Distributed accountability: picking a carbon price for cost–benefit analysis

References

• Amelang, K. and Bauer, S., 2019. Following the algorithm: how epidemiological risk-scores do accountability. Social Studies of Science, 49, 476–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asdal, K., 2008. Enacting things through numbers: taking nature into account/ing. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 39, 123–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asdal, K., 2014. From climate issue to oil issue: offices of public administration, versions of economics, and the ordinary technologies of politics. Environment and Planning A, 46, 2110–2124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudia, S., 2016. Des instruments pour mettre en économie l’environnement. L’économicisation par approximation et occultation. . Ecologie & Politique, 52, 45–61.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, G.C. and Star, S.L., 2000. Sorting things out: classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bye, B., ed., 2016. Samfunnsøkonomiske kostnader fra utslipp av klimagasser. Trondheim: Ex ante akademisk forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Çalışkan, K., 2007. Price as a market device: cotton trading in Izmir mercantile exchange. The Sociological Review, 55, 241–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çalışkan, K., 2010. Market threads: how cotton farmers and traders create a global commodity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Çalışkan, K. and Callon, M., 2009. Economization, part 1: shifting attention from the economy towards processes of economization. Economy and Society, 38, 369–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M., 1998. The laws of the markets. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishers/Sociological Review.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M., 2009. Civilizing markets: carbon trading between in vitro and in vivo experiments. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 535–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M. and Muniesa, F., 2005. Peripheral vision: economic markets as calculative collective devices. Organization Studies, 26, 1229–1250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiapello, E. and Engels, A., 2021. The fabrication of environmental intangibles as a questionable response to environmental problems. Journal of Cultural Economy, 14, 517–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cointe B. and Nadaï A., 2018. Feed-in tariffs in the European Union. Progressive Energy Policy. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, M.H., 2015. Measure for measure? Commensuration, commodification, and metrology in emissions markets and beyond. Environment and Planning A, 47, 1787–1804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doganova, L., 2018. Discounting the future: a political technology. Economic Sociology_the European Electronic Newsletter, 19, 4–9.
   Google Scholar
• Dussauge, I., Helgesson, C.-F., and Lee, F., 2015. Value practices in the life sciences and medicine. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenstein, V. and Muniesa, F., 2013. The conditional sink: counterfactual display in the valuation of a carbon offsetting reforestation project. Valuation Studies, 1, 161–188.
   Google Scholar
• Engels, A. and Wang, C., 2018. The value of a valuation perspective for theorizing about social change and climate change: a study on carbon pricing in China. Valuation Studies, 5, 93–130.
   Google Scholar
• Espeland, W.N., 2001. Value-matters. Economic and Political Weekly, 36, 1839–1845.
   Google Scholar
• Espeland, W.N. and Stevens, M.L., 1998. Commensuration as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 313–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fæhn, T., Jacobsen, K., and Strøm, B., 2010. Samfunnsøkonomiske kostnader ved klimamål for 2020. En generell modelltilnærming. Available at: https://www.ssb.no/natur-og-miljo/artikler-og-publikasjoner/samfunnsokonomiske-kostnader-ved-klimamaal-for-2020 [Accessed 15 May 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Fourcade, M., 2011a. Cents and sensibility: economic valuation and the nature of “nature”. American Journal of Sociology, 116, 1721–1777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fourcade, M., 2011b. Price and prejudice: on economics and the enchantments (and disenchantment) of nature. In: J. Beckert and P. Aspers, eds. The worth of goods: valuation and pricing in the economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 41–62.
   Google Scholar
• Grandclément, C. & Nadaï, A. 2018. Devising the consumer of the competitive electricity market: the mundane meter, the unbundling doctrine, and the re-bundling of choice. Journal of Cultural Economy, 11, 440–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, P. and Knox, H., 2008. ‘OTHERWISE ENGAGED’: culture, deviance and the quest for connectivity through road construction. Journal of Cultural Economy, 1, 79–92.
   Google Scholar
• Helgesson, C.-F. and Muniesa, F., 2013. For what it’s worth: an introduction to valuation studies. Valuation Studies, 1, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman, D. and Berman, E.P., 2014. Do economists make policies? On the political effects of economics. Socio-Economic Review, 12, 779–811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, P. and Morgan, M.S., 2010. How well do facts travel?: The dissemination of reliable knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC, 2007. 2007: Agriculture. Climate change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Avaliable at: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar4/wg3/.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., 1987. Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., 2005. Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J.C.-E., 2017. Pacifying uncooperative carbon: examining the materiality of the carbon market. Economy and Society, 46, 522–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livermore, M.A. and Revesz, R.L., 2013. The globalization of cost-benefit analysis in environmental policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lohmann, L., 2009. Toward a different debate in environmental accounting: the cases of carbon and cost–benefit. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 499–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, D., 2009. Making things the same: gases, emission rights and the politics of carbon markets. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 440–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon, 2017. Samfunnsøkonomisk analyse av utfasing av ferger uten skadestabilitet. Available at: https://www.menon.no/publication/samfunnsokonomisk-analyse-utfasing-ferger-skadestabilitet/ [Accessed 15 May 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Muniesa, F., 2007. Market technologies and the pragmatics of prices. Economy and Society, 36, 377–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neyland, D. and Coopmans, C., 2014. Visual accountability. The Sociological Review, 62, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neyland, D., Ehrenstein, V., and Milyaeva, S., 2018. Mundane market matters: from ordinary to profound and back again. Journal of Cultural Economy, 11, 377–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neyland, D. and Woolgar, S., 2002. Accountability in action?: The case of a database purchasing decision. The British Journal of Sociology, 53, 259–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordhaus, W.D., 2017. Revisiting the social cost of carbon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114, 1518–1523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norwegian Coastal Administration, 2020. Veileder i samfunnsøkonomisk analyse. The Norwegian Maritime Administration. Available at: https://www.kystverket.no/contentassets/92960a15253e427aa60723519d048d1b/veileder-i-samfunnsokonomisk-analyse.pdf/download [Accessed 26 October 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Environment Agency, 2019. Klimagssutslipp fra transport. Available at: https://miljostatus.miljodirektoratet.no/tema/klima/norske-utslipp-av-klimagasser/klimagassutslipp-fra-transport/ [Accessed 10 December 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Ministry of Transport and Communication, 2019. Nasjonal transportplan 2022–2033 – Oppdrag 9: prioriteringer. Available at: https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/2ceaece5bb1b405f9b9e183395c722b8/oppdrag-9-25112019.pdf [Accessed 10 December 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian National Rail Administration, 2015. Metodehåndbok. Samfunnsøkonomiske analyser for jernbanen 2015. Available at: https://www.jernbanedirektoratet.no/contentassets/f9ed15eb368e4abb9dc6d2f558432135/metodehandbok-2015.pdf [Accessed 24 April 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Pollution Control Authority, 2009. Vurdering av framtidige kvotepriser (Assessment of Future Carbon Prices). Available at: http://www.miljodirektoratet.no/old/klif/publikasjoner/2545/ta2545.pdf [Accessed 10 November 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Public Roads Administration, 2006. Konsekvensanalyser. Håndbok 140. Statens vegvesen. Available at: https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/handle/11250/195982 [Accessed 24 April 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Public Roads Administration, 2018. Konsekvensanalyser. Håndbok V712. Statens vegvesen. Available at: https://www.vegvesen.no/fag/veg+og+gate/planlegging/Grunnlagsdata/Konsekvensanalyser [Accessed 24 April 2019].
   Google Scholar
• NOU, 1997. Nytte-kostnadsanalyser. Prinsipper for lønnsomhetsvurderinger i offentlig sektor. Norwegian Government. Available at: https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/nou-1997-27/id116359/ [Accessed 15 May 2019].
   Google Scholar
• NOU, 2009. Globale miljøutfordringer – norsk politikk. Norwegian Government. Available at: NOU 2009. Globale miljøutfordringer – norsk politikk. [Accessed 15 May 2019].
   Google Scholar
• NOU, 2012. Samfunnsøkonomiske analyser. Available at: https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/nou-2012-16/id700821/?ch=3 [Accessed 15 May 2019].
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 2018. Cost–benefit analysis and the environment: further developments and policy Use. Paris: OECD, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264085169-en [Accessed 24 April 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Auditor General, 2018. Riksrevisjonens undersøkelse av overføring av godstransport fra vei til sjø og bane. Available at: https://www.riksrevisjonen.no/globalassets/rapporter/no-2017-2018/godstransport.pdf [Accessed 24 April 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Ormond, J. and Goodman, M.K., 2015. A new regime of carbon counting: The practices and politics of accounting for everyday carbon through CO2e. Global Environmental Change, 34, 119–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallesen, T., 2016. Valuation struggles over pricing–determining the worth of wind power. Journal of Cultural Economy, 9, 527–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persky, J., 2001. Cost-benefit analysis and the classical creed. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 199–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Point Carbon, 2009a. European carbon prices in 2030. Norwegian Environment Agency. Unpublished report retrieved from the Norwegian Environment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Point Carbon, 2009b. European carbon prices towards 2020. Unpublished report retrieved from the Norwegian Environment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, T.M., 1996. Trust in numbers: the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, T.M., 2007. The rise of cost–benefit rationality as solution to a political problem of distrust. In: R.O. Zerbe, ed. Research in law and economics. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 337–344.
   Google Scholar
• Randalls, S., 2011. Optimal climate change: economics and climate science policy histories (from heuristic to normative). Osiris, 26, 224–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sager, T.Ø., 2016. Why don’t cost-benefit results count for more? The case of Norwegian road investment priorities. Urban, Planning and Transport Research, 4, 101–121.
   Google Scholar
• Sandmo, A., 2015. The early history of environmental economics. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 9, 43–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafiee, K., 2019. Cost-benefit analysis at the floodgates: governing democratic futures through the reassembly of Iran’s waterways. Social Studies of Science, 50, 94–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza, C.D., 2018. Cost-benefit analysis as democratic ritual: the controversy over a proposed uranium mining and milling project in Virginia (1981–2013). PhD, Virginia State University.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, D., 2011. What’s valuable? In: J. Beckert and P. Aspers, eds. The worth of goods: valuation and pricing in the economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 319–338.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway, 2009. Vurdering av framtidige klimakvotepriser (Assessment of future carbon prices). Available at: https://www.ssb.no/natur-og-miljo/artikler-og-publikasjoner/vurdering-av-framtidige-klimakvotepriser?fane=om [Accessed 1 November 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Transport Administration, 2018. Analysmetod och samhällsekonomiska kalkylvärden för transportsektorn: ASEK 6.1. Available at: https://www.trafikverket.se/contentassets/4b1c1005597d47bda386d81dd3444b24/asek-6.1/asek_6_1_hela_rapporten_180412.pdf [Accessed 10 May 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Transport Administration, 2019. Åtgärder för ökad andel godstransporter på järnväg och med fartyg. Redovisning av regeringsuppdrag. Available at: http://trafikverket.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1352252&dswid=-5497 [Accessed 3 January 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Trading Economics, 2021. EU carbon permits. Available at: https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/carbon [Accessed 10 November 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Volden, G.H., 2013. Bruk av karbonpriser i praktiske samfunnsøkonomiske analyser. En oversikt over praksis fra analyser av statlige investeringsprosjekter under KVU-/KS1-ordningen. NTNU: NTNU. Available at: https://www.ntnu.no/documents/1261860271/1262010703/Concept_rapport_nr_37.pdf [Accessed 15 April 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Welde, M., et al., 2013. Planprosesser, beregningsverktøy og bruk av nytte-kostnadsanalyser i vegsektor. En sammenligning av praksis i Norge og Sverige. Concept. Available at: https://www.ntnu.no/documents/1261860271/1262010703/Concept_rapport_nr_33.pdf [Accessed 15 April 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, J.B., 2013. The diffusion of regulatory oversight. In: M.A. Livermore and R.L. Revesz, eds. The globalization of cost-benefit analysis in environmental policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 123–140.
   Google Scholar
• Yearley, S., 2018. Economic valuation of the environment. In: M.E. Boström and D.J.E. Davidson, eds. Environment and society. Concepts and challenges. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 143–166.
   Google Scholar