What was the project? Thoughts on genre and the project form

References

• Abram, Simone, and Weszkalnys, Gisa. eds. 2013. Elusive promises: planning in the contemporary world. New York: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, Catherine, 2017. The meeting as subjunctive form: public/private IT projects in British and turkish state bureaucracies. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 23 (S1), 80–94.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, Catherine, 2014. The local workforce of international intervention in the yugoslav successor states: ‘precariat’ or ‘projectariat’? towards an agenda for future research. International Peacekeeping, 21 (1), 91–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M, 1986. Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ballestero, Andrea, 2019. A future history of water. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bendix, Regina, Bizer, Kilian, and Noyes, Dorothy, 2017. Sustaining interdisciplinary collaboration: a guide for the academy. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berardi, Franco Bifo, 2011. After the future. Oakland: AK Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bishara, Amahl, 2013. Back stories: U.S. news production and Palestinian politics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, Luc, and Chiapello, Ève, 2007. The New spirit of capitalism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, Charles, and Bauman, Richard, 1992. Genre, intertextuality, and social power. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 2 (2), 131–172.
   Google Scholar
• Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin, and Miller, Peter. eds. 1991. The Foucault Effect: studies in governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, E. Summerson, 2010. Enactments of expertise. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39 (1), 17–32.
   Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty, Dipesh, 2001. Provincializing Europe: postcolonial Thought and historical difference. Princeton: Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chong, Kimberly, 2018. Best practice: management consulting and the Ethics of financialization in China. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Copeland, Nicholas, 2019. The democracy development machine: neoliberalism, Radical pessimism, and authoritarian populism in mayan Guatemala. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, Andrew, 2017. Projects: A very short introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Defoe, Daniel, 1897 [1697]. An Essay Upon Projects. London: Cassel and Co. Digital, public domain copy is available at: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/4087/4087-h/4087-h.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, Elizabeth Cullen, 2012. The chaos of humanitarian Aid: adhocracy in the republic of Georgia. Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development, 3 (1), 1–23. doi:10.1353/hum.2012.0005.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, Elizabeth Cullen, 2017. No path home: humanitarian camps and the grief of displacement. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, James, 1994. The anti-politics machine: “development,” depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fortun, Kim, 2012. Ethnography In late industrialism. Cultural Anthropology, 27 (3), 446–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel, 1991. Govermentality. In: Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon, and Peter Miller, Eds. The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 87–104.
   Google Scholar
• Gershon, Ilana, 2016. “I’m not a businessman, I’m a business, man”. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 6 (3), 223–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gershon, Ilana, 2017. Down and out in the New economy: How people Find (or don’t Find) work today. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graan, Andrew, 2016. Strategic publicity. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 6 (3), 277–303.
   Google Scholar
• Graan, Andrew, and Rommel, Carl, 2022. Projects and project temporalities: ethnographic reflections on the social agency of the project form. Unpublished article manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Graeber, David, 2012. Flying Cars and the Declining Rate of Profit. The Baffler, no. 19.
   Google Scholar
• Graeber, David, 2021. “After the Pandemic, We Can’t Go Back to Sleep.” Jacobin, March 4. https://jacobinmag.com/2021/03/david-graeber-posthumous-essay-pandemic.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna, 2016. Staying with the trouble: making Kin in the chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartman, Saidiya, 1997. Scenes of subjection: terror, slavery, and self-making in nineteenth-century America. race and American culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hobart, Hi‘ilei Julia Kawehipuaakahaopulani, and Kneese, Tamara, 2020. Radical care. Social Text, 38 (1), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull, Matthew, 2012. Documents and bureaucracy. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41 (1), 251–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irani, Lilly, 2015. Difference and dependence among digital workers: The case of Amazon mechanical Turk. South Atlantic Quarterly, 114 (1), 225–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irani, Lilly, 2019. Chasing Innovation: making entrepreneurial citizens in modern India. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, Stef, 2007. The privatisation of home and hope: return, reforms and the foreign intervention in bosnia-herzegovina. Dialectical Anthropology, 30 (3–4), 177–199.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, Anders, Thuesen, Christian, and Geraldi, Joana, 2016. The projectification of everything: projects as a human condition. Project Management Journal, 47 (3), 21–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostof, Spiro. ed. 1977. The architect: chapters in the history of the profession. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, Monika, 2014. The Good Project: humanitarian relief NGOs and the fragmentation of reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno, 2002. Aramis, or the Love of technology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lea, Tess, 2020. Wild policy: indigeneity and the unruly logics of intervention. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lévi-Strauss, Claude, 2000. The savage mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Tania Murray, 1999. Compromising power:development,culture, and rule in indonesia. Cultural Anthropology, 14 (3), 295–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Tania Murray, 2007. The will to improve: governmentality, development, and the practice of politics. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lie, Jon Harald, 2020. Performing compliance with development indicators: brokerage and transnational governance in aid partnerships. Social Anthropology, 28 (4), 929–943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundin, Rolf A., and Söderholm, Anders, 1995. A theory of the temporary organization. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11 (4), 437–455.
   Google Scholar
• Matsutake Worlds Research Group., 2009. A new form of collaboration in cultural anthropology: Matsutake worlds. American Ethnologist, 36 (2), 380–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merry, Sally Engle, 2016. The seductions of quantification: measuring human rights, gender violence, and Sex trafficking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mikhaylova, Marina, 2018. Project governance beyond foreign Aid: mediating neoliberalism in Lithuania. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 41 (2), 290–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Peter, and Rose, Nikolas, 2008. Governing the present: administering economic, social and personal life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mintz, Sidney, 1986. Sweetness and power: The place of sugar in modern history. New York: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Timothy, 2002. Rule of Experts: Egypt, techno-politics, modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, Peter W.G, 2011. A brief history of project management. In: Peter W.G. Morris, Jeff Pinto, and Peter Söderlund, eds. The Oxford handbook of project management. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 15–36.
   Google Scholar
• Mosse, David, 2005. Cultivating development: An ethnography of Aid policy and practice. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mosse, David, 2013. The anthropology of international development. Annual Review of Anthropology, 42 (1), 227–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, Maximillian, 2008. The Age of projects. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Odell, Jenny, 2019. How to Do Nothing: resisting the attention economy. New York: Melville House.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, Wanda, and Yates, JoAnne, 1994. Genre repertoire: The structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39 (4), 541–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortner, Sherry, 2006. Anthropology and Social Theory: culture, power, and the acting subject. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poovey, Mary, 1998. A history of the modern fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Postone, Moishe, 1993. Time, labor, and social domination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Povinelli, Elizabeth, 2006. The empire of love. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prentice, Michael M, 2019. The powers in PowerPoint: embedded authorities, documentary tastes, and institutional (second) orders in corporate Korea. American Anthropologist, 121 (2), 350–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinow, Paul, 1995. French modern: norms and forms of the social environment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rifkin, Mark, 2017. Beyond settler time. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riles, Annelise ed. 2006. Documents: artifacts of modern knowledge. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, Cedric, 2000. Black marxism: The making of the Black Radical tradition. Chapel Hill, N.C: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Douglas, 2014. Energopolitical russia: corporation, state, and the rise of social and cultural projects. Anthropological Quarterly, 87 (2), 431–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rommel, Carl, 2021. Egypt as a project: dreamwork and masculinity in a projectified society – a proposal to the Riksbankens Jubileumsfond. Available at: https://www.rj.se/en/grants/2021/egypt-as-a-project-dreamwork-and-masculinity-in-a-projectified-society/.
   Google Scholar
• Rommel, Carl, 2022. Projects as an iterative pursuit: Egyptian imaginaries of the social agency of the project form. Unpublsihed article manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, Steven, 1996. The social life of projects. In: Chris Hann and Elizabeth Dunn, eds. Civil society: challenging Western models. New York: Routledge, 121–142.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, Steven, 2003. From forms to norms: global projects and local practices in the Balkan NGO scene. Journal of Human Rights, 2 (3), 329–337.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, James, 1998. Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scranton, Philip, 2014. Projects as a focus for historical analysis: surveying the landscape. History and Technology, 30 (4), 354–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharpe, Christina, 2016. In the wake: On blackness and being. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Söderlund, Jonas, and Lenfle, Sylvain, 2013. Making project history: revisiting the past, creating the future. International Journal of Project Management, 31 (5), 653–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, Clay, 2003. Tracing genres through organizations: A sociocultural approach to information design. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strathern, Marilyn. ed. 2000. Audit cultures: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics, and the academy. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stubbs, Paul, 2002. Globalisation, memory and welfare regimes in transition: towards an anthropology of transnational policy transfers. International Journal of Social Welfare, 11 (4), 321–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunder Rajan, Kaushik, 2006. Biocapital: The constitution of postgenomic life. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, Deborah, 2019. Political life in the Wake of the plantation: sovereignty, witnessing, repair. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E. P, 1967. Time, work-discipline, and industrial capitalism. Past and Present, 38, 56–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trifuljesko, Sonja, 2021. Weeds of Sociality: Reforms and Dynamics of Social Relations at the University of Helsinki. Ph.D Thesis: University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Wilf, Eitan, 2016. The post-It note economy: understanding post-fordist business innovation through One of Its Key semiotic technologies. Current Anthropology, 57 (6), 732–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar