Pitching agri-food tech: performativity and non-disruptive disruption in Silicon Valley

References

• AgFunder, 2019. Agtech investing report - 2019 [online]. Available at: https://agfunder.com/research/agfunder-agrifood-tech-investing-report-2019/ [Accessed 25 August 2020].
   Google Scholar
• AgFunder, 2021. Agfunder agrifoodtech investment report. Available at: https://agfunder.com/research/agfunhttps://research.agfunder.com/2021/2021 [Accessed 2 February 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Belasco, W., 2008. Food: the key concepts. London, UK: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, M.M., 2010. Farming for us all: practical agriculture and the cultivation of sustainability. State College: Pennsylvania State Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benton, W., 2020. Showing and coding: venture pitching and nonmaterial production. Journal of Cultural Economy, 13 (4), 489–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berglund, H., Bousfiha, M., and Mansoori, Y., 2020. Opportunities as artifacts and entrepreneurship as design. Academy of Management Review, 45 (4), 825–846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biltekoff, C., 2013. Eating right in America: the cultural politics of food and health. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bronson, K. and Knezevic, I., 2016. Big data in food and agriculture. big data & society, 3 (1), 205395171664817.
   Google Scholar
• Brosius, J.P. and Campbell, L.M., 2010. Collaborative event ethnography: conservation and development trade-offs at the fourth world conservation congress. Conservation and Society, 8 (4), 245–255.
   Google Scholar
• Buttel, F.H. and Busch, L., 1988. The public agricultural research system at the crossroads. Agricultural History, 62 (2), 303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carolan, M, 2017. Agro-digital governance and life itself: food politics at the intersection of code and affect. Sociologia Ruralis, 57 (S1), 816–835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapple, D., Pollock, N. and D’Adderio, L., 2021. From pitching to briefing: extending entrepreneurial storytelling to new audiences. Organization Studies, 43 (5), 773–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X.-P., Yao, X., and Kotha, S., 2009. Entrepreneur passion and preparedness in business plan presentations: a persuasion analysis of venture capitalists’ funding decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 52 (1), 199–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiles, R.M., et al., 2021. Democratizing ownership and participation in the 4th industrial revolution: challenges and opportunities in cellular agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values, 38 (4), 943–961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, C., 2008. The impact of entrepreneurs’ oral ‘pitch’ presentation skills on business angels’ initial screening investment decisions. Venture Capital, 10 (3), 257–279.
   Google Scholar
• Cochrane, W.W., 1979. The development of American agriculture: a historical analysis. Minneapolis, MI: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doganova, L. and Eyquem-Renault, M., 2009. What do business models do?: innovation devices in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 38 (10), 1559–1570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doganova, L. and Muniesa, F., 2015. Capitalization devices. In: M. Kornberger, L. Justesen, J. Mouritsen and A. Koed Madsen, eds. Making things valuable. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 109–125.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbairn, M. and Guthman, J., 2020. Agri-food tech discovers silver linings in the pandemic. Agriculture and Human Values, 37 (3), 587–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, I., 2020. Investment, value, and the making of entrepreneurship in India. Economic Anthropology, 7 (2), 190–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianella, E., 2015. Morality and the idea of progress in Silicon Valley. Berkeley Journal of Sociology. Available at: http://berkeleyjournal.org/2015/01/morality-and-the-idea-of-progress-in-silicon-valley/ [Accessed 12 October 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, G.W. and Buttel, F.H., 1989. Farmer ambivalence toward agricultural research: an empirical assessment. Rural Sociology, 54 (3), 382–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, J., 2018. Planetary improvement: cleantech entrepreneurship and the contradictions of green capitalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goode, L. and Godhe, M., 2017. Beyond capitalist realism – why we need critical future studies. Culture Unbound, 9 (1), 108–129.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, D., Sorj, B., and Wilkinson, J., 1987. From farming to biotechnology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Graddy-Lovelace, G. and Diamond, A., 2017. From supply management to agricultural subsidies—and back again? The U.S. farm bill & agrarian (in)viability. Journal of Rural Studies, 50, 70–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthman, J., 2004. Agrarian dreams: the paradox of organic farming in California. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guthman, J., 2011. Weighing in: obesity, food justice, and the limits of capitalism. Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, J.L., 2011. Pesticide drift and the pursuit of environmental justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heffernan, W., 2000. In concentration of ownership and control in agriculture. In: F. Magdoff, J. Bellamy Foster, and F.H. Buttel, eds. Hungry for profit: the agribusiness threat to farmers, food and the environment. New York: Monthly Review Press, 61–75.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrickson, M.K., 2015. Resilience in a concentrated and consolidated food system. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 5 (3), 418–431.
   Google Scholar
• Hogarth, S., 2017. Valley of the unicorns: consumer genomics, venture capital and digital disruption. New Genetics and Society, 36 (3), 250–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, P.H., 2016. Concentration and power in the food system: who controls what we eat? London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, P.H., et al., 2021. “Protein” industry convergence and its implications for resilient and equitable food systems. Frontiers in sustainable food systems [online]. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2021.684181/full.
   Google Scholar
• Huet, E. and Zuleski, O., 2017. Silicon Valley’s $400 juicer may be feeling the squeeze. Bloomberg News [online]. Available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2017-04-19/silicon-valley-s-400-juicer-may-be-feeling-the-squeeze [Accessed 17 October 2020].
   Google Scholar
• James, H.S., Hendrickson, M.K., and Howard, P.H., 2013. Networks, power and dependency in the agrifood industry. In: H. James, ed. The ethics and economics of agrifood competition. Dordecht: Springer, 99–126.
   Google Scholar
• Jervis, F., 2020. Eating the world: iterative capital after Silicon Valley. Dissertation (PhD). New York University.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, I., 2019. Plant-based ‘meat’ is conquering fast food. Here's where you can get meat substitutes like the Beyond Burger and the Impossible Taco. Business Insider [online]. Available at: https://www.businessinsider.com/burger-king-tgi-fridays-chains-sell-plant-based-meat-2019-5 [Accessed 11 August 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Judkis, M., 2019. Bodega, an ‘unmanned pantry box,’ has already become America’s most hated start-up. Washington Post [online]. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/food/wp/2017/09/13/bodega-an-unmanned-pantry-box-has-already-become-americas-most-hated-start-up/ [Accessed 17 October 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Kaldewey, D., 2018. The grand challenges discourse: transforming identity work in science and science policy. Minerva, 56 (2), 161–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloppenburg, J., 2014. Re-purposing the master's tools: the open source seed initiative and the struggle for seed sovereignty. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 41 (6), 1225–1246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komulainen, K., et al., 2020. “How to give a killer pitch?” performances of entrepreneurial narratives as identity models in higher education. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 3 (3), 214–235.
   Google Scholar
• Levenstein, H.A., 1988. Revolution at the table: the transformation of the American diet. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lomas, N., 2016. Soylent pulls powder as part of probe into customer sickness. TechCrunch [online]. Available at: https://techcrunch.com/2016/10/28/soylent-pulls-powder-as-part-of-probe-into-customer-sickness/ [Accessed 6 November 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, M. and Glynn, M.A., 2001. Cultural entrepreneurship: stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22 (6-7), 545–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, D.A., Muniesa, F., and Siu, L., 2007. Do economists make markets?: on the performativity of economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, S.A., 1990. Agrarian capitalism in theory and practice. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, A.L., Jeffrey, S.A., and Lévesque, M., 2011. Business angel early stage decision making. Journal of Business Venturing, 26 (2), 212–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, C., 2019. The combine will tell the truth: on precision agriculture and algorithmic rationality. Big Data & Society, 6 (1), 205395171984944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, N., 2019. 16 product fails that defined the decade. BuzzFeed [online]. Available at: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/nicolenguyen/notable-tech-fails-of-2010s [Accessed 17 October 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Nyqvist, A., Leivestad, H.H., and Tunestad, H., 2017. Individuals and industries: large-scale professional gatherings as ethnographic fields. In: H. Leivestad and A Nyqvist, eds. Ethnographies of conferences and trade fairs: shaping industries, creating professionals. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, E.S., 2000. Plotting the organization: the embedded narrative as a construct for studying change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36 (2), 174–192.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, E., 2002. Storied business: typology, intertextuality, and traffic in entrepreneurial narrative. Journal of Business Communication, 39 (1), 36–54.
   Google Scholar
• Penniman, L., 2018. Farming while black: soul fire farm's practical guide to liberation on the land. New York: Chelsea Green Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Powers, D., 2019. On trend: the business of forecasting the future. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rajan, K.S., 2006. Biocapital: the constitution of postgenomic life. Raleigh, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reisman, E., 2021. Sanitizing agri-food tech: COVID-19 and the politics of expectation. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 48 (5), 910–933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe, E.J., 2006. Things becoming food and the embodied, material practices of an organic food consumer. Sociologia Ruralis, 46 (2), 104–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotz, S., et al., 2019. The politics of digital agricultural technologies: a preliminary review. Sociologia Ruralis, 59 (2), 203–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubarth, C., 2019. Bay area retained venture funding dominance in 2019. Silicon Valley Business Journal [online]. Available at: https://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/news/2019/12/18/bay-area-venture-funding-report-crunchbase.html [Accessed 6 November 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Sexton, A.E., 2018. Eating for the post-anthropocene: alternative proteins and the biopolitics of edibility. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 43 (4), 586–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark, D. and Paravel, V., 2008. Powerpoint in public: digital technologies and the new morphology of demonstration. Theory, Culture & Society, 25 (5), 30–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teague, B., Gorton, M.D., and Liu, Y., 2020. Different pitches for different stages of entrepreneurial development: the practice of pitching to business angels. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 32 (3-4), 334–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Mixing Bowl, 2019a. Agtech landscape 2019 [online]. Available at: http://mixingbowlhub.com/agtech-landscape-2019-1600-startups-innovating-on-the-farm-and-in-the-messy-middle/ [Accessed 25 August 2020].
   Google Scholar
• The Mixing Bowl, 2019b. Foodtech and media landscape 2019 [online]. Available at: http://mixingbowlhub.com/2019-food-tech-state-of-the-industry-report/ [Accessed 25 August].
   Google Scholar
• Tsing, A., 2000. Inside the economy of appearances. Public Culture, 12 (1), 115–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, F., 2006. From counterculture to cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the rise of digital utopianism. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weis, T., 2007. The global food economy: the battle for the future of farming. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Winders, B, 2009. The politics of food supply: U.S. agricultural policy in the world economy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, S.A. and Wood, S.D., 1997. Precision farming: environmental legitimation, commodification of information, and industrial coordination. Rural Sociology, 62 (2), 180–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar