The logic of practice in the practice of logics: practicing journalism and its relationship with business in times of technological changes

References

• ACHTENHAGEN, L. & RAVIOLA, E. (2007) ‘Organizing internal tensions: the duality management of media companies’, in Organizing Media: Mastering the Challenges of Organizational Change, ed Leona ACHTENHAGEN, JIBS Research Report Series No. 2007–1, Jönköping, pp. 127–146.
   Google Scholar
• ACHTENHAGEN, L. & RAVIOLA, E. (2009) ‘Balancing tensions during re-organization: duality management in a newspaper company’, International Journal of Media Management, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 32–41. doi: 10.1080/14241270802518505
   Google Scholar
• ATKINSON, P., COFFEY, A., DELAMONT, S., LOFLAND, J., & LOFLAND, L. (2001) Handbook of Ethnography, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• BARLEY, S. R. (1986) ‘Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 31, pp. 78–108. doi: 10.2307/2392767
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BATTILANA, J. (2006) ‘Agency and institutions: the enabling role of individuals’ social positions’, Organization, vol. 13, pp. 653–676. doi: 10.1177/1350508406067008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BENSON, R. & NEVEU, E. (2005) Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field, Polity Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• BILTON, C. (2010) ‘The management of the creative industries: from content to context’, in Managing Media Work, ed Deuze, Sage, London, pp. 31–42.
   Google Scholar
• BOCZKOWSKI, P. J. (2005) Digitizing the News: Innovation in Online Newspapers, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• BOCZKOWSKI, P. J. (2010) News at Work. Information in an Age of Information Abundance, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• BOURDIEU, P. (1979) ‘Trois étas du capital culturel’, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, vol. 30, pp. 3–6. doi: 10.3406/arss.1979.2654
   Google Scholar
• BOURDIEU, P. (Ed.) (1980) Le Sens Pratique. de Minuit, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• BOURDIEU, P. (1992/1997) Les Règles de l'Art. Genèse et Structure Du Champ Littéraire, Seuil, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• BOURDIEU, P. (1996) Sur La Télévision, Liber-Raisons d'agir, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• BURAWOY, M. (1998) ‘The extended case method’, Sociological Theory, vol. 16, pp. 4–33. doi: 10.1111/0735-2751.00040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CAVES, R. (2000) Creative Industries. Contracts between Art and Commerce, Harvard University Press, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• de Certeau, M. (2002) The Practice of Every Day Life, University of California Press, Berkely.
   Google Scholar
• CHARMAZ, K. (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory. A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• CHOMSKY, N. (2002) Media Control: The Spectacular Achievements of Propaganda, Seven Stories, New York.
   Google Scholar
• CZARNIAWSKA, B. (1997) Narrating the Organization: Dramas of Institutional Identity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• CZARNIAWSKA, B. (2004) Narratives in Social Science Research, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• CZARNIAWSKA, B. (2008) 'How to misuse institutions and get away with it: Some reflections on institutional theory(ies)', in The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, eds R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby & K. Sahlin, Sage, London, pp. 769–783. doi: 10.4135/9781849200387.n33
   Google Scholar
• CZARNIAWSKA, B. & GENDELL, K. (2002) ‘Gone shopping? Universities on their way to the market’, Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies, vol. 18, pp. 455–474. doi: 10.1016/S0956-5221(01)00029-X
   Google Scholar
• CZARNIAWSKA, B. & Sevón, G. (1996) Translating Organizational Change, de Gruyter, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• DENIS, J. L., LANGLEY, A. & ROULEAU, L. (2007) ‘Strategizing in pluralistic contexts: rethinking theoretical frames’, Human Relations, vol. 60, pp. 179–215. doi: 10.1177/0018726707075288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DEUZE, M. (2010) Managing Media Work, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• DEUZE, M. & FORTUNATI, L. (2010) ‘Journalism without journalists: on the powershift from journalists to employers and audiences’, in News Online – Transformations and Continuities, eds G. Meikle & G. Redden, Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp. 164–177.
   Google Scholar
• DJERF-PIERRE, M. & WEIBULL, L. (2010) ‘From idealist-entrepreneur to corporate executive –provincial newspaper editors’ and publishers’ ways-of-thinking from the mid-1800s to the present’, Journalism Studies, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 294–310. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2010.490655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DOBBIN, F. (1994) Forging Industrial Policy: The United States, Britain, and France in the Railway Age, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• EMERSON, R. M., FRETZ, R. I. & SHAW, L. (2001) ‘Participant observation and fieldnotes’, in Handbook of Ethnography, eds P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland & L. Lofland, Sage, London, pp. 352–368.
   Google Scholar
• FENGLER, S. & Ruß-Mohl, S. (2008) ‘Journalists and the information-attention markets: towards an economic theory of journalism’, Journalism, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 667–690. doi: 10.1177/1464884908096240
   Google Scholar
• FLICK, U. (1992) ‘Triangulation revisited – strategy of or alternative to validation of qualitative data’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, vol. 2, pp. 175–197. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1992.tb00215.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FRIEDLAND, R. & ALFORD, R. R. (1991) ‘Bringing society back in: symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions’, in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, eds W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp. 311–336.
   Google Scholar
• GADE, P. (2008) ‘Journalism guardians in a time of great change: newspaper editors perceived influence in integrated news organizations’, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 371–392. doi: 10.1177/107769900808500209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GARUD, R., HARDY, C. & MAGUIRE, S. (2007) ‘Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: an introduction to the special issue’, Organization Studies, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 957–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GHERARDI, S. & NICOLINI, D. (2000) ‘The organizational learning of safety in communities of practices’, Journal of Management Inquiry, vol. 9, pp. 7–18. doi: 10.1177/105649260091002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GIDDENS, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of a Theory of Structuration, Polity Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• GLASER, B. & STRAUSS, A. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory, Aldine, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• GOODRICK, E. & REAY, T. (2011) ‘Constellations of institutional logics: changes in the professional work of pharmacists’, Work and Occupations, vol. XX, pp. 1–45.
   Google Scholar
• JARZABKOWSKI, P. (2005) ‘Strategy as practice: recursiveness, adaptation and practice-in-use’, Organization Studies, vol. 25, pp. 529–560. doi: 10.1177/0170840604040675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JARZABKOWSKI, P. & FENTON, E. (2006) ‘Strategizing and organizing in pluralistic contexts’, Long Range Planning, vol. 39, pp. 631–648. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2006.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JARZABOWSKI, P., MATTHIESEN, J. & Van de Ven, A. H. (2009) ‘Doing which work? A practice approach to institutional pluralism’, in Institutional Work, eds T. Lawrence, R. Suddaby & B. Leca, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 284–316.
   Google Scholar
• JICK, T. D. (1979) ‘Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: triangulation in action’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 24, pp. 602–611. doi: 10.2307/2392366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KITCHENER, M. (2002) ‘Mobilizing the logic of managerialism in professional fields: the case of academic health centre mergers’, Organization Studies, vol. 23, pp. 391–420. doi: 10.1177/0170840602233004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KRAATZ, M. & BLOCK, E. (2008) ‘Organizational implications of institutional pluralism’, in Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, eds R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin & R. Suddaby, Sage, London, pp. 243–275.
   Google Scholar
• LATOUR, B. (2005) Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• LAWRENCE, T. B. & SUDDABY, R. (2006) ‘Institutions and institutional work’, in The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies, eds S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence & W. R. Nord, 2nd ed, Sage, London, pp. 215–254.
   Google Scholar
• LAWRENCE, T. B., SUDDABY, R. & LECA, B. (2009) Institutional Work, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• LECA, B., BATTILANA, J. & BOXENBAUM, E. (2006, August) ‘Taking stock: a review essay on institutional entrepreneurship’, Academy of Management conference (OMT, division), Atlanta, USA.
   Google Scholar
• LOUNSBURY, M. (2007) ‘A tale of two cities: competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 289–307. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24634436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LOUNSBURY, M. (2008) ‘Institutional rationality and practice variation: new directions in the institutional analysis of practice’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 33, pp. 349–361. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2007.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LOUNSBURY, M. & CRUMLEY, E. T. (2007) ‘New practice creation: An institutional perspective on innovation’, Organization Studies, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 993–1012. doi: 10.1177/0170840607078111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MAGUIRE, S., HARDY, C. & LAWRENCE, T. B. (2004) ‘Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 47, pp. 657–679. doi: 10.2307/20159610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MARQUIS, C. & LOUNSBURY, M. (2007) ‘Vive la résistance: competing logics in the consolidation of community banking’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 50, pp. 799–820. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.26279172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MARTIN, P. & TURNER, B. A. (1986) ‘Grounded theory and organizational research’, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, vol. 22, pp. 141–157. doi: 10.1177/002188638602200207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MEYER, R. E. & HAMMERSCHMID, G. (2006) ‘Changing institutional logics and executive identities: a managerial challenge to public administration in Austria’, American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 49, pp. 1000–1014. doi: 10.1177/0002764205285182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NICOLINI, D., YANOW, D. & GHERARDI, S. (2003) Knowing in Organizations: A Practice-based Approach, M.E. Sharpe, New York.
   Google Scholar
• ORLIKOWSKI, W. (2000) ‘Using technology and constituting structure: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations’, Organization Science, vol. 11, pp. 404–428. doi: 10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ORLIKOWSKI, W. (2007) ‘Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at Work’, Organization studies, vol. 28, pp. 1435–1448. doi: 10.1177/0170840607081138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ORLIKOWSKI, W. & BARLEY, S. (2001) ‘Technology and institutions: what can research on information technology and research on organizations learn from each other?’, Management Information Systems Quarterly, vol. 25, pp. 145. doi: 10.2307/3250927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PHILLIPS, N., LAWRENCE, T. B. & HARDY, C. (2004) ‘Discourse and institutions’, Academy of Management Review, vol. 29, pp. 635–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PICARD, R. G. (2002) The Economics and Financing of Media Companies, Fordham University Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• PINCH, T. (2008) ‘Technology and institutions: living in a material world’, Theory and Society, vol. 37, pp. 461–483. doi: 10.1007/s11186-008-9069-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RAVIOLA, E. (2010) Paper Meets Web. How the Institutions of News Production Works On Paper and Online. Doctoral dissertation. Jönköping International Business School, DS 65, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• RAVIOLA, E. (2012) ‘Exploring multiple framings: journalism and management in newspaper organizations’, Information, Communication and Society, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 932–958. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.696273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• REAY, T., GOODRICK, E., DELMESTRI, G., NICOLINI, D., ADOLFSSON, P. & LINDBERG, K. (2009) ‘Institutional logics and material practices: International comparisons of retail pharmacy’, 25th EGOS colloquium, Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• REAY, T. & HININGS, C. R. (2005) ‘The recomposition of an organizational field: health care in Alberta’, Organization Studies, vol. 26, pp. 351–384. doi: 10.1177/0170840605050872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAHLIN-ANDERSSON, K. & ENGWALL, L. (2002) The Expansion of Management Knowledge: Carriers, Flows, and Sources, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
   Google Scholar
• SCHNEIBERG, M. (2002) ‘Organizational heterogeneity and the production of new forms: politics, social movements, and mutual companies in American fire insurance, 1900–1930’, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 19, pp. 39–89. doi: 10.1016/S0733-558X(02)19002-1
   Google Scholar
• SCHWARTZMAN, H. B. (1993) Ethnography in Organizations, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
   Google Scholar
• SCOTT, W. R. (1987) ‘The adolescence of institutional theory’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 32, pp. 493–511. doi: 10.2307/2392880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCOTT, W. R. (1994) ‘Conceptualizing organizational fields: linking organizations and societal systems’, in System – Rationalitat und Partialinteresse, eds H. Derlien, U. Gerhardt & F. Scharpf, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden, pp. 203–221.
   Google Scholar
• SCOTT, W. R., RUEF, M., MENDEL, P. & CARONNA, C. (2000) Institutional Change and Healthcare Organizations: From Professional Dominance to Managed Care, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• SEO, M. & CREED, W. D. (2002) ‘Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: a dialectical perspective’, Academy of Management Review, vol. 27, pp. 222–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SPICER, A. & SEWELL, G. (2010) ‘From national service to global player: Transforming the organizational logic of a public broadcaster’, Journal of Management Studies, vol. 47, pp. 913–943. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00915.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• STONE, M. M. (1996) ‘Competing contexts: the evolution of a nonprofit organization's governance system in multiple environments’, Administration and Society, vol. 28, pp. 61–89. doi: 10.1177/009539979602800103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• STRAUSS, A. & CORBIN, J. (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, Sage, Newbury Park.
   Google Scholar
• STRAUSS, A. L. & CORBIN, J. (1994) ‘Grounded theory methodology: an overview’, in Handbook of Qualitative Research, eds N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln, Sage, London, pp. 273–285.
   Google Scholar
• SUDDABY, R. & GREENWOOD, R. (2005) ‘Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 50, pp. 35–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• THORNTON, P. (2002) ‘The rise of the corporation in a craft industry: conflict and conformity in institutional logics’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 45, pp. 81–101. doi: 10.2307/3069286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• THORNTON, P. H. (2004) Markets from Culture: Institutional Logics and Organizational Decisions in Higher Education Publishing, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
   Google Scholar
• THORNTON, P. & OCASIO, W. (1999) ‘Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 105, pp. 801–843. doi: 10.1086/210361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• THORNTON, P. & OCASIO, W. (2008) ‘Institutional logics’, in The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, eds R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin & R. Suddaby, Sage, London, pp. 99–129.
   Google Scholar
• TOWNLEY, B. (2002) ‘The role of competing rationalities in institutional change’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 45, pp. 163–179. doi: 10.2307/3069290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TSOUKAS, H. (1996) ‘The firma s a distributed knowledge system: a constructionist approach’, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 17, pp. 11–25. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250171104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TUCHMAN, G. (1973) ‘Making news by doing work: routinizing the unexpected’, The American Journal of Sociology, vol. 79, pp. 110–131. doi: 10.1086/225510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TUCHMAN, G. (1978) Making News. A Study in the Construction of Reality, The Free Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• TUNSTALL, J. (1971) Journalists at Work: Specialist Correspondents, their News Organizations, News Sources, and Competitor-Colleague, Constable, London.
   Google Scholar
• TURNER, B. A. (1981) ‘Some practical aspects of qualitative analysis: one way of organizing the cognitive process associated with the generation of grounded theory’, Quality and Quantity, vol. 15, pp. 225–247. doi: 10.1007/BF00164639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Union Agreement. (2007). Document from fieldwork. Il Sole-24 Ore.
   Google Scholar
• VAN WEEZEL, A. (2009) ‘Organizational changes in newspaper firms and their relation to performance’, International Journal on Media Management, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 144–152. doi: 10.1080/14241270903278868
   Google Scholar
• ZBRACKI, M. (1998) ‘The rhetoric and reality of total quality management’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 43, pp. 602–636. doi: 10.2307/2393677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZILBER, T. (2002) ‘Institutionalization as an interplay between actions, meanings, and actors: the case of a rape crisis center in Israel’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 45, pp. 234–254. doi: 10.2307/3069294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZILBER, T. (2006) ‘The work of the symbolic in institutional processes: translations of myths in Israeli high tech’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 49, pp. 281–303. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2006.20786073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar