From the moral to the neural: brain scans, decision-making, and the problematization of economic (ir)rationality

References

• Ariely, D. (2009) Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces that Shape Our Decisions, Harper Collins, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G. S. & Murphy, K. M. (1988) ‘A theory of rational addiction’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 675–700. doi: 10.1086/261558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourgeois-Gironde, S. (2009) ‘Les émotions économiques. Réflexions sur les mécanismes d’adaptation cérébrale à l’environnement socio-économique’, Revue européenne des sciences sociales, vol. 47, no. 144, pp. 43–56. doi: 10.4000/ress.64
   Google Scholar
• Bruni, L. & Sugden, R. (2007) ‘The road not taken: how psychology was removed from economics, and how it might be brought back’, The Economic Journal, vol. 117, no. 516, pp. 146–173. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02005.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camerer, C. F. (2008) ‘The potential of neuroeconomics’, Economics and Philosophy, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 369–379. doi: 10.1017/S0266267108002022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camerer, C., Issacharoff, S., Loewenstein, G., O’Donohue, T. & Rabin, M. (2003) ‘Regulation for conservatives: behavioral economics and the case for asymmetric paternalism’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, vol. 151, no. 3, pp. 1211–1254. doi: 10.2307/3312889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G. & Prelec, D. (2005) ‘Neuroeconomics: how neuroscience can inform economics’, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 9–64. doi: 10.1257/0022051053737843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canguilhem, G. (1966) Le normal et le pathologique, Presses universitaires de France, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Caplin, A. (2002) ‘Fear as a policy instrument,’ Available at http://cess.nyu.edu/caplin/fearfinal.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. D. (2005) ‘The vulcanization of the human brain: a neural perspective on the interaction between cognition and emotion’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 3–24. doi: 10.1257/089533005775196750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colander, D. (2007) ‘Retrospectives. Edgeworth’s Hedonimeter and the quest to measure utility’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 215–225. doi: 10.1257/jep.21.2.215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cromby, J. & Willis, M. E. H. (2014) ‘Nudging into subjectification: governmentality and psychometrics’, Critical Social Policy, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 241–259. doi: 10.1177/0261018313500868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. (1994) Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain, Avon Books, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, W. (2015) The Happiness Industry: How the Government and Big Business Sold Us Well-Being, Verso, London.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg, A. (2004) ‘Le sujet cérébral’, Esprit. Novembre: 130–155.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1975) Surveiller et punir. Naissance de la prison, Gallimard, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2008) The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France 1978–79, Palgrave MacMillan, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Glimcher, P. W. (2003) Decisions, Uncertainty, and the Brain: The Science of Neuroeconomics, The MIT Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Glimcher, P. W. (2011) Foundations of Neuroeconomic Analysis, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Glimcher, P. W., Camerer, C. F., Fehr, E. & Poldrack, R. A. (Eds.) (2008) Neuroeconomics: Decision Making and the Brain, Academic Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• Glimcher, P. W., Dorris, M. C. & Bayer, H. M. (2005) ‘Physiological utility theory and the neuroeconomics of choice’, Games and Economic Behavior, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 213–256. doi: 10.1016/j.geb.2004.06.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graeber, D. (2012) Debt: The First 5000 Years, Melville House Publishing, Brooklyn, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Gul, F. & Pesendorfer, W. (2005) ‘The case for mindless economics,’ Available at http://www.princeton.edu/~pesendor/mindless.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, E. & Jokeit, H. (2009) ‘Neurocapitalism,’ Available at http://www.eurozine.com/articles/2009-11-24-jokeit-en.html.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R., Pykett, J. & Whitehead, M. (2011) ‘Governing temptation: changing behaviour in an age of libertarian paternalism’, Progress in Human Geography, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 483–501. doi: 10.1177/0309132510385741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (1994) ‘New challenges to the rationality assumption’, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, vol. 150, no. 1, pp. 18–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2003) ‘A psychological perspective on economics’, American Economic Review, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 162–168. doi: 10.1257/000282803321946985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knutson, B. & Samanez-Larkin, G. R. (2012) ‘Brain, decision, and debt’, in A Debtor World: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Debt, eds R. Brubaker, R. M. Lawless & C. J. Tabb, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 167–180.
   Google Scholar
• Lazzarato, M. (2011) La Fabrique de l’homme endetté, Éditions Amsterdam, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, D. J. & Glimcher, P. W. (2012) ‘The root of all value: a neural common currency for choice’, Current Opinion in Neurobiology, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1027–1038. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2012.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewenstein, G. (1996) ‘Out of control: visceral influences on behavior’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 272–292. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1996.0028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortega, F. (2011) ‘Toward a genealogy of neuroascesis’, in Neurocultures: Glimpses into an Expanding Universe, eds F. Ortega & F. Vidal, Lang, Frankfurt-am-Main, pp. 27–44.
   Google Scholar
• Petit, E. (2009) ‘Le rôle des affects en économie’, Revue d’économie politique, vol. 119, no. 6, pp. 859–897. doi: 10.3917/redp.196.0859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pykett, J. (2013) ‘Neurocapitalism and the new neuros: using neuroeconomics, behavioural economics and picoeconomics for public policy’, Journal of Economic Geography, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 843–869. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbs039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (2003) ‘The neurochemical self and its anomalies’, in Risk and Morality, eds R. V. Ericson & A. Doyle, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp. 407–437.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. & Abi-Rached, J. (2013) Neuro: The New Brain Sciences and the Management of the Mind, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, D. (2008) ‘Two styles of neuroeconomics’, Economics and Philosophy, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 473–483. doi: 10.1017/S0266267108002095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, A. (2013) Creditocracy, and the Case for Debt Refusal, OR Books, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, C. (2008) ‘What neuroeconomics does really mean?’, Revue d’économie politique, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 7–34. doi: 10.3917/redp.181.0007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schüll, N. D. & Zaloom, C. (2011) ‘The shortsighted brain: neuroeconomics and the governance of choice in time’, Social Studies of Science, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 515–538. doi: 10.1177/0306312710397689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. K. (1977) ‘Rational fools: a critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 317–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. (1955) ‘A behavioral model of rational choice’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 99–118. doi: 10.2307/1884852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. (2013) ‘It’s For Your Own Good!’, The New York Review of Books, 7 Mar.
   Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H. & Sunstein, C. R. (2003a) ‘Libertarian paternalism’, American Economic Review, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 175–179. doi: 10.1257/000282803321947001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H. & Sunstein, C. R. (2003b) Libertarian Paternalism is Not an Oxymoron, John M. Olin Law & Economics Working Paper No. 185 (2nd Series), The Law School, The University of Chicago, 50 pages.
   Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H. & Sunstein, C. R. (2009) Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness, Penguin Books, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Vallois, N. (2011) ‘The pathological paradigm of neuroeconomics’, OEconomia – History, Methodology, Philosophy, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 525–556.
   Google Scholar
• Vallois, N. (2012) L’émergence d’un nouveau domaine de savoir: la neuroéconomie. PhD diss., Université Paris I – Panthéon-Sorbonne.
   Google Scholar
• Valverde, M. (1998) Diseases of the Will: Alcohol and the Dilemmas of Freedom, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1992) The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1975) ‘Marginal utility theory and the “fundamental law of psychophysics’” (translated with an introduction by L. Schneider), Social Science Quarterly, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 21–36.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, M., Jones, R. & Pykett, J. (2011) ‘Governing irrationality, or a more than rational government? reflections on the rescientisation of decision making in British public policy’, Environment and Planning A, vol. 43, pp. 2819–2837. doi: 10.1068/a43575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zak, P. J. (2004) ‘Neuroeconomics’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 359, no. 1451, pp. 1737–1748. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar