References
- Ahn, H. K., Kim, H. J., & Aggarwal, P. (2014). Helping fellow beings: Anthropomorphized social causes and the role of anticipatory guilt. Psychological Science, 25(1), 224–229. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613496823
- Ardoin, N. M., Bowers, A. W., Roth, N. W., & Holthuis, N. (2018). Environmental education and K-12 student outcomes: A review and analysis of research. The Journal of Environmental Education, 49(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2017.1366155
- Bahar, F., & Sahin, E. (2017). An associational research on turkish children’s environmentally responsible behaviors, nature relatedness, and motive concerns. Science Education International, 28(2), 111–118.
- Balding, M., & Williams, K. J. (2016). Plant blindness and the implications for plant conservation. Conservation Biology, 30(6), 1192–1199. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12738
- Basil, D. Z., Ridgway, N. M., & Basil, M. D. (2008). Guilt and giving: A process model of empathy and efficacy. Psychology & Marketing, 25(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20200
- Benjamin, D., Por, H. H., & Budescu, D. (2017). Climate change versus global warming: Who is susceptible to the framing of climate change? Environment and Behavior, 49(7), 745–770. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916516664382
- Born, D. (2019). Bearing witness? Polar bears as icons for climate change communication in national geographic. Environmental Communication, 13(5), 649–663. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1435557
- Boto-Garcìa, D., & Bucciol, A. (2020). Climate change: Personal responsibility and energy saving. Ecological Economics, 169, 106530. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106530
- Boudet, H., Ardoin, N. M., Flora, J., Armel, K. C., Desai, M., & Robinson, T. N. (2014). Energy behaviours of northern california girl scouts and their families. Energy Policy, 73, 439–449. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.05.044
- Chang, J. J., Kim, S. H., Shim, J. C., & Ma, D. H. (2016). Who is responsible for climate change? Attribution of responsibility, news media, and south Koreans’ perceived risk of climate change. Mass Communication and Society, 19(5), 566–584. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2016.1180395
- Change, C. (2019). Relations to perceived communication with parents and friends and pro-environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 51(8), 907–935. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916518763894
- Collado, S., Evans, G. W., & Sorrel, M. A. (2017). The role of parents and best friends in children’s pro-environmentalism: Differences according to age and gender. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 54, 27–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.09.007
- Collado, S., & Sorrel, M. A. (2019). Children’s environmental moral judgments: Variations according to type of victim and exposure to nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 62, 42–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.02.005
- Connell, P. M. (2013). The role of baseline physical similarity to humans in consumer responses to anthropomorphic animal images. Psychology & Marketing, 30(6), 461–468. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20619
- Doherty, T. J., & Clayton, S. (2011). The psychological impacts of global climate change. American Psychologist, 66(4), 265–276. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023141
- Dopko, R. L., Capaldi, C. A., & Zelenski, J. M. (2019). The psychological and social benefits of a nature experience for children: A preliminary investigation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 63, 134–138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.05.002
- Dunn, E. A. (2011). Talking animals: A literature review of anthropomorphism in children’s books [Master’s thesis, University of North Carolina].
- Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864–886. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864
- Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance (Vol. 2). Stanford University Press.
- Frew, K., Peterson, M. N., & Stevenson, K. (2017). Are we working to save the species our children want to protect? Evaluating species attribute preferences among children. Oryx, 51(3), 455–463. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605315001477
- Gebhard, U., Nevers, P., & Billmann-Mahecha, E. (2003). Moralizing trees: Anthropomorphism and identity in children’s relationships to nature. In S. Clayton, & S. Opotow (Eds.), Identity and the natural environment: The Psychological significance of nature (pp. 91–111). The MIT Press.
- Grønhøj, A., & Thøgersen, J. (2012). Action speaks louder than words: The effect of personal attitudes and family norms on adolescents’ pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(1), 292–302. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.10.001
- Hahn, E. R., & Garrett, M. K. (2017). Preschoolers’ moral judgments of environmental harm and the influence of perspective taking. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 53, 11–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.05.004
- Haidt, J. (2003). The moral emotions. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 852–870). Oxford University Press.
- Hansen, G., & Stone, D. (2016). Assessing the observed impact of anthropogenic climate change. Nature Climate Change, 6(5), 532–537. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2896
- Hanss, D., & Böhm, G. (2010). Can I make a difference? The role of general and domain-specific self-efficacy in sustainable consumption decisions. Umweltpsychologie, 14, 46–74. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1956/6238
- Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Publications.
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2018). Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, H.-O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J.B.R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M.I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor, and T. Waterfield (eds.)]. In Press.
- International Union for Conservation of Nature’s Red List of Threatened Species. (n.d.). IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Retrieved June 2, 2020, from https://www.iucnredlist.org/.
- Jamieson, J., Reiss, M. J., Allen, D., Asher, L., Parker, M. O., Wathes, C. M., & Abeyesinghe, S. M. (2015). Adolescents care but don’t feel responsible for farm animal welfare. Society & Animals, 23(3), 269–297. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/15685306-12341283
- Jang, S. M. (2013). Framing responsibility in climate change discourse: Ethnocentric attribution bias, perceived causes, and policy attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 27–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.07.003
- Krettenauer, T. (2017). Pro-environmental behavior and adolescent moral development. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 27(3), 581–593. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12300
- Krettenauer, T., Wang, W., Jia, F., & Yao, Y. (2019). Connectedness with nature and the decline of pro-environmental behavior in adolescence: A comparison of Canada and China. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 101348, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101348
- Kuhnert, R. L., Begeer, S., Fink, E., & de Rosnay, M. (2017). Gender-differentiated effects of theory of mind, emotion understanding, and social preference on prosocial behavior development: A longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 154, 13–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.10.001
- Kunst, J. R., & Hohle, S. M. (2016). Meat eaters by dissociation: How we present, prepare and talk about meat increases willingness to eat meat by reducing empathy and disgust. Appetite, 105, 758–774. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.07.009
- Lane, J. D., Wellman, H. M., Olson, S. L., LaBounty, J., & Kerr, D. C. (2010). Theory of mind and emotion understanding predict moral development in early childhood. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28(4), 871–889. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1348/026151009X483056
- Lee, K., Gjersoe, N., O'Neill, S., & Barnett, J. (2020). Youth perceptions of climate change: A narrative synthesis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 11(3), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.641
- Li, D., Zhao, L., Ma, S., Shao, S., & Zhang, L. (2019). What influences an individual’s pro-environmental behavior? A literature review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 146, 28–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.024
- Liang, D., Hou, C., Jo, M. S., & Sarigöllü, E. (2019). Pollution avoidance and green purchase: The role of moral emotions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210, 1301–1310. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.103
- Lithoxoidou, L. S., Georgopoulos, A. D., Dimitriou, A. T., & Xenitidou, S. C. (2017). “Trees have a soul too!” Developing empathy and environmental values in early childhood. International Journal of Early Childhood Environmental Education, 5(1), 68–88.
- Littrell, M. K., Tayne, K., Okochi, C., Leckey, E., Gold, A. U., & Lynds, S. (2020). Student perspectives on climate change through place-based filmmaking. Environmental Education Research, 26(4), 594–610. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1736516
- Malti, T., & Krettenauer, T. (2013). The relation of moral emotion attributions to prosocial and antisocial behavior: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 84(2), 397–412. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01851.x
- McCabe, S., & Nekaris, K. A. I. (2019). The impact of subtle anthropomorphism on gender differences in learning conservation ecology in Indonesian school children. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 18(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2018.1427011
- Mellor, D., & Moore, K. A. (2014). The use of Likert scales with children. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 39(3), 369–379. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jst079
- Monroe, M. C., Plate, R. R., Oxarart, A., Bowers, A., & Chaves, W. A. (2019). Identifying effective climate change education strategies: A systematic review of the research. Environmental Education Research, 25(6), 791–812. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1360842
- Muldoon, J. C., Williams, J. M., & Currie, C. (2019). Differences in boys’ and girls’ attachment to pets in early-mid adolescence. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 62, 50–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2018.12.002
- Muralidharan, S., & Sheehan, K. (2018). The role of guilt in influencing sustainable pro-environmental behaviors among shoppers: Differences in response by gender to messaging about England’s plastic-bag levy. Journal of Advertising Research, 58(3), 349–362. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-2017-029
- Ojala, M. (2012). How do children cope with global climate change? Coping strategies, engagement, and well-being. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(3), 225–233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.02.004
- Ojala, M., & Lakew, Y. (2017). Young people and climate change communication. In Oxford research encyclopedia of climate science. Retrieved from https://oxfordre.com/climatescience/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228620-e-408
- O’Neill, S., & Nicholson-Cole, S. (2009). “Fear won’t do it”: promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Science Communication, 30(3), 355–379. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008329201
- Otto, S., Evans, G. W., Moon, M. J., & Kaiser, F. G. (2019). The development of children’s environmental attitude and behavior. Global Environmental Change, 58, 101947. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101947
- Pearce, H., Hudders, L., & Van de Sompel, D. (2020). Young energy savers: Exploring the role of parents, peers, media and schools in saving energy among children in Belgium. Energy Research & Social Science, 63, 101392. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101392
- Rees, J. H., Klug, S., & Bamberg, S. (2015). Guilty conscience: Motivating pro-environmental behavior by inducing negative moral emotions. Climatic Change, 130(3), 439–452. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1278-x
- Rickard, L. N., Yang, Z. J., Seo, M., & Harrison, T. M. (2014). The “I” in climate: The role of individual responsibility in systematic processing of climate change information. Global Environmental Change, 26, 39–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.03.010
- Root-Bernstein, M., Douglas, L., Smith, A., & Verissimo, D. (2013). Anthropomorphized species as tools for conservation: Utility beyond prosocial, intelligent and suffering species. Biodiversity and Conservation, 22(8), 1577–1589. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0494-4
- Rothgerber, H., & Mican, F. (2014). Childhood pet ownership, attachment to pets, and subsequent meat avoidance: The mediating role of empathy toward animals. Appetite, 79, 11–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2014.03.032
- Rottman, J., Kelemen, D., & Young, L. (2015). Hindering harm and preserving purity: How can moral psychology save the planet? Philosophy Compass, 10(2), 134–144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12195
- Sanson, A. V., Van Hoorn, J., & Burke, S. E. (2019). Responding to the impacts of the climate crisis on children and youth. Child Development Perspectives, 13(4), 201–207. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12342
- Schneider, C. R., Zaval, L., Weber, E. U., & Markowitz, E. M. (2017). The influence of anticipated pride and guilt on pro-environmental decision making. PLOS ONE, 12(11), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188781
- Smetana, J. G., Jambon, M., & Ball, C. (2014). The social domain approach to children’s moral and social judgments. In M. Killen, & J. G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 23–45). Psychology Press.
- Strife, S. J. (2012). Children’s environmental concerns: Expressing ecophobia. The Journal of Environmental Education, 43(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2011.602131
- Swim, J. K., & Bloodhart, B. (2015). Portraying the perils to polar bears: The role of empathic and objective perspective-taking toward animals in climate change communication. Environmental Communication, 9(4), 446–468. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.987304
- Šorytė, D., & Pakalniškienė, V. (2019). Why it is important to protect the environment: Reasons given by children. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 28(3), 228–241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2019.1582771
- Tam, K. P. (2019). Anthropomorphism of nature, environmental guilt, and pro-environmental behavior. Sustainability, 11(19), 5430. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195430
- Tam, K. P., Lee, S. L., & Chao, M. M. (2013). Saving Mr. Nature: Anthropomorphism enhances connectedness to and protectiveness toward nature. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(3), 514–521. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.001
- Van der Graaff, J., Carlo, G., Crocetti, E., Koot, H. M., & Branje, S. (2018). Prosocial behavior in adolescence: Gender differences in development and links with empathy. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(5), 1086–1099. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0786-1
- van Valkengoed, A. M., & Steg, L. (2019). Meta-analyses of factors motivating climate change adaptation behaviour. Nature Climate Change, 9(2), 158–163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0371-y
- Villarroel, J. D., Antón, Á, Zuazagoitia, D., & Nuño, T. (2017). Young children’s environmental judgement and its relationship with their understanding of the concept of living things. Environmental & Socio-Economic Studies, 5(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/environ-2017-0001
- Wang, F., & Basso, F. (2019). “Animals are friends, not food”: anthropomorphism leads to less favorable attitudes toward meat consumption by inducing feelings of anticipatory guilt. Appetite, 138, 153–173. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.03.019
- Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J., & Epley, N. (2010). Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(3), 219–232. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610369336
- Weiner, B. (1972). Attribution theory, achievement motivation, and the educational process. Review of Educational Research, 42(2), 203–215. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543042002203
- Wray-Lake, L., Flanagan, C. A., & Osgood, D. W. (2010). Examining trends in adolescent environmental attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors across three decades. Environment and Behavior, 42(1), 61–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916509335163
- Wu, B., & Yang, Z. (2018). The impact of moral identity on consumers’ green consumption tendency: The role of perceived responsibility for environmental damage. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 59, 74–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.08.011
- Young, A., Khalil, K. A., & Wharton, J. (2018). Empathy for animals: A review of the existing literature. Curator: The Museum Journal, 61(2), 327–343. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/cura.12257
- Yu, T. Y., Yu, T. K., & Chao, C. M. (2017). Understanding Taiwanese undergraduate students’ pro-environmental behavioral intention towards green products in the fight against climate change. Journal of Cleaner Production, 161, 390–402. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.115
- Zhu, H., Wong, N., & Huang, M. (2019). Does relationship matter? How social distance influences perceptions of responsibility on anthropomorphized environmental objects and conservation intentions. Journal of Business Research, 95, 62–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.008