Biopolitical platforms: the perverse virtues of digital labour

References

• Adamson, M., 2009. The human capital strategy. Ephemera, 9 (4), 271–284.
   Google Scholar
• Andrejevic, M., 2014. The big data divide. International Journal of Communication, 8, 1673–1689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, G., 1964. Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G., 1974. A theory of social interactions. The Journal of Political Economy, 82 (6), 1063–1093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, G., 1993. Human capital: A theoretical and empirical Analysis, with special reference to education (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boland, H., 2018. Deliveroo ‘eyeing $4bn valuation’ as it pushes ahead with fundraising talks. The Telegraph, 28 Nov. Available at: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2018/11/24/deliveroo-eyeing-4bn-valuation-pushes-ahead-fundraising-talks/ [Accessed 19 April 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Bouk, D., 2017. The history and political economy of personal data over the last two centuries in three acts. Osiris, 32 (1), 85–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cant, C., 2019. Riding for deliveroo: resistance in the new economy. London: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty, D., 2008. Provincializing Europe postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K., 2006. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Crain, M., 2018. The limits of transparency: data brokers and commodification. New Media & Society, 20 (1), 88–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., 1995. Negotiations, 1972–1990. Translated by M. Joughin. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeStefano, V., 2016. Introduction: crowdsourcing, the gig-economy and the law. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 37 (3), 461–470. Bocconi Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2767383.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, K., 2020. Colonising the future. Boston Review. Available at: http://bostonreview.net/class-inequality-global-justice/kevin-p-donovan-colonizing-future [Accessed 19 April 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 2008. The Birth of biopolitics: lectures at the College de France, 1978-1979. Translated by G. Burchell. New York: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Fourcade, M., 2017. The fly and the cookie: alignment and unhingement in 21st-century capitalism. Socio-Economic Review, 15 (3), 661–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fourcade, M., and Healy, K., 2017. Seeing like a market. Socio-Economic Review, 15 (1), 9–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, A, 2019. Land grab/data grab: precision agriculture and its new horizons. Journal of Peasant Studies, 46 (5), 893–912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandini, A., 2019. Labour process theory and the gig economy. Human Relations, 72 (6), 1039–1056. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718790002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, M., and Anwar, M.A., 2019. The Global Gig economy: towards a planetary labour market? First Monday, 24 (4), np. doi:https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v24i4.9913.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, K., 2020. ‘My life Is more valuable than this’: understanding risk among on-demand food couriers in Edinburgh. Work, Employment and Society, doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017020969593.
   Google Scholar
• Griesbach, K., et al., 2019. Algorithmic control in platform food delivery work. Socius, doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023119870041.
   Google Scholar
• Kallenberg, A., and Vallas, S., 2018. Probing precarious work: theory, research, and politics. Research in the Sociology of Work, 31, 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Kessler, K., 2018. Gigged the gig economy, the end of the job and the future of work. New York: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Klair, A., 2019. Almost half of self-employed are on poverty pay. Trade Union Congress. Available at: https://www.tuc.org.uk/blogs/almost-half-self-employed-are-poverty-pay [Accessed 19 April 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Langley, P., and Leyshon, A., 2017. Platform capitalism: The intermediation and capitalisation of digital economic circulation. Finance and Society, 3 (1), 11–31.
   Google Scholar
• Lehdonvirta, V., 2018. Flexibility in the gig economy: managing time on three online piecework platforms. New Technology, Work and Employment, 33 (1), 13–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, D., 2018. Material signals: A historical sociology of high-frequency trading. American Journal of Sociology, 123 (6), 1635–1683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malin, B. J., and Chandler, C., 2017. Free to work anxiously: splintering precarity among drivers for uber and lyft. Communication, Culture & Critique, 10, 382–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, K., 1990. Capital, volume 1. Translated by B Fowkes. London: Penguin Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Mezzadra, S., and Neilson, B., 2015. Operations of capital. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 114 (1), 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezzadra, S., and Neilson, B., 2017. On the multiple frontiers of extraction: excavating contemporary capitalism. Cultural Studies, 31 (2/3), 185–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonnen, P., 2019. Algorithm as a boss and co-worker: A sociological analysis of the organisation of Deliveroo riders’ work processes and their experience of work. M.A. Kulturwissenschaft. Institut für Kulturwissenschaft. Humboldt University.
   Google Scholar
• Ravenelle, A., 2019. Hustle and gig: struggling and surviving in the sharing economy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, L., 2019. Platforms, markets, and contingent calculation: The flexible arrangement of the delivered meal. Antipode, 52, 619–636. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roderick, L., 2014. Discipline and power in the digital age: The case of the US consumer data broker industry. Critical Sociology, 40 (5), 729–746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenblat, A., and Stark, L., 2016. Algorithmic labor and information asymmetries: a case study of uber’s drivers. International Journal of Communication, 10, 3758–3784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenblat, R., 2019. Uberland: How algorithms are rewriting the rules of work. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sadowski, J., 2019. When data is capital: datafication, accumulation, and extraction. Big Data & Society, 6 (1), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadowski, J., 2020. The internet of landlords: digital platforms as rentier capitalism and value grabbing. Antipode, 52 (2), 562–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, S., 2017. The speed trap: Of taxis, truck stops and TaskRabbits. In: Judy Wajcman, and Nigel Dodd, eds. Societies of speed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 131–151.
   Google Scholar
• Srnicek, N., 2017. Platform capitalism. London: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanford, J., 2017. The resurgence of gig work: Historical and theoretical perspectives. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 28 (3), 382–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., and Corbin, J. M., 1990. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Thatcher, J., O’Sullivan, D., and Mahmoudi, D., 2016. Data colonialism through accumulation by dispossession: New metaphors for daily data. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34 (6), 990–1006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallas, S., and Schor, J.B., 2020. What Do platforms Do? understanding the gig economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 46 (1), 273–294.
   Google Scholar
• van Doorn, N.A.J.M., 2017. Platform labor: On the gendered and racialized exploitation of low-income service work in the ‘On-demand’ economy. Information, Communication & Society, 20, 898–914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veen, A., Barratt, T., and Goods, C., 2019. Platform-Capital’s ‘App-etite’ for control: A labour process analysis of food-delivery work in Australia. Work, Employment and Society, doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017019836911.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, A. J., et al., 2019. “Good gig, bad gig: autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society, 33 (1), 56–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, A., and Lehdonvirta, V, 2019. Platform labour and structured antagonism: understanding the origins of protest in the gig economy. SSRN. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3357804 [Accessed 19 February 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S., 2019. The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar