References
- Alaska Earthquake Center. (2018). Retrieved from https://earthquake.alaska.edu/.
- Brennan, B. (2013). Qualitative research methods for media studies. New York: Routledge.
- Charmaz, K. (2002). Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. In J. Gubrium & J. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research (pp. 675–694). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Comunello, F., & Mulargia, S. (2018). Social media in earthquake-related communication: Shake networks. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
- Crooks, A., Croitoru, A., Stefanidis, A., & Radzikowski, J. (2013). #Earthquake: Twitter as a distributed sensor system. Transactions in GIS, 17(1), 124–147. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9671.2012.01359.x.
- Dickson, I. (2018). Anchorage M7.0: What we know so far. Retrieved from https://earthquake.alaska.edu/anchorage-m70-what-we-know-so-far.
- Earle, P., Bowden, D., & Guy, M. (2011). Twitter earthquake detection: Earthquake monitoring in a social world. Annals of Geophysics, 54, 6. doi:10.4401/ag-5364.
- Facebook. (2019). Groups. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/help/1629740080681586.
- Finch, K., Snook, K., Duke, C., Fu, K.-W., Tse, Z., Adhikari, A., & Chun-Hai Fung, I. (2016). Public health implications of social media use during natural disasters, environmental disasters, and other environmental concerns. Natural Hazards, 83, 729–760. doi:10.1007/s11069-016-2327-8.
- Gardine, L. (2018). Magnitude 7.9 Offshore Kodiak Earthquake and Tsunami Timeline. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10215768640553062.
- Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
- Guy, M., Earle, P., Ostrum, C., Gruchalla, K., & Horvath, S. (2010). Integration and dissemination of citizen reported and seismically derived earthquake information via social network technologies. In P. R. Cohen, N. M. Adams, & M. R. Berthold (Eds.), Advances in Intelligent data analysis IX. IDA 2010. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol 6065, pp. 42–53). Tucson, AZ: Springer.
- Houston, J., Hawthorne, J., Perreault, M., Park, E., Goldstein Hode, M., Halliwell, M., … Griffith, S. A. (2014). Social media and disasters: A functional framework for social media use in disaster planning, response, and research. Disasters, 39(1), 1–22. doi:10.1111/disa.12092.
- Hui, L., & Tsang, P. (2016). Everyday knowledge and disaster management: The role of social media. In: M. Robertson & P. Tsang (Eds.), Everyday knowledge, education and sustainable futures. Education in the Asia-Pacific region: Issues, concerns and prospects (pp. 107–121). Singapore: Springer.
- Jurgens, M., & Helsloot, I. (2017). The effect of social media on the dynamics of (self) resilience during disasters: A literature review. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 26(1), 79–88. doi:10.1111/1468-5973.12212.
- Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. (1995). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. doi: 10.1177/089124196025003006
- Löfstedt, R. E., & 6, P. (2008). What environmental and technological risk communication research and health risk research can learn from each other. Journal of Risk Research, 11(1-2), 141–167. doi:10.1080/13669870701797137. doi: 10.1080/13669870701797137
- Marbouti, M., & Maurer, F. (2016). Social media use during emergency response – insights from emergency professionals. In Y. K. Dwivedi, M. Mäntymäki, M. N. Ravishankar, M. Janssen, M. Clement, E. L. Slade, … A. C. Simintiras (Eds.), Social media: The good, the bad, and the ugly (pp. 557–566). Cham: Springer.
- National Research Council Committee on the Alaska Earthquake. (1970). The great Alaska earthquake of 1964 (Vol. 7). Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.
- Palen, L., & Hughes, A. (2018). Social media in disaster communication. In H. Rodríguez, W. Donner, & J. Trainor (Eds.), Handbook of disaster research (pp. 497–518). Cham: Springer.
- Reuter, C., & Kaufhold, M.-A. (2017). Fifteen years of social media in emergencies: A retrospective review and future directions for crisis Informatics, 41–57. doi: 10.1111/1468-5973.12196
- Shtob, D. (2018). Remembering the future: Natural disaster, place, and symbolic survival. doi: 10.1111/ruso.12224
- Silver, A., & Matthews, L. (2017). The use of Facebook for information seeking, decision support, and self-organization following a significant disaster. Information Communication and Society, 20(11), 1680–1697. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1253762.
- Spence, W., Sipkin, S., & Choy, G. (1989). Measuring the size of an Earthquake. Retrieved from https://earthquake.usgs.gov/learn/topics/measure.php.
- Sutton, J., Palen, L., & Shklovski, I. (2008). Backchannels on the front lines: Emergent uses of social media in the 2007 Southern California Wildfires. In F. Fiedrich & B. Van de Walle (Eds.), 5th International ISCRAM Conference (pp. 1178–1204). Washington, D.C: Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management.
- U.S. Geological Survey. (2018). M 7.9 - 280 km SE of Kodiak, Alaska. Retrieved from https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us2000cmy3/executive.
- Veil, S., Buehner, T., & Palenchar, M. (2011). A work-in-process literature review: Incorporating social media in risk and crisis communication. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 19, 2. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5973.2011.00639.x
- White, J., & Fu, K.-W. (2012). Who Do You trust? Comparing people-centered communications in disaster Situations in the United States and China. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 14(2), 126–142. doi:10.1080/13876988.2012.664688.
- Yutzy, D., & Haas, J. (1970). Disaster and functional priorities in anchorage. In The great Alaska earthquake of 1964 (Vol. 7, pp. 90–95). Washington, D.C: National Academy of Sciences.