Should we care about neutrality in the city?

References

• Alasdair, M. 2007. After Virtue. 3rd ed. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amin, A. 2004. “Regions Unbound: Towards a New Politics of Place.” Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 86 (1): 33–44. doi:10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00152.x.
   Google Scholar
• Antonsich, M., and P. I. Jones. 2010. “Mapping the Swiss Referendum on the Minaret Ban.” Political Geography 29 (2): 57–62. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2010.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollens, S. A. 2002. “Urban Planning and Intergroup Conflict: Confronting a Fractured Public Interest.” Journal of the American Planning Association 68 (1): 22–42. doi:10.1080/01944360208977189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. 2006. “Just Planning: The Art of Situated Ethical Judgment.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 26 (1): 92–106. doi:10.1177/0739456X06288090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, H., and R. Marshall. 2006. “Towards Justice in Planning: A Reappraisal.” European Planning Studies 14 (2): 239–252. doi:10.1080/09654310500418192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carens, J. H. 2000. Culture, Citizenship and Community: A Contextual Exploration of Justice as Evenhandedness. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carmon, N. 2013. “The Profession of Urban Planning and Its Societal Mandate.” In Policy, Planning and People: Promoting Justice in Urban Development, edited by N. Carmon and S. Fainstein, 13–31. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cherniss, J., and H. Hardy. 2014. “Isaiah Berlin.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edited by E. N. Zalta, \url{http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/berlin/
   Google Scholar
• Claassen, R. 2014. “Capability Paternalism.” Economics and Philosophy 30 (1): 57–73. doi:10.1017/S0266267114000042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R. 1985a. “Liberalism.” Chapter 8.  In A Matter of Principle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R. 1985b. “Can a Liberal State Support Art?.” Chapter 11. In A Matter of Principle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R. 2011. Justice for Hedgehogs. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J. 1986. “Self-Realization in Work and Politics: The Marxist Conception of the Good Life.” Social Philosophy and Policy 3 (2): 97–126. doi:10.1017/S0265052500000327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estlund, D. 1996. “The Survival of Egalitarian Justice in John Rawls’s Political Liberalism.” Journal of Political Philosophy 4 (1): 68–78. doi:10.1111/jopp.1996.4.issue-1.
   Google Scholar
• Fainstein, N., and S. Fainstein. 2013. “Restoring Just Outcomes to Planning Concerns.” In Policy, Planning and People: Promoting Justice in Urban Development, edited by N. Carmon and S. Fainstein. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. 2010. The Just City. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fincher, R., K. Iveson, H. Leitner, and V. Preston. 2014. “Planning in the Multicultural City: Celebrating Diversity or Reinforcing Difference?.” Progress in Planning 92: 1–55. doi:10.1016/j.progress.2013.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forester, J. 1989. Planning in the Face of Power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. 1994. “Bridging Interests and Community: Advocacy Planning and the Challenges of Deliberative Democracy.” Journal of the American Planning Association 60 (2): 153–158. doi:10.1080/01944369408975567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forester, J., and D. Stitzel. 1989. “Beyond Neutrality.” Negotiation Journal 5 (3): 251–264. doi:10.1111/nejo.1989.5.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsyth, A. 1999. “Administrative Discretion and Urban and Regional Planners’ Values.” Journal of Planning Literature 14 (1): 5–15. doi:10.1177/08854129922092559.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, S. 2003. “Introduction.” In The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, edited by S. Freeman, 1–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 2003. “Collaborative Planning in Perspective.” Planning Theory 2 (2): 101–123. doi:10.1177/14730952030022002.
   Google Scholar
• Kymlicka, W. 1995. Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kymlicka, W. 2004. “Dworkin on Freedom and Culture.” In Dworkin and His Critics, edited by J. Burley, 113–133. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Langer, L. 2010. “Panacea or Pathetic Fallacy-The Swiss Ban on Minarets.” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 43 (4): 863–951.
   Google Scholar
• Larmore, C. 1987. Patterns of Moral Complexity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacMullen, I. 2007. Faith in Schools?: Autonomy, Citizenship, and Religious Education in the Liberal State. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McClymont, K. 2014. “Stuck in the Process, Facilitating Nothing? Justice, Capabilities and Planning for Value-Led Outcomes.” Planning Practice & Research 29 (2): 187–201. doi:10.1080/02697459.2013.872899.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. 1995. On Nationality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. 2016. “Majorities and Minarets: Religious Freedom and Public Space.” British Journal of Political Science  46 (2): 437–456. doi:10.1017/S0007123414000131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. 2004. “Justice, Democracy and Public Goods.” In Justice and Democracy: Essays for Brian Barry, edited by Keith Dowding, Robert E. Goodin, and Carole Pateman, 127–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nagel, T. 1987. “Moral Conflict and Political Legitimacy.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 16 (3): 215–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, E. 2008. “From Primary Goods to Capabilities: Distributive Justice and the Problem of Neutrality.” Political Theory 36 (1): 93–122. doi:10.1177/0090591707310088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. 1988. “Non-Relative Virtues: An Aristotelian Approach.” Midwest Studies In Philosophy 13 (1): 32–53. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4975.1988.tb00111.x.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. 2011. “Perfectionist Liberalism and Political Liberalism.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 39 (1): 3–45. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2011.01200.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patten, A. 2003. “Liberal Neutrality and Language Policy.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 31 (4): 356–386. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2003.00356.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patten, A. 2012. “Liberal Neutrality: A Reinterpretation and Defense.” Journal of Political Philosophy 20 (3): 249–272. doi:10.1111/jopp.2012.20.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patten, A. 2014. Equal Recognition: The Moral Foundations of Minority Rights. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pile, S. 1993. “Human Agency and Human-Geography Revisited - A Critique of New Models of the Self.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 18 (1): 122–139. doi:10.2307/623072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, D. 2013. “Swiss Shock: Minaret Rejection, European Values, and the Challenge of Tolerant Neutrality.” Politics, Religion & Ideology 14 (2): 193–207. doi:10.1080/21567689.2013.792649.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Quong, J. 2004. “The Scope of Public Reason.” Political Studies 52 (2): 233–250. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00477.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quong, J. 2011. Liberalism without Perfection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. 1996. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. 1999. A Theory of Justice. Revised ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raz, J. 1986. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J. 2012. Great American City: Chicago and the Enduring Neighborhood Effect. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandel, M. J. 2011. “Justice: What’s the Right Thing to Do.” Boston University Law Review 91 (4): 1303–1310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. 2004. Cosmopolis II: Mongrel Cities in the 21st Century. Vancouver: Continuum International.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlon, T. M. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlon, T. M. 2003. “Rawls on Justification.” In The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, edited by S. Freeman, 139–167. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scheffler, S. 2007. “Immigration and the Significance of Culture.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 35 (2): 93–125. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2007.00101.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, S. M., and T. L. Harper. 2000. “The Paradox of Planning in A Multicultural Liberal Society: A Pragmatic Reconciliation.” In Urban Planning in a Multicultural Society, edited by M. A. Burayidi, 67–82. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Sypnowich, C. 2014. “A New Approach to Equality.” In Political Neutrality: A Reevaluation, edited by D. Weinstock and R. Merrill, 178–209. Basingstoke, Hampshire, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. 1989. “‘Introduction’ to New Models of Civil Society.” In New Models in Geography: The Political-Economy Perspective, edited by R. Peet and N. Thrift, 149–156. Vol. 2. London: Unwin Hyman.
   Google Scholar
• Wall, S., and G. Klosko. 2003. “Introduction.” In Perfectionism and Neutrality, edited by S. Wall and G. Klosko, 1–27. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, V. 2006. “Deep Difference: Diversity, Planning and Ethics.” Planning Theory 5 (1): 31–50. doi:10.1177/1473095206061020.
   Google Scholar
• Zellentin, A. 2014. “Freedom, Equality, Minarets.” Res Publica 20 (1): 45–63. doi:10.1007/s11158-013-9224-8.
   Google Scholar