State rescaling in practice: urban governance reform in Toronto

References

• Avana Corporation. 2000. The Greater Toronto Charter. Toronto: Avana Corporation. http://www.ideasthatmatter.com/cities/TwdsCharter.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Boudreau, J.-A. 2000. The Mega-City Saga: Democracy and Citizenship in the Global Age. Montreal: Black Rose Books.
   Google Scholar
• Boudreau, J.-A., P. Hamel, B. Jouve, and R. Keil. 2007. “New State Spaces in Canada: Metropolitanization in Montreal and Toronto Compared.” Urban Geography 28 (1): 30–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradford, N. 2005. Place-based Public Policy: Towards a New Urban and Community Agenda for Canada. Research Report F|51. Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. 2001. “The Limits to Scale? Methodological Reflections on Scalar Structuration.” Progress in Human Geography 25 (4): 591–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. 2004. New State Spaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. 2009. “Open Questions on State Rescaling.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 2 (1): 123–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büchs, M. 2009. “Examining the Interaction Between Vertical and Horizontal Dimensions of State Transformation.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 2 (1): 35–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• City of Toronto. 2012. Demographics: Census and Trends. http://www.toronto.ca/demographics/reports.htm
   Google Scholar
• City of Toronto. 2013. Government Structure. http://www.toronto.ca/toronto_facts/government.htm
   Google Scholar
• Donald, B. 1999. “Economic Change and City-Region Governance: The Case of Toronto.” PhD thesis, University of Toronto, Department of Geography.
   Google Scholar
• Eidelman, G. 2010. “Managing Urban Sprawl in Ontario: Good Policy or Good Politics?” Politics & Policy 38 (6): 1211–1236.
   Google Scholar
• Eidelman, G. 2013. “Landlocked: Politics, Property and the Toronto Waterfront, 1960-2000.” PhD thesis, University of Toronto, Department of Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, R., and T. Kalinowski. 2009. “Politicians Shunned in Transit Planning Overhaul.” Toronto Star, March 31.
   Google Scholar
• Frisken, F. 2007. The Public Metropolis: The Political Dynamics of Urban Expansion in the Toronto Region, 1924–2003. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Ontario. 2006. The Metrolinx Act. Toronto: Ontario Legislature.
   Google Scholar
• Harmes, A. 2007. “The Political Economy of Open Federalism.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 40 (2): 417–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., and G. Marks. 2003. “Unraveling the Central State, But How? Types of Multi-Level Governance.” American Political Science Review 97 (2): 233–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horak, M. 1998. The Power of Local Identity: C4LD and the Anti-Amalgamation Mobilization in Toronto. Research Paper 195. Toronto: Cities Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Horak, M. 2008. Governance Reform from Below: Multilevel Politics and Toronto’s ‘New Deal’ Campaign. Global Dialogue Series, No. 4. Nairobi: UN-Habitat.
   Google Scholar
• Horak, M. 2012. “Multilevel Governance in Toronto: Success and Failure in Canada’s Largest City.” In Sites of Governance: Multilevel Governance and Policy Making in Canada’s Big Cities, edited by M. Horak and R. Young, 228–262. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horak, M., and M. Dantico. Forthcoming. “The Limits of Local Redistribution: Neighborhood Regeneration Initiatives in Toronto and Phoenix.” International Journal of Canadian Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Horak, M., and R. Young, eds. 2012. Sites of Governance: Multilevel Governance and Policy Making in Canada’s Big Cities. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hulckanski, D. 2007. The Three Cities Within Toronto: Income Polarization Among Toronto’s Neighbourhoods, 1970–2000. Toronto: Cities Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 1994. “Post-Fordism and the State.” In Post-Fordism: A Reader, edited by A. Amin, 251–279. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 2002. The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalinowski, T. 2007. “A $17.5B Transit Promise.” Toronto Star, June 16.
   Google Scholar
• Kalinowski, T. 2012a. “TTC Reports $22 Million Surplus Due to Ridership Growth Last Year.” Toronto Star, June 25.
   Google Scholar
• Kalinowski, T. 2012b. “TTC, Metrolinx Finally Sign Off on LRTs.” Toronto Star, November 28.
   Google Scholar
• Keil, R., and D. Young. 2003. “A Charter for the People? A Research Note on the Debate About Municipal Autonomy in Toronto.” Urban Affairs Review 39 (1): 87–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, S., and R. Keil. 2012. “The Ontario Greenbelt: Shifting the Scales of the Sustainability Fix?” The Professional Geographer 64 (1): 125–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marston, S. 2000. “The Social Construction of Scale.” Progress in Human Geography 24 (2): 219–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metrolinx. 2008. The Big Move: Transforming Transportation in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area. Toronto: Metrolinx.
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Ministry of Public Infrastructure Renewal. 2006. Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe. Toronto: Ministry of Public Infrastructure Renewal.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., N. Theodore, and N. Brenner. 2009. “Neoliberal Urbanism: Models, Moments, Mutations.” Sais Review 29 (1): 49–66.
   Google Scholar
• Pigg, S. 2012. “Toronto Leading the Western World in High Highrise Development.” Toronto Star, December 12.
   Google Scholar
• Rusk, D. 1993. Cities without Suburbs. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Centre for International Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Sancton, A. 2008. The Limits of Boundaries: Why City-Regions Cannot be Self-Governing. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sancton, A. 2010. “Provinces, Boundaries, and the Governance of Canadian City-Regions.” Progress in Planning 73 (1): 21–24.
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, S. 2001. The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, A. J. 2008. “Resurgent Metropolis: Economy, Society and Urbanization in an Interconnected World.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32: 548–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemiatycki, M. 2011. “Governing Immigrant City: Immigrant Political Representation in Toronto.” American Behavioral Scientist 55 (9): 1214–1234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slack, E., and R. Bird. 2013. Merging Municipalities: Is Bigger Better? IMFG Papers on Municipal Finance and Governance, No. 14. Toronto: Institute on Municipal Finance and Governance.
   Google Scholar
• Strong Neighbourhoods Task Force. 2005. Strong Neighbourhoods: A Call to Action. Final Report of the SNTF. Accessed March 12, 2013. http://www.unitedwaytoronto.com/downloads/whatWeDo/reports/SNTF-web_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. 1997. “Neither Global nor Local: ‘Glocalization’ and the Politics of Scale.” In Spaces of Globalization, edited by K. Cox, 137–166. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Z. 2011. “Who Elected Rob Ford, and Why? An Ecological Analysis of the 2010 Toronto Election.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association. Accessed February 19, 2013. http://www.cpsa-acsp.ca/papers-2011/Taylor.pdf
   Google Scholar
• TD Economics. 2002. The GTA: Canada’s Primary Economic Locomotive in Need of Repairs. Special Report. Toronto: TD Economics.
   Google Scholar
• United Way of Greater Toronto. 2004. Poverty by Postal Code: The Geography of Neighbourhood Poverty 1981–2001. Toronto: United Way.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, R. K. 2010. “The City-Region as a New State Space.” Progress in Planning 73 (1): 64–68.
   Google Scholar