From drafts to drafting: genre work, time, and the fragility of managerial expertise in South Korea

References

• Ashcraft, Karen Lee, Kuhn, Timothy R, and Cooren, François, 2009. 1 Constitutional amendments: “materializing” organizational communication. Academy of Management Annals, 3 (1), 1–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazerman, Charles, 1994. Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. In: Aviva Freedman, and Peter Medway, eds. Genre and the new rhetoric. Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis, 67–85.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre, 1977. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourgoin, Alaric, and Muniesa, Fabian, 2016. Building a rock-solid slide: management consulting, PowerPoint, and the craft of signification. Management Communication Quarterly, 30 (3), 390–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenneis, Donald, 1994. Discourse and discipline at the National Research Council: a bureaucratic Bildungsroman. Cultural Anthropology, 9 (1), 23–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, Charles, and Bauman, Richard, 1992. Genre, intertextuality, and social power. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 2 (2), 131–172.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, Charles, and Bauman, Richard, 1999. “The foundation of all future researches”: Franz Boas, George Hunt, native american texts, and the construction of modernity. American Quarterly, 51 (3), 479–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, E. Summerson, 2010. Enactments of expertise. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39 (1), 17–32.
   Google Scholar
• Chong, Kimberly, 2015. Producing “global” corporate subjects in post-Mao China: management consultancy, culture and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Anthropology, 4 (2), 320–341.
   Google Scholar
• Dent, Alexander S., 2013. Intellectual property in practice: filtering testimony at the United States trade representative. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 23 (2), E48–E65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derrida, Jacques, 2005. Paper machine. Translated by Rachel Bowlby. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fonstad, N. O., 2003. The roles of technology in improvising. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel, 1998 [1969]. What is an author? In: James D. Faubion, ed. Aesthetics, method, and epistemology. New York: The New Press, 205–222.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, Harold, 1967. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Giraudeau, Martin, 2008. The drafts of strategy: opening up plans and their uses. Long Range Planning, 41 (3), 291–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, Charles, 1994. Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96 (3), 606–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, Kyonghee, 2010. A crisis of identity: the Kwa-hak-ki-sul-ja (scientist–engineer) in contemporary Korea. Engineering Studies, 2 (2), 125–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, Richard, 1998. Inside the IMF: an ethnography of documents, technology, and organisational action. San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, Karen Z., 2009. Liquidated: an ethnography of Wall Street. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, Matthew, 2003. The file: agency, authority, and autography in an Islamabad bureaucracy. Language & Communication, 23 (3), 287–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, Sarah, 2011. Strategy and PowerPoint: an inquiry into the epistemic culture and machinery of strategy making. Organization Science, 22 (2), 320–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Hyun Mee, 2018 [2001]. Work experience and identity of skilled male workers following the economic crisis. Korean Anthropology Review, 2, 141–163.
   Google Scholar
• Knoblauch, Hubert, 2008. The performance of knowledge: pointing and knowledge in powerpoint presentations. Cultural Sociology, 2 (1), 75–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuipers, Joel C., 2013. Evidence and authority in ethnographic and linguistic perspective. Annual Review of Anthropology, 42, 399–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno, and Woolgar, Steve, 1986. Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, John, 2009. Seeing like a survey. Cultural Sociology, 3 (2), 239–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, Graham S., 1984. “The enormous file”: the evolution of the modern office in early twentieth-century Canada. Archivaria, 19, 137–151.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, Paul, 2008. Barista rants about stupid customers at Starbucks: what imaginary conversations can teach us about real ones. Language & Communication, 28 (2), 101–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mialet, Hélène, 2012. Hawking incorporated: Stephen Hawking and the anthropology of the knowing subject. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. Wright, 1951. White collar: the American middle classes. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Doherty, Damian, and Ratner, Helene, 2017. The break-up of management: critique inside-out. Journal of Cultural Economy, 10 (3), 231–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, Wanda J., and Yates, JoAnne, 1994. Genre repertoire: the structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39 (4), 541–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, Joseph Sung-Yul, 2010. Images of “good English” in the Korean conservative press: three processes of interdiscursivity. Pragmatics and Society, 1 (2), 189–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prentice, Michael M., 2019. The powers in PowerPoint: embedded authorities, documentary tastes, and institutional (second) orders in corporate Korea. American Anthropologist, 121 (2), 350–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riles, Annelise, 1998. Infinity within the brackets. American Ethnologist, 25 (3), 378–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, Donald F., 1959. “Banana time”: job satisfaction and informal interaction. Human Organization, 18 (4), 158–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabri, Duna, 2013. Student evaluations of teaching as ‘fact-totems’: the case of the UK National student survey. Sociological Research Online, 18 (4), 148–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, Clay, and Zachry, Mark, 2000. Genre ecologies: an open-system approach to understanding and constructing documentation. ACM Journal of Computer Documentation, 24 (3), 169–181.
   Google Scholar
• Turco, Catherine J., 2016. The conversational firm: rethinking bureaucracy in the age of social media. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weeks, John, 2004. Unpopular culture: the ritual of complaint in a British bank. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, JoAnne, and Orlikowski, Wanda J., 1992. Genres of organizational communication: a structurational approach to studying communication and media. The Academy of Management Review, 17 (2), 299–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, JoAnne, and Orlikowski, Wanda, 2002. Genre systems: structuring interaction through communicative norms. The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 39 (1), 13–35.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, JoAnne, and Orlikowski, Wanda, 2007. The PowerPoint presentation and its corollaries: how genres shape communicative action in organizations. In: Mark Zachry and Charlotte Thralls, eds. Communicative practices in workplaces and the professions: Cultural perspectives on the regulation of discourse and organizations. Amityville, NY: Baywood, 67–92.
   Google Scholar