3,646
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Report

Experiencing Climate Change Virtually: The Effects of Virtual Reality on Climate Change Related Cognitions, Emotions, and Behavior

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 581-601 | Received 26 Oct 2022, Accepted 18 Jun 2023, Published online: 05 Jul 2023

References

  • Ahn, S. J., Bailenson, J. N., & Park, D. (2014). Short- and long-term effects of embodied experiences in immersive virtual environments on environmental locus of control and behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.025
  • Ahn, S. J., Bostick, J., Ogle, E., Nowak, K. L., McGillicuddy, K. T., & Bailenson, J. N. (2016). Experiencing nature: Embodying animals in immersive virtual environments increases inclusion of nature in self and involvement with nature. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(6), 399–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12173
  • Bergquist, M., Nilsson, A., & Wesley Schultz, P. (2019). Experiencing a severe weather event increases concern about climate change. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(FEB), 1–6.
  • Bradley, G. L., & Reser, J. P. (2016). Adaptation processes in the context of climate change: A social and environmental psychology perspective. Journal of Bioeconomics, 19(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-016-9231-x
  • Breves, P. (2020). Bringing people closer: The prosocial effects of immersive media on users’ attitudes and behavior. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 49(5), 1015–1034. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764020903101
  • Breves, P., & Heber, V. (2020). Into the wild: The effects of 360 immersive nature videos on feelings of commitment to the environment. Environmental Communication, 14(3), 332–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2019.1665566
  • Breves, P., & Schramm, H. (2021). Bridging psychological distance: The impact of immersive media on distant and proximal environmental issues. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106606
  • Brosch, T. (2021). Affect and emotions as drivers of climate change perception and action: A review. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 42, 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.02.001
  • Brown, S. L., & West, C. (2015). Sequencing the threat and recommendation components of persuasive messages differentially improves the effectiveness of high- and low-distressing imagery in an anti-alcohol message in students. British Journal of Health Psychology, 20(2), 324–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12103
  • Chapman, D. A., Lickel, B., & Markowitz, E. M. (2017). Reassessing emotion in climate change communication. Nature Climate Change, 7(12), 850–852. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-017-0021-9
  • DeCuir-Gunby, J. T., Marshall, P. L., & McCulloch, A. W. (2011). Developing and using a codebook for the analysis of interview data: An example from a professional development research project. Field Methods, 23(2), 136–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X10388468
  • De Groeve, B., Bleys, B., & Hudders, L. (2019). Okay to promote eating less meat, but don't be a cheat–The role of dietary identity, perceived inconsistency and inclusive language of an advocate in legitimizing meat reduction. Appetite, 138, 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.03.031
  • Demski, C., Capstick, S., Pidgeon, N., Sposato, R. G., & Spence, A. (2017). Experience of extreme weather affects climate change mitigation and adaptation responses. Climatic Change, 140(2), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1837-4
  • Duan, R., Zwickle, A., & Takahashi, B. (2022). Refining the application of construal level theory: Egocentric and nonegocentric psychological distances in climate change visual communication. Environmental Communication, 16(1), 92–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2021.1964999
  • Fauville, G., Queiroz, A. C. M., & Bailenson, J. N. (2020). Virtual reality as a promising tool to promote climate change awareness. In Technology and health (pp. 91–108). Elsevier.
  • Fonseca, D., & Kraus, M. (2016). A comparison of head-mounted and hand-held displays for 360° videos with focus on attitude and behavior change. Academicmindtrek 2016 - proceedings of the 20th international academic mindtrek conference, 287–296.
  • Gibbs, J. K., Gillies, M., & Pan, X. (2022). A comparison of the effects of haptic and visual feedback on presence in virtual reality. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 157, 102717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102717
  • Hartmann, P., Apaolaza, V., D’Souza, C., Barrutia, J. M., & Echebarria, C. (2014). Environmental threat appeals in green advertising: The role of fear arousal and coping efficacy. International Journal of Advertising, 33(4), 741–765. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJA-33-4-741-765
  • Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.
  • Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(3), 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12028
  • Heeter, C. (1992). Being there: The subjective experience of presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1(2), 262–271. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1992.1.2.262
  • Hofman, K., Hughes, K., & Walters, G. (2021). The effectiveness of virtual vs real-life marine tourism experiences in encouraging conservation behaviour. Journal of Sustainable Tourism.
  • Hunter, E., & Röös, E. (2016). Fear of climate change consequences and predictors of intentions to alter meat consumption. Food Policy, 62, 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.06.004
  • Jones, C., Hine, D. W., & Marks, A. D. G. (2017). The future is now: Reducing psychological distance to increase public engagement with climate change. Risk Analysis, 37(2), 331–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12601
  • Kim, S. C., Pei, D., Kotcher, J. E., & Myers, T. A. (2021). Predicting responses to climate change health impact messages from political ideology and health status: Cognitive appraisals and emotional reactions as mediators. Environment and Behavior, 53(10), 1095–1117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916520942600
  • Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Onsongo, E., Wieczorek, A., … Wells, P. (2019). An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004
  • Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S., & Whitmarsh, L. (2007). Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change, 17(3–4), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.004
  • Loy, L. S., & Spence, A. (2020). Reducing, and bridging, the psychological distance of climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 67, 101388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101388
  • Maddux, J. E., & Rogers, R. W. (1983). Protection motivation and self-efficacy: A revised theory of fear appeals and attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19(5), 469–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(83)90023-9
  • Markowitz, D. M., Laha, R., Perone, B. P., Pea, R. D., & Bailenson, J. N. (2018). Immersive virtual reality field trips facilitate learning about climate change. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2364. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02364
  • Meijers, M. H. C., Smit, E. S., de Wildt, K., Karvonen, S. G., van der Plas, D., & van der Laan, L. N. (2022). Stimulating sustainable food choices using virtual reality: Taking an environmental vs health communication perspective on enhancing response efficacy beliefs. Environmental Communication, 16(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2021.1943700
  • Meijers, M. H. C., Wonneberger, A., Azrout, R., & Brick, C. (2023). Introducing and testing the personal-collective-governmental efficacy typology: How personal, collective, and governmental efficacy subtypes are associated with differential environmental actions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 85, 101915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101915
  • Nielsen, K. S., Clayton, S., Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (2020). How psychology can help limit climate change. American Psychologist, 76(1), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000624
  • Oh, J., Jin, E., Sudarshan, S., Nah, S., & Yu, N. (2021). Does 360-degree video enhance engagement with global warming?: The mediating role of spatial presence and emotions. Environmental Communication, 15(6), 731–748. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2021.1891945
  • Poore, J., & Nemecek, T. (2018). Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science, 360(6392), 987–992. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq0216
  • Poortinga, W., Spence, A., Whitmarsh, L., Capstick, S., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2011). Uncertain climate: An investigation into public scepticism about anthropogenic climate change. Global Environmental Change, 21(3), 1015–1024. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.001
  • Raja, U. S., & Carrico, A. R. (2021). A qualitative exploration of individual experiences of environmental virtual reality through the lens of psychological distance. Environmental Communication, 15(5), 594–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2020.1871052
  • Schoemann, A. M., Boulton, A. J., & Short, S. D. (2017). Determining power and sample size for simple and complex mediation models. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 379–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617715068
  • Schöne, B., Wessels, M., & Gruber, T. (2019). Experiences in virtual reality: A window to autobiographical memory. Current Psychology, 38(3), 715–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9648-y
  • Slater, M., & Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2016). Enhancing our lives with immersive virtual reality. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 3, 74. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2016.00074
  • Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24(2), 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x
  • Smit, E. S., Meijers, M. H. C., & van der Laan, L. N. (2021). Using virtual reality to stimulate healthy and environmentally friendly food consumption among children: An interview study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(3), 1088. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031088
  • Spence, A., Poortinga, W., Butler, C., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2011). Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience. Nature Climate Change, 1(1), 46–49. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1059
  • Spence, A., Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. (2012). The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 32(6), 957–972. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01695.x
  • Strecher, V. J., & Rosenstock, I. M. (1997). The health belief model. Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine, 113, 117.
  • Tannenbaum, M. B., Hepler, J., Zimmerman, R. S., Saul, L., Jacobs, S., Wilson, K., & Albarracín, D. (2015). Appealing to fear: A meta-analysis of fear appeal effectiveness and theories. Psychological Bulletin, 141(6), 1178–1204. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039729
  • Tussyadiah, I. P., Wang, D., Jung, T. H., & Tom Dieck, M. C. (2018). Virtual reality, presence, and attitude change: Empirical evidence from tourism. Tourism Management, 66, 140–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.12.003
  • Van der Linden, S. (2015). The social-psychological determinants of climate change risk perceptions: Towards a comprehensive model. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 41, 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.11.012
  • Vautard, R., Van Aalst, M., Boucher, O., Drouin, A., Haustein, K., Kreienkamp, F., … Wehner, M. (2020). Human contribution to the record-breaking June and July 2019 heatwaves in Western Europe. Environmental Research Letters, 15(9), 094077. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aba3d4
  • Witte, K. (1994). Fear control and danger control: A test of the extended parallel process model (EPPM). Communication Monographs, 61(2), 113–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759409376328