The infrapolitics of cultural value: cultural policy, evaluation and the marginalisation of practitioner perspectives

References

• Bakhshi, H., Freeman, A. & Hitchen, G. (2009) ‘ Measuring intrinsic value – how to stop worrying and love economics’, Research Papers in Economics, pp. 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, M. (2015) ‘Valuing cultural industries’, in The Routledge Companion to the Cultural Industries, eds K. Oakley & J. O’Connor, Routledge, London, pp. 35–72.
   Google Scholar
• Belfiore, E. (2002) ‘Art as a means of alleviating social exclusion: Does it really work? A critique of instrumental cultural policies and social impact studies in the UK’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 91–106. doi: 10.1080/102866302900324658
   Google Scholar
• Belfiore, E. (2004) ‘Auditing culture’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 183–202. doi: 10.1080/10286630042000255808
   Google Scholar
• Belfiore, E. (2009) ‘On bullshit in cultural policy, practice and research: Notes from the British case’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 343–359. doi: 10.1080/10286630902806080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belfiore, E. (2015) ‘Impact, value and bad economics: making sense of the problem of value in the arts and humanities’, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 95–110. doi: 10.1177/1474022214531503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belfiore, E. & Bennett, O. (2007) ‘Determinants of impact: Towards a better understanding of encounters with the arts’, Cultural Trends, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 225–275. doi: 10.1080/09548960701479417
   Google Scholar
• Bunting, C. (2010) Achieving Great art for Everyone: A Review of Research and Literature to Inform the Arts Council's 10-Year Strategic Framework, Arts Council England, London.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2010) ‘Performative agency’, Journal of Cultural Economy, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 147–161. doi: 10.1080/17530350.2010.494117
   Google Scholar
• Butterfield, L. D., Borgen, W. A., Amundson, N. E. & Maglio, A.-S. T. (2005) ‘Fifty years of the critical incident technique, 1954–2004 and beyond’, Qualitative Research, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 475–497. doi: 10.1177/1468794105056924
   Google Scholar
• CASE (2010a). Understanding the Drivers, Impact and Value of Engagement in Culture and Sport: An Over-Arching Summary of the Research. DCMS, Arts Council England (Wallace), English Heritage (EH), the Museums, Libraries and Archives Council (MLA) and Sport England (SE ), London.
   Google Scholar
• CASE. (2010b) Understanding the Impact of Engagement in Culture and Sport: A Systematic Review of the Learning Impacts for Young People, DCMS, London.
   Google Scholar
• Caust, J. (2003) ‘Putting the ‘art’ back into arts policy making: How arts policy has been ‘captured’ by the economists and the marketeers’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 51–63. doi: 10.1080/1028663032000089723
   Google Scholar
• Chell, E. (2004) Critical Incident Technique. Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research C. Cassell and G. Symon, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, T. (2014) ArtWorks Evaluation Survey of Artists, Paul Hamlyn Foundation, Birmingham, pp. 1–48.
   Google Scholar
• Crossick, G. & Kaszynska, P. (2014) ‘Under construction: towards a framework of cultural value’, Cultural Trends, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 120–131. doi: 10.1080/09548963.2014.897453
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan, J. (1954) ‘The critical incident technique’, Psychological Bulletin, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 327–358. doi: 10.1037/h0061470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, B. (2008) What Values Should Count in the Arts? The Tension between Economic Effects and Cultural Value. Beyond Price: Value in Culture, Economics, and the Arts M. Hutter and D. Throsby, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 261–269.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, L. (2008) ‘In defence of instrumentality’, Cultural Trends, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 247–257. doi: 10.1080/09548960802615380
   Google Scholar
• Grey, C. (2002) ‘Local government and the arts’, Local Government Studies, Vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 77–90. doi: 10.1080/714004133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grey, C. (2007) ‘Commodification and instrumentality in cultural policy’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 203–215. doi: 10.1080/10286630701342899
   Google Scholar
• Hesmondhalgh, D., Nisbett, M., Oakley, K. & Lee, D. (2015) ‘Were New Labour's cultural policies neoliberal?’ International Journal of Cultural Policy, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 97–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewison, R. (2012) ‘The benefits of the valuing culture debate, 2003–2011’, Cultural Trends, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 209–210. doi: 10.1080/09548963.2012.698472
   Google Scholar
• Holden, J. (2004) Capturing Cultural Value: How Culture has Become a Tool of Government Policy, Demos, London.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, R. (2010) ‘Going “mainstream”: Evaluating the instrumentalisation of multicultural arts’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 184–199. doi: 10.1080/10286630902971561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaszynska, P. (2015) ‘Capturing the vanishing point: Subjective experiences and cultural value’, Cultural Trends, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 256–266.
   Google Scholar
• McGuigan, J. (2005) ‘Neo-liberalism, culture and policy’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 229–241. doi: 10.1080/10286630500411168
   Google Scholar
• Merli, P. (2002) ‘Evaluating the social impact of participation in arts activities’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 107–118. doi: 10.1080/10286630290032477
   Google Scholar
• Mirza, M., Ed. (2007) Culture Vultures: Is UK Arts Policy Damaging the Arts? Policy Exchange, London.
   Google Scholar
• Moor, L. & Lury, C. (2011) ‘Making and measuring value’, Journal of Cultural Economy, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 439–454. doi: 10.1080/17530350.2011.609708
   Google Scholar
• Newsinger, J. (2012) ‘The politics of regional audio-visual policy in England: Or, how we learnt to stop worrying and get “creative”’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 111–125. doi: 10.1080/10286632.2011.561334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newsinger, J. (2015) ‘A cultural shock doctrine? Austerity, the neoliberal state and the creative industries discourse’, Media, Culture and Society, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 302–313.
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, D. (2010) Measuring the Value of Culture: A Report to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, DCMS, London, pp. 1–66.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. (1992) Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts, Yale University Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• Selwood, S. (2002) ‘The politics of data collection: gathering, analysing and using data about the subsidised cultural sector in England’, Cultural Trends, vol. 12, no. 47, pp. 13–84. doi: 10.1080/09548960209390330
   Google Scholar
• Vickery, J. (2007) ‘ The emergence of culture-led regeneration: a policy concept and its discontents.’ Centre for Cultural Policy Studies Research Papers’, O. Bennett and J. Ahearne. Warwick, Centre for Cultural Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Walmsley, B. (2012) ‘Towards a balanced scorecard: A critical analysis of the culture and sport evidence (CASE) programme’, Cultural Trends, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 325–334. doi: 10.1080/09548963.2012.726800
   Google Scholar
• Woddis, J. (2014) ‘Arts practitioners in the cultural policy process: Spear carriers or speaking parts?’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 496–512. doi: 10.1080/10286632.2013.818672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolsey, L. K. (1986) ‘The critical incident technique: An innovative qualitative method of research’, Canadian Journal of Counselling, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 242–254.
   Google Scholar