Living together privately: for a cautious reading of cohousing

References

• Abrahams, K., and D. S. Middleton. 1997. “Cohousing Development: Creating Genuine Communities.” Urban Land 56 (9): 32–35.
   Google Scholar
• Ache, P., and M. Fedrowitz. 2012. “The Development of Co-Housing Initiatives in Germany.” Built Environment 38 (3): 395–412.
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez-Rivadulla, M. J. 2007. “Golden Ghettos: Gated Communities and Class Residential Segregation in Montevideo, Uruguay.” Environment and Planning A 39 (1): 47–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R., and J. Flint. 2004. “Fortress UK? Gated Communities, the Spatial Revolt of the Elites and Time-space Trajectories of Segregation.” Housing Studies 19 (6): 875–892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baglione, V. 2011. “Cohousing. Ricognizione e classificazione di un modello di comunità contrattuale.” Urbanistica 146: 104–107. [In Italian.]
   Google Scholar
• Baglione, V., and F. Chiodelli. 2011. “Esperienze di cohousing a Milano e Torino.” In La città intraprendente. Comunità contrattuali e sussidiarietà orizzontale, edited by G. Brunetta and S. Moroni, 33–42. Roma: Carocci. [In Italian.]
   Google Scholar
• Baker, B. 2007. “Green Cohousing”. Urban Land 66 (6): 70–75.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. 2000. Missing Community. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Joseph, E. 2004. “Double Standards, Single Goal: Private Communities and Design Innovation.” Journal of Urban Design 9 (2): 131–151.
   Google Scholar
• Blakely, E. J., and M. G. Snyder. 1997. Fortress America: Gated Communities in the United States. Washington, DC: Brooking Institute Press and Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Blakely, E. J., and M. G. Snyder. 1998. “Separate Places: Crime and Security in Gated Communities.” In Reducing Crime Through Real Estate Development and Management, edited by M. Felson and R. B. Peiser, 53–70. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Blandy, S. 2006. “Gated Communities in England: Historical Perspectives and Current Development.” Geojournal 66 (1–2): 15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Bollinger, J. M. 2009. “Homeowners’ Associations and the Use of Property Planning Tools: When Does the Right to Exclude Go Too Far?” Temple Law Review 81 (1): 269–302.
   Google Scholar
• Boudreaux, D. J., and R. G. Holcombe. 2009. “Contractual Governments in Theory and Practice.” In The Voluntary City. Choice, Community and Civil Society, edited by D. T. Beito, P. Gordon, and A. Tabarrok, 289–306. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brenton, M. 1998. We’re in Charge: Co-housing Communities of Older People in the Netherlands – Lessons for Britain? Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brunetta, G., and S. Moroni. 2012. Contractual Communities in the Self-organising City: Freedom, Creativity, Subsidiarity. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Caldeira, T. 1999. “Fortified Enclaves. The New Urban Segregation.” In Theorizing the City, edited by S. M. Low, 83–107. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cashin, S. 2001. “Privatized Communities and the ‘Secession of the Successful’: Democracy and Fairness Beyond the Gate.” Fordham Urban Law Journal 28 (5): 1675–1692.
   Google Scholar
• Chadderdon, L. J. 2006. “No Political Speech Allowed: Common Interest Developments, Homeowners Associations, and Restrictions on Free Speech.” Journal of Land Use 21 (2): 233–264.
   Google Scholar
• Chiodelli, F. 2010. “Enclaves Private a Carattere Residenziale: Il Caso del Cohousing.” Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia Urbana 51 (1): 95–116.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper Marcus, C. 2000. “Site Planning, Building Design and a Sense of Community: An Analysis of Six Cohousing Schemes in Denmark, Sweden and Netherlands.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 17 (2): 146–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coy, M., and M. Pöhler. 2002. “Gated Communities in Latin American Megacities: Case Studies in Brazil and Argentina.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 29 (3): 355–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellickson, R. C. 1982. “Cities and Homeowners Associations.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 130(6): 1519–1580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellickson, R. C. 2006. “Unpacking the Household: Informal Property Rights Around the Hearth.” Yale Law School Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 402. Accessed March 13, 2013. http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/402
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, R. A. 1997. “Takings, Exclusivity and Speech: The Legacy of PruneYard v. Robins.” The University of Chicago Law Review 64 (1): 21–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenster, M. 1999. “Community by Covenant, Process, and Design: Cohousing and the Contemporary Common Interest Community.” Journal of Land Use and Environmental Law 15 (1): 3–54. Accessed March 13, 2013. http://www.law.fsu.edu/journals/landuse/vol151/fenster1.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Foldvary, F. 2006. “The Economic Case for Private Residential Government.” In Private Cities. Global and Local Perspectives, edited by G. Glasze, C. Webster, and C. Frantz, 31–34. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Franzese, P. A. 2008. “The Twin Rivers Case: Of Homeowners Associations, Free Speech Rights and Privatized Mini-Governments.” Rutgers Journal of Law and Public Policy 5 (4): 729–768.
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, D. 1991. Collaborative Communities: Co-Housing, Central Living, and Other New Forms of Housing with Shared Facilities. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, D. 1993. “Collaborative Communities.” Progressive Architecture 74 (3): 92–96.
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, D. 2000. “American Cohousing: The First Five Years.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 17 (2): 94–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromm, D. 2006. “Aging Together.” Urban Land 65 (5): 72–76.
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, D. 2012. “Seeding Community: Collaborative Housing as a Strategy for Social and Neighbourhood Repair.” Built Environment 38 (3): 364–394.
   Google Scholar
• Glasze, G., and A. Alkhayyal. 2002. “Gated Housing Estates in the Arab World: Case Studies in Lebanon and Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 29 (3): 321–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasze, G., C. Webster, and C. Frantz. eds. 2006a. Private Cities. Global and Local Perspectives. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Glasze, G., C. Webster, and C. Frantz. 2006b. “Introduction: Global and Local Perspectives on the Rise of Private Neighbourhoods.” In Private Cities. Global and Local Perspectives, edited by G. Glasze, C. Webster, and C. Frantz, 1–8. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, T. M. 2003. “Crowd Out or Crowd In? The Effects of Common Interest Developments on Political Participation in California.” The Annals of Regional Science 37 (2): 203–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helsley, R. W. and W. C. Strange. 1999. “Gated Communities and the Economic Geography of Crime.” Journal of Urban Economics 46 (1): 80–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, H. 2011. “Saving Space, Sharing Time: Integrated Infrastructures of Daily Life in Cohousing.” Environment and Planning A 43 (3): 560–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, D. J. 1995. “Residential Associations as State Actors: Regulating the Impact of Gated Communities on Non-members.” The Yale Law Journal 105 (3): 761–793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krokfors, K. 2012. “Co-Housing in the Making.” Built Environment 38 (2): 309–314.
   Google Scholar
• Krueckeberg, D. A. 1995. “The Difficult Character of Property. To Whom Do Things Belong?.” Journal of the American Planning Association 61 (3): 301–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, R. E., and K. A. Danielsen. 1997. “Gated Communities in America: Walling Out the World?” Housing Policy Debate 8 (4): 867–899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Goix, R. 2002. “Les gated communities en Californie du Sud, un produit immobilier pas tout à fait comme les autres.” L‘Espace Géographique 31 (4): 328–344.
   Google Scholar
• Lietaert, M. 2010. “Cohousing’s Relevance to Degrowth Theories.” Journal of Cleaner Production 18 (6): 576–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low, S. M. 1997. “Urban Fear: Building Fortress America.” City and Society 9 (1): 53–71.
   Google Scholar
• Low, S. M. 2003. “Construire l’exclusion à travers les communautés fermées.” Les Annales de la recherche urbaine 93: 149–158. [In French.]
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, S. 2004. “The Images Used to ‘Sell’ and Represent Retirement Communities.” The Professional Geographers 56 (4): 449–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis, D., and D. Entin. 2011. “Report on Survey of Cohousing Communities 2011.” Cohousing Association of the United States. Accessed November 9, 2012. http://www.cohousing.org/docs/2011/survey_of_cohousing_communities_2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McCabe, B. C., and J. Tao. 2006. “Private Governments and Private Services: Homeowner Associations in the City and Behind the Gate.” Review of Policy Research 23 (6): 1143–1157.
   Google Scholar
• McCamant, K., C. Durrett, and E. Hertzman. 2011. Cohousing: A Contemporary Approach to Housing Ourselves. Barkeley, CA: Ten Speed Press.
   Google Scholar
• McHugh, K. E. 2007. “Generational Consciousness and Retirement Communities.” Population, Space and Place 13 (4): 293–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHugh, K. E., P. Gober, and D. Borough. 2002. “The Sun City Wars: Chapter 3.” Urban Geography 23 (7): 627–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHugh, K. E., and E. M. Larson-Keagy. 2005. “These White Walls: The Dialectic of Retirement Communities.” Journal of Aging Studies 19 (2): 241–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie, E. 2005. “Planning Through Residential Clubs: Homeowners’ Associations.” Economic Affairs 25 (4): 28–31.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, E. 2006. “Emerging Trends in the State Regulation of Private Communities in the US.” GeoJournal 66 (1–2): 89–102.
   Google Scholar
• Meltzer, G. 2000. “Cohousing: Verifying the Importance of Community in the Application of Environmentalism.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 17 (2): 110–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meltzer, G. 2005. Sustainable Community. Learning from the Cohousing Model. Trafford: Victoria.
   Google Scholar
• Moroni, S., and F. Chiodelli. Forthcoming. “Pluralism in Private Spaces: Homeowners Associations, Clubs, Shopping Malls.” In Space and Pluralism, edited by S. Moroni, and D. Weberman, Budapest: Central European University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. H. 2004. “The Private Neighborhood.” Regulation 27 (2): 40–46.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. H. 2005. Private Neighborhoods. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rahe, L. T. 2002. “The Right to Exclude: Preserving the Autonomy of the Homeowners’ Association.” The Urban Lawyer 34 (2): 521–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly, A. 2005. “City of God: Tom Monaghan’s Coming Catholic Utopia.” Boston Phoenix. Accessed November 9, 2012. http://www.bostonphoenix.com/boston/news_features/top/features/documents/04761831.asp
   Google Scholar
• Rifkin, J. 2000. The Age of Access: The New Culture of Hypercapitalism, Where All of Life is a Paid for Experience. New York: Tatcher/Putnam.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, B. 2005. “Living Together.” Urban Land 64 (2): 69–73.
   Google Scholar
• Salcedo, R., and A. Torres. 2004. “Gated Communities in Santiago: Wall of Frontier?” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 28 (1): 27–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, T. W., R. E. Lang, and D. M. Dhavale. 2005. “Security Versus Status? A First Look at the Census’s Gated Community Data.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 24 (3): 281–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scotthanson, K., and C. Scotthanson. 2005. The Cohousing Handbook. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Scott-Hunt, S. 2007. “Cohousing for Stages of an Aging Britain.” Paper presented at ENHR – International conference “Sustainable Urban Areas”, Rotterdam, June 25–28. Accessed March 19, 2013. http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/4295/
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, S. 1998. “The Constitution and Private Government: Toward the Recognition of Constitutional Rights in Private Residential Communities Fifty Years After Marsh v. Alabama.” William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal 6 (2): 461–563.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, D. 2002. “Habitat et écologie: Le co-housing aux États-Unis.” Revue Française d‘études Américaines no. 94: 113–128.
   Google Scholar
• Stoyanov, P., and K. Frantz. 2006. “Gated Communities in Bulgaria: Interpreting a New Trend in Post-communist Urban Development.” GeoJournal 66 (1–2): 57–63.
   Google Scholar
• Torres-Antonini, M. 2001. “Our Common House: Using the Built Environment to Develop Supportive Communities.” PhD diss., Graduate School of the University of Florida. Accessed October 6, 2012. http://etd.fcla.edu/UF/UFE0000360/torres_m.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Vesselinov, E., M. Cazessus, and W. Falk. 2007. “Gated Communities and Spatial Inequalities.” Journal of Urban Affairs 29 (2): 109–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vestbro, D. U. 2012. “Saving by Sharing – Collective Housing for Sustainable Lifestyles in the Swedish Context.” Paper Presented at 3rd International Conference on Degrowth for Ecological Sustainability and Social Equity,” Venice, September 19–23. Accessed March 19, 2013. http://www.venezia2012.it/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/WS_13_FP_VESTBRO.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vestbro, D. U. and L. Horelli. 2012. “Design for Gender Equality: The History of Co-Housing Ideas and Realities.” Built Environment 38 (3): 315–335.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, C. 2001. “Gated Cities of Tomorrow”. Town Planning Review 72 (2): 149–170.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, C. 2002. “Property Rights and the Public Realm: Gates, Green Belts, and the Gemeinschaft.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 29 (3): 397–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, C., G. Glasze, and K. Frantz. 2002. “The Global Spread of Gated Communities.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 29 (3): 315–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, C., and R. Le Goix. 2005. “Planning by Commonhold.” Economic Affairs 25 (4): 19–23.
   Google Scholar
• White-Harvey, R. J. 1993. “Cohousing: A Scandinavian Longhouse, or a Traditional Approach to Modern Housing?” The Canadian Journal of Native Studies 13 (1): 69–82.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. 2005a. “Designing Neighborhoods for Social Interaction: The Case of Cohousing.” Journal of Urban Design 10 (2): 195–227.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. 2005b. “Sun, Surf and Sustainable Housing – Cohousing, the Californian Experience.” International Planning Studies 10 (2): 145–177.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. 2008. “Predicting an American Future for Cohousing.” Futures 40 (3): 268–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. 1991. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar