From scarce resources to ‘the good economy’: a new ‘version of economization’ replacing Weber’s rational ascetism as the capitalist spirit?

References

• Asdal, K, 1998. Knappe Ressurser?: Økonomenes grep om miljøfeltet [Scarce resources? The Economists hold on the Environment]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Asdal, K, 2008. Enacting things through numbers: Taking nature into account/ing. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 39 (1), 123–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asdal, K, 2015. What is the issue? The transformative capacity of documents. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 16 (1), 74–90.
   Google Scholar
• Asdal, K, 2021. Foucaults metode og nyliberalismen. Eller skal vi heller snakke om den grenseløse og intense innovasjonsøkonomien? Agora, 38 (3-4), 86–119.
   Google Scholar
• Asdal, K., and Hobæk, B, 2020. The modified issue: Turning around parliaments, politics as usual and how to extend issue-politics with a little help from Max Weber. Social Studies of Science, 50 (2), 252–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asdal, K., and Huse, T, 2023. Nature-Made Economy. Cod, Capital and the Great Economization of the Ocean. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asdal, K., et al., 2021. ‘The good economy’: a conceptual and empirical move for investigating how economies and versions of the good are entangled. BioSocieties, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-021-00245-5.
   Google Scholar
• Asdal, K., and Engen, S., 2022. Good Money for the good economy? The financialization of the environment and the politicization of finance. Long Paper, EGOS, July.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., and Chiapello, È, 2005. The New Spirit of Capitalism. Translated by Gregory Elliott. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Çalışkan, K., and Callon, M, 2009. Economization, part 1: Shifting attention from the economy towards processes of economization. Economy and Society, 38 (3), 369–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiapello, È, 2015. Financialisation of Valuation. Human Studies, 38 (1), 13–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Gay, 2008.. Max Weber and the moral economy of office. Journal of Cultural Economy, 1 (2), 129–144.
   Google Scholar
• Doganova, L., and Karnøe, P., 2015. Clean and Profitable: Entangling Valuations in Environmental Entrepreneurship. In: A.B. Antal, M. Hutter, and D. Stark, eds. Moments of Valuation: Exploring Sites of Dissonance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 229–248.
   Google Scholar
• Fourcade, M, 2017. The fly and the cookie: alignment and unhingement in the twenty-first-century capitalism. Socio-Economic Review, 15 (3), 661–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisch, R, 1962. [1937]. Innledning til produksjonsteorien. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Langley, P, 2020. The folds of social finance: Making markets, remaking the social. Environment and Planning A, 52 (1), 130–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lie, E, 1995. Ambisjon og tradisjon: Finansdepartementet 1945-1965. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Lie, E., and Vennesland, C, 2010. Over evne: Finansdepartementet 1965-1992. Oslo: Pax Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Mangset, M., and Asdal, K, 2019. Bureaucratic power in note-writing: Authoritative expertise within the state. British Journal of Sociology, 70 (2), 569–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muniesa, F, et al., 2017. Capitalization: A Cultural Guide. Paris: Presses des Mines.
   Google Scholar
• Møller, A.M., et al., 2022. The Bureaucratic Ethos in Street-Level Work: Revitalizing Weber’s Ethics of Office. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 5, 151–163.
   Google Scholar
• Frankel, C., et al., 2019. The organization of markets for collective concerns and their failure. Economy and Society, 48 (2), 153–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palonen, K, 2022. Max Weber on Parliamentarism and Democracy. In: A. Sica, ed. The Routledge International Handbook on Max Weber. London: Routledge, 432–445.
   Google Scholar
• Palonen, K, 2014. Politics of Parliamentary Procedure: The Formation of the Westminster Procedure as a Parliamentary Ideal Type. Opladen: Barbara Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M, 1904. Die “Objektivität” sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis. Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, 19 (1), 22–87.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M, 2001 [1904]. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Translated by Talcott Parsons. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M, 2012 [1904]. The ‘objectivity’ of knowledge in social science and social policy. In: M. Weber, H. H. Bruun, and S. Whimster, eds. Collected Methodological Writings. London: Routledge, 100–138.
   Google Scholar