Negotiating platformisation: MusicTech, intellectual property rights and third wave platform reintermediation in the music industry

References

• Andersen, B., Kozul-Wright, R., and Kozul-Wright, Z, 2007. Rents, rights N’Rhythm: cooperation, conflict and capabilities in the music industry. Industry and Innovation, 14 (5), 513–540.
   Google Scholar
• Arditi, D, 2015. iTake-Over: the recording industry in the digital era. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Arditi, D, 2018. Digital subscriptions: The unending consumption of music in the digital era. Popular Music and Society, 41 (3), 302–318. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03007766.2016.1264101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, K, 2013. Theorizing music streaming: preliminary investigations. Scottish Music Review, 3, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjee, S., et al., 2006. Impact of legal threats on online music sharing activity: an analysis of music industry legal actions. Journal of Law and Economics, 49 (1), 91–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, A., and Rogers, I, 2016. Popular music and materiality: memorabilia and memory traces. Popular Music and Society, 39 (1), 28–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boldrin, M., and Levine, D, 2002. The case against intellectual property. The American Economic Review, 92 (2), 209–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bustinza, O.F., et al., 2013. Music business models and piracy. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 113 (1), 4–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, D., and Rogers, I, 2014. Fifteen years of ‘utopia’: Napster and Pitchfork as technologies of democratization. First Monday, 19 (10), no pagination.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, D., Matthews, R., and Hyslop, A, 2001. Blockchain as an external enabler of new venture ideas: digital entrepreneurs and the disintermediation of the global music industry. Journal of Business Research, 125, 577–591.
   Google Scholar
• Christophers, B, 2020. Rentier capitalism: who owns the economy, and who pays for it? London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, D.Y., and Perez, A, 2007. Online piracy, innovation, and legitimate business models. Technovation, 27, 168–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crittenden, A.B., Crittenden, V.L., and Crittenden, W.F, 2019. The digitalization triumvirate: how incumbents survive. Business Horizons, 62, 259–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, M, 2010. Peer to peer and the music industry: the criminalization of sharing. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• De Groote, J.K., and Backman, J., 2020. Initiating open innovation collaborations between incumbents and startups: how can David and Goliath get along? International Journal of Innovation Management, 24 (2), 1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Digital Music News, 2018. 99% of all music streaming comes from just 10% of available songs. February 2018. Available at: https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2018/02/14/spotify-apple- music-top-songs/ [Accessed 29 January 2021].
   Google Scholar
• DIT, 2018. British music innovation. Hitting the right notes for the future. Department for International Trade, May 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Dobusch, L., and Schüßler, E, 2014. Copyright reform and business model innovation: regulatory propaganda at German music industry conferences. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 83, 24–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumbreck, A., and McPherson, G, 2016. Music entrepreneurship. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Durand, C., and Milberg, W, 2020. Intellectual monopoly in global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 27 (2), 404–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easley, R.F., Michel, J.G., and Devaraj, S, 2003. The MP3 open standard and the music industry’s technological response to internet piracy. Communications of the ACM, 46 (11), 91–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, M., et al., 2019. Spotify teardown: inside the black box of streaming music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garafalo, R, 1999. From music publishing to MP3: music and industry in the twentieth century. American Music, 17 (3), 318–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, G., et al., 2004. The transformation of the music industry supply chain. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24 (11), 1087–1103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen, A. N, 2015. The playlist experience: personal playlists in music streaming services. Popular Music and Society, 38 (5), 625–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrikse, R., Bassens, D., and van Meeteren, M., 2018. The appleization of finance: charting incumbent finance’s embrace of FinTech. Finance and Society, 4 (2), 159–180.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrikse, R., van Meeteren, M., and Bassens, D., 2019. Strategic coupling between finance, technology and the state: cultivating a fintech ecosystem for incumbent finance. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19887967.
   Google Scholar
• Hesmondhalgh, D, 2020. Is music streaming bad for musicians? problems of evidence and argument. New Media and Society. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820953541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knopper, S, 2009. Appetite for self-destruction: the spectacular crash of the record industry in the digital Age. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, A. B, 2019. Rockonomics: what the music industry Can teach Us about economics (and our future). London: John Murray.
   Google Scholar
• Langley, P., and Leyshon, A, 2017. Platform capitalism: the intermediation and capitalization of digital economic circulation. Finance and Society, 3 (1), 11–31.
   Google Scholar
• Langley, P., and Leyshon, A, 2021. The platform political economy of FinTech: reintermediation, consolidation and capitalisation. New Political Economy 26 (3), 376–388. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2020.1766432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leyshon, A, 2014. Reformatted: code, networks, and the transformation of the music industry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leyshon, A., and Watson, A, 2021. User as asset, music as liability: the moral economy of the “value gap” in a platform musical economy. In: P McDonald, ed. Routledge companion to media industries. London: Routledge, 267–280.
   Google Scholar
• McCourt, T., and Burkart, P, 2003. When creators, corporations and consumers collide: Napster and the development of on-line music distribution. Media, Culture and Society, 25, 333–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, J. W, 2015. Selling digital music, formatting culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maasø, A., and Hagen, A. N, 2020. Metrics and decision-making in music streaming. Popular Communication, 18 (1), 18–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, L., and Manzerolle, V.R, 2019. Rising tides? data capture, platform accumulation, and new monopolies in the digital music economy. New Media & Society, 21 (3), 543–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, L., and Potts, J, 2009. Does weaker copyright mean stronger creative industries? Some Lessons from China. Creative Industries Journal, 1 (3), 245–261.
   Google Scholar
• Music Ally, 2019. Fresh start Rightsholders want to nurture the next generation of inventive music/tech startups - so how well are they doing? Available at: https://musically.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Report-424-169704300.pdf [Accessed 29/07/2020].
   Google Scholar
• Music and Copyright, 2021. UMG and SME put the market share squeeze on WMG and the independent sector. Available at: https://musicandcopyright.wordpress.com/ [Accessed 7 June 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Music Business Worldwide, 2015. World’s top music publishers now control 11 million songs. Available at: https://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/top-5-publishers-now-control-11m- songs/ [Accessed 4 February 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Negus, K, 2019. From creator to data: the post-record music industry and the digital conglomerates. Media, Culture & Society, 41 (3), 367–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Dair, M., and Beaven, Z, 2017. The networked record industry: how blockchain technology could transform the record industry. Strategic Change, 26 (5), 471–480.
   Google Scholar
• Pagano, U, 2014. The crisis of intellectual monopoly capitalism. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 38 (6), 1409–1429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, W., 2020. Streaming is stalling: can music keep up in the attention economy? Available at: https://www.billboard.com/articles/business/9500546/streaming-music-growth- stalled-factors-attention-economy/ [Accessed 11 February 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Power, D., and Jansson, J, 2004. The emergence of a post-industrial music economy? Music and ICT synergies in Stockholm, Sweden. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 35, 425–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, J, 2013. The death and life of the music industry in the digital Age. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, J. P, 2019. New players in the music industry: lifeboats or killer whales? The role of streaming platforms. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 21 (6), 525–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statista, 2020a. Number of Spotify premium subscribers worldwide from 1st quarter 2015 to 3rd quarter 2020. Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/244995/number-of-paying- spotify-subscribers/ [Accessed 29 January 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Statista, 2020b. Number of apple music subscribers worldwide from October 2015 to June 2020. Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/604959/number-of-apple-music-subscribers/ [Accessed 29 January 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Stockholm Business Region, 2016. Stockholm – the powerhouse of sound: The Birthplace of MusicTech Innovation. Stockholm Business Region, June 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Truby, J, 2020. Fintech and the city: sandbox 2.0 policy and regulatory reform proposals. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 34 (3), 277–309.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, A, 2008. Global music city: knowledge and geographical proximity in London’s recorded music industry. Area, 40 (1), 12–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, A., 2015. New business strategies and the reinforcement of intellectual property rights in the digital economy: The case of the online digital marketplace for music. Available at: http://www.nemode.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Watson-2015- Online-Digital-Markeplace-for-Music.pdf [Accessed 3 February 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Wójcik, D, 2020. Financial geography II: the impacts of FinTech – financial sector and centres, regulation and stability, inclusion and governance. Progress in Human Geography. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132520959825.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, T, 2016. The attention merchants: the epic struggle to get in our heads. London: Atlantic Books.
   Google Scholar