Defending “Canadian Energy”: Connective Leadership and Extractive Populism on Canadian Facebook

References

• Anon. (2022). Third party financial returns for the 43rd general election. Elections Canada. https://www.elections.ca/content.aspx?section = fin&document = index&dir = oth/thi/advert/tp43&lang = e.
   Google Scholar
• Austen, I., & Flavelle, C. (2021, April 21). Trudeau was a global climate hero. Now Canada risks falling behind. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/21/world/canada/trudeau-climate-oil-sands.html.
   Google Scholar
• Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 611–639. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, E. F., & Tillery, D. (2019). The circulation of climate change denial online: Rhetorical and networking strategies on Facebook. Environmental Communication, 13(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1527378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brulle, R. J. (2014). Institutionalizing delay: Foundation funding and the creation of U.S. climate change counter-movement organizations. Climatic Change, 122(4), 681–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-1018-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryden, J. (2018, August 30). Federal court quashes Trans Mountain expansion; Ottawa forging ahead with purchase. Global News. https://globalnews.ca/news/4418485/trans-mountain-pipeline-quashed-federal-court/.
   Google Scholar
• Bryden, J. (2019, April 24). Online registry requirement applies only to paid political ads. Toronto Star. https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2019/04/24/online-registry-requirement-applies-only-to-paid-political-adverts.html.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers. (2015, April). The engagement issue. Context Magazine, 3(2), 1–18 . https://issuu.com/capp/docs/context_issue_8_online.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, W. K. ed. (2021). Regime of obstruction: How corporate power blocks energy democracy. Athabasca University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chakradhar, S. (2021, October 26). More internal documents show how Facebook’s algorithm prioritized anger and posts that triggered it. Nieman Lab. https://www.niemanlab.org/2021/10/more-internal-documents-show-how-facebooks-algorithm-prioritized-anger-and-posts-that-triggered-it/.
   Google Scholar
• Coan, T. G., Boussalis, C., Cook, J., & Nanko, M. O. (2021). Computer-assisted classification of contrarian claims about climate change. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 22320–22320. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01714-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coates, K., & Buffalo, S. (2018, June 18). How Indigenous peoples can save the resource economy in Canada. The Hill Times. https://www.hilltimes.com/story/2018/06/18/indigenous-peoples-can-save-resource-economy-canada/262024/.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, D. J., & Gismondi, M. (2011). Challenging legitimacy at the precipice of energy calamity. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, W. (2020). Nervous states: Democracy and the decline of reason. W.W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., & McCright, A. M. (2015). Challenging climate change: The denial countermovement. In R. E. Dunlap & R. J. Brulle (Eds.), Climate change and society: Sociological perspectives (pp. 300–332). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N., Mulderrig, J., & Wodak, R. (2011). Critical discourse analysis. In N. Fairclough, J. Mulderrig, & R. Wodak (Eds.), Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (2nd ed., pp. 357–378). SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, T. (2005). What’s the matter with Kansas? How conservatives won the heart of America. Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A. (1992). Talking politics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, N. (2020). Fossil knowledge networks: Science, ecology and the “greening” of carbon extractive development. Studies in Political Economy, 101(2), 93–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/07078552.2020.1802831
   Google Scholar
• Graham, N., Carroll, W. K., & Chen, D. (2019). Big oil’s political reach: Mapping fossil fuel lobbying from Harper to Trudeau (pp. 1–64). Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.
   Google Scholar
• Gruzd, A., & Mai, P. (2020). The state of social media in Canada 2020. Ryerson University Social Media Lab.
   Google Scholar
• Gunster, S. (2022). Connective action, digital engagement and network-building: A year in the life of Canadian climate Facebook. Environmental Communication, 16(5), 645–663. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2022.2027802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunster, S., Neubauer, R., Bermingham, J., & Massie, A. (2021). Our oil”: Extractive populism in Canadian social media. In W. Carroll (Ed.), Regime of obstruction: How corporate power blocks energy democracy (pp. 197–224). Athabasca University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gunster, S., & Saurette, P. (2014). Storylines in the sands: News, narrative and ideology in the Calgary Herald. Canadian Journal of Communication, 39(3), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2014v39n3a2830
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A. (1993). Discourse coalitions and the institutionalization of practice: The case of acid rain in Great Britain. In F. Fischer (Ed.), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning (pp. 43–76). Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hestres, L. E. (2015). Climate change advocacy online: Theories of change, target audiences, and online strategy. Environmental Politics, 24(2), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2015.992600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoberg, G. (2013). The battle over oil sands access to tidewater: A political risk analysis of pipeline alternatives. Canadian Public Policy, 39(3), 371–392. https://doi.org/10.3138/CPP.39.3.371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussey, I., Pineault, E., Jackson, E., & Cake, S. (2021). Boom, bust, and consolidation: Corporate restructuring in the Alberta oil sands. In W. K. Carroll (Ed.), Regime of obstruction: How corporate power blocks energy democracy (pp. 35–59). Athabasca University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Issawi, H. (2019, August 13). Climate change a ‘serious concern’ for Canadians, poll finds—even if Albertans don’t feel the same. Toronto Star. https://www.thestar.com/edmonton/2019/08/13/climate-change-a-serious-concern-for-canadians-poll-finds-even-if-albertans-dont-feel-the-same.html.
   Google Scholar
• Jacques, P. J., Dunlap, R. E., & Freeman, M. (2008). The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism. Environmental Politics, 17(3), 349–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010802055576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (2012). Politics and ideology in Marxist theory: Capitalism, fascism, populism. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laduke, W. (2014). Ending the age of fossil fuels and building an economics for the seventh generation. In S. D’Arcy, T. Black, T. Weis, & J. K. Russell (Eds.), A line in the tar sands (pp. 229–239). PM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, W. F., Mattioli, G., Levi, S., Roberts, J. T., Capstick, S., Creutzig, F., Minx, J. C., Müller-Hansen, F., Culhane, T., & Steinberger, J. K. (2020). Discourses of climate delay. Global Sustainability, 3, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2019.23
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, M. (2018). Right-wing populism and the climate change agenda: Exploring the linkages. Environmental Politics, 27(4), 712–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1458411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacNeil, R. (2014). The decline of Canadian environmental regulation: Neoliberalism and the staples bias. Studies in Political Economy, 93(1), 81–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/19187033.2014.11674965
   Google Scholar
• Malm, A., & Collective, T. Z. (2021). White skin, black fuel: On the danger of fossil fascism (p. 576). Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Munn, L. (2020). Angry by design: Toxic communication and technical architectures. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00550-7
   Google Scholar
• Neubauer, R. (2011). Manufacturing junk: Think tanks, climate denial, and neoliberal hegemony. Australian Journal of Communication, 38(3), 65–88. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.776574584867350
   Google Scholar
• Neubauer, R. (2018). Moving beyond the petrostate: Northern gateway, extractivism, and the Canadian petrobloc. Studies in Political Economy, 99(3), 246–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/07078552.2018.1536369
   Google Scholar
• Neubauer, R., & Graham, N. (2021). Fuelling the subsidized public: Mapping the flow of extractivist content on Facebook. Canadian Journal of Communication, 46(4), 905–938. https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2021v46n4a4019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neubauer, R., & Gunster, S. (2019). Enemies at the gateway: Regional populist discourse and the fight against oil pipelines on Canada’s west coast. Frontiers in Communication, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00061
   Google Scholar
• Pineault, E. (2018). The capitalist pressure to extract: The ecological and political economy of extreme oil in Canada. Studies in Political Economy, 99(2), 130–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/07078552.2018.1492063
   Google Scholar
• Plehwe, D. (2021). Think tanks and the politics of climate change. In D. Abelson & R. Christopher (Eds.), Handbook on think tanks in public policy (pp. 150–165). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Poell, T., Abdulla, R., Rieder, B., Woltering, R., & Zack, L. (2016). Protest leadership in the age of social media. Information, Communication & Society, 19(7), 994–1014. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1088049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratta, D. D., & Valeriani, A. (2012). Remixing the spring!: Connective leadership and read-write practices in the 2011 Arab uprisings. CyberOrient, 6(1), 52–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.cyo2.20120601.0004
   Google Scholar
• Scott, N. (2022). Against environmentalism for the common good: A theoretical model. In D. T. Tindall, M. C. J. Stoddart, & R. E. Dunlap (Eds.), Handbook of anti-environmentalism (pp. 43–61). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, D. E. (2000). The rise of the environmental justice paradigm: Injustice framing and the social construction of environmental discourses. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(4), 508–580. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764200043004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tienhaara, K., & Walker, J. (2021). Fossil capital, ‘unquantifiable risk’ and neoliberal nationalizations: The case of the trans mountain pipeline in Canada. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 124, 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urman, A., & Katz, S. (2022). What they do in the shadows: Examining the far-right networks on telegram. Information, Communication & Society, 25(7), 904–923. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1803946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, E. T. (2014). Grassroots for hire: Public affairs consultants in American democracy. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Welsby, D., Price, J., Pye, S., & Ekins, P. (2021). Unextractable fossil fuels in a 1.5 °C world. Nature, 597(7875), 230–234. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03821-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, T. (2018). Energy’s citizens: The making of a Canadian petro-public. Canadian Journal of Communication, 43(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2018v43n1a3312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yunker, Z. (2019). Dispossession politics: Mapping the contours of reconciliatory colonialism in Canada through industry-funded think tanks. MA Thesis. University of Victoria.
   Google Scholar