Core task and organizational reality

REFERENCES

• Ahrne, G. & Brunsson, N. (2011) ‘Organizations outside organizations: the significance of partial organizations’, Organization, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 83–104. 10.1177/1350508410376256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M. & Willmott, H. (1992) Critical Management Studies, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C. & SchöN, D. A. (1996) Organizational Learning II; Theory, Method, and Practice, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Armenakis, A. A, Harris, S. G. & Mossholder, K. W. (1993) ‘Creating readiness for organizational change’, Human Relations, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 681–703. 10.1177/001872679304600601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnard, C. I. (1938/1968) The Functions of the Executive, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Bartunek, J. (1988) ‘The dynamics of personal and organizational reframing’, in Paradox and Transformation: toward a Theory of Change in Organization and Management, eds. R. E. Quinn & K. S. Cameron, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA, PP.137–162.
   Google Scholar
• Bejerot, E. & Hasselbladh, H. (2013) ‘Forms of intervention in public sector organizations: generic traits in public sector reforms’, Organization Studies, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 1357–1380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, T., Mcfall, L. & Pryke, M. (2009) ‘Editor's introduction’, Journal of Cultural Economy, vol. 2, no. 1–2, pp. 237–238.
   Google Scholar
• Bennis, W. (1989) On Becoming a Leader, Addison Wesley, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, J. M. (1982) ‘Introduction to the special issue on the utilization of organizational research’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 27, pp. 588–590. 10.2307/2392533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bion, W. (1961) Experiences in Group, Tavistock Publications Limited/Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Blackler, F., Crump, N. & Mcdonald, S. (2000) ‘Organizing processes in complex activity networks’, Organization, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 277–300.
   Google Scholar
• Blaschke, S., Schoeneborn, D. & Seidl, D. (2012) ‘Organizations as networks of communication episodes: turning the network perspective inside out’, Organization Studies, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 879–906.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L. & Chiapello, E. (2005) The New Spirit of Capitalism, Verso, London.
   Google Scholar
• Braverman, H. (1974) Labour and Monopoly Capital, Monthly Review Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Brighouse, T. & Tomlinson, J. R. G. (1991) Successful Schools, Institute for Public Policy Research, London.
   Google Scholar
• Brunsson, N. (1982) ‘The irrationality of action and action rationality: Decisions, ideologies and organizational actions’, Journal of Management Studies, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 29–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burawoy, M. (1979) Manufacturing Consent, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Burawoy, M. (2004) ‘Public sociologies: contradictions, dilemmas and possibilities’, Social Forces, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 1603–1618. 10.1353/sof.2004.0064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrell, G. & Morgan, G. (1979) Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis: elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life, Ashgate Publishing Company, Burlington, VT.
   Google Scholar
• Calás, M. B. & Smircich, L. (2006) ‘From the “woman's point of view” ten years later: towards a feminist organization studies’, in Handbook of Organization Studies, 2nd edition, eds S. Clegg, W. Hardy, C. Nord & W. & T. Lawrence, Sage, London, pp. 284–346.
   Google Scholar
• Casile, M. & Davis-Blake, A. (2002) ‘When accreditation standards change: factors affecting differential responsiveness of public and private organizations, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 45, no.1, pp. 180–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, Manuel (1996) The Rise of the Network Society, Blackwell, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, S., Courpasson, D. & Phillips, N. (2006) Power and Organizations, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, S., Hardy, C. & Nord, W. R. (1996) Handbook of Organization Studies, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. D., March, J. G. & Olsen, J. P. (1972) ‘A garbage can model of organizational choice’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–25. 10.2307/2392088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crozier, M. (1964) The Bureaucratic Phenomenon, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Crozier, M. & Friedberg, E. (1980) Actors and Systems: The Politics of Collective Action, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Cyert, R. & March, J. G. (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. (2003) ‘The styles and stylists of organization theory’, in The Oxford Handbook of Organization Theory: meta-theoretical Perspectives, eds H. Tsoukas & C. Knudsen, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 237–261.
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. (2004) ‘On time, space, and action nets’, Organization, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 773–791. 10.1177/1350508404047251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalin, P. (1998) School Development: Theories & Strategies, Continuum Books, London.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, L. (2001) The Contingency Theory of Organizations, Sage, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, P. (1955/1968) The Practice of Management, Pan Books Ltd., London.
   Google Scholar
• Du Gay, P. & Vikkelsø, S. (2013) Exploitation, exploration and exaltation: Notes on a metaphysical (re)turn to ‘one best way of organizing’, in Managing ‘Human Resources’ by Exploiting and Exploring People's Potentials, eds. Mikael Holmqvist & André Spicer, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 249–279 ( Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 37).
   Google Scholar
• Dyer, J. H. & Singh, H. (1998) ‘The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage’, Academy of Management Review, vol. 23, no. 40, pp. 660–679.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., Westcott, B. J. (1988), ‘Paradoxical demands and the creation of excellence: The case of just-in-time manufacturing’, in Paradox and Transformation: Towards a Theory of Change in Organization and Management, eds R. E. Quinn & K. Cameron, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA., pp. 169–194.
   Google Scholar
• Fineman, S. (2008) The Emotional Organization: Passions and Power, Blackwell, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Follett, M. P. (2013) ‘The giving of orders’, in Dynamic Administration: the Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follett, eds H. C. Metcalf & L. Urwick, Martino Publishing, Mansfield, CA, pp. 50–70.
   Google Scholar
• gouldner, A. W. (1957) ‘Cosmopolitans and locals: towards an analysis of latent social roles – I’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 281–306. 10.2307/2391000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1985) ‘Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 91, pp. 481–510. 10.1086/228311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. (1983) Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C. (2005) ‘Venturing outside the monastery’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 961–962. 10.5465/AMJ.2005.19573097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A. (2010) ‘Total student load: maybe worth a longer book, but hardly a revolution’, Book review, Education Next, vol. 10, no. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Hassard, J. (1993) Sociology and Organization Theory: Positivism, Paradigms and Postmodernity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Hassard, J., Holliday, R. & Willmott, H. (2000) Body and Organization, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Hassard, J. & Wolfram Cox, J. (2013) ‘Can sociological paradigms still inform organizational analysis? a paradigm model for post-paradigm times’, Organization Studies, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 1701–1728.
   Google Scholar
• Hasselbladh, H. (2013) ‘Forms of intervention in public sector organizations: Generic traits in public sector reforms’, Organization Studies, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 1357–1380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatch, M. J. & Yanow, D. (2003) ‘Organization theory as an interpretive science’, in The Oxford Handbook of Organization Theory: Meta-theoretical Perspectives, eds H. Tsoukas & C. Knudsen, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 63–87.
   Google Scholar
• hernes, T. (2008) Understanding Organization as Process: Theory for a Tangled World, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschhorn, L. (1999) ‘The primary risk’, Human Relations, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 5–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoggett, P. (2006) ‘Conflict, ambivalence, and the contested purpose of public organizations’, Human Relations, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 175–194. 10.1177/0018726706062731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, I. (2006) ‘The history of theory’, Critical Inquiry, vol. 3, pp. 78–112. 10.1086/509747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, I. (2007) ‘The time of theory’, Postcolonial Studies, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 5–22. 10.1080/13688790601153123
   Google Scholar
• James, W. (1975) Pragmatism, Harvard University Press, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C. (2003) ‘Value maximization and the corporate objective function’, in Breaking the Code of Change, eds M. Beer & N. Nohria, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, pp. 37–57.
   Google Scholar
• JuelskjæR, M., Knudsen, H., Pors, J. G. & StaunæS, D. (2011) Ledelse af Uddannelse: At Lede det Potentielle, Samfundslitteratur, Frederiksberg.
   Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M., Stein, B. A. & Jick, T. D. (1992) The Challenge of Organizational Change: How Companies Experience it and Leaders Guide it, Free Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Khurana, R. (2007) From Higher Aims to Hired Hands: The Social Transformation of American Business Schools and the Unfulfilled Promise of Management as a Profession, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
   Google Scholar
• King, B. G., Clemens, E. S. & Konty, M. F. (2011) ‘Identity realization and organizational forms: differentiation and consolidation of identities among Arizona's charter schools’, Organization Science, vol. 22, pp. 554–572. 10.1287/orsc.1100.0548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotter, J. P. (1996) Leading Change, Harvard Business Press, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Knudsen, H. & Andersen, N. Å. (2014) ‘Playful hyper responsibility: Toward a dislocation of parents’ responsibility?’, Journal of Education Policy, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 105–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krackhardt, D. (1992) ‘The strength of strong ties: the importance of philos in organizations’, in Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action, eds N. Nohria & R. Eccles, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, pp. 216–239.
   Google Scholar
• latour, B. (1991) ‘Technology is society made durable’, in A Sociology of Monsters Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, eds J. Law, Routledge, London, pp. 103–132.
   Google Scholar
• latour, B. (2004) ‘Why has critique run out of steam? from matters of fact to matters of concern’, Critical Inquiry, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 225–248. 10.1086/421123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, P. R. & Lorsch, J. W. (1967/1986) Organization and Environment, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Leavitt, B. & March, J. (1988) ‘Organizational learning’, Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 14, pp. 319–340. 10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, H. (1970) ‘Management by whose objectives?’, Harvard Business Review, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 125–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linstead, S. & HöPfl, H. (2000) The Aesthetics of Organization, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Marres, N. (2009) ‘Testing powers of engagement: green living experiments, the ontological turn and the undoability of involvement’, European Journal of Social Theory, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 117–133. 10.1177/1368431008099647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A., Lopez, S., Roscigno, V. & Hodson, R. (2012) ‘Against the rules: synthesizing types and processes of bureaucratic rulebreaking, Academy of Management Review, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 550–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1940) ‘Bureaucratic structure and personality’, Social Forces, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 560–568. 10.2307/2570634
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W. & Rowan, B. (1977) ‘Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony’, American Journal of Sociology, vol.83, pp. 340–63. 10.1086/226550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, E. J. & Rice, A. K. (1967) Systems of Organization, Tavistock Publications, London.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (1979) The Structuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of the Research, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, G. (1986) Images of Organization, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Moos, L. & Macbeath, J. (EDS) (2003) Democratic Learning: the Challenge to School Effectiveness. RoutledgeFalmer, London.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. (1994) ‘Transformational change and the evolving role of the principal’, in Reshaping the Principalship: insights from Transformational Reform Efforts, eds J. Murphy & K. Seashore, Corwin, Thousand Oaks CA, pp. 20–53.
   Google Scholar
• nohria, N. & Eccles, R. (1992) Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I. (1991) ‘The knowledge-creating company’, Harvard Business Review, November, pp. 96–104.
   Google Scholar
• Nord, W. R. & Connell, A. D. (2011) Rethinking the Knowledge Controversy in Organization Studies: A Generative Uncertainty Perspective, Routledge, New York.
   Google Scholar
• O'Connor, E. S. (2011) Creating New Knowledge in Management: Appropriating the Field’s Lost Foundations, Stanford University Press, Stanford, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Ouchi, W. (2003) Making Schools Work: A Revolutionary Plan to Get Your Children the Education They Need, Simon and Schuster, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Ouchi, W. (2009) ‘The Secret of TSL: the Revolutionary Discovery That Raises School Performance, Simon & Schuster, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Ouchi, W., Riordan, R., Lingle, L. & Porter, L. (2005) ‘Making public schools work: managemnet reform as the key’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 929–994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, M. (2013) ‘University, Ltd: changing a business school’, Organization, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 281–292.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, O. K. (2008) ‘Folkeskolens formål og nyeste udfordringer. Folkeskolens fremtid. Fremtidens folkeskole’, Jubilæumsudgave af Fagbladet Folkeskolen, pp. 22–45.
   Google Scholar
• Perrow, C. (1972) Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay, McGraw-Hill Publishers, Glenview, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J. (1981) Power in Organizations, Pitman, Marshfield, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J. (1993) ‘Barriers to the advance of organizational science: paradigm development as a dependent variable’, Academy of Management Review, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 599–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J. (1997) New Directions for Organization Theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Pil, F. K. & Leana, C. (2009) ‘Applying organizational research to public school reform: the effects of teacher human and social capital on student performance’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 52. no. 6, pp. 1101–1112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W. (1990) ‘Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization’, Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 12, pp. 295–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W. & Dimaggio, P. J. (1991) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Quirke, L. (2013) ‘Rogue resistance: sidestepping isomorphic pressures in a patchy institutional field’, Organization Studies, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 1675–1699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• raffensøe, S. (2013) The Human Turn: The Makings of a Contemporary Relational Topography, Copenhagen Business School Press, Frederiksberg.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, A. K. (1963) The Enterprise and Its Environment, Tavistock Publications, London.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, A. K. (1965) Learning for Leadership, Tavistock Publications, London.
   Google Scholar
• Ritzer, G. (2004) The MacDonaldization of Society, Pine Forge Press, Thousand Oaks, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1993) ‘Government, authority and expertise in advanced liberalism’, Economy & Society, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 283–299. 10.1080/03085149300000019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rynes, S. L. & Shapiro, D. L. (2005) ‘Public policy and the public interest: what if we mattered more?', Academy of Management Journal, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 925–927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salancik, G. R. (1995) ‘Wanted: a good network theory of organization’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 40, pp. 345–349. 10.2307/2393642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, R. W. (1981) Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Segal, L. & Lehrer, M. (2012) ‘The institutionalization of stewardship: theory, propositions, and insights from change in the Edmonton public schools’, Organization Studies, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 169–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selznick, P. (1948) ‘Foundations of the theory of organization’, American Sociological Review, vol. 13, pp. 25–35. 10.2307/2086752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selznick, P. (1949) TVA and the Grass Roots: A Study of Politics and Organization, University of California Press, Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Senge, P. M. (1990) The Fifth Discipline, Currency Doubleday, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1997) Administrative Behavior, 4th edn, Free Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, R. D. (1993) Strategic Management and Organizational Dynamics, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Starbuck, W. H. (1982) ‘Congealing oil: inventing ideologies to justify acting ideologies out’, Journal of Management Studies, vol. 19, no.1, pp. 3–27. 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1982.tb00057.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stengers, I. (2010) Cosmopolitics I, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
   Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. & Shuen, A. (1997) ‘Dynamic capabilities and strategic management’, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 509–533.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7%3C509::AID-SMJ882%3E3.0.CO;2-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsoukas, H. (2003) ‘New times, fresh challenges’, in The Oxford Handbook of Organization Theory: Meta-theoretical Perspectives, eds H. Tsoukas & C. Knudsen, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 607–619.
   Google Scholar
• Tsoukas H. & Chia, R. (2002) ‘On organizational becoming: rethinking organizational change,’ Organization Science, vol 13, no. 5, pp. 567–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• turner, C. (1996) Modernity and Politics in the Work of Max Weber, Routledge, London.10.4324/9780203414194
   Google Scholar
• Tushman, M. L. & O'Reilly, C. A. (1996) ‘Ambidextrous organizations: managing evolutionary and revolutionary change’, California Management Review, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 8–30. 10.2307/41165852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umstot, D. D., Mitchell, T. R. & Bell, C. H. (1978) ‘Goal setting and job enrichment: an integrated approach to job design’, Academy of Management Review, pp. 867–879.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. (2006) ‘Complexity’, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 23, no. 2–3, pp. 111–115.
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, T. (1914) The Instinct of Workmanship and the State of the Industrial Arts, Macmillan, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Vermeulen, F. (2005) ‘On rigor and relevance: fostering dialectic progress in management search, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 978–982. 10.5465/AMJ.2005.19573102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (2005) ‘The pragmatics of “really mattering” on policy issues: William Ouchi as exemplar’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 986–988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K & Sutcliffe, K. (2007) Managing the Unexpected: Resilient Performance in an Age of Uncertainty, Jossey Bass, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, G. (2012) ‘Sociology's core object(s) and the discipline's relevance’, Journal of Sociology, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 339–344. 10.1177/1440783312458068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuiderent-Jerak, T. & Jensen, C. B. (2007) ‘Unpacking “intervention” in Science and Technology Studies’, Science as Culture, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 227–235. 10.1080/09505430701568552
   Google Scholar