Ten little jurors in the training camp: a genealogy of audience simulation

References

• Adorno, T. W., 1938. Report on music in radio. Box 25, Folder 4. Paul F. Lazarsfeld Papers. Columbia University Archive, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Adorno, T. W., 1969. Scientific experiences of a European scholar in America. In: D. Fleming, and B. Bailyn, eds. The intellectual migration: Europe and America, 1930-1960. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 338–370.
   Google Scholar
• Ambrosio, J., 2010. A fearsome trap: the will to know, the obligation to confess, and the Freudian subject of desire. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 42 (7), 728–741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang, I., 1991. Desperately seeking the audience. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bales, R., 1951. Interaction process analysis: a method for the study of small groups. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, B., 1995. All economies are “embedded”: the career of a concept, and beyond. Social Research, 62 (2), 387–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedell Smith, S., 2002. In all his glory: the life and times of William S. Paley and the Birth of modern broadcasting. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Beville, H., 1988. Audience ratings: radio, television, cable. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Biocca, F., David, P., and West, M., 1994. Continuous response measurement (CRM): a computerized tool for research on the cognitive processing of communication messages. In: A. Lang, ed. Measuring psychological responses to media. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 15–64.
   Google Scholar
• Blaustein, P., Wald, H., and Millard, W., 1955. Audience reaction system. US Patent No. 2,712,976 (patented July 12).
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., and Thevenot, L., 2006. On justification: economies of worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonus, A., 2016. Refashioning rhythm: hearing, acting and reacting to metronomic sound in experimental psychology and beyond, c.1875-1920. In: K. Gibbson, and I. Biddle, eds. Cultural histories of noise, sound and listening in Europe, 1300-1918. London: Routledge, 76–105.
   Google Scholar
• Brain, R., 2001. The ontology of the questionnaire: Max Weber on measurement and mass investigation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 32 (4), 647–684.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buzzard, K., 1990. Chains of gold: marketing the ratings and rating the markets. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buzzard, K., 1992. Electronic media ratings: turning audiences into Dollars and sense. Boston, MA: Focal Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buzzard, K., 1999. Radio ratings pioneers: the development of a standardized ratings vocabulary. Journal of Radio & Audio Media, 6, 287–306.
   Google Scholar
• Çalişkan, K., and Callon, M., 2009. Economization, part 1: shifting attention from the economy towards processes of economization. Economy and Society, 38, 369–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambre, M., 1981. ‘Historical overview of formative evaluation of instructional media products. Educational Technology Research and Development, 29, 3–25.
   Google Scholar
• Chappell, M., and Hooper, C. E., 1944. Radio audience measurement. New York: Stephen Daye.
   Google Scholar
• Cochoy, F., and Soutjis, B., 2020. Back to the future of digital price display: analyzing patents and other archives to understand contemporary market innovations. Social Studies of Science, 50 (1), 3–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochoy, F., Hagberg, J., and Kjellberg, H., 2018. The technologies of price display: mundane retail price governance in the early twentieth century. Economy and Society, 47 (4), 572–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Columbia University Office of Radio Research, 1943. Listen to your listeners: How to improve your programme with the Lazarsfeld-Stanton Program Analyzer. Box 7, Folder B-0217. Papers of the Bureau of Applied Social Research, Columbia University Archive, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, D., 2000. Fireside politics: radio and political culture in the United States, 1920-1940. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cuthbert, D., 1940. Three types of ‘like’ reactions in judging popular songs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 24 (6), 746–748.
   Google Scholar
• Dandelion, P., 2017. The liturgies of quakerism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, W., 2017. How are we now? Real-time mood-monitoring as valuation. Journal of Cultural Economy, 10 (1), 34–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dichter, E., 1942a. A tentative outline of problems for inclusion in a study of daytime radio programs and listeners. Report for the CBS Research Department. Report No. 18. Ernest Dichter Papers, Hagley Library and Archive, Wilmington, DE.
   Google Scholar
• Dichter, E., 1942b. Lazarsfeld-Stanton Program Analyzer, ‘Mother and Dad’, No. 1 Broadcast August 10, 1942, Report on Listener Reactions. Report for the CBS Research Department. Report No. 19. Ernest Dichter Papers, Hagley Library and Archive, Wilmington, DE.
   Google Scholar
• Dichter, E., 1943. Summary of meeting held by CBS Committee on Daytime Program Research. Report for Columbia Broadcasting System. Report No. 25. Ernest Dichter Papers, Hagley Library and Archive, Wilmington, DE.
   Google Scholar
• Donigan, R., 1964. A descriptive analysis of the effectiveness of broadcasting by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints in the Norther States mission area. M.A. Thesis, Brigham Young University. BYU Scholars Archive: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/ [Accessed 13 February 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Doscher, L, 1947. The significance of audience measurement in motion pictures. Journal of Social Issues, 3, 51–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ettema, J., and Whitney, C., eds. 1994. Audiencemaking: How the media create the audience. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, I., and Rice, M. D., 1991. Reliability of continuous measurement copy-testing methods. Journal of Advertising Research, 31 (1), 23–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, G. A., 2012. Tiny publics: a theory of group action and culture. New York: Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fisk, G., 1948. Methods of handling certain field research problems. Journal of Marketing, 12, 382–384.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, M., and Lazarsfeld, P., 1945. The Columbia office of radio research. Hollywood Quarterly, 1 (1), 51–59.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, J., 1981. Handbook of radio and TV broadcasting: research procedures in audience, program and revenues. London: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Forsyth, J., 1875. The history of trial by jury (2nd ed., prepared by J. A. Morgan). New York: Cockcroft & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1997. Technologies of the self. In: P. Rabinow, ed. Ethics: subjectivity and truth. New York: The New Press, 223–251.
   Google Scholar
• Glennie, P., and Thrift, N., 2009. Shaping the day: a history of timekeeping in England and wales, 1300-1800. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, B., and Johns, E., 1966. An introduction to sociology. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Handel, L., 1953. Hollywood market research. The Quarterly of Film Radio and Television, 7, 304–310.
   Google Scholar
• Heut, F., and Mol, A., 2013. What is a good tomato? A case of valuing in practice. Valuation Studies, 1 (2), 125–146.
   Google Scholar
• Hoff, H. E., and Geddes, L. A., 1959. Graphic registration before Ludwig: the antecedents of the kymograph. Isis, 50, 5–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollonquist, T., and Suchman, E., 1944. Listening to the listeners: experiences with the Lazarsfeld-Stanton Program Analyzer. In: P. Lazarsfeld, and F. Stanton, eds. Radio research, 1942-1943. New York: Duell, Sloan and Pearce, 265–334.
   Google Scholar
• Honomichl, J., 1984. Marketing/research people: their behind-the-scenes stories. Chicago, IL: Crain Books.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, E., 2007. There are no media. Grey Room, 29, 7–13.
   Google Scholar
• Hovland, C., Lumsdaine, A., and Sheffield, F., 1949. Experiments on mass communication. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hurwitz, D., 1988. Market research and the study of the United States radio audience. Communication, 10, 223–241.
   Google Scholar
• Jerabek, H., 2017. Paul Lazarsfeld and the origins of communications research. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Karol, J., 1938. Analyzing the radio market. Journal of Marketing, 2, 309–313.
   Google Scholar
• Kjellberg, H., Hagberg, J., and Cochoy, F., 2019. Thinking market infrastructure: barcode scanning in the US grocery retail sector, 1967-2010. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 62, 207–232.
   Google Scholar
• Kling, D., 2017. Presbyterians and congregationalists in North America. In: T. Larsen, and M. Ledger-Thomas, eds. The Oxford history of protestant dissenting traditions. Vol. III: the nineteenth century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 176–210.
   Google Scholar
• Korczynski, M., Pickering, M., and Robertson, E., 2013. Rhythms of labour: music at work in Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld, P. F, 1940. The use of mail questionnaires to ascertain the relative popularity of network stations in family listening surveys. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 24, 802–816.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld, P. F., 1942a. The testing of radio programs: The program analyzer. Box 5, Folder B-0169. Papers of the Bureau of Applied Social Research. Columbia University Archive, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld, P. F., 1942b. Memorandum: Interviews on the Program Analyzer. Box 5, Folder B-0169. Papers of the Bureau of Applied Social Research. Columbia University Archive, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld, P. F., 1943. Memorandum to Mr. Stone, BBDO (August 24). Box 7, Folder B-0217. Papers of the Bureau of Applied Social Research. Columbia University Archive, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld, P. F., 1963. Afterword: some reflections on past and future research on broadcasting. In: G. Steiner, ed. The people look at television: a study of audience attitudes. New York: Knopf, 411–412.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld, P. F., and Robinson, W. S., 1940. Some properties of the trichotomy ‘like, no opinion, dislike’ and their psychological interpretation. Sociometry, 3, 151–178.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, T., and von der Linn, M., 1994. Elements of a radio theory: Adorno and the princeton research project. The Musical Quarterly, 78, 316–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, M., 1982. The Lazarsfeld-Stanton Program Analyzer: an historical note. Journal of Communication, 32 (4), 30–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lezaun, J., 2007. A market of opinions: the political epistemology of focus groups. The Sociological Review, 55 (2), 130–151.
   Google Scholar
• Lumley, F. H., 1934. Measurement in radio. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Macho, T., 2008. Tiere zweiter Ordnung. Kulturtechnik der Identität und Identifikation. In: D. Baecker, M. Kettner, and D. Rustemeyer, eds. Über Kultur: Theorie und Praxis der Kulturreflexion. Bielefeld: transcript, 99–117.
   Google Scholar
• Macmillan, A., 2011. Michel Foucault’s techniques of the self and the Christian politics of obedience. Theory, Culture & Society, 28 (4), 3–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, J, 2013. Assessing reception and individual responses to media messages: relevance, computer techniques, quality and analysis of Real-Time Response Measurements (RTR–M). ESSACHESS - Journal for Communication Studies, 6 (1), 169–184.
   Google Scholar
• Mattelart, A., and Mattelart, M., 1998. Theories of communication: a short introduction. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, M., 1962. CBS: the network and the mind machines. Show, 2 (4), 58–64.
   Google Scholar
• Meehan, E. R., 1984. Ratings and the institutional approach: a third answer to the commodity question. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 1, 216–225.
   Google Scholar
• Merriley, B., 1987. Instruments and an independent physiology: the harvard physiological laboratory, 1871–1906. In: G. Geisson, ed. Physiology in the American context, 1850-1940. New York: Springer, 293–321.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R., Fiske, M., and Kendall, P., 1956. The focused interview: a manual of problems and procedures. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K., and Kendall, P. L., 1946. The focused interview. American Journal of Sociology, 51, 541–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millard, W., 1960. Audience reaction to ‘Indictment’. Archive of the Presbyterian Historical Society, Philadelphia. United Presbyterian Church in the U.S.A. Division of Mass Media Records, Subseries II, Box 3, Folder 23.
   Google Scholar
• Millard, W., 1964. The influence of sponsorship on willingness to watch network television programs. Southwestern Social Science Quarterly, 45 (2), 135–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millard, W., 1992. A history of handsets for direct measurement of audience response. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 4 (1), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P. V., 1994. Made-to-order and standardized audiences: forms of reality in audience measurement. In: J. Ettema, and C. Whitney, eds. Audiencemaking: how the media create the audience. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 57–74.
   Google Scholar
• Napoli, P. M., 2011. Audience Evolution: new technologies and the transformation of media audiences. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ohmer, S., 1991. Measuring desire: George Gallup and audience research in Hollywood. Journal of Film and Video, 43 (1/2), 3–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohmer, S., 2006. George Gallup in Hollywood. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Papastefanou, G., 2013. Reliability and Validity of RTR Measurement Device. GESIS Working Papers No. 27. GESIS Institute: Mannheim.
   Google Scholar
• Perse, E., 1996. Herta Herzog. In: N. Signorelli, ed. Women in communication: A biographical sourcebook. Westport, CT: Praeger, 202–211.
   Google Scholar
• Peterman, J. N., 1940. The ‘Program Analyzer’: a new technique in studying liked and disliked items in radio programs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 24, 728–741.
   Google Scholar
• Plus Four Market Research, 1986. The Qualitative Lab. Market Research Society Newsletter, No. 243, 13.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, L., 2019. Culturalisation and devices: what is culture in cultural economy? Journal of Cultural Economy, 12 (3), 228–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, B., 2016. Science of the seance: transnational networks and gendered bodies in the study of psychic phenomena, 1918-1940. Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roslow, S., 1943. Measuring the radio audience by the personal interview roster method. Journal of Applied Psychology, 27, 526–534.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, A., and Simonson, P., 2014. The founding mothers of communication research: toward a history of a gendered assemblage. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 31 (1), 3–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarzkopf, S., and Gries, R., eds. 2010. Ernest Dichter and motivation research: new perspectives on the making of post-war consumer culture. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Siegert, B., 2013. Cultural techniques: or the end of the intellectual postwar era in German Media Theory. Theory, Culture & Society, 30, 48–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, A., 1990. The curious importance of small groups in American sociology. In: H. J. Gans, ed. Sociology in America. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 61–72.
   Google Scholar
• Silvey, R., 1944. Methods of listener research employed by the British Broadcasting Corporation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 107 (3/4), 190–230.
   Google Scholar
• Smythe, D., 2001. On the audience commodity and its work. In: M. G. Durham, and D. Kellner, eds. Media and cultural studies: keyworks. Oxford: Blackwell, 253–279.
   Google Scholar
• Stanton, F., 1935. Checking the checkers. Advertising & Selling, December 19, pp. 24, 44.
   Google Scholar
• Sturmthal, A., and Curtis, A., 1944. Program analyzer tests of two educational films. In: P. F. Lazarsfeld, and F. Stanton, eds. Radio research, 1942-1943. New York: Duell, Sloan & Pearce, 485–506.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E. P., 1967. Time, work-discipline and industrial capitalism. Past & Present, 38, 56–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Time, 1942. What Do They Like? Monday, June 29, p. 4.
   Google Scholar
• Upton, C., 1969. Broadcast Program-Audience Analyzers: a century of no progress in instrument design. M.A. Thesis, Department of Speech, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M., 1978. Economy and society: an outline of interpretative sociology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, J., Phalen, P., and Lichty, L., 2006. Ratings analysis: the theory and practice of ratings research (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar