471
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Sex and stigma: The impact of structural violence on people with disabilities in Taiwan

ORCID Icon

References

  • Addis, M. E., and J. R. Mahalik. 2003. “Men, Masculinity, and the Contexts of Help Seeking.” American Psychologist 58 (1): 5–14. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.58.1.5.
  • Addlakha, R. 2009. “Gender, Subjectivity and Sexual Identity: How Young People with Disabilities Conceptualise the Body, Sex and Marriage in Urban India.” IDEAS Working Paper Series from RePEc. https://ideas.repec.org/p/ess/wpaper/id2075.html
  • Agmon, M., A. Sa’Ar, and T. Araten-Bergman. 2016. “The Person in the Disabled Body: A Perspective on Culture and Personhood from the Margins.” International Journal for Equity in Health 15 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1186/s12939-016-0437-2.
  • Campbell, M. 2017. “Disabilities and Sexual Expression: A Review of the Literature.” Sociology Compass 11 (9): 1–19. doi:10.1111/soc4.12508.
  • Carey, M. 2013. The Social Work Dissertation: Using Small-scale Qualitative Methodology. 2nd ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  • Chambon, A. S. 1999. “Foucault’s Approach: Making the Familiar Visible.” Chap. 3 In Reading Foucault for Social Work, edited by A. S. Chambon, A. Irving, and L. Epstein, 51–81. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Charmaz, K., and D. Rosenfeld. 2006. “Reflections of the Body, Images of Self: Visibility and Invisibility in Chronic Illness and Disability.” Chap. 3 In Body/embodiment: Symbolic Interaction and the Sociology of the Body, edited by D. Waskul and P. Vannini, 35–50. Abingdon: Ashgate.
  • Chiou, L. C. 2011. “Tantao Butong Zhangaizhe De Qingyu Wenti: Yige Zhixing Yanjiu Chengguo De Fenxi [Exploring the Sexuality of People with Varied Disabilities: Results from a Qualitative Study].” Taida Shehuigongzuo Xuekan [NTU Social Work Review] 24: 39–86. doi:10.6171/ntuswr2011.24.02.
  • Dauncey, S. 2017. “Gentlemen, Heroes, Real Men, Disabled Men: Explorations at the Intersections of Disability and Masculinity in Contemporary China.” Nan Nü 19 (2): 357–384. doi:10.1163/15685268-00192P05.
  • FitzPatrick, B. 2019. “Validity in Qualitative Health Education Research.” Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning 11 (2): 211–217. doi:10.1016/j.cptl.2018.11.014.
  • Goldstein, S. B., and V. A. Johnson. 1997. “Stigma by Association: Perceptions of the Dating Partners of College Students with Physical Disabilities.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology 19 (4): 495–504. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1904_6.
  • Hammer, G. 2016. “‘If They’re Going to Stare, at Least I’ll Give Them a Good Reason To’: Blind Women’s Visibility, Invisibility, and Encounters with the Gaze.” Signs 41 (2): 409–432. doi:10.1086/682924.
  • Houghton, C., C. Dympna, D. Shaw, and K. Murphy. 2013. “Rigour in Qualitative Case-study Research.” Nurse Researcher 20 (4): 12–17. doi:10.7748/nr2013.03.20.4.12.e326.
  • Kendall, D. E. 2013. “Health Care: Problems of Physical and Mental Illness.” In Social Problems in a Diverse Society, 202–223. 5th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Kim, E. J. 2010. “The Melodrama of Virginity and Sex Drive: The Gendered Discourse of “the Sexual Oppression of Disabled People” and Its ‘solutions’.” Sexuality Research and Social Policy 7 (4): 334–347. doi:10.1007/s13178-010-0026-x.
  • Kulick, D., and J. Rydström. 2015. Loneliness and Its Opposite: Sex, Disability, and the Ethics of Engagement. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Markham, A., and E. Buchanan. 2012. “Ethical Decision-making and Internet Research Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee.” Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (Version 2.0). https://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf
  • McCulloch, G. 2012. “Documentary Methods.” Chap. 29 In Research Methods and Methodologies in Education, edited by J. Arthur, M. Waring, R. Coe, and L. Hedges, 210–214. London: Sage.
  • McDonald, K. E., C. B. Keys, and F. E. Balcazar. 2007. “Disability, Race/ethnicity and Gender: Themes of Cultural Oppression, Acts of Individual Resistance.” American Journal of Community Psychology 39 (1–2): 145–161. doi:10.1007/s10464-007-9094-3.
  • McLaughlin, J., and E. Coleman-Fountain. 2014. “The Unfinished Body: The Medical and Social Reshaping of Disabled Young Bodies.” Social Science & Medicine 120: 76–84. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.09.012.
  • Moin, V., I. Duvdevany, and D. Mazor. 2009. “Sexual Identity, Body Image and Life Satisfaction among Women with and without Physical Disability.” Sexuality and Disability 27 (2): 83–95. doi:10.1007/s11195-009-9112-5.
  • Neuberg, S. L., D. M. Smith, J. C. Hoffman, and F. J. Russell. 1994. “When We Observe Stigmatized and “normal” Individuals Interacting: Stigma by Association.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 20 (2): 196–209. doi:10.1177/0146167294202007.
  • Peta, C., and L. Ned. 2019. “So from Here Where Do We Go? A Focus on the Sexuality of Women with Disabilities in Africa: A Narrative Review.” Sexuality & Culture 23: 978–1009. Online First. doi:10.1007/s12119-019-09585-8.
  • Plummer, K. 1995. Telling Sexual Stories: Power, Change, and Social Worlds. London: Routledge.
  • Rabiee, P. 2013. “Exploring the Relationships between Choice and Independence: Experiences of Disabled and Older People.” British Journal of Social Work 43 (5): 872–888. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcs022.
  • Rembis, M. A. 2009. “Beyond the Binary: Rethinking the Social Model of Disabled Sexuality.” Sexuality and Disability 28 (1): 51–60. doi:10.1007/s11195‐009‐9133‐0.
  • Rogers, R., I. Schaenen, C. Schott, K. O’Brien, L. Trigos-Carrillo, K. Starkey, and C. C. Chasteen. 2016. “Critical Discourse Analysis in Education: A Review of the Literature, 2004 to 2012.” Review of Educational Research 86 (4): 1192–1226. doi:10.3102/0034654316628993.
  • Scott, J.-A. 2014. “Illuminating the Vulnerability of Hegemonic Masculinity through a Performance Analysis of Physically Disabled Men’s Personal Narratives.” Disability Studies Quarterly 34 (1). doi:10.18061/dsq.v34i1.3570.
  • Shakespeare, T. 1996. “Disability, Identity and Difference.” Chap. 6 In Exploring the Divide: Illness and Disability, edited by C. Barnes, and G. Mercer, 94–113. Leeds: Disability Press.
  • Shakespeare, T. 2014. Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited. 2nd ed. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Shakespeare, T., K. Gillespie-Sells, and D. Davies. 1996. The Sexual Politics of Disability: Untold Desires. New York, NY: Cassell.
  • Shang, X., and K. R. Fisher. 2014. “Social Support for Mothers of Children with Disabilities in China.” Journal of Social Service Research 40 (4): 573–586. doi:10.1080/01488376.2014.896849.
  • Shento, A. K. 2004. “Strategies for Ensuring Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research Projects.” Education for Information 22 (2): 63–75. doi:10.3233/efi-2004-22201.
  • Shildrick, M. 2009. Dangerous Discourses of Disability, Subjectivity and Sexuality. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Shuttleworth, R., and L. Mona. 2002. “Disability and Sexuality: Toward a Focus on Sexual Access.” Disability Studies Quarterly 22 (4): 2–9. doi:10.18061/dsq.v22i4.368.
  • Stanhope, V., J. Tennille, C. Bohrman, and E. Hamovitch. 2016. “Motivational Interviewing: Creating a Leadership Role for Social Work in the Era of Healthcare Reform.” Social Work in Public Health 31 (6): 474–480. doi:10.1080/19371918.2016.1160338.
  • Sun, H. Y. 2006. “Experience of Disability: Taiwan.” In Encyclopedia of Disability, edited by G. L. Albrecht, 698–699. doi:10.4135/9781412950510.n325.
  • Tennille, J., P. Solomon, and C. Bohrman. 2014. “Using the FIELD Model to Prepare Social Work Students and Field Instructors on Sexuality and Intimacy for Persons with Psychiatric Disabilities.” Sexuality and Disability 32 (4): 469–483. doi:10.1007/s11195-014-9380-6.
  • Thomas, E., and J. K. Magilvy. 2011. “Qualitative Rigor or Research Validity in Qualitative Research.” Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing 16 (2): 151–155. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6155.2011.00283.x.
  • Wodak, R., and M. Meyer. 2001. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.
  • Wong, J. P. H., and M. K. L. Poon. 2010. “Bringing Translation Out of the Shadows: Translation as an Issue of Methodological Significance in Cross-Cultural Qualitative Research.” Journal of Transcultural Nursing 21 (2): 151–158. doi:10.1177/1043659609357637.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.