Participation in neighbourhood regeneration: achievements of residents in a Dutch disadvantaged neighbourhood

References

• Andersen, H. T., and R. Van Kempen. 2003. “New Trends in Urban Policies in Europe: Evidence from the Netherlands and Denmark.” Cities 20 (2): 77–86. doi:10.1016/S0264-2751(02)00116-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R. 1999. “Discourses of Partnership and Empowerment in Contemporary British Urban Regeneration.” Urban Studies 36: 59–72. doi:10.1080/0042098993736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, N. 2010. “Understanding Community Empowerment in Urban Regeneration and Planning in England: Putting Policy and Practice in Context.” Planning Practice & Research 25 (3): 317–332. doi:10.1080/02697459.2010.503425.
   Google Scholar
• Beauregard, R. A. 1990. “Trajectories of neighborhood Change: The Case of Gentrification.” Environment and Planning A 22: 855–874. doi:10.1068/a220855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanco, I., J. Bonet, and A. Walliser. 2011. “Urban Governance and Regeneration Policies in Historic City Centres: Madrid and Barcelona.” Urban Research & Practice 4: 326–343. doi:10.1080/17535069.2011.616749.
   Google Scholar
• Boonstra, B., and L. Boelens. 2011. “Self-Organization in Urban Development: Towards a New Perspective on Spatial Planning.” Urban Research & Practice 4 (2): 99–122. doi:10.1080/17535069.2011.579767.
   Google Scholar
• Chaskin, R., and S. Garg. 1997. “The Issue of Governance in Neighborhood-Based Initiatives.” Urban Affairs Review 32 (5): 631–661. doi:10.1177/107808749703200502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaskin, R., A. Khare, and M. Joseph. 2012. “Participation, Deliberation, and Decision-Making: The Dynamics of Inclusion and Exclusion in Mixed Income Developments.” Urban Affairs Review 48: 863–906. doi:10.1177/1078087412450151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker, K., and R. Van Kempen. 2009. “Participation, Social Cohesion and the Challenges in the Governance Process: An Analysis of a Post-World War II Neighbourhood in the Netherlands.” European Planning Studies 17 (1): 109–130. doi:10.1080/09654310802514011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker, K., B. Völker, H. Lelieveldt, and R. Torenvlied. 2010. “Civic Engagement in Urban Neighborhoods: Does the Network of Civic Organizations Influence Participation in Neighborhood Projects?” Journal of Urban Affairs 32 (5): 609–632. doi:10.1111/juaf.2010.32.issue-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. 2010. The Just City. Ithaca, NY: Cornwell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flint, A. 2009. Wrestling with Moses. How Jane Jacobs Took on New York’s Master Builder and Transformed the American City. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Hackworth, J., and N. Smith. 2001. “The Changing State of Gentrification.” Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 92: 464–477. doi:10.1111/tesg.2001.92.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huisman, C. 2014. “Displacement through Participation.” Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie 105 (2): 161–174. doi:10.1111/tesg.2014.105.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, P. 2003. “Urban Regeneration’s Poisoned Chalice: Is There an Impasse in (Community) Participation-based Policy?” Urban Studies 40 (3): 581–601. doi:10.1080/0042098032000053932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokx, A., and R. Van Kempen. 2009. “Joining Forces in Urban Restructuring: Dealing with Collaborative Ideals and Role Conflicts in Breda, the Netherlands.” Environment and Planning A 41: 1234–1250. doi:10.1068/a4136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokx, A., and R. Van Kempen. 2010. “A Fact Is a Fact, but Perception Is Reality: Stakeholders’ Perceptions and Urban Policies in the Process of Urban Restructuring.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 28: 335–348. doi:10.1068/c0932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, L., and A. Kearns. 2010. “Community Engagement in Regeneration: Are We Getting the Point?” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 25: 19–36. doi:10.1007/s10901-009-9168-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees, L., T. Slater, and E. Wyly. 2008. Gentrification. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, L. 2007. “Fighting for Control: Political Displacement in Atlanta’s Gentrifying Neighborhoods.” Urban Affairs Review 42: 603–628. doi:10.1177/1078087406296604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministerie van VROM. 2007. Actieplan Krachtwijken. Van Aandachtswijk Naar Krachtwijk. The Hague: Ministerie van VROM.
   Google Scholar
• Musterd, S., M. Bontje, and W. Ostendorf. 2006. “The Changing Role of Old and New Urban Centers: The Case of the Amsterdam Region.” Urban Geography 27 (4): 360–387. doi:10.2747/0272-3638.27.4.360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musterd, S., and W. Ostendorf. 2008. “Integrated Urban Renewal in the Netherlands: A Critical appraisal.” Urban Research & Practice 1: 78–92. doi:10.1080/17535060701795389.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, K., and E. K. Wyly. 2006. “The Right to Stay Put, Revisited: Gentrification and Resistance to Displacement in New York City.” Urban Studies 43 (1): 23–57. doi:10.1080/00420980500388710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parés, M., J. Bonet-Marti, and M. Marti-Costa. 2012. “Does Participation Really Matter in Urban Regeneration Policies? Exploring Governance Networks in Catalonia (Spain).” Urban Affairs Review 48 (2): 238–271. doi:10.1177/1078087411423352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priemus, H. 2003. “Dutch Housing Associations: Current Developments and Debates.” Housing Studies 18: 327–351. doi:10.1080/02673030304237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raco, M., and R. Imrie. 2000. “Governmentality and Rights and Responsibilities in Urban Policy.” Environment and Planning A 32: 2187–2204. doi:10.1068/a3365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, F., K. Shaw, and G. Davidson. 2005. “On the Side of the Angels: Community Involvement in the Governance of Neighbourhood Renewal.” Local Economy 20 (1): 13–26. doi:10.1080/0269094042000313584.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, T. 1995. “Gentrification and Grassroots Resistance in San Francisco’s Tenderloin.” Urban Affairs Review 30: 483–513. doi:10.1177/107808749503000401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuiling, D. 2007. “Stadsvernieuwing Door De Jaren Heen.” Rooilijn 40 (3): 158–165.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. 1996. The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, H., A. Knops, M. Barnes, and J. Newman. 2004. “Central-Local Relations in an Era of Multi-Level Governance: The Case of Public Participation Policy in England, 1997–2001.” Local Government Studies 30 (2): 245–265. doi:10.1080/0300393042000267263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. 2005. “Governance Innovation and the Citizen: The Janus Face of Governance-Beyond-The-State.” Urban Studies 42 (11): 1991–2006. doi:10.1080/00420980500279869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. 2007. “Community Participation in the Real World: Opportunities and Pitfalls in New Governance Spaces.” Urban Studies 44 (2): 297–317. doi:10.1080/00420980601074987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teernstra, A. B. Forthcoming. “Contextualizing State-Led Gentrification: Goals of Governing Actors in Generating Neighbourhood Upgrading.” Environment and Planning A.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonkens, E., and I. Verhoeven. 2011. Bewonersinitiatieven: Proeftuin Voor Partnerschap Tussen Burgers En Overheid. Een Onderzoek Naar Bewonersinitiatieven in De Amsterdamse Wijkaanpak. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam/Stichting Actief burgerschap.
   Google Scholar
• Uitermark, J., and J. W. Duyvendak. 2008. “Citizen Participation in a Mediated Age: Neighbourhood Governance in the Netherlands.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32 (1): 114–134. doi:10.1111/ijur.2008.32.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urban District East. 2009. Uitvoeringsplan Participatie. Amsterdam: Urban District East.
   Google Scholar
• Urban District East. 2013. De Staat Van Transvaalbuurt 2013. Amsterdam: Urban District East.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gent, W. P. C. 2013. “Neoliberalization, Housing Institutions and Variegated Gentrification: How the ‘Third Wave’ Broke in Amsterdam.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37: 503–522. doi:10.1111/ijur.2013.37.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ymere. 2012. Zo Wil Ik Wonen! De Geleerde Lessen Van Het Open Planproces Bij De Verbetering Van De Tugelawegblokken. Amsterdam: Ymere.
   Google Scholar