Coordinating quality practices in Direct Trade coffee

References

• ACE. 2014. ‘What is cup of excellence? – ACE’, Alliance for Coffee Excellence (ACE), Available at: http://www.allianceforcoffeeexcellence.org/en/cup-of-excellence/ (accessed 26 September 2014).
   Google Scholar
• BROWN, T. 2012. ‘Face to Face with the Farmer: Narratives of Production and Consumption in Specialty Coffee Value Chains Between the United States and Guatemala’, Master's Thesis, Lewis & Clark College.
   Google Scholar
• CCC. 2014. ‘Direct trade certification counter culture coffee’, Counter Culture Coffee, Available at: https://counterculturecoffee.com/sustain/direct-trade-certification (accessed 26 September).
   Google Scholar
• DAVIRON, B. T., And S. PONTE. 2005. The Coffee Paradox: Global Markets, Commodity Trade, and the Elusive Promise of Development, Zed Books in association with the CTA; Distributed in the USA by Palgrave Macmillan, London.
   Google Scholar
• FLYVBJERG, B. 2001. Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How it can Succeed Again, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• FLYVBJERG, B. 2003. ‘Rationality and power’, in Readings in Planning Theory (3rd ed.), eds S. Cambell, and S. S. Fainstein. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 318–329.
   Google Scholar
• GOLDSTEIN, J. E. 2011. ‘The “Coffee Doctors”: the language of taste and the rise of rwanda's specialty bean value’, Food and Foodways, vol. 19, pp. 135–159. doi: 10.1080/07409710.2011.544226
   Google Scholar
• GOODMAN, D. 2003. ‘The quality ‘turn’ and alternative food practices: reflections and agenda’, Journal of Rural Studies, vol. 19, pp. 1–7. doi: 10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00043-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HARVEY, M., A. Mcmeekin, and A. Warde. 2004. Qualities of food, Manchester University Press; Distributed exclusively in the USA by Palgrave, Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• INTELLIGENTSIA. 2014. ‘Direct Trade How We Buy Coffee Intelligentsia Coffee’, Intelligentsia Coffee, Available at: http://www.intelligentsiacoffee.com/content/direct-trade (accessed 26 September 2014).
   Google Scholar
• KAPLINSKY, R., and R. FITTER. 2004. ‘Technology and globalisation: who gains when commodities are de-commodified?’ International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, vol. 1, pp. 5–28. doi: 10.1504/IJTG.2004.004548
   Google Scholar
• LATOUR, B. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientist and Engineers through Society, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• LATOUR, B. 1996. Aramis or the Love of Technology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• LAW, J. 2002. Aircraft Stories: Decentering the Object in Technoscience, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
   Google Scholar
• LAW, J., and E. Ruppert. 2013. ‘The social life of methods: devices’, Journal of Cultural Economy, vol. 6, pp. 229–240. doi: 10.1080/17530350.2013.812042
   Google Scholar
• LINGLE, T. R. 2011. The Coffee Cupper's Handbook. Systematic Guide to the Sensory Evaluation of Coffee's Flavor, Specialty Coffee Association of America, Long Beach, CA.
   Google Scholar
• MOL, A. 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
   Google Scholar
• MOL, A. 2008. The Logic of Care: Health and the Problem of Patients Choice, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• MOL, A., I. MOSER, and J. POLS. 2010. Care in Practice. On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms, transcript Verlag, Bielefeld.
   Google Scholar
• MUNIESA, F., Y. MILLO, and M. CALLON. 2007. ‘An introduction to market devices’, The Sociological Review, vol. 55, pp. 1–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00727.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RUDDICK, S. 1990. ‘Rationality of care’, in Women, Militarism, & War: Essays in History, Politics, and Social Theory, eds J. B. Elshtain and S. Tobias, Rowman & Littlefield, New York, pp. 229–254.
   Google Scholar
• SCAE. 2015. ‘What is Specialty Coffee?’ Specialty Coffee Association of Europe, Available at: http://www.scae.com/about-us/what-is-speciality-coffee.html (accessed 7 February 2015).
   Google Scholar
• SINGLETON, V., and J. LAW. 2013. ‘Devices as rituals: notes on enacting resistance’, Journal of Cultural Economy, vol. 6, pp. 259–277. doi: 10.1080/17530350.2012.754365
   Google Scholar
• STUMPTOWN. 2014a. ‘Direct Trade – Stumptown Coffee Roasters’, Stumptown Coffee, Available at: http://stumptowncoffee.com/education-overview/direct-trade/ (accessed 30 September 2014).
   Google Scholar
• STUMPTOWN. 2014b. ‘Natural Process – Stumptown Coffee Roaster’, Available at: http://stumptowncoffee.com/processing/natural-process/ (accessed 30 September 2014).
   Google Scholar
• STUMPTOWN. 2014c. ‘Washed Process – Stumptown Coffee Roasters’, Available at: http://stumptowncoffee.com/processing/washed-process/ (accessed 30 September 2014).
   Google Scholar
• TEIL, G. 2011. ‘No such thing as terroir? objectivities and the regimes of existence of objects’, Science, Technology & Human Values, vol. 37, 478–505. doi: 10.1177/0162243911423843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TSING, A. L. 2005. Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• WILSON, B. R., J. F. CONLEY, T. M. HARRIS, and F. LAFONE. 2012. ‘New terrains of taste: spatial analysis of price premiums for single origin coffees in central america’, Applied Geography, vol. 35, pp. 499–507. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar