Keeping things different: coexistence within European markets for cleantech and biofuels

References

• Ahlgren, S. & Di Lucia, L. (2014) ‘Indirect land use changes of biofuel production – a review of modelling efforts and policy developments in the European Union’, Biotechnology for Biofuels, vol. 7, pp. 35–45. http://www.biotechnologyforbiofuels.com/content/7/1/35 doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-7-35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, A. (1993) ‘The European community and European government harmonization, mobility and European community and European government’, Economy and Society, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 314–326. doi: 10.1080/03085149300000021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, A. (2001) Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society, Athlone Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• Bausch, L. & Mohr, A. (2013) ‘Review of tackling long-term global energy problems: the contribution of social science by Daniel Spreng, Thomas Flueler, David L. Goldblatt and Jurg Minsch (editors)’, Energy, Sustainability and Society, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 5. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/2192-0567-3-5 doi: 10.1186/2192-0567-3-5
   Google Scholar
• Blok, A. (2011) ‘Clash of the eco-sciences: Carbon marketization, environmental NGOs and performativity as politics’, Economy and Society, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 451–476. doi: 10.1080/03085147.2011.574422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caliskan, K. & Callon, M. (2009) ‘Economization, part 1: shifting attention from the economy towards processes of economization’, Economy and Society, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 369–398. doi: 10.1080/03085140903020580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caliskan, K. & Callon, M. (2010) ‘Economization, part 2: a research programme for the study of markets’, Economy and Society, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1–32. doi: 10.1080/03085140903424519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (1998) ‘An essay on framing and overflowing: economic externalities revisited by sociology’, in The Laws of the Markets, ed. M. Callon, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 244–269.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (2004) ‘Europe wrestling with technology. About Andrew Barry, political machines: governing a technological society, London: Athlone Press’, Economy and Society, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 121–134. doi: 10.1080/0308514042000176766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (2007) ‘What does it mean to say that economics is performative?’, in Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, eds D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa & L. Siu, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp. 311–357.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. & Rabeharisoa, V. (2008) ‘The growing engagement of emergent concerned groups in political and economic life: lessons from the French association of neuromuscular disease patients’, Science, Technology and Human Values, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 230–261. doi: 10.1177/0162243907311264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campins Eritja, M. (2006) ‘Reviewing the challenging task faced by member stats in implementing the emissions trading diective: issues of member state liability’, in EU Climate Change Policy. The Challenges of New Regulatory Initiatives, eds M. Peeters & K. Deketelaere, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 69–82.
   Google Scholar
• Doganova, L. & Karnoe, P. (2015a) ‘Clean and profitable: entangling valuations in environmental entrepreneurship’, in Valorizing Dissonance: Cultural perspectives on newness, eds A. B. Antal, M. Hutter & D. Stark, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 229–248.
   Google Scholar
• Doganova, L. & Karnoe, P. (2015b) ‘Building markets for clean technologies: controversies, environmental concerns and economic worth’, Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 22–31. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2014.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2003). On the Road to Sustainable Production: Progress in Implementing Council Directive 96/61/EC Concerning Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2005) Report of the Commission on the Implementation of Directive 96/61/EC Concerning Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2012) Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Amending Directive 98/70/EC Relating to the Quality of Petrol and Diesel Fuels and Amending Directive 2009/28/EC on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. (1996) Council Directive 96/61/EC of 24 September 1996 Concerning Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control.
   Google Scholar
• European Economic and Social Committee. (2003) Opinion on the Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – On the Road to sustainable Production: Progress in Implementing Council Directive 96/61/EC Concerning Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2015) European Parliament Legislative Resolution of 28 April 2015 on the Council Position at First Reading with a View to the Adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Amending Directive 98/70/EC Relating to the Quality of Petrol and Diesel Fuels and Amending Directive 2009/28/EC on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (2004) States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and the Social Order, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (2013) ‘Epistemic subsidiarity – coexistence, cosmopolitanism, constitutionalism’, European Journal of Risk Regulation, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 133–141.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, A. J., Benson, D., Wurzel, R. & Zito, A. R. (2012) ‘Environmental policy: governing by multiple policy instruments?’, in Constructing a Policy-making State?: Policy Dynamics in the EU, ed J. Richardson, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 104–124.
   Google Scholar
• Kjellberg, H. & Helgesson, C.-F. (2010) ‘Political marketing. Multiple values, performativities and modes of engaging’, Journal of Cultural Economy, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 279–297. doi: 10.1080/17530350.2010.494379
   Google Scholar
• Knill, C. & Liefferink, D. (2013) ‘The establishment of EU environmental policy’, in Environmental Policy in the European Union: Contexts, Actors and Policy Dynamics, eds A. J. Jordan & C. Adelle, Routledge, London, pp. 103–123.
   Google Scholar
• Klooster, D. (2010) ‘Standardizing sustainable development? The forest stewardship council's plantation policy review process as neoliberal environmental governance’, Geoforum, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 117–129. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1993) We Have Never been Modern, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Laurent, B. (2011) Democracies on Trial: Assembling Nanotechnology and its Problems, Centre de Sociologie de l'Innovation, Mines ParisTech, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Laurent, B. (2015) ‘The politics of European agencements: constructing a market of sustainable biofuels’, Environmental Politics, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 138–155. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2014.927190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederer, M. (2012) ‘Market making via regulation: the role of the state in carbon markets’, Regulation & Governance, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 524–544. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01145.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levidow, L. & Boschert, K. (2008) ‘Coexistence or contradiction? GM crops versus alternative agricultures in Europe’, Geoforum, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 174–190. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levidow, L., Papaioannou, T. & Birch, K. (2012) ‘Neoliberalising technoscience and environment: EU policy for competitive, sustainable biofuels’, in Neoliberalism and Technoscience. Theory, Technology and Society, eds L. Pellizzoni & M. Ylonen, Ashgate, Farnham, pp. 159–186.
   Google Scholar
• Lezaun, J. (2011) ‘Bees, beekeepers, and bureaucrats: parasitism and the politics of transgenic life’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 738–756. doi: 10.1068/d0510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohmann, L. (2009) ‘Toward a different debate in environmental accounting: the cases of carbon and cost-benefit’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 34, no. 3–4, pp. 499–534. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2008.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, D. (2009) ‘Making things the same: gases, emission rights and the politics of carbon markets’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 34, no. 3–4, pp. 440–455. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2008.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majone, G. (1994) ‘The rise of the regulatory state in Europe’, West European Politics, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 77–101. doi: 10.1080/01402389408425031
   Google Scholar
• Meckling, J. (2011) Carbon Coalitions: Business, Climate Politics, and the Rise of Emissions Trading, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. P. J. (2007) ‘Boundless biofuels? Between environmental sustainability and vulnerability’, Sociologia Ruralis, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 297–315. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2007.00446.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, B. E. (2006) ‘The IPPC permit and the greenhouse gas permit’, in EU Climate Change Policy: The Challenge of New Regulatory Initiatives, eds M. Peeters & K. Deketelaere, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp. 153–168.
   Google Scholar
• Overmars, K. P., Stehfest, E., Ros, J. P. M. & Prins, A. G. (2011) ‘Indirect land use change emissions related to EU biofuel consumption: an analysis based on historical data’, Environmental Science & Policy, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 248–257. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilgrim, S. & Harvey, M. (2010) ‘Battles over biofuels in Europe: NGOs and the politics of markets’, Sociological Research Online, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 4. doi: 10.5153/sro.2192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponte, S. (2014) ‘Roundtabling sustainability: lessons from the biofuels industry’, Geoforum, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 261–271. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, M. (1996) Accounting and Science: Natural Inquiry and Commercial Reason, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C. M. (2007) ‘Whither better regulation for the Lisbon agenda?’, Journal of European public policy, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 190–207. doi: 10.1080/13501760601122274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehbinder, E. & Stewart, R. (1985) ‘Legal integration in federal systems: European community environmental law’, American Journal of Comparative Law, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 371–446. doi: 10.2307/840235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spash, C. L. (2010) ‘The brave new world of carbon trading’, New Political Economy, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 169–195. doi: 10.1080/13563460903556049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickson, F. & Wynne, B. (2012) ‘Ethics of science for policy in the environmental governance of biotechnology: MON810 maize in Europe’, Ethics, Policy & Environment, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 321–340. doi: 10.1080/21550085.2012.730245
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, J. (2006) ‘Better regulation in Europe’, Current Legal Problems, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 447–518. doi: 10.1093/clp/59.1.447
   Google Scholar