 10.1007/s10584-017-2067-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winickoff, D. E., Flegal, J. A., & Asrat, A. (2015). Engaging the global South on climate engineering research. Nature Climate Change, 5, 627–634. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, P.-H. (2013). The public and geoengineering decision-making. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 17, 350–367. doi: 10.5840/techne201421110
   Google Scholar
• Wong, P.-H. (2015). Confucian environmental ethics, climate engineering, and the “playing god” argument. Zygon, 50, 28–41. doi: 10.1111/zygo.12151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, M. J., Teagle, D. A. H., & Feetham, P. M. (2014). A quantitative evaluation of the public response to climate engineering. Nature Climate Change, 4, 106–110. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar